National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Blood Clots (1)
- Blood Pressure (1)
- Brain Injury (3)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (1)
- Caregiving (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (6)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (6)
- Communication (2)
- COVID-19 (1)
- Critical Care (1)
- Cultural Competence (1)
- (-) Decision Making (40)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (7)
- Elderly (2)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (3)
- (-) Emergency Department (40)
- Emergency Medical Services (EMS) (6)
- Evidence-Based Practice (2)
- Falls (1)
- Guidelines (3)
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) (1)
- Healthcare Delivery (2)
- Healthcare Utilization (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (9)
- Health Literacy (1)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (2)
- Heart Disease and Health (1)
- Hospitalization (1)
- Hospitals (1)
- Imaging (6)
- Implementation (1)
- Influenza (1)
- Injuries and Wounds (1)
- Kidney Disease and Health (3)
- Medical Errors (1)
- Newborns/Infants (3)
- Nursing (1)
- Outcomes (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (4)
- Patient and Family Engagement (7)
- Patient Experience (2)
- Patient Safety (1)
- Policy (2)
- Primary Care (1)
- Provider (1)
- Provider: Clinician (1)
- Provider: Nurse (1)
- Provider: Physician (3)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Respiratory Conditions (2)
- Risk (3)
- Simulation (1)
- Stroke (1)
- Surgery (1)
- Teams (1)
- Transitions of Care (1)
- Trauma (2)
- Vulnerable Populations (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 25 of 40 Research Studies DisplayedHinson JS, Klein E, Smith A
Multisite implementation of a workflow-integrated machine learning system to optimize COVID-19 hospital admission decisions.
This study’s objective was to develop, implement, and evaluate an electronic health record (EHR) embedded clinical decision support (CDS) system that leveraged machine learning (ML) to estimate short-term risk for clinical deterioration in patients with or under investigation for COVID-19. The system translates model-generated risk for critical care needs within 24 hours and inpatient care needs within 72 hours into rapidly interpretable COVID-19 Deterioration Risk Levels made viewable within ED clinician workflow. A retrospective cohort of 21,452 ED patients who visited one of five ED study sites was used to derive ML models and were prospectively validated in 15,670 ED visits that occurred before (n = 4322) or after (n = 11,348) CDS implementation. Model performance and numerous patient-oriented outcomes including in-hospital mortality were measured across study periods. ML model performance was excellent under all conditions. AUC ranged from 0.85 to 0.91 for prediction of critical care needs and 0.80-0.90 for inpatient care needs. Total mortality was unchanged across study periods but was reduced among high-risk patients after the implementation.
AHRQ-funded; HS026640.
Citation: Hinson JS, Klein E, Smith A .
Multisite implementation of a workflow-integrated machine learning system to optimize COVID-19 hospital admission decisions.
NPJ Digit Med 2022 Jul 16;5(1):94. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00646-1..
Keywords: COVID-19, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Health Information Technology (HIT), Implementation, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Emergency Department, Decision Making
Jacobsohn GC, Leaf M, Liao F
Collaborative design and implementation of a clinical decision support system for automated fall-risk identification and referrals in emergency departments.
The authors used a collaborative and iterative approach to design and implement an automated clinical decision support system (CDS) for Emergency Department (ED) providers to identify and refer older adult ED patients at high risk of future falls. The system was developed using collaborative input from an interdisciplinary design team and integrated seamlessly into existing ED workflows. A key feature of development was the unique combination of patient experience strategies, human-centered design, and implementation science, which allowed for the CDS tool and intervention implementation strategies to be designed simultaneously. Challenges included: usability problems, data inaccessibility, time constraints, low appointment availability, high volume of patients, and others. The study concluded that using the collaborative, iterative approach was successful in achieving all project goals, and could be applied to other cases.
AHRQ-funded; HS024558.
Citation: Jacobsohn GC, Leaf M, Liao F .
Collaborative design and implementation of a clinical decision support system for automated fall-risk identification and referrals in emergency departments.
Healthc 2022 Mar;10(1):100598. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2021.100598..
Keywords: Elderly, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Decision Making, Falls, Risk, Emergency Department, Health Information Technology (HIT)
Aronson PL, Schaeffer P, Niccolai LM
Parents' perspectives on communication and shared decision making for febrile infants ≤60 days old.
This study examined parents’ perceptions of receiving and understanding information in the emergency department (ED) and their perspectives on shared decision making (SDM) in the management of febrile infants 60 days of age or less. The authors conducted semistructured interviews with 23 parents of febrile infants ≤60 days old evaluated in the pediatric ED at an urban, academic medical center. Themes for parents’ perspectives on SDM included: 1) giving parents the opportunity to express their opinions and concerns builds confidence in the decision making process, 2) parents’ preferences for participation in decision making vary considerably, and 3) different perceptions about risk influence parents’ preferences about having their infant undergo a lumbar puncture (LP). Parents valued risk and benefits of having their infant undergo an LP differently, which influences their preferences.
AHRQ-funded; HS026006.
Citation: Aronson PL, Schaeffer P, Niccolai LM .
Parents' perspectives on communication and shared decision making for febrile infants ≤60 days old.
Pediatr Emerg Care 2021 Dec;37(12):e1213-e19. doi: 10.1097/pec.0000000000001977..
Keywords: Newborns/Infants, Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Decision Making, Emergency Department
Chartash D, Sharifi M, Emerson B
Documentation of shared decisionmaking in the emergency department.
Patient-centered communication and shared decision making is a vital element of clinical practice, but little is known about its impact or value in the emergency department (ED) setting. The researchers of this study developed a natural language processing tool using regular expressions to identify shared decision making, patient-centered communications, and to describe visit-, site-, and temporal-level patterns within a large health system. The study took place in two parts: part 1 was the development and validation of the natural language processing tool, and part 2 was a retrospective analysis of shared decision making and patient discussion using the processing tool to assess ED physician and advanced practitioner documentation from 2013 to 2020. Compared to chart review of 600 ED notes, the accuracy rates of the natural language processing tool were 96.7% and 88.9% respectively. Between 2013 to 2020 the researchers observed greater likelihood of shared decision-making documentation among physicians vs advanced practice providers, higher likelihood among female vs male patients, and lower likelihood of shared decision-making in Black patients compared with White patients. The researchers also found that patient discussion and shared decision-making were associated with higher levels of commercial insurance status and level of triage. The study concluded that a natural language processing tool was developed, validated, and utilized to identify incidences of shared decision making from ED documentation, with the researchers finding multiple possible factors which contribute to variation in shared decision making.
AHRQ-funded; HS025701.
Citation: Chartash D, Sharifi M, Emerson B .
Documentation of shared decisionmaking in the emergency department.
Ann Emerg Med 2021 Nov;78(5):637-49. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.04.038..
Keywords: Decision Making, Emergency Department, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT)
Schoenfeld EM, Poronsky KE, Westafer LM
Feasibility and efficacy of a decision aid for emergency department patients with suspected ureterolithiasis: protocol for an adaptive randomized controlled trial.
Both ultrasound and CT scan can be used for diagnosis of ureterolithiasis (or renal colic, the pain from an obstructing kidney stone), but the majority of patients receive a CT scan. Diagnostic pathways utilizing ultrasound have been shown to decrease radiation exposure to patients but are potentially less accurate. The investigators developed a decision aid to facilitate SDM in this scenario. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of this decision aid, as compared to usual care, on patient knowledge, radiation exposure, engagement, safety, and healthcare utilization.
AHRQ-funded; HS025701.
Citation: Schoenfeld EM, Poronsky KE, Westafer LM .
Feasibility and efficacy of a decision aid for emergency department patients with suspected ureterolithiasis: protocol for an adaptive randomized controlled trial.
Trials 2021 Mar 10;22(1):201. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05140-9..
Keywords: Emergency Department, Decision Making, Kidney Disease and Health, Imaging, Diagnostic Safety and Quality
Aronson PL, Politi MC, Schaeffer P
Development of an app to facilitate communication and shared decision-making with parents of febrile infants ≤ 60 days old.
This study’s aim was to develop and test a tool to engage parents of febrile infants 60 days or less of age evaluated in the emergency department (ED). The tool was designed to improve communication between parents and healthcare providers and to support shared decision-making (SDM) about whether to perform a lumbar puncture (LP) for infants 29 to 60 days of age. The authors conducted a multi-phase development and testing process including individual, semi-structured interviews with parents and clinicians; design of a “storyboard” of the tool with design impression testing; development of a software application prototype called e-Care; and usability testing of e-Care using qualitative assessment and the System Usability Scale (SUS). The authors interviewed 27 parents and 23 clinicians. After the interviews, they developed separate versions of e-Care for infants aged 28 days or less and 29 to 60 days of age in both English and Spanish. e-Care is divided into 4 sections: 1) homepage; 2) why testing is done; 3) what tests are done; and 4) what happens after testing. The mean SUS score given by parents and clinicians was 90.3 representing “excellent” usability.
