National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Cancer (1)
- Caregiving (1)
- Children/Adolescents (1)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (2)
- Communication (1)
- Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) (11)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (3)
- Health Insurance (1)
- Health Literacy (1)
- Hospitalization (1)
- Hospitals (4)
- Inpatient Care (1)
- Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (1)
- Kidney Disease and Health (1)
- Low-Income (1)
- Medicare (1)
- (-) Patient Experience (14)
- Primary Care (2)
- Provider Performance (3)
- Quality Improvement (7)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (1)
- Quality Measures (4)
- (-) Quality of Care (14)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (2)
- Research Methodologies (1)
- Urban Health (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 14 of 14 Research Studies DisplayedEvensen CT, Yost KJ, Keller S
Development and testing of the CAHPS Cancer Care Survey.
In order to develop the CAHPS Cancer Care Survey instrument, the authors conducted cognitive tests of the instrument as well as field tests at six cancer centers and four community oncology practices; the survey was then finalized and obtained the CAHPS trademark. The authors recommend mail-only, mail-telephone mixed-mode, and Web-mail mixed-mode data collection methods.
AHRQ-funded; 290200600019I.
Citation: Evensen CT, Yost KJ, Keller S .
Development and testing of the CAHPS Cancer Care Survey.
J Oncol Pract 2019 Nov;15(11):e969-e78. doi: 10.1200/jop.19.00039..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Cancer, Patient Experience, Quality of Care
Hargraves JL, Cosenza C, Elliott MN, et al.
The effect of different sampling and recall periods in the CAHPS Clinician & Group (CG-CAHPS) survey.
Researchers examined the effect of changing the sampling and reference periods for the CAHPS((R)) Clinician & Group Survey from 12 to 6 months. They found that shortening the reference reduced the proportion of respondents reporting a blood test, X-ray, or other tests, and the most positive response was selected more often on the 6-month survey for 12 out of 13 questions. They concluded that surveys using a 6-month recall period may yield slightly higher scores than surveys with a 12-month recall period.
AHRQ-funded; HS016978.
Citation: Hargraves JL, Cosenza C, Elliott MN, et al..
The effect of different sampling and recall periods in the CAHPS Clinician & Group (CG-CAHPS) survey.
Health Serv Res 2019 Oct;54(5):1036-44. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13173..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Patient Experience, Quality of Care, Research Methodologies
Beckett MK, Elliott MN, Burkhart Q
The effects of survey version on patient experience scores and plan rankings.
Researchers assessed the effect of changing survey questions on plan-level patient experience measures and ratings. Using CAHPS data, they concluded that their analyses illustrated how to assess the impact of seemingly minor survey modifications for other national surveys considering changes and highlighted the importance of screeners in instrument design.
AHRQ-funded; HS016978.
Citation: Beckett MK, Elliott MN, Burkhart Q .
The effects of survey version on patient experience scores and plan rankings.
Health Serv Res 2019 Oct;54(5):1016-22. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13172..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Patient Experience, Medicare, Quality of Care
Setodji CM, Peipert JD, Hays RD
Differential item functioning of the CAHPS(R) In-Center Hemodialysis Survey.
End-stage renal disease patients' experience of care is an integral part of the assessment of the quality of the care provided at hemodialysis centers and is needed to promote patient choice, quality improvement, and accountability. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the In-Center Hemodialysis Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (ICH-CAHPS(R)) survey and its equivalence in different age, gender, race, and education subgroups.
AHRQ-funded; HS016980; HS016978.
Citation: Setodji CM, Peipert JD, Hays RD .
Differential item functioning of the CAHPS(R) In-Center Hemodialysis Survey.
Qual Life Res 2019 Jul 26;28(11):3117-35. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02250-5.
.
.
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Kidney Disease and Health, Quality of Care, Patient Experience, Quality Improvement
Ahluwalia SC, Damberg CL, Haas A
How are medical groups identified as high-performing? The effect of different approaches to classification of performance.
The researchers examined how different classification approaches influence which providers are designated as "high-performers.” They found that classification of medical groups as high performing is sensitive to the domains of performance included, the classification approach, and the choice of threshold. They further suggest that the absence of a consistently applied approach to identifying high performers impedes efforts to reliably compare, select and reward high-performing providers.
