Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- MONAHRQ
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Blood Clots (2)
- Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) (1)
- Decision Making (1)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (1)
- Disparities (1)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (1)
- Emergency Department (1)
- Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) (2)
- Healthcare Costs (4)
- Healthcare Delivery (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- Health Insurance (1)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (2)
- Hospital Readmissions (1)
- Hospitals (4)
- Imaging (1)
- Infectious Diseases (1)
- Innovations and Emerging Issues (1)
- Long-Term Care (1)
- Medical Errors (1)
- Medicare (8)
- Nursing Homes (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (1)
- Patient Experience (3)
- Patient Safety (3)
- (-) Payment (20)
- Policy (5)
- Practice Patterns (1)
- Prevention (3)
- Primary Care (2)
- Provider Performance (12)
- Public Reporting (1)
- (-) Quality Improvement (20)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (1)
- Quality of Care (14)
- Racial / Ethnic Minorities (1)
- Respiratory Conditions (1)
- Surgery (1)
- Value (7)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a monthly compilation of research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers and recently published in journals or newsletters.
Results
1 to 20 of 20 Research Studies Displayed
Roberts ET, Song Z, Ding L
Changes in patient experiences and assessment of gaming among large clinician practices in precursors of the merit-based incentive payment system.
Medicare's Merit-Based Incentive Payment System (MIPS), a public reporting and pay-for-performance program, adjusts clinician payments based on publicly reported measures that are chosen primarily by clinicians or their practices. Within precursor programs of the MIPS, this study examined 1) practices' selection of Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) patient experience measures for quality scoring under pay-for-performance and 2) the association between mandated public reporting on CAHPS measures and performance on those measures.
AHRQ-funded; HS026727.
Citation:
Roberts ET, Song Z, Ding L .
Changes in patient experiences and assessment of gaming among large clinician practices in precursors of the merit-based incentive payment system.
JAMA Health Forum 2021 Oct;2(10). doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.3105..
Keywords:
Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Patient Experience, Medicare, Provider Performance, Payment, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Markovitz AA, Ayanian JZ, Warrier A
Medicare Advantage plan double bonuses drive racial disparity in payments, yield no quality or enrollment improvements.
Using national data for 2008-18, investigators found that double bonuses were not associated with either improvements in plan quality or increased Medicare Advantage enrollment. Additionally, double bonuses increased payments to plans to care for Black beneficiaries by $60 per year, compared with $91 for White beneficiaries. These findings suggest that double bonuses not only fail to improve quality and enrollment but also foster a racially inequitable distribution of Medicare funds that disfavors Black beneficiaries. This study supports eliminating double bonuses, thereby saving Medicare an estimated $1.8 billion per year.
AHRQ-funded; HS000053.
Citation:
Markovitz AA, Ayanian JZ, Warrier A .
Medicare Advantage plan double bonuses drive racial disparity in payments, yield no quality or enrollment improvements.
Health Aff 2021 Sep;40(9):1411-19. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.00349..
Keywords:
Medicare, Health Insurance, Payment, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Disparities, Racial / Ethnic Minorities
Rosenthal M, Shortell S, Shah ND
Physician practices in Accountable Care Organizations are more likely to collect and use physician performance information, yet base only a small proportion of compensation on performance data.
The purpose of this study was to characterize the strategies that physician practices use to improve clinician performance and determine their association with accountable care organizations (ACOs) and other payment reforms. The investigators concluded that ACO-affiliated practices are using more performance improvement strategies than other practices, but base only a small fraction of compensation on quality or cost.
AHRQ-funded; HS024075.
Citation:
Rosenthal M, Shortell S, Shah ND .
Physician practices in Accountable Care Organizations are more likely to collect and use physician performance information, yet base only a small proportion of compensation on performance data.
Health Serv Res 2019 Dec;54(6):1214-22. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13238..
Keywords:
Provider Performance, Payment, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Sheetz KH, Dimick JB, Englesbe MJ
Hospital-acquired condition reduction program is not associated with additional patient safety improvement.
In 2013 the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services announced that it would begin levying penalties against hospitals with the highest rates of hospital-acquired conditions through the Hospital-Acquired Condition Reduction Program. This study evaluates whether the program has been successful in improving patient safety or not. The investigators concluded that the program did not improve patient safety in Michigan beyond existing trends.
AHRQ-funded; HS000053; HS026244.
Citation:
Sheetz KH, Dimick JB, Englesbe MJ .
Hospital-acquired condition reduction program is not associated with additional patient safety improvement.
