National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Antibiotics (1)
- Antimicrobial Stewardship (1)
- Blood Pressure (1)
- Cancer (3)
- Cancer: Colorectal Cancer (1)
- Cancer: Ovarian Cancer (1)
- Cancer: Prostate Cancer (1)
- Cancer: Skin Cancer (1)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (3)
- Care Management (1)
- Case Study (1)
- Children/Adolescents (2)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (1)
- Colonoscopy (1)
- Communication (2)
- Comparative Effectiveness (1)
- Diabetes (1)
- Education: Patient and Caregiver (1)
- Elderly (2)
- Emergency Medical Services (EMS) (1)
- (-) Evidence-Based Practice (27)
- (-) Guidelines (27)
- Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) (1)
- Healthcare Delivery (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- Health Literacy (1)
- Heart Disease and Health (2)
- Implementation (2)
- Infectious Diseases (1)
- Long-Term Care (1)
- Medication (4)
- Nursing Homes (1)
- Opioids (1)
- Outcomes (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (2)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (4)
- Patient and Family Engagement (2)
- Policy (1)
- Practice Patterns (3)
- Prevention (13)
- Primary Care (6)
- Provider (1)
- Provider: Clinician (1)
- Provider: Physician (1)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Quality Measures (1)
- Quality of Care (1)
- Research Methodologies (3)
- Risk (1)
- Screening (5)
- Shared Decision Making (5)
- Surgery (1)
- Trauma (1)
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) (12)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 25 of 27 Research Studies DisplayedLi SA, Alexander PE, Reljic T
Evidence to decision framework provides a structured "roadmap" for making GRADE guidelines recommendations.
It is unclear how guidelines panelists discuss and consider factors (criteria) that are formally and not formally included in the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. To describe the use of decision criteria, the investigators explored how panelists adhered to GRADE criteria and sought to identify any emerging non-GRADE criteria when the panelists used the Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework as part of GRADE application.
AHRQ-funded; HS024917.
Citation: Li SA, Alexander PE, Reljic T .
Evidence to decision framework provides a structured "roadmap" for making GRADE guidelines recommendations.
J Clin Epidemiol 2018 Dec;104:103-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.09.007..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Shared Decision Making
Vermandere M, Kuijpers T, Burgers JS
Alpha-Blockers for uncomplicated ureteric stones: a clinical practice guideline.
This paper develops an evidence-based recommendation for the use of alpha-blockers for treating uncomplicated ureteric stones. It is based on an up-to-date Cochran review and applies the Rapid Recommendations approach to guideline development. An international panel of clinicians, researchers, methodologists and patient representatives was created and a recommendation was created. There is only low-quality evidence for using alpha-blockers and the net benefit was found to be small.
AHRQ-funded; HS025701.
Citation: Vermandere M, Kuijpers T, Burgers JS .
Alpha-Blockers for uncomplicated ureteric stones: a clinical practice guideline.
BJU Int 2018 Dec;122(6):924-31. doi: 10.1111/bju.14457..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Medication
Magrath M, Yang E, Ahn C
Impact of a clinical decision support system on guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations for colonoscopy after polypectomy.
The goal of this study was to characterize guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations after implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR)-based Colonoscopy Pathology Reporting and Clinical Decision Support System (CoRS). Results showed that an EMR-based CoRS was widely used and significantly improved guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Magrath M, Yang E, Ahn C .
Impact of a clinical decision support system on guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations for colonoscopy after polypectomy.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2018 Nov;16(11):1321-28. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7050..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Health Information Technology (HIT), Colonoscopy, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Screening, Cancer, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Prevention
Admon AJ, Gupta A, Williams M
Appraising the evidence supporting Choosing Wisely(R) recommendations.