AHRQ-funded; HS024067.
Citation: Ahluwalia SC, Damberg CL, Haas A .
How are medical groups identified as high-performing? The effect of different approaches to classification of performance.
BMC Health Serv Res 2019 Jul 18;19(1):500. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4293-9..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Patient Experience, Provider Performance, Quality of Care, Quality Measures
Chen PG, Harrison MI, Bergofsky LR
AHRQ Author: Harrison MI, Bergofsky LR
Use of internal performance measurement to guide improvement within medical groups.
The purpose of this study was to investigate how medical groups use measures of quality, cost, and patient experience of care for performance improvement. Through interviews, findings showed that strategies for using internal measurement for quality improvement included taking a gradual, iterative approach and setting clear goals with high priority, finding workable approaches to data sharing, and fostering engagement by focusing on actionable measures. Measurement was also used to check accuracy of external performance reports, clarify and manage conflicting external measurement requirements, and prepare for anticipated external measurement requirements. Most respondents did not report a need to assess costs of internal measurement or the capacity to do so.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 233201500026I.
Citation: Chen PG, Harrison MI, Bergofsky LR .
Use of internal performance measurement to guide improvement within medical groups.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2019 Jul;45(7):487-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.02.009..
Keywords: Quality Measures, Quality Improvement, Provider Performance, Patient Experience, Quality of Care
Sheetz KH, Nathan H, Dimick JB
Patients' perceptions of hospitals affiliated with America's highest-rated medical centers.
Using the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey to measure how patients perceive a hospital’s overall quality and reputation, the investigators sought to determine whether HCAHPS scores increased for those affiliating with the prominent medical centers named to the U.S. News and World Report Honor Roll.
AHRQ-funded; HS023597.
Citation: Sheetz KH, Nathan H, Dimick JB .
Patients' perceptions of hospitals affiliated with America's highest-rated medical centers.
J Gen Intern Med 2019 Jun;34(6):787-88. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4822-y..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Patient Experience, Hospitals, Quality Measures, Quality of Care
Tieu L, Hobbs A, Sarkar U
Adapting patient experience data collection processes for lower literacy patient populations using tablets at the point of care.
This study compared the acceptability of low-literacy tablet-based and traditional paper-based patient experience surveys in English and Spanish. The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers & Systems Clinician & Group Survey (CG-CAHPS) was adapted for a pilot survey using low-literacy questions in Spanish and English. The majority of interview participants preferred the tablet version over the traditional paper-based survey. This was especially true for the younger and Latino respondents.
AHRQ-funded; HS022408.
Citation: Tieu L, Hobbs A, Sarkar U .
Adapting patient experience data collection processes for lower literacy patient populations using tablets at the point of care.
Med Care 2019 Jun;57 Suppl 6 Suppl 2:S140-s48. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001030..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Health Information Technology (HIT), Health Literacy, Patient Experience, Primary Care, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement, Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Urban Health
Fowler FJ, Cosenza C, Cripps LA
The effect of administration mode on CAHPS survey response rates and results: a comparison of mail and web-based approaches.
The researchers compared response rates, respondents' characteristics, and substantive results for CAHPS surveys administered using web and mail protocols. They found that response rates to surveys administered using the Internet protocols were lower than for the surveys administered by mail, but characteristics of respondents and survey answers were very similar across protocols. Respondents without email addresses tended to be older, less educated, and more likely to be male than those with email addresses, and there were a few differences in their responses.
AHRQ-funded; HS016978.
Citation: Fowler FJ, Cosenza C, Cripps LA .
The effect of administration mode on CAHPS survey response rates and results: a comparison of mail and web-based approaches.
Health Serv Res 2019 Jun;54(3):714-21. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13109..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient Experience, Primary Care, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement
Hanson C, Herring B, Trish E
Do health insurance and hospital market concentration influence hospital patients' experience of care?
