National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) (2)
- Data (1)
- Disparities (1)
- Education: Patient and Caregiver (1)
- Elderly (4)
- Falls (1)
- Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) (1)
- Hospital Discharge (1)
- Hospitalization (1)
- Hospitals (1)
- Injuries and Wounds (1)
- Long-Term Care (6)
- Medicare (1)
- (-) Nursing Homes (13)
- Patient Experience (3)
- Patient Safety (2)
- Pressure Ulcers (1)
- Provider Performance (5)
- Public Reporting (2)
- Quality Improvement (3)
- (-) Quality Indicators (QIs) (13)
- Quality Measures (8)
- Quality of Care (10)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (1)
- Surveys on Patient Safety Culture (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 13 of 13 Research Studies DisplayedSanghavi P, Chen Z
Underreporting of quality measures and associated facility characteristics and racial disparities in US nursing home ratings.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between nursing home characteristics and reporting of 2 of 3 specific clinical outcomes reported by the Nursing Home Care Compare (NHCC) website: major injury falls and pressure ulcers. The researchers of this quality improvement study utilized hospitalization data for all Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2017. Hospital admission claims for major injury falls and pressure ulcers were linked with facility-reported evaluations at the nursing home resident level. For each linked hospital claim, it was determined whether the nursing home had reported the event and rates of reporting were computed. To evaluate whether nursing homes reported similarly on both measures, the researchers estimated the relationship between reporting of major injury falls and pressure ulcers within a nursing home, and explored racial and ethnic disparities that could otherwise explain the associations. The study sample included 13,179 nursing homes where 131,000 residents experienced major injury fall or pressure ulcer hospitalizations. Of the 98,669 major injury fall hospitalizations, 60.0% were reported, and of the 39,894 stage 3 or 4 pressure ulcer hospitalizations, 67.7% were reported. Underreporting for both conditions was pervasive, with 69.9% and 71.7% of nursing homes having reporting rates less than 80% for major injury fall and pressure ulcer hospitalizations, respectively. Lower reporting rates had few correlations with facility characteristics other than racial and ethnic composition. Facilities with high vs low fall reporting rates had significantly more White residents (86.9% vs 73.3%), and facilities with high vs low pressure ulcer reporting rates had significantly fewer White residents (69.7% vs 74.9%).
AHRQ-funded; HS026957.
Citation: Sanghavi P, Chen Z .
Underreporting of quality measures and associated facility characteristics and racial disparities in US nursing home ratings.
JAMA Netw Open 2023 May; 6(5):e2314822. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.14822..
Keywords: Quality Measures, Quality of Care, Elderly, Disparities, Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Nursing Homes, Pressure Ulcers, Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs), Quality Indicators (QIs), Long-Term Care
Konetzka RT, Davila H, Brauner DJ
The quality measures domain in Nursing Home Compare: is high performance meaningful or misleading?
The Federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services publishes a Nursing Home Compare (NHC) web site that provides information to compare nursing homes across the nation. Since NHC began reporting the percent of nursing home residents suffering adverse outcomes, the negative outcomes decreased dramatically. However, the validity of scores has been questioned for nursing homes that score well on facility-reported measures but scored poorly on inspections. The study purpose was to determine whether nursing homes with these “discordant” scores are better than nursing homes that score poorly across all domains. The researchers analyzed national data from 2012- 2016, conducted in-depth interviews and observations of 12 nursing homes in 2017 to 2018, and studied nursing home performance trajectories over time. Both qualitative and quantitative methods were utilized and interpreted together. The study found that facilities identified as discordant took part in more quality improvement (QI) activities than those identified as poor performers, but those QI activities were lower-resource improvements and not of the type and scope that would impact improvements across other quality domains. It was determined that the poor-performing facilities appeared to lack the leadership and staff continuity required for even low-resource improvements. The study concluded that while high performance on quality measures using facility-reported data is mostly meaningful, and the quality measures domain should continue to be utilized in Nursing Home Compare, facilities identified as discordant still have quality defects.
AHRQ-funded; HS024967.
Citation: Konetzka RT, Davila H, Brauner DJ .
The quality measures domain in Nursing Home Compare: is high performance meaningful or misleading?
Gerontologist 2022 Feb 9;62(2):293-303. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnab054..
Keywords: Nursing Homes, Long-Term Care, Provider Performance, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality Measures, Quality of Care
Yount N, Zebrak KA, Famolaro T
Linking patient safety culture to quality ratings in the nursing home setting.
This study examined the relationship between scores on the AHRQ Surveys on Patient Safety Culture™ (SOPS®) Nursing Home Survey (NH SOPS) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Nursing Home Five-Star Quality Ratings. The authors used data on 186 nursing homes to conduct multiple regression analyses predicting the Five-Star Quality Ratings from the NH SOPS survey measures. Five NH SOPS measures were related to the Overall, Health Inspections, and Quality Five-Star Ratings; four NH SOPS measures were related to at least two of the four Five-Star Quality Ratings and three SOPS measures were related to one Five-Star Rating. No NH SOPS measures were significantly associated with the Staffing Five-Star Rating.
