National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Access to Care (3)
- Cancer (18)
- Cancer: Breast Cancer (1)
- Cancer: Cervical Cancer (1)
- (-) Cancer: Colorectal Cancer (24)
- Case Study (2)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (1)
- Colonoscopy (8)
- Community-Based Practice (1)
- Decision Making (2)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (2)
- Digestive Disease and Health (1)
- Disparities (2)
- Education: Patient and Caregiver (1)
- Elderly (5)
- Evidence-Based Practice (3)
- Guidelines (2)
- Healthcare Costs (1)
- Healthcare Delivery (1)
- Healthcare Utilization (2)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- Health Insurance (1)
- Health Literacy (1)
- Health Promotion (2)
- Medicaid (4)
- Medicare (2)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (2)
- Patient Adherence/Compliance (2)
- Policy (3)
- (-) Prevention (24)
- Primary Care (1)
- Primary Care: Models of Care (1)
- Provider: Pharmacist (1)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (3)
- Risk (1)
- (-) Screening (24)
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) (1)
- Vulnerable Populations (1)
- Women (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 24 of 24 Research Studies DisplayedFerrari RM, Atkins DL, Wangen M
Patient perspectives on a proposed pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening program.
The objective of this study was to assess patient perspectives on receiving fecal immunochemical colorectal cancer (CRC) screening tests through pharmacies. Researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with participants in North Carolina and Washington. Survey participants reported pharmacy-based CRC screening programs to be highly acceptable, citing convenience, ease of access, and avoidance of co-pays, but they also had concerns about privacy and coordination with primary care providers. The researchers concluded that CRC screening in pharmacies is potentially a good option, provided patients have privacy and their primary care providers are informed.
AHRQ-funded; HS026122.
Citation: Ferrari RM, Atkins DL, Wangen M .
Patient perspectives on a proposed pharmacy-based colorectal cancer screening program.
Transl Behav Med 2023 Dec 15; 13(12):909-18. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibad057..
Keywords: Provider: Pharmacist, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Colonoscopy, Screening, Prevention
Hicklin K, O'Leary MC, Nambiar S
Assessing the impact of multicomponent interventions on colorectal cancer screening through simulation: what would it take to reach national screening targets in North Carolina?
The authors simulated the impact of multicomponent interventions in North Carolina over 5 years to assess the potential for meeting national screening targets for colorectal cancer (CRC). They reported that each multicomponent intervention was associated with increased CRC screening and averted both CRC cases and deaths, while three had the potential to reach screening targets.
AHRQ-funded; HS022981.
Citation: Hicklin K, O'Leary MC, Nambiar S .
Assessing the impact of multicomponent interventions on colorectal cancer screening through simulation: what would it take to reach national screening targets in North Carolina?
Prev Med 2022 Sep;162:107126. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.107126..
Keywords: Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Cancer, Screening, Colonoscopy, Prevention
Fan T, Stefanos R
AHRQ Author: Fan T
Screening for colorectal cancer.
This AHRQ-authored Putting Preventions in Practice quiz has three questions and answers on the US Preventive Services Task Force final recommendation on screening for colorectal cancer. A case study is presented with questions on the best behavioral interventions, the effect of a patient’s age on the counseling approach, and what is an appropriate test and interval for colorectal screening. References are also provided at the end of the answers.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Fan T, Stefanos R .
Screening for colorectal cancer.
Am Fam Physician 2021 Sep 1;104(3):295-96..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Cancer, Screening, Prevention, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Case Study
Glenn BA, Nonzee NJ, Hamilton AS
Cancer surveillance and preventive services in a diverse sample of breast and colorectal cancer survivors.
This study assessed engagement in surveillance for recurrence, cancer screening, and other recommended preventive health services among breast and colorectal cancer survivors with early-onset disease (age 50 years and younger) who were diagnosed in California. Findings showed that, although the majority of survivors received appropriate surveillance for recurrence, engagement in other preventive health services varied substantially. Implications included efforts to address gaps in the use of recommended cancer screening and preventive health services among cancer survivors.
AHRQ-funded; HS000046.
Citation: Glenn BA, Nonzee NJ, Hamilton AS .
Cancer surveillance and preventive services in a diverse sample of breast and colorectal cancer survivors.
J Cancer Surviv 2021 Apr;15(2):213-23. doi: 10.1007/s11764-020-00925-4..
