National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Ambulatory Care and Surgery (1)
- Cancer (1)
- Chronic Conditions (1)
- Critical Care (2)
- Elderly (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (1)
- Inpatient Care (1)
- Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (2)
- (-) Palliative Care (7)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (4)
- Patient Safety (1)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (1)
- Quality Measures (4)
- (-) Quality of Care (7)
- Research Methodologies (1)
- Respiratory Conditions (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 7 of 7 Research Studies DisplayedIyer AS, Benzo RP, Bakitas MA
Easing the tension between palliative care and intensive care in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
This editorial discusses palliative care and intensive care in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and comments on an article by Shen, et al., published, in 2018, in the Journal of Palliative Care, entitled “Life-sustaining procedures, palliative care consultation, and do-not resuscitate status in dying patients with COPD in US hospitals: 2010-2014.”
AHRQ-funded; HS023009.
Citation: Iyer AS, Benzo RP, Bakitas MA .
Easing the tension between palliative care and intensive care in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
J Palliat Care 2018 Jul;33(3):123-24. doi: 10.1177/0825859718782505..
Keywords: Chronic Conditions, Respiratory Conditions, Critical Care, Elderly, Palliative Care, Quality of Care
LeBlanc TW, Ritchie CS, Friedman F
Adherence to measuring what matters items when caring for patients with hematologic malignancies versus solid tumors.
The authors sought to assess adherence to Measuring What Matters (MWM) measures by palliative care clinicians caring for patients with hematologic malignancies, compared to those with solid tumors. They found that MWM adherence regarding symptom assessment and meeting emotional needs was lower for patients with hematologic malignancies compared to those with solid tumors. They concluded that this finding suggests two key areas for quality improvement initiatives in palliative care for patients with hematologic malignancies.
AHRQ-funded; HS023681; HS022763.
Citation: LeBlanc TW, Ritchie CS, Friedman F .
Adherence to measuring what matters items when caring for patients with hematologic malignancies versus solid tumors.
J Pain Symptom Manage 2016 Dec;52(6):775-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.09.004.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Quality of Care, Palliative Care, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Quality Measures
Wysham NG, Hochman MJ, Wolf SP
Performance of consultative palliative care model in achieving quality metrics in the ICU.
The purpose of this paper was to assess adherence to proposed quality metrics of ICU-based palliative care by palliative care specialists. The authors found that palliative care consultations in an ICU setting are characterized by variable adherence to candidate ICU palliative care quality metrics. Although symptom management was the foremost reason for palliative care consultation, consultants infrequently documented symptom assessments. The consultants performed better in offering spiritual support and managing documented symptoms.
AHRQ-funded; HS023681.
Citation: Wysham NG, Hochman MJ, Wolf SP .
Performance of consultative palliative care model in achieving quality metrics in the ICU.
J Pain Symptom Manage 2016 Dec;52(6):873-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.05.026.
.
.
Keywords: Critical Care, Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Palliative Care, Quality of Care, Quality Measures
Hochman MJ, Wolf S, Zafar SY
Comparing unmet needs to optimize quality: characterizing inpatient and outpatient palliative care populations.
The researchers compared the unmet needs of palliative care patients by location of care to better characterize these populations. They found that outpatients are more burdened by pain at first palliative care encounter compared to inpatients, yet outpatients experience higher quality of life and better performance status.
AHRQ-funded; HS023681.
Citation: Hochman MJ, Wolf S, Zafar SY .
Comparing unmet needs to optimize quality: characterizing inpatient and outpatient palliative care populations.
J Pain Symptom Manage 2016 Jun;51(6):1033-39.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.338.
.
.
Keywords: Quality of Care, Inpatient Care, Ambulatory Care and Surgery, Palliative Care, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Wysham NG, Kamal AH
Integrating palliative care in the intensive care unit. evidence gaps and quality gaps.
The authors discuss Mularski and colleagues in the same issue, stating that this study provides an important advancement in measuring palliative care quality in the ICU. They commend Mularski and colleagues for advancing the candidate measures of ICU-based palliative care and conclude that this report draws attention to important and persistent deficiencies in comprehensive, patient-centered critical care delivery that needs to be addressed in research and in practice.
AHRQ-funded; HS023681.
Citation: Wysham NG, Kamal AH .
Integrating palliative care in the intensive care unit. evidence gaps and quality gaps.
Ann Am Thorac Soc 2016 May;13(5):595-7. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201601-061ED.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Palliative Care, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Quality of Care
Kamal AH, Bull J, Ritchie CS
Adherence to measuring what matters measures using point-of-care data collection across diverse clinical settings.
The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the implementation of Measuring What Matters (MWM) measures by exploring documentation of quality measure adherence across six diverse clinical settings inherent to palliative care practice. The authors found that the lowest adherence involved comprehensive assessments during the first visit in hospitalized patients in the intensive care unit and that the highest adherence across all settings involved documentation of management of moderate to severe pain. They recommended additional studies for better understanding of benchmarks and acceptable ranges for adherence tailored to various clinical settings.
AHRQ-funded; HS023681; HS022763.
Citation: Kamal AH, Bull J, Ritchie CS .
Adherence to measuring what matters measures using point-of-care data collection across diverse clinical settings.
J Pain Symptom Manage 2016 Mar;51(3):497-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.313.
.
.
Keywords: Quality Measures, Palliative Care, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Quality of Care, Patient Safety
Dy SM, Herr K, Bernacki RE
Methodological research priorities in palliative care and hospice quality measurement.
The authors describe three key priorities: 1) defining the population of interest for palliative care quality indicators, 2) developing methods to measure quality from different data sources, and 3) conducting research to advance the development of patient/family-reported indicators. They apply these concepts to the key quality domain of advance care planning and address relevance to implementation of indicators in improving care in order to facilitate improved quality measurement across all populations with serious illness and care for patients and families.
AHRQ-funded; HS023681.
Citation: Dy SM, Herr K, Bernacki RE .
Methodological research priorities in palliative care and hospice quality measurement.
J Pain Symptom Manage 2016 Feb;51(2):155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.10.019.
.
.
Keywords: Research Methodologies, Palliative Care, Quality Measures, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality of Care