AHRQ-funded; 233201500026I.
Citation: Yount N, Zebrak KA, Famolaro T .
Linking patient safety culture to quality ratings in the nursing home setting.
J Appl Gerontol 2022 Jan;41(1):73-81. doi: 10.1177/0733464820969283..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Patient Safety, Nursing Homes, Long-Term Care, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality Measures, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Davila H, Shippee TP, Park YS
Inside the black box of improving on nursing home quality measures.
This qualitative study investigated how nursing homes (NHs) interact with quality measures (QMs) used by Nursing Home Compare (NHC) as part of its 5-star rating system. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 110 NH personnel and 23 NH provider association representatives. Observations of organizational processes in 12 NHs in three states were also done. The authors found that most NHs are working to improve the quality of care they provide, not merely to improve their QM scores. They also found limitations with the QMs, suggesting that the QMs on their own may not accurately reflect the quality of care that NHs provide. The findings suggest several changes to improve NHC.
AHRQ-funded; HS024967.
Citation: Davila H, Shippee TP, Park YS .
Inside the black box of improving on nursing home quality measures.
Med Care Res Rev 2021 Dec;78(6):758-70. doi: 10.1177/1077558720960326..
Keywords: Nursing Homes, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality Measures, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Provider Performance, Long-Term Care
Sanghavi P, Pan S, Caudry D
Assessment of nursing home reporting of major injury falls for quality measurement on Nursing Home Compare.
The purpose of this study was to assess the accuracy of nursing home self-report of major injury falls on the Minimum Data Set (MDS). They linked inpatient claims for major injury falls with MDS assessments. The investigators concluded that the nursing home-reported data used for the Nursing Home Compare (NHC) falls measure may be highly inaccurate.
AHRQ-funded; HS026957.
Citation: Sanghavi P, Pan S, Caudry D .
Assessment of nursing home reporting of major injury falls for quality measurement on Nursing Home Compare.
Health Serv Res 2020 Apr;55(2):201-10. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13247..
Keywords: Falls, Nursing Homes, Quality Measures, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality of Care, Elderly, Public Reporting, Injuries and Wounds
Li Y, Cen X, Cai X
Perceived patient safety culture in nursing homes associated with "Nursing Home Compare" performance indicators.
This study examined the association between the use of “Nursing Home Compare” performance indicators and improved patient safety culture in nursing homes. A survey was conducted in 2017 using AHRQ’s Survey on Patient Safety Culture for Nursing Homes which collects data on 12 core domains of safety culture scores. Out of 2254 nursing homes sampled, there was a response rate of 36%. It was found that for every 10 percentage points increase in overall positive response rate for safety culture, there was an association with 0.56 fewer health care deficiencies, 0.74 fewer substantiated complaints, reduced fines by $2285.20, and 20% increased odds of being designed as 4-star or 5-star.
AHRQ-funded; HS024923.
Citation: Li Y, Cen X, Cai X .
Perceived patient safety culture in nursing homes associated with "Nursing Home Compare" performance indicators.
Med Care 2019 Aug;57(8):641-47. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001142..
Keywords: Surveys on Patient Safety Culture, Patient Safety, Nursing Homes, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality Measures, Quality of Care, Provider Performance
Ryskina KL, Konetzka RT, Werner RM
Association between 5-Star nursing home report card ratings and potentially preventable hospitalizations.
The goal of this study was to test whether the improvements in nursing homes’ 5-star ratings were correlated with reductions in rates of hospitalization; the researchers’ hypothesis was that increased attention to ratings motivated nursing homes to make changes to improve ratings but did not affect hospitalization rate, resulting in a weakened association between ratings and hospitalizations. 2007-2010 Medicare hospital claims and nursing home clinical assessment data were used to compare the correlation between nursing homes’ ratings and hospitalization rates. Correlation weakened slightly after the ratings became publicly available. The researchers conclude that improvements in nursing home ratings after the release of Medicare's 5-star rating system were not accompanied by improvements in a broader measure of outcomes for post-acute care patients and, although this dissociation may be due to additional factors, the 5-star ratings became less meaningful as an indicator of nursing home quality for these patients.
AHRQ-funded; HS021861.
Citation: Ryskina KL, Konetzka RT, Werner RM .
Association between 5-Star nursing home report card ratings and potentially preventable hospitalizations.
Inquiry 2018 Jan-Dec;55:46958018787323. doi: 10.1177/0046958018787323..
Keywords: Elderly, Nursing Homes, Medicare, Quality Indicators (QIs), Provider Performance, Quality Measures, Hospitalization, Quality of Care
Goodwin JS, Li S, Zhou J
Comparison of methods to identify long term care nursing home residence with administrative data.
