National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Care Management (2)
- Chronic Conditions (1)
- Comparative Effectiveness (1)
- (-) Healthcare Delivery (5)
- (-) Health Insurance (5)
- Health Systems (1)
- Hospitals (1)
- Learning Health Systems (1)
- Low-Income (1)
- Medicare (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (1)
- (-) Primary Care (5)
- Primary Care: Models of Care (1)
- Public Health (1)
- Social Determinants of Health (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 5 of 5 Research Studies DisplayedGraves JA, Nshuti L, Everson J
Breadth and exclusivity of hospital and physician networks in US insurance markets.
The goal of this study was to quantify network breadth and overlap among primary care physician (PCP), cardiology, and general acute care hospital networks for employer-based (large group and small group), individually purchased (marketplace), Medicare Advantage (MA), and Medicaid managed care (MMC) plans. The main outcomes measured were percentage of in-network physicians and/or hospitals within a 60-minute drive from a hypothetical patient in a given zip code (breadth), and the number of physicians and/or hospitals within each network that overlapped with other insurers' networks, expressed as a percentage of the total possible number of shared connections (exclusivity). Networks were categorized by network breadth size and analyzed by insurance type, state, and insurance, physician, and/or hospital market concentration level, as measured by the Hirschman-Herfindahl index. Markets with concentrated primary care and insurance markets had the broadest and least exclusive primary care networks among large-group commercial plans. Markets with the least concentration had the narrowest and most exclusive networks. Rising levels of insurer and market concentration were associated with broader and less exclusive healthcare networks. The authors suggest that this means that patients could switch to a lower-cost, narrow network plan without losing-in-network coverage to their PCP.
AHRQ-funded; HS025976; HS026395.
Citation: Graves JA, Nshuti L, Everson J .
Breadth and exclusivity of hospital and physician networks in US insurance markets.
JAMA Netw Open 2020 Dec;3(12):e2029419. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29419..
Keywords: Health Insurance, Learning Health Systems, Health Systems, Primary Care, Hospitals, Healthcare Delivery
Fraze T, Lewis VA, Rodriguez HP
Housing, transportation, and food: how ACOs seek to improve population health by addressing nonmedical needs of patients.
The authors examined how accountable care organizations (ACOs) addressed the nonmedical needs of their patients. They found that ACOs most commonly addressed the need for transportation, housing, and food insecurity, which they identified through the primary care visit or care transformation programs. They concluded that their findings offer insights into how health care organizations such as ACOs integrate themselves with nonmedical organizations.
AHRQ-funded; HS024792.
Citation: Fraze T, Lewis VA, Rodriguez HP .
Housing, transportation, and food: how ACOs seek to improve population health by addressing nonmedical needs of patients.
Health Aff 2016 Nov;35(11):2109-15. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0727.
.
.
Keywords: Social Determinants of Health, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Health Insurance, Healthcare Delivery, Primary Care, Public Health
Luo Z, Chen Q, Annis AM
A comparison of health plan- and provider-delivered chronic care management models on patient clinical outcomes.
Two contrasting strategies of chronic care management include provider-delivered care management (PDCM) and health plan-delivered care management (HPDCM). The researchers aimed to compare the effectiveness of PDCM vs. HPDCM on improving clinical outcomes for patients with chronic diseases. They found that in a commercially insured population, neither PDCM nor HPDCM resulted in substantial improvement in patients' clinical indicators in the first year.
AHRQ-funded; HS020108.
Citation: Luo Z, Chen Q, Annis AM .
A comparison of health plan- and provider-delivered chronic care management models on patient clinical outcomes.
J Gen Intern Med 2016 Jul;31(7):762-70. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3617-2.
.
.
Keywords: Chronic Conditions, Care Management, Primary Care: Models of Care, Primary Care, Healthcare Delivery, Comparative Effectiveness, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Health Insurance
Nguyen OK, Makam AN, Halm EA
National use of safety-net clinics for primary care among adults with non-Medicaid insurance in the United States.
This study described the prevalence, characteristics, and predictors of safety-net use for primary care among non-Medicaid insured adults (i.e., those with private insurance or Medicare). It concluded that safety net clinics are important primary care delivery sites for non-Medicaid insured minority and low-income populations with a high burden of chronic illness.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Nguyen OK, Makam AN, Halm EA .
National use of safety-net clinics for primary care among adults with non-Medicaid insurance in the United States.
PLoS One 2016 Mar 30;11(3):e0151610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151610.
.
.
Keywords: Primary Care, Health Insurance, Medicare, Low-Income, Healthcare Delivery
Annis AM, Holtrop JS, Tao M
Comparison of provider and plan-based targeting strategies for disease management.
The researchers described and contrasted the targeting methods and engagement outcomes for health plan-delivered disease management with those of a provider-delivered care management program. They concluded that both provide advantages and that an optimal model may be to combine the strengths of each approach to maximize benefits in care management.
AHRQ-funded; HS020108.
Citation: Annis AM, Holtrop JS, Tao M .
Comparison of provider and plan-based targeting strategies for disease management.
Am J Manag Care 2015 May;21(5):344-51.
.
.
Keywords: Care Management, Primary Care, Health Insurance, Healthcare Delivery