AHRQ-funded; HS026006.
Citation: Aronson PL, Politi MC, Schaeffer P .
Development of an app to facilitate communication and shared decision-making with parents of febrile infants ≤ 60 days old.
Acad Emerg Med 2021 Jan;28(1):46-59. doi: 10.1111/acem.14082..
Keywords: Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Newborns/Infants, Caregiving, Decision Making, Patient and Family Engagement, Emergency Department, Health Information Technology (HIT)
Rutkowski RA, Salwei M, Barton H
Physician perceptions of disposition decision-making for older adults in the emergency department: a preliminary analysis.
Disposition decision-making in the emergency department (ED) is critical to patient safety and quality of care. Disposition decision-making has particularly important implications for older adults who comprise a significant portion of ED visits annually and are vulnerable to suboptimal outcomes throughout ED care transitions. In this study, the investigators conducted a secondary inductive content analysis of interviews with ED physicians to explore their perceptions of who they involve in disposition decision-making and what information they use to make disposition decisions for older adults.
AHRQ-funded; HS026624.
Citation: Rutkowski RA, Salwei M, Barton H .
Physician perceptions of disposition decision-making for older adults in the emergency department: a preliminary analysis.
Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet 2020 Dec;64(1):648-52. doi: 10.1177/1071181320641148..
Keywords: Elderly, Decision Making, Emergency Department, Provider: Physician
Schoenfeld EM, Houghton C, Patel PM
Shared decision making in patients with suspected uncomplicated ureterolithiasis: a decision aid development study.
The objective of this study was to develop a decision aid (DA) to facilitate shared decision making (SDM) around whether to obtain computed tomography (CT) imaging in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected uncomplicated ureterolithiasis. Using stakeholder engagement and qualitative inquiry, the investigators developed their evidence-based DA. They indicated that future research will test the efficacy of the DA in facilitating SDM.
AHRQ-funded; HS025701.
Citation: Schoenfeld EM, Houghton C, Patel PM .
Shared decision making in patients with suspected uncomplicated ureterolithiasis: a decision aid development study.
Acad Emerg Med 2020 Jul;27(7):554-65. doi: 10.1111/acem.13917..
Keywords: Decision Making, Emergency Department, Imaging, Diagnostic Safety and Quality
Carayon P, Hoonakker P, Hundt AS
Application of human factors to improve usability of clinical decision support for diagnostic decision-making: a scenario-based simulation study.
This study used a scenario-based simulation to compare a human factor (HF)-based clinician decision support (CDS) with a web-based CDS (MDCalc) for clinicians to diagnose pulmonary embolism (PE) in the emergency department. A total of 32 emergency physicians participated using both CDS types. Emergency physicians made more appropriate diagnoses decisions with the PE-Dx CDS (94%) than with the web-based CDS (84%). Experimental tasks were also performed faster (average 96 seconds per scenario versus 117 seconds). They also reported lower workload and higher satisfaction with the HF-based CDS.
AHRQ-funded; HS024342; HS024558; HS022086.
Citation: Carayon P, Hoonakker P, Hundt AS .
Application of human factors to improve usability of clinical decision support for diagnostic decision-making: a scenario-based simulation study.
BMJ Qual Saf 2020 Apr;29(4):329-40. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009857..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Decision Making, Health Information Technology (HIT), Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Emergency Department
Dugas AF, Hsieh YH, LoVecchio F
Derivation and validation of a clinical decision guideline for influenza testing in 4 US emergency departments.
This study looked at which patients should be tested for influenza among adult emergency department (ED) patients with fever or respiratory symptoms who met criteria for antiviral treatment per 2013 CDC guidelines. A prospective cohort study was conducted at 4 US EDs from November 2013 to April 2014. All 1941 enrolled participants were tested for influenza using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and 183 patients (9.4%) had influenza. The CDC clinical decision guidelines (CDGs) for influenza testing includes new or increased cough (2 points), headache (1 point), subjective fever (1 point), and triage temperature >100.4F degrees. The CDG had a sensitivity and specificity of 94.1% and 36.6% respectively in the derivation set and the validation set.
AHRQ-funded; HS009699.
Citation: Dugas AF, Hsieh YH, LoVecchio F .
Derivation and validation of a clinical decision guideline for influenza testing in 4 US emergency departments.
Clin Infect Dis 2020 Jan;70(1):49-58. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz171..
Keywords: Guidelines, Decision Making, Influenza, Respiratory Conditions, Emergency Department, Evidence-Based Practice, Diagnostic Safety and Quality
Schoenfeld EM, Shieh MS, Pekow PS
Association of patient and visit characteristics with rate and timing of urologic procedures for patients discharged from the emergency department with renal colic.
Little is known about the timing of urologic interventions in patients with renal colic discharged from the emergency department. Understanding patients' likelihood of a subsequent urologic intervention could inform decision-making in this population. The objective of this study was to examine the rate and timing of urologic procedures performed after an emergency department visit for renal colic and the factors associated with receipt of an intervention.
AHRQ-funded; HS025701.
Citation: Schoenfeld EM, Shieh MS, Pekow PS .
Association of patient and visit characteristics with rate and timing of urologic procedures for patients discharged from the emergency department with renal colic.
JAMA Netw Open 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1916454. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.16454..
Keywords: Emergency Department, Kidney Disease and Health, Decision Making
Schoenfeld EM, Probst MA, Quigley
Does shared decision making actually occur in the emergency department? Looking at it from the patients' perspective.
In this study the investigators sought to assess the frequency, content, and quality of shared decision making (SDM) in the emergency department (ED), from patients' perspectives. The investigators found that fewer than half of ED patients surveyed reported they were involved in SDM. The most common decision for which SDM was used was around ED disposition (admission vs. discharge). When SDM was employed, patients generally rated the discussion highly.
AHRQ-funded; HS025701.
Citation: Schoenfeld EM, Probst MA, Quigley .
Does shared decision making actually occur in the emergency department? Looking at it from the patients' perspective.
Acad Emerg Med 2019 Dec;26(12):1369-78. doi: 10.1111/acem.13850..
Keywords: Decision Making, Emergency Department, Clinician-Patient Communication, Patient and Family Engagement
Vogel JA, Rising KL, Jones J
Reasons patients choose the emergency department over primary care: a qualitative metasynthesis.
To enhance the acute care delivery system, a comprehensive understanding of the patient's perspectives for seeking care in the emergency department (ED) versus primary care (PC) is necessary. In this study, the investigators conducted a qualitative metasynthesis on reasons patients sought care in the ED instead of PC. The investigators concluded that reasons included: (1) urgency of the medical condition, (2) barriers to accessing primary care, (3) advantages of the ED, and (4) fulfillment of medical needs and quality of care in the ED.
AHRQ-funded; HS023901.
Citation: Vogel JA, Rising KL, Jones J .
Reasons patients choose the emergency department over primary care: a qualitative metasynthesis.
J Gen Intern Med 2019 Nov;34(11):2610-19. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05128-x..
Keywords: Emergency Department, Primary Care, Decision Making, Healthcare Delivery
Cochran AL, Rathouz PJ, Kocher KE
A latent variable approach to potential outcomes for emergency department admission decisions.
The authors sought to provide a general framework to evaluate admission decisions from electronic healthcare records. They estimated that while admitting a patient with higher latent needs reduced the 30-day risk of revisiting the emergency department or later being admitted through the emergency department by over 79%, admitting a patient with lower latent needs actually increased these 30-day risks by 3.0% and 7.6%, respectively.
AHRQ-funded; HS024160.
Citation: Cochran AL, Rathouz PJ, Kocher KE .
A latent variable approach to potential outcomes for emergency department admission decisions.
Stat Med 2019 Sep 10;38(20):3911-35. doi: 10.1002/sim.8210..
Keywords: Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Emergency Department, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Decision Making, Hospitalization
Hoonakker PLT, Carayon P, Salwei ME
The design of PE Dx, a CDS to support pulmonary embolism diagnosis in the ED.
One possible explanation for user resistance to clinical decision support (CDS) procedures may be poor CDS design. This study describes the design of PE Dx, a CDS built to aid in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in the emergency department using human factors methods.
AHRQ-funded; HS022086.
Citation: Hoonakker PLT, Carayon P, Salwei ME .
The design of PE Dx, a CDS to support pulmonary embolism diagnosis in the ED.
Stud Health Technol Inform 2019 Aug 9;265:134-40. doi: 10.3233/shti190152..
Keywords: Blood Clots, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Decision Making, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Emergency Department, Respiratory Conditions
Ingraham A, Wang X, Havlena J
Factors associated with the interhospital transfer of emergency general surgery patients.
Researchers used data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample to determine patient- and hospital-level factors associated with interhospital emergency general surgery (EGS) transfers. They identified that hospital-level characteristics more strongly predicted the need for transfer than patient-related factors. They recommended considering these factors in order to facilitate transfer decision-making.
