National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (1)
- Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) (1)
- Critical Care (1)
- (-) Decision Making (5)
- Education: Patient and Caregiver (2)
- Healthcare Costs (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (1)
- Primary Care (1)
- Public Reporting (2)
- Quality Measures (1)
- (-) Quality of Care (5)
- Web-Based (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 5 of 5 Research Studies DisplayedEinbinder J, Hebel E, Wright A
The number needed to remind: a measure for assessing CDS effectiveness.
The purpose of this paper is to provide a better understanding of population based clinical decision support (CDS) performance measurement, to identify best practices for designing and implementing CDS, and to introduce two new quality measures, titled Reminder Performance (RP) and the Number Needed to Remind (NNR) for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical reminders in the context of the CDS Dashboards.
AHRQ-funded; 290200810010.
Citation: Einbinder J, Hebel E, Wright A .
The number needed to remind: a measure for assessing CDS effectiveness.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2014 Nov 14;2014:506-15..
Keywords: Decision Making, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Quality Measures, Quality of Care
Schlesinger M, Kanouse DE, Martino SC
Complexity, public reporting, and choice of doctors: a look inside the blackest box of consumer behavior.
The authors identified four pathways through which complexity may impair consumer choice. They examined these pathways using data from an experiment in which consumers hypothetically selected a primary care physician. They found that some of the loss of decision quality accompanying more complex choice sets can be explained by consumers' skills and decision-making style, but even after accounting for these factors, complexity undermines the quality of decision making in ways that cannot be fully explained. They concluded by discussing implications for report designers, sponsors, and policy makers aspiring to promote consumer empowerment and health care quality.
AHRQ-funded; HS016978; HS016980.
Citation: Schlesinger M, Kanouse DE, Martino SC .
Complexity, public reporting, and choice of doctors: a look inside the blackest box of consumer behavior.
Med Care Res Rev 2014 Oct;71(5 Suppl):38s-64s. doi: 10.1177/1077558713496321.
.
.
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Decision Making, Quality of Care, Primary Care, Public Reporting
Damberg CL, McNamara P
AHRQ Author: McNamara P
Postscript: research agenda to guide the next generation of public reports for consumers.
The authors identified five areas for additional public reporting tools research that, if addressed, could foster better design and delivery of quality and cost information to consumers.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Damberg CL, McNamara P .
Postscript: research agenda to guide the next generation of public reports for consumers.
Med Care Res Rev 2014 Oct;71(5 Suppl):97s-107s. doi: 10.1177/1077558714535982.
.
.
Keywords: Education: Patient and Caregiver, Decision Making, Quality of Care, Health Services Research (HSR), Public Reporting
Admon AJ, Cooke CR
Will Choosing Wisely(R) improve quality and lower costs of care for patients with critical illness?
This article reports on a campaign by the American Board of Internal Medicine to improve care and lower costs by generating a “top five” list of expensive tests or treatments without known benefits. It offers several strategies for stakeholders to increase the impact of the critical care top-five list.
AHRQ-funded; HS020672
Citation: Admon AJ, Cooke CR .
Will Choosing Wisely(R) improve quality and lower costs of care for patients with critical illness?
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2014 Jun;11(5):823-7. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201403-093OI..
Keywords: Decision Making, Critical Care, Quality of Care, Healthcare Costs
Longo DR, Woolf HS
Rethinking the information priorities of patients.
Efforts have intensified to provide consumers with online data tools and consumer reports that offer profiles and statistics for evaluating specialists, hospitals, and other clinical facilities. In this article, the authors examine two key questions: what should these resources look like and do patients really want them?
AHRQ-funded; HS021902
Citation: Longo DR, Woolf HS .
Rethinking the information priorities of patients.
JAMA. 2014 May 14;311(18):1857-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.3038..
Keywords: Education: Patient and Caregiver, Decision Making, Quality of Care, Health Information Technology (HIT), Web-Based