Keywords: Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Cancer, Prevention, Screening
Sanchez JI, Shankaran V, Unger JM
Inequitable access to surveillance colonoscopy among Medicare beneficiaries with surgically resected colorectal cancer.
After colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery, surveillance with colonoscopy is an important step for the early detection of local recurrence. Unfortunately, surveillance colonoscopy is underused, especially among racial/ethnic minorities. This study assessed the association between patient and neighborhood factors and receipt of surveillance colonoscopy. The investigators concluded that receipt of initial surveillance colonoscopy remained low, and that there were acute disparities between Black and NHW patients.
AHRQ-funded; HS013853.
Citation: Sanchez JI, Shankaran V, Unger JM .
Inequitable access to surveillance colonoscopy among Medicare beneficiaries with surgically resected colorectal cancer.
Cancer 2021 Feb;127(3):412-21. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33262..
Keywords: Colonoscopy, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Cancer, Access to Care, Screening, Prevention, Disparities, Medicare
Shah SC, Itzkowitz SH
Reappraising risk factors for inflammatory bowel disease-associated neoplasia: implications for colonoscopic surveillance in IBD.
One of the most feared complications of inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]-associated colitis is colorectal cancer. An opportunity for early detection is being missed in a group that is overlooked as high-risk, as a substantial proportion of colorectal cancers are being diagnosed in individuals with colonic IBD who have disease duration shorter than when guidelines recommend surveillance initiation. In this study, the investigators discuss a viewpoint that supports a paradigm shift that will ideally result in a more effective and higher-value colorectal cancer prevention approach in IBD.
AHRQ-funded; HS026395.
Citation: Shah SC, Itzkowitz SH .
Reappraising risk factors for inflammatory bowel disease-associated neoplasia: implications for colonoscopic surveillance in IBD.
J Crohns Colitis 2020 Sep 7;14(8):1172-77. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjaa040..
Keywords: Digestive Disease and Health, Risk, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Cancer, Colonoscopy, Prevention, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Screening
Nelson HD, Cantor A, Wagner J
Effectiveness of patient navigation to increase cancer screening in populations adversely affected by health disparities: a meta-analysis.
This study evaluated the effectiveness of patient navigation to increase screening for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer in populations adversely affected by health care disparities. Two of the investigators independently abstracted study data and assessed study quality and applicability using criteria adapted from the USPSTF. Findings indicated that, in populations adversely affected by disparities, colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screening rates were higher in patients provided navigation services.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500009I.
Citation: Nelson HD, Cantor A, Wagner J .
Effectiveness of patient navigation to increase cancer screening in populations adversely affected by health disparities: a meta-analysis.
J Gen Intern Med 2020 Jul 22;35(10):3026-35. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06020-9..
Keywords: Cancer, Disparities, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Screening, Prevention, Women, Health Promotion
Davis SN, Wischhusen JW, Sutton SK
Demographic and psychosocial factors associated with limited health literacy in a community-based sample of older Black Americans.
This study examined the frequency of limited health literacy and demographic and psychosocial factors associated with limited health literacy in a sample of older black Americans. The participants enrolled in a community-based intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening and completed baseline surveys that assessed their health literacy using the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine, Revised (REALM-R) test, CRC awareness, cancer fatalism, Preventive Health Model (PHM) constructs, and demographics. Findings showed that limited health literacy was associated with multiple complex factors. Recommendations include interventions to incorporate patient health literacy and low-literacy materials that can be delivered through multiple channels.
AHRQ-funded; HS026120.
Citation: Davis SN, Wischhusen JW, Sutton SK .
Demographic and psychosocial factors associated with limited health literacy in a community-based sample of older Black Americans.
Patient Educ Couns 2020 Feb;103(2):385-91. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.026..
Keywords: Health Literacy, Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Elderly, Screening, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Cancer, Prevention
Murphy CC, Sen A, Watson B
A systematic review of repeat fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer screening.
This systematic review examined the prevalence of repeat fecal occult blood tests (FOBT) for colorectal cancer screening. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published from 1997 to 2017 and reported repeat FOBT over 2 and more screening rounds. Thirty-five articles (n=27) were identified which measured repeat FOBT as 1) proportion of Round 1 participants completing repeat FOBT in Round 2; 2) proportion completing two, consecutive FOBTs; or 3) proportion completing 3 or more rounds. The number of participants completing Round 1 ranged from 24.6% to 89.6%. Those who completed Round 2 ranged from 16.4% to 80%; and completion of 3 or more rounds ranged from 0.8% to 64.1%. Repeat FOBT was higher in mailed outreach than opportunistic screening.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Murphy CC, Sen A, Watson B .