AHRQ-funded; HS025224.
Citation: Ingraham A, Wang X, Havlena J .
Factors associated with the interhospital transfer of emergency general surgery patients.
J Surg Res 2019 Aug;240:191-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.11.053..
Keywords: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP), Emergency Department, Surgery, Decision Making, Hospitals, Healthcare Delivery, Transitions of Care
Pang PS, Fermann GJ, Hunter BR
TACIT (High Sensitivity Troponin T Rules Out Acute Cardiac Insufficiency Trial).
This study examined the use of high-sensitivity troponin assays to determine whether a patient presenting in the emergency department with chest pains is safe for discharge. An observational study called High Sensitivity Troponin T Rules Out Acute Cardiac Insufficiency Trial (TACIT) explored whether serial high-sensitivity troponin (hsTnT) might aid in making diagnosis of acute heart failure faster. The presence of hsTnT above the 99th percentile usually indicates acute heart failure. Patients in the cohort with hsTnT at or above the 99th percentile were older, more often male, less often black, and more likely to have chronic kidney disease. The study found no difference in risk for 90-day death or rehospitalization or return ED visits in the group with hsTnT above the 99th percentile than those with levels below the 99th percentile so hsTnT would not be considered useful.
AHRQ-funded; HS025411.
Citation: Pang PS, Fermann GJ, Hunter BR .
TACIT (High Sensitivity Troponin T Rules Out Acute Cardiac Insufficiency Trial).
Circ Heart Fail 2019 Jul;12(7):e005931. doi: 10.1161/circheartfailure.119.005931..
Keywords: Cardiovascular Conditions, Heart Disease and Health, Emergency Department, Risk, Decision Making
Hinson JS, Martinez DA, Cabral S
Triage performance in emergency medicine: a systematic review.
The authors synthesized existing emergency department (ED) triage literature by using a framework that enables performance comparisons and benchmarking across triage systems, with respect to clinical outcomes and reliability. They found that a substantial proportion of ED patients who die post-encounter or who are critically ill are not designated as high acuity at triage. They suggested that the opportunity exists to improve interrater reliability and triage performance in identifying patients at risk of adverse outcome.
AHRQ-funded; HS023641.
Citation: Hinson JS, Martinez DA, Cabral S .
Triage performance in emergency medicine: a systematic review.
Ann Emerg Med 2019 Jul;74(1):140-52. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.09.022..
Keywords: Emergency Department, Decision Making, Critical Care, Outcomes, Health Information Technology (HIT)
Aronson PL, Schaeffer P, Fraenkel L
Physicians' and nurses' perspectives on the decision to perform lumbar punctures on febrile infants </=8 weeks old.
This paper discusses the reasons for wide variation in the decision to perform lumbar punctures (LPs) in febrile infants 8 weeks or less. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 pediatric and general emergency medicine physicians and 8 pediatric emergency medicine nurses at an urban, academic medical center. Five themes emerged from the interviews that included: age of the infant, the physician’s clinical experience, physician’s use of research findings, the physician’s values, and the role of the primary care pediatrician.
AHRQ-funded; HS026006.
Citation: Aronson PL, Schaeffer P, Fraenkel L .
Physicians' and nurses' perspectives on the decision to perform lumbar punctures on febrile infants </=8 weeks old.
Hosp Pediatr 2019 Jun;9(6):405-14. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2019-0002..
Keywords: Newborns/Infants, Decision Making, Provider: Physician, Provider: Nurse, Provider: Clinician, Provider, Emergency Department, Diagnostic Safety and Quality
Medford-Davis LN, Singh H, Mahajan P
Diagnostic decision-making in the emergency department.
Emergency providers must often diagnose from undifferentiated symptoms, without previous knowledge of the patient. Failure to provide an accurate assessment of the problem or to communicate the problem to the patient is diagnostic error. This article considers methods to monitor diagnostic error in emergency departments.
AHRQ-funded; HS024953.
Citation: Medford-Davis LN, Singh H, Mahajan P .
Diagnostic decision-making in the emergency department.
Pediatr Clin North Am 2018 Dec;65(6):1097-105. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2018.07.003..
Keywords: Emergency Department, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Decision Making, Medical Errors, Patient Safety
Cornelius T, Moise N, Birk JL
The presence of companions during emergency department evaluation and its impact on perceptions of clinician-patient communication.
