National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Autism (1)
- Behavioral Health (2)
- Cancer (2)
- Cancer: Cervical Cancer (1)
- Cancer: Colorectal Cancer (1)
- Cancer: Lung Cancer (2)
- Cancer: Prostate Cancer (1)
- Care Management (1)
- Children/Adolescents (3)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (2)
- (-) Decision Making (8)
- Depression (2)
- Elderly (1)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (3)
- Implementation (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (1)
- (-) Primary Care (8)
- Primary Care: Models of Care (1)
- (-) Screening (8)
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 8 of 8 Research Studies DisplayedKukhareva PV, Li H, Caverly TJ
Implementation of lung cancer screening in primary care and pulmonary clinics: pragmatic clinical trial of electronic health record-integrated everyday shared decision-making tool and clinician-facing prompts.
The authors conducted pre- and post-intervention analysis in primary care and pulmonary clinics to explore whether clinician-facing electronic health record (EHR) prompts and an EHR-integrated shared decision-making (SDM) tool designed to support incorporation of SDM into primary care could improve low-dose computer tomography scan imaging ordering and completion. Subjects were patients who met US Preventive Services Task Force criteria for lung cancer screening (LCS). The results indicated that EHR prompts and the EHR-integrated SDM tool were promising approaches to improving LCS in the primary care setting. The authors noted that further research is warranted.
AHRQ-funded; HS026198; HS028791.
Citation: Kukhareva PV, Li H, Caverly TJ .
Implementation of lung cancer screening in primary care and pulmonary clinics: pragmatic clinical trial of electronic health record-integrated everyday shared decision-making tool and clinician-facing prompts.
Chest 2023 Nov; 164(5):1325-38. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.04.040..
Keywords: Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Screening, Primary Care, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Decision Making
Reese TJ, Schlechter CR, Kramer H
Implementing lung cancer screening in primary care: needs assessment and implementation strategy design.
This study explored the implementation of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (CT) in primary care. The study’s two goals included exploring the implementation of lung cancer screening primary care in the context of integrating a decision aid into the electronic health record and a designing of implementation strategies that target hypothesized mechanics of change and context-specific barriers. The two phases included a Qualitative Analysis phase including semi-structured interviews with primary care physicians to elicit key task behaviors, and an Implementation Strategy Design phase consisting of defining implementation strategies and hypothesizing causal pathways to improve screening with a decision aid. Fourteen interviews were conducted and out of that 3 key task behaviors and four behavioral determinants emerged. Strategies included increasing provider self-efficacy toward performing shared decision making and using the decision aid, improving provider performance expectancy, increasing social influence, and addressing key facilitators to using the decision aid.
AHRQ-funded; HS026198.
Citation: Reese TJ, Schlechter CR, Kramer H .
Implementing lung cancer screening in primary care: needs assessment and implementation strategy design.
Transl Behav Med 2022 Feb 16;12(2):187-97. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab115..
Keywords: Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Primary Care, Screening, Implementation, Decision Making
Downs SM, Bauer NS, Saha C
Effect of a computer-based decision support intervention on autism spectrum disorder screening in pediatric primary care clinics: a cluster randomized clinical trial.
This study examined outcomes for implementation of a decision support system called CHICA (Child Health Improvement Through Computer Automation) to improve screening rates for autism in children aged 18 to 24 months. A random sample of 274 children in four urban clinics was used. Two clinics participated in the intervention, and two served as controls. Because participating clinics requested intervention be discontinued for children aged 18 months, only results for those aged 24 months was analyzed. Of the 263 children with reviewed results, 92% were enrolled in Medicaid, 52.5% were African American, and 36.5% were Hispanic. Screening rates increased from 0% at baseline to 100% in 24 months during the study period of November 2010 to November 2012. Screening results were positive for 265 of 980 children screened by CHICA in the time period, with 2 children from the intervention group positively diagnosed in the time frame of the study.
AHRQ-funded; HS018453.
Citation: Downs SM, Bauer NS, Saha C .
Effect of a computer-based decision support intervention on autism spectrum disorder screening in pediatric primary care clinics: a cluster randomized clinical trial.
