National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Behavioral Health (1)
- Cancer (3)
- Cancer: Prostate Cancer (2)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (2)
- Caregiving (1)
- Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) (1)
- Children/Adolescents (2)
- Chronic Conditions (1)
- Comparative Effectiveness (1)
- Depression (1)
- Elderly (1)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (6)
- Guidelines (1)
- Healthcare Delivery (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (2)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (1)
- Health Systems (1)
- Heart Disease and Health (1)
- Hospital Discharge (1)
- Hospitals (1)
- Implementation (1)
- Learning Health Systems (1)
- Medicare (1)
- Neurological Disorders (1)
- Outcomes (4)
- Palliative Care (2)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (2)
- (-) Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (17)
- Patient Experience (1)
- Patient Safety (2)
- Practice Patterns (1)
- Primary Care (2)
- Provider Performance (2)
- Quality Improvement (6)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (4)
- (-) Quality Measures (17)
- Quality of Care (10)
- Quality of Life (1)
- Rehabilitation (1)
- Surgery (3)
- Transitions of Care (2)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 17 of 17 Research Studies DisplayedJE Wallis, CJD Huang, LC
AHRQ Author: Tallman
Association between adherence to radiation therapy quality metrics and patient reported outcomes in prostate cancer.
Researchers evaluated the impact of compliance with nationally recognized radiation therapy quality measures on patient-reported health-related quality of life outcomes in the Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Surgery and Radiation (CEASAR) population-based, prospective cohort study of men with localized prostate cancer. Eight quality measures were identified based on national guidelines. In multivariable analyses, no clinically significant associations were discovered between compliance with evaluated radiation therapy quality measures and patient-reported outcomes such as urinary irritation, urinary incontinence, bowel, sexual or hormonal function. The researchers concluded that further work would be needed to identify patient-centered quality measures of prostate cancer care.
AHRQ-funded; HS019356.
Citation: JE Wallis, CJD Huang, LC .
Association between adherence to radiation therapy quality metrics and patient reported outcomes in prostate cancer.
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2023 Mar;26(1):80-87. doi: 10.1038/s41391-022-00518-5.
Keywords: Cancer: Prostate Cancer, Cancer, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Quality Measures
Fernald DH, Mullen R,, Hall T
Exemplary practices in cardiovascular care: results on clinical quality measures from the EvidenceNOW Southwest Cooperative.
The authors identified practice characteristics associated with high performance on four cardiovascular disease cardiovascular clinical quality measures (CQMs). They found that multiple strategies - registries, prompts and protocols, patient self-management support, and patient-team partnership activities - were associated with delivering high-quality cardiovascular care over time, measured by CQMs.
AHRQ-funded; HS023904.
Citation: Fernald DH, Mullen R,, Hall T .
Exemplary practices in cardiovascular care: results on clinical quality measures from the EvidenceNOW Southwest Cooperative.
J Gen Intern Med 2020 Nov;35(11):3197-204. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06094-5..
Keywords: Cardiovascular Conditions, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality Measures, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Primary Care
Coley RY, Boggs JM, Beck A
Defining success in measurement-based care for depression: a comparison of common metrics.
This study compared response and remission measures with effect size and severity-adjusted effect size (SAES) measures and examined the relationship between baseline symptom severity and treatment success for depression. Electronic records from two large integrated health systems were used to identify new psychotherapy episodes. Findings showed that response was preferable for comparing treatment outcomes, as it did not favor more or less baseline symptom severity, indicated clinically meaningful improvement, and was transparent and easy to calculate.
AHRQ-funded; HS026369.
Citation: Coley RY, Boggs JM, Beck A .
Defining success in measurement-based care for depression: a comparison of common metrics.
Psychiatr Serv 2020 Apr;71(4):312-18. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201900295..
Keywords: Depression, Behavioral Health, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Outcomes, Quality of Care, Quality Measures
White CM, Coleman CI, Jackman K
AHRQ series on improving translation of evidence: linking evidence reports and performance measures to help learning health systems use new information for improvement.