Investigators studies whether having a companion present during an emergency department visit improves clinician-patient communication. An observation cohort of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome were recruited at an academic medical center from 2013-2016. There was no observational difference except when the patient had a high school education or less.
AHRQ-funded; HS025198.
Citation: Cornelius T, Moise N, Birk JL .
The presence of companions during emergency department evaluation and its impact on perceptions of clinician-patient communication.
Emerg Med J 2018 Nov;35(11):701-03. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2018-207735..
Keywords: Clinician-Patient Communication, Decision Making, Emergency Department, Patient and Family Engagement
Schoenfeld EM, Kanzaria HK, Quigley DD
Patient preferences regarding shared decision making in the emergency department: findings from a multisite survey.
In this study, the investigators sought to determine patients' desired level of involvement in medical decisions and their perceptions of potential barriers and facilitators to shared decision making in the emergency department (ED). They found that the majority of ED patients wanted to be involved in medical decisions, especially in the case of a "serious" medical problem, and felt that they had the ability to do so. Nevertheless, many patients were unlikely to actively seek involvement and defaulted to allowing the physician to make decisions during the ED visit.
AHRQ-funded; HS025701.
Citation: Schoenfeld EM, Kanzaria HK, Quigley DD .
Patient preferences regarding shared decision making in the emergency department: findings from a multisite survey.
Acad Emerg Med 2018 Oct;25(10):1118-28. doi: 10.1111/acem.13499..
Keywords: Clinician-Patient Communication, Decision Making, Emergency Department, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient Experience
Schoenfeld EM, Goff SL, Downs G
A qualitative analysis of patients' perceptions of shared decision making in the emergency department: "let me know i have a choice.".
In this study, the investigators sought to explore the use of shared decision making (SDM) from the perspectives of emergency department (ED) patients, focusing on what affects patients' desired level of involvement and what barriers and facilitators patients found most relevant to their experience. The investigators concluded that this exploration suggested that most patients wanted some degree of involvement in medical decision making but more proactive engagement of patients by clinicians was often needed.
AHRQ-funded; HS024311.
Citation: Schoenfeld EM, Goff SL, Downs G .
A qualitative analysis of patients' perceptions of shared decision making in the emergency department: "let me know i have a choice.".
Acad Emerg Med 2018 Jul;25(7):716-27. doi: 10.1111/acem.13416.
.
.
Keywords: Clinician-Patient Communication, Decision Making, Emergency Department, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient Experience
Mistry B, Stewart De Ramirez S, Kelen G
Accuracy and reliability of emergency department triage using the emergency severity index: an international multicenter assessment.
This study assessed the accuracy and variability of triage score assignment by emergency department (ED) nurses using the Emergency Severity Index (ESI) in 3 countries. It found that the concordance of nurse-assigned ESI score with reference standard was universally poor and variability was high. Although the ESI is the most popular ED triage tool in the United States and is increasingly used worldwide, its findings point to a need for more reliable ED triage tools.
AHRQ-funded; HS023641.
Citation: Mistry B, Stewart De Ramirez S, Kelen G .
Accuracy and reliability of emergency department triage using the emergency severity index: an international multicenter assessment.
Ann Emerg Med 2018 May;71(5):581-87.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.09.036.
.
.
Keywords: Decision Making, Emergency Department, Emergency Medical Services (EMS), Health Information Technology (HIT), Nursing
Rosenman ED, Dixon AJ, Webb JM
A simulation-based approach to measuring team situational awareness in emergency medicine: a multicenter, observational study.
This study’s goal was to develop and evaluate a novel approach to the measurement of team situational awareness (TSA) in interprofessional emergency medicine (EM) teams. EM teams, consisting of resident physicians, nurses, and medical students, were recruited from the University of Washington and Wayne State University; each team completed a simulated emergency resuscitation scenario, then completed three measures: a TSA measure, a team perception of shared understanding measure, and a team leader effectiveness measure. The simulations were recorded and coded independently for team performance by using a previously validated measure. Relationships between the TSA measure and other variables were explored. The authors conclude that simulations can provide a platform for TSA research and that their study provides a feasible method for simulation-based assessment of TSA.
AHRQ-funded; HS020295; HS022458.
Citation: Rosenman ED, Dixon AJ, Webb JM .
A simulation-based approach to measuring team situational awareness in emergency medicine: a multicenter, observational study.
Acad Emerg Med 2018 Feb;25(2):196-204. doi: 10.1111/acem.13257..
Keywords: Decision Making, Emergency Department, Simulation, Teams