A systematic review of repeat fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer screening.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020 Feb;29(2):278-87. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.Epi-19-0775..
Keywords: Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Cancer, Screening, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Prevention, Patient Adherence/Compliance, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice
Hassmiller Lich K, O'Leary MC, Nambiar S
Estimating the impact of insurance expansion on colorectal cancer and related costs in North Carolina: a population-level simulation analysis.
Researchers used microsimulation to estimate the health and financial effects of insurance expansion and reduction scenarios in North Carolina (NC) for colorectal cancer screening (CRC). The full lifetime of a simulated population of residents age-eligible for CRC screening (aged 50-75) during a 5-year period were simulated. Findings indicate that the estimated cost savings--balancing increased CRC screening/testing costs against decreased cancer treatment costs--were approximately $30 M and $970 M for Medicaid expansion and Medicare-for-all scenarios, respectively, compared to status quo. The researchers concluded that insurance expansion will likely improve CRC screening both overall and in underserved populations while saving money, with the largest savings realized by Medicare.
AHRQ-funded; HS022981.
Citation: Hassmiller Lich K, O'Leary MC, Nambiar S .
Estimating the impact of insurance expansion on colorectal cancer and related costs in North Carolina: a population-level simulation analysis.
Prev Med 2019 Dec;129s:105847. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.105847..
Keywords: Health Insurance, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Cancer, Healthcare Costs, Screening, Prevention, Medicaid, Medicare, Policy, Access to Care
Bravo RI, Kietzman KG, Toy P
Linking primary care and community organizations to increase colorectal cancer screening rates: the HAPPI project.
This paper describes the Healthy Aging Partnerships in Prevention Initiative (HAPPI) which aims to increase colorectal cancer screening and other preventive services among underserved Latinos and African-Americans in South Los Angeles who are 50 years and older. It uses an evidence-based model (SPARC) to leverage existing resources and has multi-sectoral partnerships among different agencies, community health centers (CHCs), and a university. The authors engaged five CHCs in quality improvement activities and eight non-governmental organizations in networking and programming to increase awareness of these preventive services.
AHRQ-funded; HS010858.
Citation: Bravo RI, Kietzman KG, Toy P .
Linking primary care and community organizations to increase colorectal cancer screening rates: the HAPPI project.
Salud Publica Mex 2019 Jul-Aug;61(4):427-35. doi: 10.21149/9450..
Keywords: Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Cancer, Screening, Prevention, Primary Care: Models of Care, Primary Care, Elderly, Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Vulnerable Populations, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Huguet N, Angier H, Rdesinski R
Cervical and colorectal cancer screening prevalence before and after Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion.
This study assessed changes in the prevalence of cervical and colorectal cancer screening from before and after the Affordable Care Act in Medicaid expansion and non-expansion states among patients seen in community health centers. Results showed that, despite increased prevalences of cervical and colorectal cancer screening in both expansion and non-expansion states across all race/ethnicity groups, rates remained suboptimal for this population of socioeconomically disadvantaged patients.
AHRQ-funded; HS024270.
Citation: Huguet N, Angier H, Rdesinski R .
Cervical and colorectal cancer screening prevalence before and after Affordable Care Act Medicaid expansion.
Prev Med 2019 Jul;124:91-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.05.003..
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Cervical Cancer, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Healthcare Delivery, Healthcare Utilization, Medicaid, Policy, Prevention, Screening
O'Leary MC, Lich KH, Gu Y
Colorectal cancer screening in newly insured Medicaid members: a review of concurrent federal and state policies.
The goal of this study was to determine the impact of national and state policies enacted to increase access to Medicaid and to promote colorectal cancer (CRC) screening on newly enrolled, age-eligible Oregon Medicaid beneficiaries. 2010 - 2015 Oregon Medicaid claims data was used to conduct a cohort analysis of enrollees who turned 50 and became age-eligible for CRC screening. Individuals newly enrolled in Medicaid in 2013 or 2014 were more likely to initiate CRC screening than those enrolled by 2010, associated with the timing of policies such as Medicaid expansion and federal matching for preventive services. A primary care visit during the calendar year, one or more chronic conditions, and Hispanic ethnicity were also associated with CRC screening initiation.
AHRQ-funded; HS022981.
Citation: O'Leary MC, Lich KH, Gu Y .
Colorectal cancer screening in newly insured Medicaid members: a review of concurrent federal and state policies.
BMC Health Serv Res 2019 May 9;19(1):298. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4113-2..
Keywords: Access to Care, Cancer, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Medicaid, Policy, Prevention, Screening
Davis MM, Shafer P, Renfro S
Does a transition to accountable care in Medicaid shift the modality of colorectal cancer testing?
This study investigated whether Medicaid expansion due to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) increased the number of patients who tested for colorectal cancer (CRC). Results in Oregon showed that there was an increased in statewide fecal testing mainly in Coordinated Care Organizations (CCOs).
AHRQ-funded; HS022981.
Citation: Davis MM, Shafer P, Renfro S .
Does a transition to accountable care in Medicaid shift the modality of colorectal cancer testing?
BMC Health Serv Res 2019 Jan 21;19(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3864-5..
Keywords: Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Healthcare Utilization, Medicaid, Prevention, Screening
Magrath M, Yang E, Ahn C
Impact of a clinical decision support system on guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations for colonoscopy after polypectomy.
The goal of this study was to characterize guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations after implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR)-based Colonoscopy Pathology Reporting and Clinical Decision Support System (CoRS). Results showed that an EMR-based CoRS was widely used and significantly improved guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Magrath M, Yang E, Ahn C .
Impact of a clinical decision support system on guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations for colonoscopy after polypectomy.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2018 Nov;16(11):1321-28. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7050..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Health Information Technology (HIT), Colonoscopy, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Screening, Cancer, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Prevention
Predmore Z, Pannikottu J, Sharma R
Factors associated with the overuse of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.
The purpose of this systematic review was to examine factors associated with overuse of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, using studies that were in English, used a U.S. population, and contained original data. The review indicates that overuse of CRC screening was greater in the Northeast/Mid-Atlantic regions and in urban areas, but was lower in academically affiliated centers. The authors conclude that, although the literature supports important overuse of CRC screening, what drives these practices remains unclear and that future research should explore these factors thoroughly.
AHRQ-funded; HS000029.
Citation: Predmore Z, Pannikottu J, Sharma R .
Factors associated with the overuse of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review.
Am J Med Qual 2018 Sep/Oct;33(5):472-80. doi: 10.1177/1062860618764302..
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Colonoscopy, Prevention, Screening
Lewis CL, Kistler CE, Dalton AF
A decision aid to promote appropriate colorectal cancer screening among older adults: a randomized controlled trial.
The purpose of this study was to test a patient decision aid (PtDA) to promote CRC screening in older adults. The PtDA was designed to facilitate individual decision-making to help patients understand the potential risks and benefit of CRC screening. 424 patients aged 70 – 84 who were not up to date with CRC screening participated in a double-blinded randomized controlled trial, using the PtDA or an attention control. Two outcomes - appropriate CRC screening behavior at 6 months following the initial visit or appropriate screening intent immediately after the visit - were defined as completed screening or intent for patients in good health, discussion about screening with their provider for patients in intermediate health, or no screening or intent for patients in poor health. Appropriate screening behavior at 6 months was higher in the intervention group; appropriate screening intent following the provider visit was also higher. The authors conclude that the PtDA for older adults promoted appropriate CRC screening behavior.
AHRQ-funded; HS021133.
Citation: Lewis CL, Kistler CE, Dalton AF .
A decision aid to promote appropriate colorectal cancer screening among older adults: a randomized controlled trial.
Med Decis Making 2018 Jul;38(5):614-24. doi: 10.1177/0272989x18773713..
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Decision Making, Education: Patient and Caregiver, Elderly, Prevention, Screening
Kistler CE, Golin C, Morris C
Design of a randomized clinical trial of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid to promote appropriate screening in community-dwelling older adults.
This paper reports on the design of a randomized clinical trial to understand the effects of a patient decision aid on appropriate colorectal cancer screening. The study aims to determine the ability of a patient decision aid to increase individualized and appropriate colorectal cancer screening.
AHRQ-funded; HS021133.
Citation: Kistler CE, Golin C, Morris C .
Design of a randomized clinical trial of a colorectal cancer screening decision aid to promote appropriate screening in community-dwelling older adults.
Clin Trials 2017 Dec;14(6):648-58. doi: 10.1177/1740774517725289..
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Decision Making, Elderly, Prevention, Screening
Adams LB, Richmond J, Corbie-Smith G
Medical mistrust and colorectal cancer screening among African Americans.