This paper analyzed ways to enhance usability of AHRQ’s Evidence-based Practice Center (EPC) reports. The reports are often lengthy and difficult for users to navigate. A quality measure index was created to allow health systems to more efficiently access relevant information. A test was created where two tables were embedded in an EPC report. The first identified quality measures covered by the report descriptively. The second contained page numbers in the executive summary which hyperlinked to those pages with the quality measures. An exercise with two health system-targeted scenarios was then created. The participants were timed how long it took to find answers to scenario questions and gave feedback. It was found that it took 63.4% less time to find quality measure information with the hyperlinked indexing tables than without. The participants felt that the tables were easy to use and more user friendly to health systems.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2019 Oct;45(10):706-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.05.002.
Citation: White CM, Coleman CI, Jackman K .
AHRQ series on improving translation of evidence: linking evidence reports and performance measures to help learning health systems use new information for improvement.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2019 Oct;45(10):706-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.05.002..
Keywords: Implementation, Evidence-Based Practice, Health Systems, Learning Health Systems, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Provider Performance, Quality Measures, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Knierim KE, Hall TL, Dickinson LM
Primary care practices' ability to report electronic clinical quality measures in the EvidenceNOW Southwest Initiative to Improve Heart Health.
The objective of this study was to determine how quickly primary care practices can report electronic clinical quality measures (eCQMs) and to identify the practice characteristics associated with faster reporting. Examining the EvidenceNOW Southwest initiative, the researchers’ results showed that the time to report eCQMs varied by measure and practice type, with very few practices reporting quickly. Additional support for practices to succeed in new programs that require eCQM reporting was recommended.
AHRQ-funded; HS023904.
Citation: Knierim KE, Hall TL, Dickinson LM .
Primary care practices' ability to report electronic clinical quality measures in the EvidenceNOW Southwest Initiative to Improve Heart Health.
JAMA Netw Open 2019 Aug 2;2(8):e198569. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.8569..
Keywords: Primary Care, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality Measures, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Heart Disease and Health, Cardiovascular Conditions, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT)
Desai AD, Starmer AJ
Process metrics and outcomes to inform quality improvement in pediatric hospital medicine.
This article provides an overview of the selection, development, and use of process and outcome measures for pediatric hospital medicine quality improvement initiatives. It reviews commonly used categories of process and outcome measures, provides a list of common sources and repositories of previously validated measures, and provides a blueprint for the development of novel measures.
AHRQ-funded; HS024299.
Citation: Desai AD, Starmer AJ .
Process metrics and outcomes to inform quality improvement in pediatric hospital medicine.
Pediatr Clin North Am 2019 Aug;66(4):725-37. doi: 10.1016/j.pcl.2019.03.002..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Hospitals, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement, Quality Measures, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Desai AD, Simon TD, Leyenaar JK
Utilizing family-centered process and outcome measures to assess hospital-to-home transition quality.
This commentary describes the success of using 8 new caregiver-reported measures to assess the quality of hospital- and emergency department (ED)-to-home transitions in pediatric patients. This measures were originally created by the national Pediatric Quality Measures Program mandated by the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA). An original article describing these measures was published 2016 and there have been several follow-up studies. These measures are undergoing further testing.
AHRQ-funded; HS024133; HS024299; HS020506.
Citation: Desai AD, Simon TD, Leyenaar JK .
Utilizing family-centered process and outcome measures to assess hospital-to-home transition quality.
Acad Pediatr 2018 Nov - Dec;18(8):843-46. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.07.013..
Keywords: Hospital Discharge, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Transitions of Care, Quality of Care, Quality Measures, Quality Improvement, Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), Evidence-Based Practice
Lee DJ, Barocas DA, Zhao Z
Contemporary prostate cancer radiation therapy in the United States: patterns of care and compliance with quality measures.
This study measured compliance with quality measures for radiation therapy treatment of prostate cancer. The Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Surgery and Radiation Study enrolled men who were treated for localized prostate cancer from 2011 and 2012. Medical records were reviewed, and patients completed surveys. Researchers concluded that men who received external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) were treated more appropriately than those treated with brachytherapy (BT). White men were also more likely to receive appropriate treatment than African-American and other minorities.
