National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Behavioral Health (2)
- Care Management (1)
- Chronic Conditions (3)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (2)
- (-) Decision Making (5)
- Elderly (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- Inpatient Care (1)
- Medication (5)
- (-) Opioids (5)
- Pain (4)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (1)
- Primary Care (1)
- Substance Abuse (2)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 5 of 5 Research Studies DisplayedSomohano VC, Smith CL, Saha S
Patient-provider shared decision-making, trust, and opioid misuse among US veterans prescribed long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain.
This article examined the role that trust in a prescribing provider has on shared decision-making and opioid misuse in opioid-specific pain management. A secondary analysis of data from a prospective cohort study was conducted of US Veterans (N = 1273) prescribed long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) for chronic non-cancer pain. Patient-provider shared decision-making had a total significant effect on opioid misuse, in the absence of the mediator, such that higher levels of shared decision-making were associated with lower levels of reported opioid misuse. When trust in provider was added to the mediation model, the indirect effect of shared decision-making on opioid misuse through trust in provider remained significant.
AHRQ-funded; HS026370.
Citation: Somohano VC, Smith CL, Saha S .
Patient-provider shared decision-making, trust, and opioid misuse among US veterans prescribed long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain.
J Gen Intern Med 2023 Sep; 38(12):2755-60. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08212-5..
Keywords: Decision Making, Opioids, Medication, Substance Abuse, Behavioral Health, Pain, Chronic Conditions
Kagarmanova A, Sparkman H, Laiteerapong N
Improving the management of chronic pain, opioid use, and opioid use disorder in older adults: study protocol for i-cope study.
This article describes a protocol for an upcoming study on the planned implementation and evaluation of I-COPE (Improving Chicago Older Adult Opioid and Pain Management through Patient-centered Clinical Decision Support and Project ECHO®) to improve care for older adults with chronic pain, opioid use, and opioid use disorder (OUD). The study will be implemented in 35 clinical sites across the metropolitan Chicago area for patients aged ≥ 65 with chronic pain, opioid use, or OUD who receive primary care at one of the clinics. I-COPE includes the integration of patient-reported data on symptoms and preferences, clinical decision support tools and shared decision making into routine primary care. Primary care providers will be trained on the tools through web-based videos and an optional Project ECHO® course, entitled "Pain Management and OUD in Older Adults." A framework called RE-AIM will be used to assess the I-COPE implementation. Outcomes considered effective include an increased variety of recommended pain treatments, decreased prescriptions of higher-risk pain treatments, and decreased patient pain scores. Outcomes will be evaluated at 6 and 12 months after implementation, and PCPs participating in Project ECHO® will be evaluated on changes in knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy using pre- and post-course surveys.
AHRQ-funded; HS027910.
Citation: Kagarmanova A, Sparkman H, Laiteerapong N .
Improving the management of chronic pain, opioid use, and opioid use disorder in older adults: study protocol for i-cope study.
Trials 2022 Jul 27;23(1):602. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06537-w..
Keywords: Elderly, Pain, Chronic Conditions, Opioids, Medication, Substance Abuse, Behavioral Health, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Decision Making, Health Information Technology (HIT)
Marcial LH, Blumenfeld B, Harle C
Barriers, facilitators, and potential solutions to advancing interoperable clinical decision support: multi-stakeholder consensus recommendations for the opioid use case.
These proceedings report on the AHRQ-sponsored Patient-Centered CDS Learning Network (PCCDS LN) Technical Framework Working Group (TechFWG), which was convened to identify barriers, facilitators, and potential solutions for interoperable clinical decision support, with a specific focus on addressing the opioid epidemic. The key insights were extrapolated to CDS-facilitated care improvement outside of the specific opioid use case. If applied broadly, the recommendations should help advance the availability and impact of interoperable CDS delivered at scale.
AHRQ-funded; HS024849.
Citation: Marcial LH, Blumenfeld B, Harle C .
Barriers, facilitators, and potential solutions to advancing interoperable clinical decision support: multi-stakeholder consensus recommendations for the opioid use case.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2020 Mar 4;2019:637-46..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Decision Making, Opioids, Medication, Pain, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Moore AB, Navarrett S, Herzig SJ
Potentially inappropriate use of intravenous opioids in hospitalized patients.
This study examined the frequency of potentially inappropriate intravenous (IV) opioid use in hospitalized patients. The researchers looked at patients hospitalized at a tertiary medical center. Patients with cancer, receiving comfort care, or gastrointestinal dysfunction were excluded. Using guidelines from the Society of Hospital Medicine IV doses were defined as potentially inappropriate if administered more than an initial IV does in patients who did not have nil per os status. Of the 200 patients in the study, 31% were administered potentially inappropriate IV opioids at least once during hospitalization, and 33% of all IV doses were potentially administered inappropriately.
AHRQ-funded; HS026215.
Citation: Moore AB, Navarrett S, Herzig SJ .
Potentially inappropriate use of intravenous opioids in hospitalized patients.
J Hosp Med 2019 Nov 1;14(10):678-80. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3225..
Keywords: Opioids, Medication, Inpatient Care, Decision Making
Militello LG, Anders S, Downs SM
Understanding how primary care clinicians make sense of chronic pain.
This research explored how primary care clinicians manage their patients with chronic noncancer pain. They conducted Critical Decision Method interviews with 10 clinicians about 30 individual patients. Findings suggested that clinicians should focus on supporting sensemaking in the content of clinical evidence rather than trying to provide them with rules.
AHRQ-funded; HS023306.
Citation: Militello LG, Anders S, Downs SM .
Understanding how primary care clinicians make sense of chronic pain.
Cogn Technol Work 2018 Nov;20(4):575-84. doi: 10.1007/s10111-018-0491-1..
Keywords: Pain, Chronic Conditions, Opioids, Medication, Decision Making, Primary Care, Care Management