Health Aff 2019 Nov;38(11):1858-65. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05504..
Keywords:
Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs), Hospitals, Patient Safety, Provider Performance, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Infectious Diseases, Payment
Berenson R, Singh H
Payment innovations to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce diagnostic error.
Researchers examined ways that payment innovations could be used to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce diagnostic error among Medicare patients. They recommended three different approaches: 1) coding changes in the Medicare Physician Fee schedule; new Alternative Payment Models (APMs) that could improve accuracy in challenging cases and even provide second or third opinions; and 3) have a method that accurate diagnoses would trigger APM payments and establish payment amounts.
AHRQ-funded; HS022087; HS017820.
Citation:
Berenson R, Singh H .
Payment innovations to improve diagnostic accuracy and reduce diagnostic error.
Health Aff 2018 Nov;37(11):1828-35. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2018.0714..
Keywords:
Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Innovations and Emerging Issues, Medical Errors, Medicare, Patient Safety, Payment, Prevention, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement
Martin BI, Lurie JD, Farrokhi FR
Early effects of Medicare's Bundled Payment For Care Improvement program for lumbar fusion.
The purpose of this study was to describe the early effects of Bundled Payment for Care Improvement (BPCI) program participation for lumbar fusion on 90-day reimbursement, procedure volume, reoperation, and readmission. The investigators included 89,605 beneficiaries undergoing lumbar fusion, finding that the mean age was 73.4 years, with 59% women, 92% White, and 22% with a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 2 or more. Participant hospitals had greater procedure volume, bed size, and total discharges. Relative to nonparticipants, risk-bearing hospitals had a slightly increased fusion procedure volume from 2012 to 2013, did not reduce 90-day episode of care costs, increased 90-day readmission rate, and increased repeat surgery rates.
AHRQ-funded; HS024714; HS024075; HS021695.
Citation:
Martin BI, Lurie JD, Farrokhi FR .
Early effects of Medicare's Bundled Payment For Care Improvement program for lumbar fusion.
Spine 2018 May 15;43(10):705-11. doi: 10.1097/brs.0000000000002404.
.
.
Keywords:
Payment, Medicare, Quality Improvement, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Surgery
Cohen DJ, Dorr DA, Knierim K
Primary care practices' abilities and challenges in using electronic health record data for quality improvement.
Federal value-based payment programs require primary care practices to conduct quality improvement activities, informed by the electronic reports on clinical quality measures that their electronic health records (EHRs) generate. This study concluded that the current state of EHR measurement functionality may be insufficient to support federal initiatives that tie payment to clinical quality measures.
AHRQ-funded; HS023940.
Citation:
Cohen DJ, Dorr DA, Knierim K .
Primary care practices' abilities and challenges in using electronic health record data for quality improvement.
Health Aff 2018 Apr;37(4):635-43. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1254.
.
.
Keywords:
Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Primary Care, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Health Information Technology (HIT), Payment
Paddock SM, Damberg CL, Yanagihara D
What role does efficiency play in understanding the relationship between cost and quality in physician organizations?
Previous studies demonstrate overuse of a narrow set of services, suggesting provider inefficiency, but existing studies neither quantify inefficiency more broadly nor assess its variation across physician organizations (POs). This study found that POs had substantial variation in efficiency, producing widely differing levels of quality for the same cost.
AHRQ-funded; HS021860.
Citation:
Paddock SM, Damberg CL, Yanagihara D .
What role does efficiency play in understanding the relationship between cost and quality in physician organizations?
Med Care 2017 Dec;55(12):1039-45. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000000823.
.
.
Keywords:
Value, Practice Patterns, Healthcare Costs, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement, Payment, Provider Performance
Bhatt SP, Wells JM, Iyer AS
Results of a Medicare bundled payments for care improvement initiative for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease readmissions.
This study evaluated whether a comprehensive chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) multidisciplinary intervention focusing on inpatient, transitional, and outpatient care as part of an institution's Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) participation would reduce 30-day all-cause readmission rates for COPD exacerbations and reduce overall costs. It concluded that a Medicare BPCI intervention did not reduce 30-day all-cause readmission rates or overall costs after hospitalization for acute exacerbation of COPD.
AHRQ-funded; HS013852.
Citation:
Bhatt SP, Wells JM, Iyer AS .
Results of a Medicare bundled payments for care improvement initiative for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease readmissions.
Ann Am Thorac Soc 2017 May;14(5):643-48. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201610-775BC.
.
.
Keywords:
Respiratory Conditions, Payment, Hospital Readmissions, Medicare, Quality Improvement
Lau BD, Haut ER, Hobson DB
ICD-9 code-based venous thromboembolism performance targets fail to measure up.
Suboptimal prevention practices have prompted payers to consider hospital-associated Venous thromboembolism (VTE) as a potentially preventable condition for which financial incentives or penalties exist to drive practice improvement. The authors reviewed a subset of hospital-associated VTE that were identified by ICD-9 codes used by a state-run pay-for-performance quality improvement program and discuss their findings.
AHRQ-funded; HS017952.
Citation:
Lau BD, Haut ER, Hobson DB .
ICD-9 code-based venous thromboembolism performance targets fail to measure up.
Am J Med Qual 2016 Sep;31(5):448-53. doi: 10.1177/1062860615583547.
.
.
Keywords:
Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs), Quality Indicators (QIs), Prevention, Hospitals, Quality Improvement, Blood Clots, Payment, Provider Performance
Kronick R, Casalino LP, Bindman AB
AHRQ Author: Kronick R
Apple pickers or federal judges: strong versus weak incentives in physician payment.
The authors provide an introduction for five papers commissioned by AHRQ focusing on incentives for physicians that are featured in this special issue of Health Services Research. These papers concentrate on suggesting a conceptual framework for the use of financial incentives in health care, key implications of the evidence to date on pay for performance and public reporting in health care and several related topics.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation:
Kronick R, Casalino LP, Bindman AB .
Apple pickers or federal judges: strong versus weak incentives in physician payment.
Health Serv Res 2015 Dec;50 Suppl 2:2049-56. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12424.
.
.
Keywords:
Payment, Provider Performance, Policy, Health Services Research (HSR), Quality of Care, Value, Healthcare Costs, Quality Improvement
Berenson RA, Rice T
Beyond measurement and reward: methods of motivating quality improvement and accountability.
The article examines public policies designed to improve quality and accountability that do not rely on financial incentives and public reporting of provider performance. It concludes that public policies related to quality improvement should focus more on methods of enhancing professional intrinsic motivation, while recognizing the potential role of organizations to actively promote and facilitate that motivation.
AHRQ-funded
Citation:
Berenson RA, Rice T .
Beyond measurement and reward: methods of motivating quality improvement and accountability.
Health Serv Res 2015 Dec;50 Suppl 2:2155-86. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12413.
.
.
Keywords:
Quality Improvement, Policy, Provider Performance, Quality of Care, Value, Payment
Layton TJ, Ryan AM
Higher incentive payments in Medicare Advantage's pay-for-performance program did not improve quality but did increase plan offerings.
The researchers evaluated the effects of the size of financial bonuses on quality of care and the number of plan offerings in the Medicare Advantage Quality Bonus Payment Demonstration. They concluded that at great expense to Medicare, double bonuses in the Medicare Advantage Quality Bonus Payment Demonstration were not associated with improved quality but were associated with more plan offerings.
AHRQ-funded; HS018546.
Citation:
Layton TJ, Ryan AM .
Higher incentive payments in Medicare Advantage's pay-for-performance program did not improve quality but did increase plan offerings.
Health Serv Res 2015 Dec;50(6):1810-28. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12409..
Keywords:
Medicare, Payment, Provider Performance, Value, Health Services Research (HSR), Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Berdahl C, Schuur JD, Fisher NL
Policy measures and reimbursement for emergency medical imaging in the era of payment reform: proceedings from a panel discussion of the 2015 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference.
In May 2015, Academic Emergency Medicine convened a consensus conference titled "Diagnostic Imaging in the Emergency Department: A Research Agenda to Optimize Utilization." As part of the conference, a panel of health care policy leaders and emergency physicians discussed the effect of the Affordable Casre Act and other quality programs on ED diagnostic imaging. This article discusses the content of the panel's presentations.
AHRQ-funded; HS023498.
Citation:
Berdahl C, Schuur JD, Fisher NL .
Policy measures and reimbursement for emergency medical imaging in the era of payment reform: proceedings from a panel discussion of the 2015 Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference.
Acad Emerg Med 2015 Dec;22(12):1393-9. doi: 10.1111/acem.12829.
.
.
Keywords:
Emergency Department, Healthcare Costs, Payment, Policy, Imaging, Policy, Quality Improvement
Schlesinger M, Grob R, Shaller D
Using patient-reported information to improve clinical practice.