AHRQ-funded; HS019356; HS022640.
Citation: Lee DJ, Barocas DA, Zhao Z .
Contemporary prostate cancer radiation therapy in the United States: patterns of care and compliance with quality measures.
Pract Radiat Oncol 2018 Sep-Oct;8(5):307-16. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2018.04.009..
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Prostate Cancer, Comparative Effectiveness, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Practice Patterns, Quality Measures
Cary MP, Prvu Bettger J, Jarvis JM
Successful community discharge following postacute rehabilitation for Medicare beneficiaries: analysis of a patient-centered quality measure.
The purpose of this study was to determine the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics as well as health services use associated with successful community discharge. The investigators retrospectively examined 167,664 Medicare beneficiaries discharged from inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs) in 2013 to determine the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics as well as health services use associated with successful community discharge.
AHRQ-funded; HS022134.
Citation: Cary MP, Prvu Bettger J, Jarvis JM .
Successful community discharge following postacute rehabilitation for Medicare beneficiaries: analysis of a patient-centered quality measure.
Health Serv Res 2018 Aug;53(4):2470-82. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12796..
Keywords: Elderly, Medicare, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Rehabilitation, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality Measures
Desai AD, Jacob-Files EA, Lowry SJ
Development of a caregiver-reported experience measure for pediatric hospital-to-home transitions.
The objective for this study was to develop and test a caregiver-reported experience measure for pediatric hospital-to-home transitions. An eight-item caregiver-reported experience measure to evaluate hospital-to-home transition outcomes in pediatric populations demonstrated acceptable content validity and psychometric properties.
AHRQ-funded; HS024299.
Citation: Desai AD, Jacob-Files EA, Lowry SJ .
Development of a caregiver-reported experience measure for pediatric hospital-to-home transitions.
Health Serv Res 2018 Aug;53 Suppl 1:3084-106. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12864..
Keywords: Caregiving, Children/Adolescents, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Quality Measures, Transitions of Care
Waljee JF, Dimick JB
Do patient-reported outcomes correlate with clinical outcomes following surgery?
This study examines whether patient-reported outcomes (PROs) correlate with clinical outcomes following surgery. PROs are distinct from clinical outcomes and represent a potential indicator of performance that can be targeted to improve quality of care. Future studies that examine the influence of measurement techniques, case mix, and disease characteristics on PROs will inform efforts to routinely and efficiently integrate these critical outcomes into existing strategies to capture treatment effectiveness and quality of care for surgical conditions.
AHRQ-funded; HS023313.
Citation: Waljee JF, Dimick JB .
Do patient-reported outcomes correlate with clinical outcomes following surgery?
Adv Surg 2017 Sep;51(1):141-50. doi: 10.1016/j.yasu.2017.03.011..
Keywords: Quality of Care, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Surgery, Patient Experience, Quality Measures
LeBlanc TW, Ritchie CS, Friedman F
Adherence to measuring what matters items when caring for patients with hematologic malignancies versus solid tumors.
The authors sought to assess adherence to Measuring What Matters (MWM) measures by palliative care clinicians caring for patients with hematologic malignancies, compared to those with solid tumors. They found that MWM adherence regarding symptom assessment and meeting emotional needs was lower for patients with hematologic malignancies compared to those with solid tumors. They concluded that this finding suggests two key areas for quality improvement initiatives in palliative care for patients with hematologic malignancies.
AHRQ-funded; HS023681; HS022763.
Citation: LeBlanc TW, Ritchie CS, Friedman F .
Adherence to measuring what matters items when caring for patients with hematologic malignancies versus solid tumors.
J Pain Symptom Manage 2016 Dec;52(6):775-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.09.004.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Quality of Care, Palliative Care, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Quality Measures
Carlozzi NE, Schilling SG, Lai JS
HDQLIFE: the development of two new computer adaptive tests for use in Huntington disease, speech difficulties, and swallowing difficulties.
