National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 3 of 3 Research Studies DisplayedGallo T, Heise CW, Woosley RL
Clinician satisfaction with advanced clinical decision support to reduce the risk of torsades de pointes.
The purpose of this study was to create an advanced torsades de pointes (TdP) clinical decision support (CDS) advisory that provides relevant, patient-specific information, including 1-click management options, and to evaluate clinician satisfaction with the CDS. The researchers implemented the advanced TdP CDS across a health system comprising 29 hospitals. A brief electronic survey was developed to collect clinician feedback on the advisory and was emailed to 442 clinicians who received the advisory. Feedback was generally positive across the 38 responding providers, with 79% of respondents reporting that the advisory assisted with their care for their patients and 87% responding that the alerts clearly specified alternative actions. The researchers concluded that providers who receive an advanced TdP risk CDS alert generally view the alert favorably.
AHRQ-funded; HS026662.
Citation: Gallo T, Heise CW, Woosley RL .
Clinician satisfaction with advanced clinical decision support to reduce the risk of torsades de pointes.
J Patient Saf 2022 Sep 1;18(6):e1010-e13. doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000996..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Risk, Provider: Clinician, Heart Disease and Health, Cardiovascular Conditions
Gallo T, Heise CW, Woosley RL
Clinician responses to a clinical decision support advisory for high risk of Torsades de pointes.
The purpose of this study was to assess provider actions taken in response to a Clinical decision support (CDS) advisory for Torsade de pointes (TdP) that uses a modified Tisdale QT risk score and presents single click management options. The researchers implemented an inpatient TdP risk advisory across a large, 30 hospital health care system. The CDS advisory was programmed to appear when prescribers attempted to order medications with a known risk of TdP in a patient. The CDS advisory displayed patient-specific information and offered related management options including canceling the requested medication and ordering relevant protocols. The study found that 7794 TdP risk advisories were issued during an 8-month period. The most frequent advisory trigger was antibiotics (33.1%.) The most frequent action taken as a result of the advisory was ordering an ECG (20.3%). Incoming medication orders were canceled in 10.2% of the advisories. The researchers concluded that a single-click, modified Tisdale QT risk score-based CDS resulted in a high action/response rate.
AHRQ-funded; HS026662.
Citation: Gallo T, Heise CW, Woosley RL .
Clinician responses to a clinical decision support advisory for high risk of Torsades de pointes.
J Am Heart Assoc 2022 Jun 7;11(11):e024338. doi: 10.1161/jaha.122.024338..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Health Information Technology (HIT), Heart Disease and Health, Cardiovascular Conditions
Daley CN, Cornet VP, Toscos TR
Naturalistic decision making in everyday self-care among older adults with heart failure.
The purpose of this study was to explore the role of everyday decision-making on disease outcome in a group of older adults living with heart failure. The researchers describe such decisions as events of naturalistic decision-making which are influenced by factors such as the involvement of others, older adults’ social and physical environments, high stakes of the decision, and shifting goals. The researchers recruited 24 older adults with heart failure and 14 of their support persons from an ambulatory cardiology center, and conducted a qualitative field study. The study utilized a naturalistic decision-making model and critical incident technique to analyze health-related everyday decision making and determine how individuals make everyday health-related decisions. The study found that for various decisions, the decision-making of White, male, older adults aligned with the three phases of a preliminary model of naturalistic decision making: monitoring, interpreting, and acting. The researchers also determined that: health decisions are made in a context of personal variables such as emotions, priorities, and values; other people can play important roles; and the performance of the phases can be affected by barriers and strategies. The study concluded that the findings contribute to an expanded model of naturalistic decision-making with implications for not only future research, but for the design of interventions.
AHRQ-funded; HS025232.
Citation: Daley CN, Cornet VP, Toscos TR .
Naturalistic decision making in everyday self-care among older adults with heart failure.
J Cardiovasc Nurs 2022 Mar-Apr;37(2):167-76. doi: 10.1097/jcn.0000000000000778..
Keywords: Elderly, Patient Self-Management, Shared Decision Making, Heart Disease and Health, Cardiovascular Conditions