National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 3 of 3 Research Studies DisplayedGarrity B, Berry Crofton, C
Parent-to-parent advice on considering spinal fusion in children with neuromuscular scoliosis.
The purpose of this study was to convey advice from families whose children recently underwent spinal fusion to families whose children are under consideration for initial spinal fusion for neuromuscular scoliosis and to providers who counsel families on this decision. Results showed that parents of children who had recently undergone spinal fusion had strong perceptions about what information to convey to families considering surgery, which may improve communication between future parents and physicians. Further investigation is needed to assess how best to incorporate the wisdom and experiences of parent peers into shared decisionmaking and preparation for spinal fusion in children with neuromuscular scoliosis.
AHRQ-funded; HS024453.
Citation: Garrity B, Berry Crofton, C .
Parent-to-parent advice on considering spinal fusion in children with neuromuscular scoliosis.
J Pediatr 2019 Oct;213:149-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.05.055..
Keywords: Decision Making, Patient and Family Engagement, Caregiving, Children/Adolescents, Back Health and Pain, Surgery
Brodney S, Fowler FJ, Barry MJ
Comparison of three measures of shared decision making: SDM Process_4, CollaboRATE, and SURE scales.
This study compared 3 different shared decision making (SDM) aids for patients facing surgery for hip or knee osteoarthritis, lumbar herniated disc or lumber spinal stenosis (backs). Patients were surveys after they used one of the following patient decision aids (PDAs): SMD Process_4, CollaboRATE, or SURE. The sample size was 649 with a mean age of 63.3 years, 51% female, and 60% were college educated. Most patients (69%) were facing hip or knee surgery. Results showed that the PDAs did aid patients – especially for hips/knees and were different for each PDA.
AHRQ-funded; HS025718.
Citation: Brodney S, Fowler FJ, Barry MJ .
Comparison of three measures of shared decision making: SDM Process_4, CollaboRATE, and SURE scales.
Med Decis Making 2019 Aug;39(6):673-80. doi: 10.1177/0272989x19855951..
Keywords: Decision Making, Surgery, Arthritis, Back Health and Pain
Turner JA, Comstock BA, Standaert CJ
Can patient characteristics predict benefit from epidural corticosteroid injections for lumbar spinal stenosis symptoms?
The study’s aim was to identify patient characteristics associated with benefits from epidural injections of corticosteroid with lidocaine versus epidural injections of lidocaine only for lumbar spinal stenosis symptoms. It found that among 21 baseline patient characteristics examined, none, including clinician rated spinal stenosis severity, were consistent predictors of benefit from epidural injections of lidocain corticosteroid versus lidocaine only.
AHRQ-funded; HS019222; HS022972.
Citation: Turner JA, Comstock BA, Standaert CJ .
Can patient characteristics predict benefit from epidural corticosteroid injections for lumbar spinal stenosis symptoms?
Spine J 2015 Nov;15(11):2319-31. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2015.06.050..
Keywords: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Decision Making, Medication, Back Health and Pain, Chronic Conditions