National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Behavioral Health (1)
- Blood Pressure (1)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (1)
- Disparities (1)
- (-) Evidence-Based Practice (9)
- Guidelines (4)
- Mortality (1)
- Outcomes (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (3)
- Prevention (3)
- Primary Care (3)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (1)
- Research Methodologies (3)
- Risk (1)
- Screening (2)
- (-) Social Determinants of Health (9)
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) (5)
- Urban Health (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 9 of 9 Research Studies DisplayedLin JS, Hoffman L, Bean SI
Addressing racism in preventive services: methods report to support the US Preventive Services Task Force.
The purpose of this report was to articulate the definitional and conceptual issues around racism and health inequity and to describe how racism and health inequities are currently addressed in preventive health. An audit was conducted assessing published literature on policy and position statements addressing racism, a subset of cancer and cardiovascular topics in USPSTF reports, recent systematic reviews on interventions to reduce health inequities, and societies, organizations, agencies, and funding bodies to gather information about how they address racism and health equity. Findings showed that racism is complex and pervasive, operates at multiple interrelated levels, and exerts negative effects on other social determinants and health and well-being through multiple pathways. The most directly relevant and immediately useful guidance identified is that from the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) working group.
AHRQ-funded; 290201600006C.
Citation: Lin JS, Hoffman L, Bean SI .
Addressing racism in preventive services: methods report to support the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2021 Dec 21;326(23):2412-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.17579..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Social Determinants of Health, Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Disparities, Research Methodologies, Prevention, Evidence-Based Practice
Razon N, Hessler D, Bibbins-Domingo K
How hypertension guidelines address social determinants of health: a systematic scoping review.
Patient-level and community-level social and economic conditions impact hypertension risk and control. In this study, the investigators examined adult hypertension management guidelines to explore whether and how existing guidelines refer to social care activities. The investigators concluded that information about social determinants of health is included in many hypertension guidelines, but few guidelines provide clear guidance for clinicians or health systems on how to identify and address social risk factors in the context of care delivery.
AHRQ-funded; HS022241.
Citation: Razon N, Hessler D, Bibbins-Domingo K .
How hypertension guidelines address social determinants of health: a systematic scoping review.
Med Care 2021 Dec;59(12):1122-29. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001649..
Keywords: Social Determinants of Health, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Blood Pressure
Davidson KW, Krist AH, Tseng CW
AHRQ Author: Mills J, Borsky A
Incorporation of social risk in US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations and identification of key challenges for primary care.
The authors assessed how social risks have been considered in USPSTF recommendation statements and identified current gaps in evidence needed to expand the systematic inclusion of social risks in future recommendations. They concluded that their report serves as a benchmark and foundation for ongoing work to advance the goal of ensuring that health equity and social risks are incorporated into USPSTF methods and recommendations.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Davidson KW, Krist AH, Tseng CW .
Incorporation of social risk in US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations and identification of key challenges for primary care.
JAMA 2021 Oct 12;326(14):1410-15. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.12833..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Primary Care, Social Determinants of Health, Risk, Evidence-Based Practice, Research Methodologies, Guidelines
Kostelanetz S, Di Gravio C, Schildcrout JS
Should we implement geographic or patient-reported social determinants of health measures in cardiovascular patients.
The authors compared patient-reported social determinants of health (SDOH) to the Brokamp Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and then evaluated the association of patient-reported SDOH and ADI with mortality in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). They found that the Brokamp ADI is associated with mortality in hospitalized patients with CVD. They recommended that, in the absence of available patient-reported data, hospitals implement the Brokamp ADI as an approximation for patient-reported data to enhance risk stratification of patients with CVD.
AHRQ-funded; HS026122.
Citation: Kostelanetz S, Di Gravio C, Schildcrout JS .
Should we implement geographic or patient-reported social determinants of health measures in cardiovascular patients.
Ethn Dis 2021 Winter;31(1):9-22. doi: 10.18865/ed.31.1.9..