JAMA Netw Open 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1917676. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17676..
Keywords: Autism, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Decision Making, Health Information Technology (HIT), Primary Care, Children/Adolescents, Screening
Kim JJ, Burger EA, Regan C
Screening for cervical cancer in primary care: a decision analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
The purpose of this study was to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force by modeling the benefits and harms of various cervical cancer screening strategies. In this microsimulation modeling study, it was estimated that primary hrHPV screening may represent a reasonable balance of harms and benefits when performed every 5 years. Switching from cytology to hrHPV testing at age 30 years yielded the most efficient harm to benefit ratio when using colposcopy as a proxy for harms.
AHRQ-funded; 290-2012-00015-I.
Citation: Kim JJ, Burger EA, Regan C .
Screening for cervical cancer in primary care: a decision analysis for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2018 Aug 21;320(7):706-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.19872..
Keywords: Cancer: Cervical Cancer, Decision Making, Primary Care, Screening, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
Misra-Hebert AD, Hom G, Klein EA
Testing of a tool for prostate cancer screening discussions in primary care.
As prostate cancer (PCa) screening decisions often occur in outpatient primary care, a brief tool to help the PCa screening conversation in busy clinic settings is needed. This paper discusses a previously-created 9-item tool to aid (PCa) screening discussions. The study found that the brief conversation tool was well received in busy primary-care settings and improved patients' knowledge about the screening decision.
AHRQ-funded; HS024128.
Citation: Misra-Hebert AD, Hom G, Klein EA .
Testing of a tool for prostate cancer screening discussions in primary care.
Front Oncol 2018 Jun 28;8:238. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00238..
Keywords: Cancer: Prostate Cancer, Decision Making, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Primary Care, Screening
Aalsma MC, Zerr AM, Etter DJ
Physician intervention to positive depression screens among adolescents in primary care.
The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of computer-based screening and physician feedback to guide adolescent depression management within primary care. The investigators found that when a computer-based decision support system algorithm focused on adolescent depression and was implemented in two primary care clinics, a majority of physicians utilized screening results to guide clinical care.
AHRQ-funded; HS022681.
Citation: Aalsma MC, Zerr AM, Etter DJ .
Physician intervention to positive depression screens among adolescents in primary care.
J Adolesc Health 2018 Feb;62(2):212-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.08.023..
Keywords: Care Management, Children/Adolescents, Decision Making, Depression, Health Information Technology (HIT), Behavioral Health, Primary Care, Primary Care: Models of Care, Screening
Etter DJ, McCord A, Ouyang F
Suicide screening in primary care: use of an electronic screener to assess suicidality and improve provider follow-up for adolescents.
The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of using an existing computer decision support system to screen adolescent patients for suicidality and provide follow-up guidance to clinicians in a primary care setting. The authors concluded that incorporating adolescent suicide screening and provider follow-up guidance into an existing computer decision support system in primary care was feasible and well utilized by providers.
AHRQ-funded; HS022681.
Citation: Etter DJ, McCord A, Ouyang F .
Suicide screening in primary care: use of an electronic screener to assess suicidality and improve provider follow-up for adolescents.
J Adolesc Health 2018 Feb;62(2):191-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.08.026..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Decision Making, Depression, Behavioral Health, Primary Care, Screening
Kistler CE, Golin C, Sundaram A
Individualized colorectal cancer screening discussions between older adults and their primary care providers: a cross-sectional study.
The aim of this study was to describe colorectal cancer (CRC) screening discussions and explore their associations with patient characteristics and screening intentions. The investigators found that CRC screening discussions varied by type of participant and content. They assert that future work is needed to determine if interventions focused on specific domains alters the appropriateness of participants' colorectal cancer screening intentions.
AHRQ-funded; HS021133.
Citation: Kistler CE, Golin C, Sundaram A .
Individualized colorectal cancer screening discussions between older adults and their primary care providers: a cross-sectional study.
MDM Policy Pract 2018 Jan-Jun;3(1):2381468318765172. doi: 10.1177/2381468318765172..
Keywords: Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Decision Making, Elderly, Primary Care, Screening