The purposes of this study were to assess what is known about the relationship between patient experience measures and incentives designed to improve care, and to identify how public policy and medical practices can promote patient-valued outcomes in health systems with strong financial incentives. It concluded that unless public policies are attentive to patients' perspectives, stronger financial incentives for clinicians can threaten aspects of care that patients most value.
AHRQ-funded.
Citation:
Schlesinger M, Grob R, Shaller D .
Using patient-reported information to improve clinical practice.
Health Serv Res 2015 Dec;50 Suppl 2:2116-54. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12420.
.
.
Keywords:
Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Patient Experience, Provider Performance, Policy, Value, Payment, Public Reporting
Chen LM, Meara E, Birkmeyer JD
Medicare's Bundled Payments for Care Improvement initiative: expanding enrollment suggests potential for large impact.
The researchers examined the cross-sectional association between Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) participation and providers' structural and cost characteristics. Overall participation in BPCI increased from about 400 in October 2013 to more than 2000 in June 2014. The authors concluded that growing participation in BPCI suggests strong interest in bundled payments.
AHRQ-funded; HS020671.
Citation:
Chen LM, Meara E, Birkmeyer JD .
Medicare's Bundled Payments for Care Improvement initiative: expanding enrollment suggests potential for large impact.
Am J Manag Care 2015 Nov;21(11):814-20.
.
.
Keywords:
Healthcare Costs, Payment, Medicare, Quality Improvement
Abrahamson K, Miech E, Davila HW
Pay-for-performance policy and data-driven decision making within nursing homes: a qualitative study.
The researchers explored ways in which data were collected, thought about and used by nursing home employees as a result of participation in a pay-for-performance (P4P) program. Their findings indicated that participants in the Minnesota Performance-based Incentive Payment Program’s quality improvement (QI) projects perceived a change in the rate and manner in which they gathered, used, and considered data in their QI decisions.
AHRQ-funded; HS018464
Citation:
Abrahamson K, Miech E, Davila HW .
Pay-for-performance policy and data-driven decision making within nursing homes: a qualitative study.
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 May;24(5):311-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003362..
Keywords:
Nursing Homes, Long-Term Care, Payment, Provider Performance, Decision Making, Policy, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Michtalik HJ, Carolan HT, Haut ER
Use of provider-level dashboards and pay-for-performance in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.
The researchers sequentially examined an individualized physician dashboard and pay-for-performance program to improve venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis rates among hospitalists. They found that direct feedback using dashboards was associated with significantly improved compliance, with further improvement after incorporating an individual physician pay-for-performance program.
AHRQ-funded; HS017952; HS022331.
Citation:
Michtalik HJ, Carolan HT, Haut ER .
Use of provider-level dashboards and pay-for-performance in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis.
J Hosp Med 2015 Mar;10(3):172-8. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2303..
Keywords:
Provider Performance, Payment, Blood Clots, Prevention, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Hospitals, Patient Safety
Ryan AM, Burgess JF, Pesko MF
The early effects of Medicare's mandatory hospital pay-for-performance program.
This study evaluated the impact of hospital value-based purchasing (HVBP) on clinical quality and patient experience during its initial implementation period. It found that hospitals that were exposed to HVBP did not show greater improvement for either the clinical process or patient experience measures during the program’s initial implementation period.
AHRQ-funded; HS018546
Citation:
Ryan AM, Burgess JF, Pesko MF .
The early effects of Medicare's mandatory hospital pay-for-performance program.
Health Serv Res. 2015 Feb;50(1):81-97. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12206..
Keywords:
Medicare, Provider Performance, Payment, Hospitals, Value, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Patient Experience
DeVoe JE, Stenger R
Aligning provider incentives to improve primary healthcare delivery in the United States.
This critical review uses a theoretical framework from game-theory models to discuss some of the dominant primary care provider payment models and how they create 'prisoner's dilemmas' that have stalled past reform efforts, then illustrates an escape from the dilemma. It concludes that a blend of guaranteed payment and selective incentives designed to encourage primary care providers to deliver high quality care, efficient and equitable care and to eliminate incentives towards over-servicing could reach outcomes leading to shared benefits for everyone involved.
AHRQ-funded; HS014645; HS016181.
Citation:
DeVoe JE, Stenger R .
Aligning provider incentives to improve primary healthcare delivery in the United States.
OA Fam Med 2013 Jun 1;1(1):7.
.
.
Keywords:
Healthcare Delivery, Payment, Primary Care, Quality Improvement, Value