National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 2 of 2 Research Studies DisplayedKim KK, Joseph JG, Ohno-Machado L
Comparison of consumers' views on electronic data sharing for healthcare and research.
The researchers surveyed California consumers to learn their views of privacy, security, and consent in electronic data sharing for healthcare and research together. They found considerable concern that health information exchanges will worsen privacy (40.3 percent) and security (42.5 percent). Consumers are in favor of electronic data sharing but elements of transparency are important: individual control, who has access, and the purpose for use of data.
AHRQ-funded; HS019913.
Citation: Kim KK, Joseph JG, Ohno-Machado L .
Comparison of consumers' views on electronic data sharing for healthcare and research.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015 Jul;22(4):821-30. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv014..
Keywords: Communication, Data, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Exchange (HIE), Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient-Centered Healthcare
Rajamani S, Chen ES, Akre ME
Assessing the adequacy of the HL7/LOINC Document Ontology Role axis.
This study assessed the adequacy of the Role axis for representing the type of author documenting care. Experts used a master list of 220 values created from seven resources and established mapping guidelines. Baseline certification, licensure, and didactic training were identified as key parameters that define roles and hence often need to be pre-coordinated. Document Ontology (DO) was inadequate in representing 82 percent of roles, and this gap was primarily due to lack of granularity in DO.
AHRQ-funded; HS022085.
Citation: Rajamani S, Chen ES, Akre ME .
Assessing the adequacy of the HL7/LOINC Document Ontology Role axis.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015 May;22(3):615-20. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-003100..
Keywords: Health Information Exchange (HIE), Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT)