National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 2 of 2 Research Studies DisplayedCarney RM, Freedland KE, Steinmeyer BC
Collaborative care for depression symptoms in an outpatient cardiology setting: a randomized clinical trial.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether collaborative care (CC) for patients who screen positive for depression during an outpatient cardiology visit results in greater improvement in depression symptoms and better medical outcomes than seen in patients who screen positive for depression but receive only usual care (UC). Tthis trial did not show that CC produces better depression outcomes than UC.
AHRQ-funded; HS018335.
Citation: Carney RM, Freedland KE, Steinmeyer BC .
Collaborative care for depression symptoms in an outpatient cardiology setting: a randomized clinical trial.
Int J Cardiol 2016 Sep 15;219:164-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.045.
.
.
Keywords: Care Management, Cardiovascular Conditions, Depression, Healthcare Delivery, Behavioral Health, Outcomes, Ambulatory Care and Surgery, Teams
Irvin VL, Kaplan RM
AHRQ Author: Kaplan RM
Effect sizes and primary outcomes in large-budget, cardiovascular-related behavioral randomized controlled trials funded by NIH since 1980.
The authors reviewed large-budget, National Institutes of Health (NIH)-supported randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with behavioral interventions to assess (1) publication rates, (2) trial registration, (3) use of objective measures, (4) significant behavior and physiological change, and (5) effect sizes. They concludedc that behavioral trials complied with trial registration standards. Most reported a physiological benefit, but few documented morbidity or mortality benefits.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Irvin VL, Kaplan RM .
Effect sizes and primary outcomes in large-budget, cardiovascular-related behavioral randomized controlled trials funded by NIH since 1980.
Ann Behav Med 2016 Feb;50(1):130-46. doi: 10.1007/s12160-015-9739-7.
.
.
Keywords: Outcomes, Cardiovascular Conditions, Research Methodologies, Behavioral Health