The goal of this systematic review was to summarize evidence investigating associations between medical mistrust and CRC screening among African Americans, and variations in these associations by gender, CRC screening type, and level of mistrust. The study found that quantitative differences in mistrust and CRC screening by gender were mixed, but qualitative studies highlighted fear of experimentation and intrusiveness of screening methods as unique themes among African American men.
AHRQ-funded; HS000032.
Citation: Adams LB, Richmond J, Corbie-Smith G .
Medical mistrust and colorectal cancer screening among African Americans.
J Community Health 2017 Oct;42(5):1044-61. doi: 10.1007/s10900-017-0339-2..
Keywords: Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Prevention, Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Screening
Ngo-Metzger Q, Rajupet S
AHRQ Author: Ngo-Metzger Q
Screening for colorectal cancer.
This case study involves a 50-year-old woman who presents for a routine visit. She is healthy with no significant medical history, takes no medications, and has no personal or family history of cancer. She asks about colorectal cancer screening. There are three multiple choice questions together with the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force answers, recommendations and related background information.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Ngo-Metzger Q, Rajupet S .
Screening for colorectal cancer.
Am Fam Physician 2017 May 15;95(10):653-54.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Case Study, Colonoscopy, Prevention, Screening
Garcia-Albeniz X, Hsu J, Bretthauer M
Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy to prevent colorectal cancer among Medicare beneficiaries aged 70 to 79 years: a prospective observational study.
The researchers evaluated the effectiveness and safety of screening colonoscopy to prevent colorectal cancer (CRC) in persons aged 70 to 74 and those aged 75 to 79 years. They concluded that screening colonoscopy may have had a modest benefit in preventing CRC in beneficiaries aged 70 to 74 years and a smaller benefit in older beneficiaries.
AHRQ-funded; HS023128.
Citation: Garcia-Albeniz X, Hsu J, Bretthauer M .
Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy to prevent colorectal cancer among Medicare beneficiaries aged 70 to 79 years: a prospective observational study.
Ann Intern Med 2017 Jan 3;166(1):18-26. doi: 10.7326/m16-0758.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Colonoscopy, Elderly, Prevention, Screening
Liss DT, French DD, Buchanan DR
Outreach for annual colorectal cancer screening: a budget impact analysis for community health centers.
This budget impact analysis investigated benefits and costs of fecal immunochemical testing (FIT) outreach-with FIT kits mailed to patients, followed by reminders and phone calls-compared with point-of-care (POC) strategies. Cost per patient screened was $20.60 for POC and $71.84 for outreach ($51.24 difference). Outreach costs decreased by approximately one fourth under optimized workflows.
AHRQ-funded; HS021141.
Citation: Liss DT, French DD, Buchanan DR .
Outreach for annual colorectal cancer screening: a budget impact analysis for community health centers.
Am J Prev Med 2016 Feb;50(2):e54-61. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.07.003.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Community-Based Practice, Health Promotion, Prevention, Screening
Singal AG, Gupta S, Tiro JA
Outreach invitations for FIT and colonoscopy improve colorectal cancer screening rates: a randomized controlled trial in a safety-net health system.
Among a racially diverse and socioeconomically disadvantaged cohort of patients, the researchers compared the effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach and colonoscopy outreach to increase screening participation rates, compared with usual visit-based care. Mailed outreach invitations appear to significantly increase colorectal cancer screening rates among underserved populations. In the current study, FIT-based outreach was found to be more effective than colonoscopy-based outreach.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Singal AG, Gupta S, Tiro JA .
Outreach invitations for FIT and colonoscopy improve colorectal cancer screening rates: a randomized controlled trial in a safety-net health system.
Cancer 2016 Feb 1;122(3):456-63. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29770.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Cancer, Screening, Prevention
Baker DW, Brown T, Goldman SN
Two-year follow-up of the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to annual colorectal cancer screening in community health centers.
After an earlier outreach intervention achieved 82 percent annual adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) screening with fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), this study assessed adherence to FOBT after a second outreach. It found that a total of 88.7 percent of patients completed a fecal immunochemical test within 6 months of their second outreach.
AHRQ-funded; HS021141.
Citation: Baker DW, Brown T, Goldman SN .
Two-year follow-up of the effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve adherence to annual colorectal cancer screening in community health centers.
Cancer Causes Control 2015 Nov;26(11):1685-90. doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0650-0..
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Patient Adherence/Compliance, Prevention, Screening