Keywords: Social Determinants of Health, Cardiovascular Conditions, Mortality, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Outcomes, Evidence-Based Practice
Davidson KW, Kemper AR, Doubeni CA
AHRQ Author: Mills J, Borsky A
Developing primary care-based recommendations for social determinants of health: methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
This article highlights social determinants already included in USPSTF recommendations and proposes a process by which others may be considered for primary care preventive recommendations. By reviewing the evidence on the effects of screening and interventions on social determinants relevant to primary care, the USPSTF will continue to be able to provide recommendations on clinical preventive services to improve the health of all Americans.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Davidson KW, Kemper AR, Doubeni CA .
Developing primary care-based recommendations for social determinants of health: methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Ann Intern Med 2020 Sep 15;173(6):461-67. doi: 10.7326/m20-0730..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Primary Care, Social Determinants of Health, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Screening, Prevention
Fichtenberg CM, Alley DE, Mistry KB
AHRQ Author: Mistry KB
Improving social needs intervention research: key questions for advancing the field.
This paper summarizes emerging evidence and identifies key areas where more research is needed to advance implementation and policy development. Gaps exist in terms of comparative effectiveness and cost effectiveness of social needs intervention approaches. Increased understanding of mechanisms of action to maximize practitioners' ability to tailor interventions would be a benefit. More research is recommended to guard against unintended consequences and ensure these interventions reduce health inequities. Implementation science research should identify supports and incentives for adoption of effective interventions. Focusing both public and private research efforts on these evidence gaps can help advance identification of interventions that maximize both health equity and healthcare value.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; HS026664.
Citation: Fichtenberg CM, Alley DE, Mistry KB .
Improving social needs intervention research: key questions for advancing the field.
Am J Prev Med 2019 Dec;57(6s1):S47-s54. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.07.018..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Social Determinants of Health
Krist AH, Davidson KW, Ngo-Metzger Q
AHRQ Author: Ngo-Metzger Q, Mills J
Social determinants as a preventive service: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force methods considerations for research.
The authors offer a brief review of the social determinants of health that may be germane to the USPSTF, the methods the USPSTF uses to evaluate relevant evidence, and current evidence gaps for social risks. Their road map for research is intended to spark ingenuity and purpose in the next generation of research studies, thereby ensuring that future recommendations to address and prevent social risks in primary care are informed by high-quality evidence.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; HS026664.
Citation: Krist AH, Davidson KW, Ngo-Metzger Q .
Social determinants as a preventive service: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force methods considerations for research.
Am J Prev Med 2019 Dec;57(6s1):S6-s12. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.07.013..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Social Determinants of Health, Research Methodologies, Evidence-Based Practice, Prevention
Smith NA, Voisin DR, Yang JP
Keeping your guard up: hypervigilance among urban residents affected by community and police violence.
This study’s aim was to quantify the effects of hypervigilance among urban residents affected by community and police violence. A survey of 504 adults in Chicago in 2018 was done in a neighborhood affected by high levels of violence. It was found that exposure to police violence was associated with a 9.8% increase in hypervigilance while exposure to community violence caused a 5.5% increase. Among participants who had a police stop, it was associated with 20% increase in hypervigilance. Overall, the highest quartile of hypervigilance was associated with higher systolic blood pressure.
AHRQ-funded; HS023007.
Citation: Smith NA, Voisin DR, Yang JP .
Keeping your guard up: hypervigilance among urban residents affected by community and police violence.
Health Aff 2019 Oct;38(10):1662-69. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00560..
Keywords: Urban Health, Social Determinants of Health, Behavioral Health, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice
Krist AH, Davidson KW, Ngo-Metzger Q
AHRQ Author: Ngo-Metzger Q
What evidence do we need before recommending routine screening for social determinants of health?
This editorial, co-written by two members of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), and a member of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) discusses the need to determine if social determinants of health (SDOH) should be discussed during a primary care visit. At the present time only 2 USPSTF recommendations are social determinants (intimate partner violence, elder abuse, and abuse of vulnerable adults; and child maltreatment). However, there are recommendations for nine health behaviors and three mental health behaviors that are included in SDOH. There is an absence of evidence of benefit for routine screening for many of the social determinants, and the USPSTF is currently conducting an evaluation to understand the state of screening for SDOH.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Krist AH, Davidson KW, Ngo-Metzger Q .
What evidence do we need before recommending routine screening for social determinants of health?
Am Fam Physician 2019 May 15;99(10):602-05..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Primary Care, Screening, Social Determinants of Health, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)