National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- (-) Brain Injury (8)
- Children/Adolescents (4)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (4)
- (-) Decision Making (8)
- Emergency Department (3)
- Emergency Medical Services (EMS) (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (2)
- Guidelines (2)
- Healthcare Utilization (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (4)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (1)
- Imaging (3)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (1)
- Trauma (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 8 of 8 Research Studies DisplayedGreenberg JK, Olsen MA, Johnson GW
Measures of intracranial injury size do not improve clinical decision making for children with mild traumatic brain injuries and intracranial injuries.
This study evaluated whether measuring traumatic brain injury size (eg, hematoma size) in children with mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBIs) and intracranial injuries (ICIs) improves risk prediction compared with the KIIDS intracranial injury decision support tool for traumatic brain injury (KIIDS-TBI) model. The cohort included children ≤18 years who presented to 1 of the 5 centers within 24 hours of TBI, had Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 13 to 15, and had ICI on neuroimaging. The data set was split into training and testing cohorts. The generalized linear model (GLM) and recursive partitioning (RP) models showed similar specificity across all risk cutoffs, but the GLM model had higher sensitivity. By comparison, the KIIDS-TBI model had slightly higher sensitivity but lower specificity.
AHRQ-funded; HS027075.
Citation: Greenberg JK, Olsen MA, Johnson GW .
Measures of intracranial injury size do not improve clinical decision making for children with mild traumatic brain injuries and intracranial injuries.
Neurosurgery 2022 Jun;90(6):691-99. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000001895..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Brain Injury, Decision Making
Greenberg JK, Ahluwalia R, Hill M
Development and external validation of the KIIDS-TBI tool for managing children with mild traumatic brain injury and intracranial injuries.
This study's objectives were to develop a new risk model with improved sensitivity compared to the CHIIDA model for the post-neuroimaging management of children with mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBI) and intracranial injuries and further to validate externally the new model and CHIIDA model in a multicenter data set. Findings showed that the KIIDS-TBI model had high sensitivity and moderate specificity for risk stratifying children with mTBI and intracranial injuries. The researchers concluded that the use of their clinical decision support tool may help improve the safe, resource-efficient management of this important patient population.
AHRQ-funded; HS027075.
Citation: Greenberg JK, Ahluwalia R, Hill M .
Development and external validation of the KIIDS-TBI tool for managing children with mild traumatic brain injury and intracranial injuries.
Acad Emerg Med 2021 Dec;28(12):1409-20. doi: 10.1111/acem.14333..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Brain Injury, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Decision Making, Health Information Technology (HIT)
Marin JR, Rodean J, Mannix RC
Association of clinical guidelines and decision support with CT use in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury.
The objective of this study was to examine whether the presence of clinical guidelines and clinical decision support (CDS) for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) were associated with lower head computed tomography (CT) use. The investigators concluded that clinical guidelines for mTBI, and particularly CDS, were associated with lower rates of head CT use without adverse clinical outcomes.
AHRQ-funded; HS026006.
Citation: Marin JR, Rodean J, Mannix RC .
Association of clinical guidelines and decision support with CT use in pediatric mild traumatic brain injury.
J Pediatr 2021 Aug;235:178-83.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.04.026..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Decision Making, Health Information Technology (HIT), Brain Injury, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Imaging
Greenberg JK, Otun A, Nasraddin A
Electronic clinical decision support for children with minor head trauma and intracranial injuries: a sociotechnical analysis.
This paper discusses the development of an evidence-based clinical decision support (CDS) for management of children with minor head trauma (MHT) and evaluates the sociotechnical environment impacting the implementation of electronic CDS, including workflow and communication, institutional culture, and hardware and software infrastructure. Semi-structured qualitative focus group interviews were conducted with 28 physicians and four information technology specialists between March and May 2020. Five primary themes were identified through inductive thematic analysis: 1) clinical impact; 2) stakeholders and users; 3) tool content; 4) clinical practice integration; and 5) post-implementation evaluation measures. Participants generally supported CDS use to determine an appropriate level-of-care. However, some had mixed feelings regarding how the tool could best be used by neurosurgeons versus non-neurosurgeons. Feedback helped refine the tool content and highlighted potential technical and workflow barriers to address prior to implementation.