Researchers compared different methods for identifying a long term care (LTC) nursing home stay, distinct from stays in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), to the method currently used by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). They concluded that using both Medicare and Minimum Data Set (MDS), data to identify LTC stays will lead to more accurate attribution of CMS nursing home quality indicators.
AHRQ-funded; HS022134.
Citation: Goodwin JS, Li S, Zhou J .
Comparison of methods to identify long term care nursing home residence with administrative data.
BMC Health Serv Res 2017 May 30;17(1):376. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2318-9.
.
.
Keywords: Data, Long-Term Care, Nursing Homes, Quality Indicators (QIs)
Mukamel DB, Amin A, Weimer DL
Personalizing nursing home compare and the discharge from hospitals to nursing homes.
This study tested whether use of a personalized report card, Nursing Home Compare Plus (NHCPlus), embedded in a reengineered discharge process, can lead to better outcomes than the usual discharge process from hospitals to nursing homes. It found that about 85 percent of users indicated satisfaction with NHCPlus. Compared to controls, intervention patients were more satisfied with the choice process.
AHRQ-funded; R21 HS021844.
Citation: Mukamel DB, Amin A, Weimer DL .
Personalizing nursing home compare and the discharge from hospitals to nursing homes.
Health Serv Res 2016 Dec;51(6):2076-94. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12588.
.
.
Keywords: Hospital Discharge, Hospitals, Nursing Homes, Patient Experience, Quality Indicators (QIs)
Werner RM, Konetzka RT, Polsky D
Changes in consumer demand following public reporting of summary quality ratings: an evaluation in nursing homes.
The study’s objective was to evaluate consumer response to summary measures in the setting of nursing homes. It found that the star rating system was associated with a significant change in consumer demand for low- and high-scoring facilities. After the star-based rating system was released, 1-star facilities typically lost 8 percent of their market share and 5-star facilities gained over 6 percent of their market share.
AHRQ-funded; HS021861.
Citation: Werner RM, Konetzka RT, Polsky D .
Changes in consumer demand following public reporting of summary quality ratings: an evaluation in nursing homes.
Health Serv Res 2016 Jun;51 Suppl 2:1291-309. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12459.
.
.
Keywords: Nursing Homes, Quality Indicators (QIs), Education: Patient and Caregiver
Schapira MM, Shea JA, Duey KA
The Nursing Home Compare report card: perceptions of residents and caregivers regarding quality ratings and nursing home choice.
The researchers evaluated the perceived usefulness of publicly reported nursing home quality indicators. They found that star ratings, clinical quality measures, and benchmarking information were salient to decision making, with preferred formats varying across participants. Participants desired additional information on the source of quality data. Confusion was evident regarding the relationship between domain-specific and overall star quality ratings.
AHRQ-funded; HS02861.
Citation: Schapira MM, Shea JA, Duey KA .
The Nursing Home Compare report card: perceptions of residents and caregivers regarding quality ratings and nursing home choice.
Health Serv Res 2016 Jun;51 Suppl 2:1212-28. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12458.
.
.
Keywords: Nursing Homes, Quality Indicators (QIs), Patient Experience, Patient Experience, Quality of Care
Mukamel DB, Amin A, Weimer DL
When patients customize nursing home ratings, choices and rankings differ from the government's version.
Report cards currently published by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) offer composite quality measures, such as the one featured on the Nursing Home Compare website. Nursing Home Compare Plus is an alternative that allows patients and their families to create their own composite scores based on their own preferences and medical needs. When comparing Nursing Home Compare Plus to Medicare's five-star ratings, we found only minimal agreement on ranking of nursing homes.
AHRQ-funded; HS021844.
Citation: Mukamel DB, Amin A, Weimer DL .
When patients customize nursing home ratings, choices and rankings differ from the government's version.
Health Aff 2016 Apr;35(4):714-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1340.
.
.
Keywords: Nursing Homes, Quality of Care, Quality Indicators (QIs), Patient Experience, Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS)
Mukamel DB, Ye Z, Glance LG
Does mandating nursing home participation in quality reporting make a difference? Evidence from Massachusetts.
This study investigated one of the mechanisms that may detract from the effectiveness of quality report cards: voluntary versus mandatory participation of nursing homes in public quality reporting. It found that once reporting became mandatory, nonvolunteers improved more than volunteers in all but 2 staffing measures.
AHRQ-funded; HS021844.
Citation: Mukamel DB, Ye Z, Glance LG .
Does mandating nursing home participation in quality reporting make a difference? Evidence from Massachusetts.
Med Care 2015 Aug;53(8):713-9. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000390..
Keywords: Nursing Homes, Long-Term Care, Public Reporting, Provider Performance, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality Measures, Elderly