The authors developed a patient-reported outcome measure for use in the Huntington Disease Health-Related Quality of Life (HDQLIFE) Measurement System that focused on the impact that difficulties with speech and swallowing have on health-related quality of life in Huntington disease. These measures may have clinical utility in other populations where speech and swallowing difficulties are prevalent.
AHRQ-funded; HS023313.
Citation: Carlozzi NE, Schilling SG, Lai JS .
HDQLIFE: the development of two new computer adaptive tests for use in Huntington disease, speech difficulties, and swallowing difficulties.
Qual Life Res 2016 Oct;25(10):2417-27. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1273-y.
.
.
Keywords: Neurological Disorders, Quality of Life, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Health Information Technology (HIT), Quality Measures
Kamal AH, Bull J, Ritchie CS
Adherence to measuring what matters measures using point-of-care data collection across diverse clinical settings.
The purpose of this paper was to evaluate the implementation of Measuring What Matters (MWM) measures by exploring documentation of quality measure adherence across six diverse clinical settings inherent to palliative care practice. The authors found that the lowest adherence involved comprehensive assessments during the first visit in hospitalized patients in the intensive care unit and that the highest adherence across all settings involved documentation of management of moderate to severe pain. They recommended additional studies for better understanding of benchmarks and acceptable ranges for adherence tailored to various clinical settings.
AHRQ-funded; HS023681; HS022763.
Citation: Kamal AH, Bull J, Ritchie CS .
Adherence to measuring what matters measures using point-of-care data collection across diverse clinical settings.
J Pain Symptom Manage 2016 Mar;51(3):497-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.12.313.
.
.
Keywords: Quality Measures, Palliative Care, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Quality of Care, Patient Safety
Maggard-Gibbons M
The use of report cards and outcome measurements to improve the safety of surgical care: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
This review summarized the history of American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project and its components, and described the evidence that feeding outcomes back to providers, along with real-time comparisons with other hospital rates, leads to quality improvement, better patient outcomes, cost savings and overall improved patient safety.
AHRQ-funded; 2902007100621.
Citation: Maggard-Gibbons M .
The use of report cards and outcome measurements to improve the safety of surgical care: the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
BMJ Qual Saf 2014 Jul;23(7):589-99. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-002223..
Keywords: Quality Improvement, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality Measures, Quality of Care, Surgery, Patient Safety, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Provider Performance
Bilimoria KY, Cella D, Butt Z
Current challenges in using patient-reported outcomes for surgical care and performance measurement: everybody wants to hear from the patient, but are we ready to listen?
This viewpoint article discussed patient-reported outcomes (PROs). It concludes that PROs undoubtedly capture some of the most important aspects of how successful an operation is, and PRO scores may be the best measure of patient-centered care, but considerable logistical and methodological issues must be addressed before PROs are ready for widespread national implementation.
AHRQ-funded; HS021857.
Citation: Bilimoria KY, Cella D, Butt Z .
Current challenges in using patient-reported outcomes for surgical care and performance measurement: everybody wants to hear from the patient, but are we ready to listen?
JAMA Surg 2014 Jun;149(6):505-6. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.5285.
.
.
Keywords: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Quality Measures, Surgery
Leroy L, Bayliss E, Domino M
AHRQ Author: Miller T
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Multiple Chronic Conditions Research Network: overview of research contributions and future priorities.
HHS developed the HHS Strategic Framework on Multiple Chronic Conditions (MCC), and AHRQ contributed by funding the MCC Research Network over 45 diverse grants. This paper described a subset of research contributions made in each topic area and made 3 recommendations for future MCC research: (1) include person-centered and person-driven measures and outcomes, (2) consider the person in the context of their relationships and community, and (3) include mental healthcare as an essential part of overall healthcare.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; HS022444.
Citation: Leroy L, Bayliss E, Domino M .
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Multiple Chronic Conditions Research Network: overview of research contributions and future priorities.
Med Care 2014 Mar;52 Suppl 3:S15-22. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000095.
.
.
Keywords: Chronic Conditions, Healthcare Delivery, Health Services Research (HSR), Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Quality Measures