AHRQ-funded; HS027075.
Citation: Greenberg JK, Otun A, Nasraddin A .
Electronic clinical decision support for children with minor head trauma and intracranial injuries: a sociotechnical analysis.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2021 May 19;21(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s12911-021-01522-w.
.
.
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Brain Injury, Health Information Technology (HIT), Evidence-Based Practice, Decision Making
Sharp AL, Huang BZ, Tang T
Implementation of the Canadian CT Head Rule and Its association with use of computed tomography among patients with head injury.
The researchers evaluated the association of implementation of the Canadian CT Head Rule on head computed tomography (CT) imaging in community emergency departments (EDs). They found that a multicomponent implementation of the Canadian CT Head Rule was associated with a modest reduction in CT use and an increased diagnostic yield of head CTs for adult trauma encounters in community EDs.
AHRQ-funded; HS021271.
Citation: Sharp AL, Huang BZ, Tang T .
Implementation of the Canadian CT Head Rule and Its association with use of computed tomography among patients with head injury.
Ann Emerg Med 2018 Jan;71(1):54-63.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.06.022.
.
.
Keywords: Brain Injury, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Decision Making, Emergency Department, Guidelines, Healthcare Utilization, Imaging
Melnick ER, Hess EP, Guo G
Patient-centered decision support: formative usability evaluation of integrated clinical decision support with a patient decision aid for minor head injury in the emergency department.
The study’s objective was to formatively evaluate an electronic tool that not only helps clinicians at the bedside to determine the need for CT use based on the Canadian CT Head Rule but also promotes evidence-based conversations between patients and clinicians regarding patient-specific risk and patients' specific concerns. It concluded that the Concussion or Brain Bleed app is a useful and usable final product integrating clinical decision support with a patient decision aid.
AHRQ-funded; HS021271.
Citation: Melnick ER, Hess EP, Guo G .
Patient-centered decision support: formative usability evaluation of integrated clinical decision support with a patient decision aid for minor head injury in the emergency department.
J Med Internet Res 2017 May 19;19(5):e174. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7846.
.
.
Keywords: Brain Injury, Decision Making, Emergency Department, Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient-Centered Healthcare
Melnick ER, Shafer K, Rodulfo N
Understanding overuse of computed tomography for minor head injury in the emergency department: a triangulated qualitative study.
The objective was to identify nonclinical, human factors that promote or inhibit the appropriate use of computed tomography (CT) in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with minor head injury. Five core domains emerged from the analysis: establishing trust, anxiety (patient and provider), constraints related to ED practice, the influence of others, and patient expectations.
AHRQ-funded; HS021271.
Citation: Melnick ER, Shafer K, Rodulfo N .
Understanding overuse of computed tomography for minor head injury in the emergency department: a triangulated qualitative study.
Acad Emerg Med 2015 Dec;22(12):1474-83. doi: 10.1111/acem.12824.
.
.
Keywords: Emergency Medical Services (EMS), Imaging, Brain Injury, Decision Making, Health Services Research (HSR)
Easter JS, Haukoos JS, Claud J
Traumatic intracranial injury in intoxicated patients with minor head trauma.
This study to estimate the prevalence of intracranial injury following minor head injury found that 8% of 225 intoxicated patients with minor head injury had clinically important injuries requiring either hospital admission or neurosurgical followup. Neither the Canadian CT Head Rule nor NEXUS criteria had adequate sensitivity to be used with these patients.
AHRQ-funded; HS019464; HS017526
Citation: Easter JS, Haukoos JS, Claud J .
Traumatic intracranial injury in intoxicated patients with minor head trauma.
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Aug;20(8):753-60. doi: 10.1111/acem.12184..
Keywords: Emergency Department, Trauma, Brain Injury, Decision Making