Researchers examined the effects of insurance and hospital market concentration on hospital patients' experience of care. They found that changes in patient satisfaction are positively associated with increases in insurance concentration and negatively associated with increases in hospital concentration. They concluded that their findings add to the evidence on the harms of hospital consolidation but suggest that insurer consolidation may improve patient experience.
AHRQ-funded; HS026333.
Citation: Hanson C, Herring B, Trish E .
Do health insurance and hospital market concentration influence hospital patients' experience of care?
Health Serv Res 2019 May 16;54(4):805-15. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13168..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Health Insurance, Hospitals, Patient Experience, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement
Toomey SL, Elliott MN, Zaslavsky AM
Improving response rates and representation of hard-to-reach groups in family experience surveys.
This study examined the use of an audio-enabled tablet to survey parents of children discharged from 4 units of a children’s hospital. Normal mail survey response rates are very low, especially for black, Latino, and low-income respondents. This survey was done day of discharge at the hospital and there was a response rate of 71.1% via tablet versus 16.3% for mail only. The Child Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey was used. Tablet response rates were highest with fathers, those more likely to have a high school education or less, less likely to be white, and more likely to be publicly insured. The results are promising for future surveys using tablet administration.
AHRQ-funded; HS020513; HS025299.
Citation: Toomey SL, Elliott MN, Zaslavsky AM .
Improving response rates and representation of hard-to-reach groups in family experience surveys.
Acad Pediatr 2019 May - Jun;19(4):446-53. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.07.007..
Keywords: Caregiving, Children/Adolescents, Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Health Information Technology (HIT), Hospitals, Low-Income, Patient Experience, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement, Racial and Ethnic Minorities
Roche SD, Reichheld AM, Demosthenes N
Measuring the quality of inpatient specialist consultation in the intensive care unit: Nursing and family experiences of communication.
The purpose of this study was to document the receipt of communication by nurses and family members regarding consultations performed on their patient or loved one, and to quantify how this impacted their overall perceptions of the quality of specialty care. The investigators found that most ICU families and nurses had no interaction with specialist providers. They concluded that nurses' frequent exclusion from conversations about specialty care may pose safety risks and increase the likelihood of mixed messages for patients and families, most of whom desire some interaction with specialists.
AHRQ-funded; K08 HS024288.
Citation: Roche SD, Reichheld AM, Demosthenes N .
Measuring the quality of inpatient specialist consultation in the intensive care unit: Nursing and family experiences of communication.
PLoS One 2019 Apr 11;14(4):e0214918. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214918..
Keywords: Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Quality of Care, Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Patient Experience, Inpatient Care
Cefalu MS, Elliott MN, Setodji CM
Hospital quality indicators are not unidimensional: a reanalysis of Lieberthal and Comer.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the dimensionality of hospital quality indicators treated as unidimensional in a prior publication. The investigators found that there were four underlying dimensions of hospital quality: patient experience, mortality, and two clinical process dimensions. They concluded that hospital quality should be measured using a variety of indicators reflecting different dimensions of quality.
AHRQ-funded; HS016980; HS016978.
Citation: Cefalu MS, Elliott MN, Setodji CM .
Hospital quality indicators are not unidimensional: a reanalysis of Lieberthal and Comer.
Health Serv Res 2019 Apr;54(2):502-08. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13056..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Hospitals, Patient Experience, Provider Performance, Quality of Care, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality Measures
Fisher KA, Smith KM, Gallagher TH
We want to know: patient comfort speaking up about breakdowns in care and patient experience.
The purpose of this study was to assess patient comfort speaking up about problems during hospitalisation and to identify patients at increased risk of having a problem and not feeling comfortable speaking up. The investigators suggest that creating conditions for patients to be comfortable speaking up may result in service recovery opportunities and improved patient experience. They assert that such efforts should consider the impact of health literacy and mental health on patient engagement in patient-safety activities.
AHRQ-funded; HS024596; HS022757.
Citation: Fisher KA, Smith KM, Gallagher TH .
We want to know: patient comfort speaking up about breakdowns in care and patient experience.
BMJ Qual Saf 2019 Mar;28(3):190-97. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008159..
Keywords: Clinician-Patient Communication, Hospitalization, Patient Experience, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement