National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 4 of 4 Research Studies DisplayedRodriguez HP, Kyalwazi MJ, Lewis VA
Adoption of patient-reported outcomes by health systems and physician practices in the USA.
This study examined the extent of patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure adoption among health systems and physician practices nationally and examines the organizational capabilities associated with more extensive PRO adoption. A total of 323 US health system and 2,190 physician practices responded to one of two nationally representative surveys. Survey results found that pain (50.6%) and depression (43.8%) PROs were more commonly adopted by all hospitals and medical groups within health systems compared to disability PROs (26.5%). Systems with more advanced health IT functions were more likely to use disability and depression PROs than systems with less advanced health IT. Practice-level advanced health IT was positively associated with use of depression PRO, but not disability or pain PRO use. The three PROs were more likely to be adopted in practices with more chronic care management processes, broader medical and social risk screening, and more processes to support patient responsiveness. Also, compared to independent physician practices, system-owned practices and community health centers were less likely to adopt PROs.
AHRQ-funded; HS024075.
Citation: Rodriguez HP, Kyalwazi MJ, Lewis VA .
Adoption of patient-reported outcomes by health systems and physician practices in the USA.
J Gen Intern Med 2022 Nov;37(15):3885-92. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07631-0..
Keywords: Health Systems, Provider: Physician, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Kerrissey M, Tietschert M, Novikov Z
Social features of integration in health systems and their relationship to provider experience, care quality and clinical integration.
The purpose of this study was to explore the social features of health system integration -elements of normative integration (alignment of norms) and interpersonal integration (collaboration among professionals and with patients). The researchers administered surveys to practice managers and 1,360 staff and physicians at 59 practice sites within 17 health systems, with a 61% response rate of 828. The study found that the variables of normative and interpersonal integration were both consistently related to better provider experience, perceived care quality, and clinical integration. Variance in social features of integration may help explain why some health systems are better at integrating care, highlighting normative and interpersonal integration as possible resources for improvement.
AHRQ-funded; HS024067.
Citation: Kerrissey M, Tietschert M, Novikov Z .
Social features of integration in health systems and their relationship to provider experience, care quality and clinical integration.
Med Care Res Rev 2022 Jun; 79(3):359-70. doi: 10.1177/10775587211024796..
Keywords: Burnout, Provider: Physician, Health Systems
Reid RO, Tom AK, Ross RM
Physician compensation arrangements and financial performance incentives in US health systems.
This study examined physician compensation arrangements for primary care physicians (PCPs) and specialists among US health system-affiliated physician organizations (POs) and measured the portion of total physician compensation based on quality and cost performance. This study used a cross-sectional mixed-methods analysis of in-depth multimodal data (compensation document review, interviews with 40 PO leaders, and surveys conducted between November 2017 and July 2019) from 31 POs affiliated with 22 purposefully selected health systems in 4 states. The most common compensation arrangement was volume-based (68.2% mean for PCPs and 73.7% mean for specialists). Incentives for quality and cost performance were common, but compensation based on those were not common (9.0% mean for PCPs, 4.5% mean for specialists).
AHRQ-funded; HS024067.
Citation: Reid RO, Tom AK, Ross RM .
Physician compensation arrangements and financial performance incentives in US health systems.
JAMA Health Forum 2022 Jan;3(1):e214634. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.4634..
Keywords: Health Systems, Provider: Physician, Payment, Provider Performance
Kimmey L, Furukawa MF, Jones DJ
AHRQ Author: Furukawa MF
Geographic variation in the consolidation of physicians into health systems, 2016-18.
The authors asked the following questions: To what extent does consolidation of physicians into vertically integrated health systems vary across markets, and how did that change from 2016 to 2018? In this article, they used AHRQ data on health systems and commercial data on physician-system affiliation to describe metropolitan statistical area-level physician consolidation and to identify differences by region and metropolitan statistical area size.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290201600001C.
Citation: Kimmey L, Furukawa MF, Jones DJ .
Geographic variation in the consolidation of physicians into health systems, 2016-18.
Health Aff 2021 Jan;40(1):165-69. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00812..
Keywords: Health Systems, Provider: Physician, Provider, Healthcare Delivery