National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 2 of 2 Research Studies DisplayedFuery MA, Kadhim B, Samsky MD
Electronic health record embedded strategies for improving care of patients with heart failure.
This article reviews recent findings from randomized clinical trials examining the impact of electronic health record (HER) alerts (called nudges) on quality of care for heart failure patients. These clinical trials demonstrated that some EHR alerts can improve care for heart failure patients. The trials described utilized default options, involved clinicians in the alert design process, provided actionable recommendations, and aimed to minimize disruptions to typical workflow.
AHRQ-funded; HS027626.
Citation: Fuery MA, Kadhim B, Samsky MD .
Electronic health record embedded strategies for improving care of patients with heart failure.
Curr Heart Fail Rep 2023 Aug; 20(4):280-86. doi: 10.1007/s11897-023-00614-0..
Keywords: Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Heart Disease and Health, Cardiovascular Conditions, Chronic Conditions
Chu CD, Lenoir KM, Rai NK
Concordance between clinical outcomes in the systolic blood pressure intervention trial and in the electronic health record.
This study examined the role that electronic health records (EHRs) can play in follow-up for concordance with trial-ascertained outcomes. The authors linked EHR and trial data for participants in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT), a randomized trial comparing intensive and standard blood pressure targets. Among participants with available EHR data concurrent to trial-ascertained outcomes, they calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for EHR-recorded cardiovascular disease (CVD) events, using the gold standard of SPRINT-adjudicated outcomes (myocardial infarction (MI)/acute coronary syndrome (ACS), heart failure, stroke, and composite CVD events). They additionally compared the incidence of non-CVD adverse events (hyponatremia, hypernatremia, hypokalemia, hyperkalemia, bradycardia, and hypotension) in trial versus EHR data. Of the 2468 SPRINT participants included, EHR data demonstrated ≥80% sensitivity and specificity, and ≥99% negative predictive value for MI/ACS, heart failure, stroke, and composite CVD events. Positive predictive value ranged from 26% for heart failure to 52% for MI/ACS. Conclusions were that EHR data uniformly identified more non-CVD adverse events and higher incidence rates compared with trial ascertainment.
AHRQ-funded; HS026383.
Citation: Chu CD, Lenoir KM, Rai NK .
Concordance between clinical outcomes in the systolic blood pressure intervention trial and in the electronic health record.
Contemp Clin Trials 2023 May; 128:107172. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2023.107172..
Keywords: Blood Pressure, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Cardiovascular Conditions