This study’s objective was to appraise the evidence supporting the Choosing Wisely® campaign initiated by the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) Foundation to advance dialogue on prevention of unnecessary medical tests, treatments, and procedures. The authors extracted all 320 recommendations that were published through August 2014. The recommendations were then categorized by evidence strength and then a sample of referenced clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) using the validated Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. Overall, 70.3% of recommendations cited CPGs, whereas 22.2% cited primary research as their highest evidence level. Hospital medicine recommendations cited CPGs 90% of the time. However, the median overall score using AGREE II was 54.2% and even for hospital medicine-referenced CPGs was 58.3%.
AHRQ-funded; HS020672.
Citation: Admon AJ, Gupta A, Williams M .
Appraising the evidence supporting Choosing Wisely(R) recommendations.
J Hosp Med 2018 Oct;13(10):688-91. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2964..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Prevention, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement
Tracer H, Jadotte YT
AHRQ Author: Tracer H
Screening for cardiovascular disease risk with electrocardiography.
This paper presents a case study, along with questions and answers, related to the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommendations for screening for cardiovascular disease risk with electrocardiography.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Tracer H, Jadotte YT .
Screening for cardiovascular disease risk with electrocardiography.
Am Fam Physician 2018 Sep 15;98(6):375-76..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Cardiovascular Conditions, Screening, Risk, Prevention, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Case Study
Lee DJ, Barocas DA, Zhao Z
Contemporary prostate cancer radiation therapy in the United States: patterns of care and compliance with quality measures.
This study measured compliance with quality measures for radiation therapy treatment of prostate cancer. The Comparative Effectiveness Analysis of Surgery and Radiation Study enrolled men who were treated for localized prostate cancer from 2011 and 2012. Medical records were reviewed, and patients completed surveys. Researchers concluded that men who received external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) were treated more appropriately than those treated with brachytherapy (BT). White men were also more likely to receive appropriate treatment than African-American and other minorities.
AHRQ-funded; HS019356; HS022640.
Citation: Lee DJ, Barocas DA, Zhao Z .
Contemporary prostate cancer radiation therapy in the United States: patterns of care and compliance with quality measures.
Pract Radiat Oncol 2018 Sep-Oct;8(5):307-16. doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2018.04.009..
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Prostate Cancer, Comparative Effectiveness, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Practice Patterns, Quality Measures
Jonas DE, Kahwati LC, Yun JDY
Screening for atrial fibrillation with electrocardiography: evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
The objective of this study was to review the evidence on screening for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation with electrocardiography (ECG) and stroke prevention treatment in asymptomatic adults 65 years or older to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force. The authors concluded that although screening with ECG can detect previously unknown cases of atrial fibrillation, it has not been shown to detect more cases than screening focused on pulse palpation.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500011I.
Citation: Jonas DE, Kahwati LC, Yun JDY .
Screening for atrial fibrillation with electrocardiography: evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2018 Aug 7;320(5):485-98. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.4190..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Heart Disease and Health, Cardiovascular Conditions, Screening, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Prevention
Egan BM, Li J, Davis RA
Differences in primary cardiovascular disease prevention between the 2013 and 2016 cholesterol guidelines and impact of the 2017 hypertension guideline in the United States.
The US Preventive Services Task Force cholesterol guideline recommended statins for fewer adults than the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) guideline by setting a higher 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease threshold and requiring concomitant diabetes mellitus, hypertension, dyslipidemia, or cigarette smoking. The 2017 ACC/AHA hypertension guideline lowered the hypertension threshold, increasing 2016 guideline statin-eligible adults. This article discusses differences in primary cardiovascular disease prevention between the 2013 and 2016 cholesterol guidelines and impact of the 2017 hypertension guideline in the United States.
AHRQ-funded; P30 HS021667.
Citation: Egan BM, Li J, Davis RA .
Differences in primary cardiovascular disease prevention between the 2013 and 2016 cholesterol guidelines and impact of the 2017 hypertension guideline in the United States.
J Clin Hypertens 2018 Jun;20(6):991-1000. doi: 10.1111/jch.13314..
Keywords: Cardiovascular Conditions, Heart Disease and Health, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Blood Pressure, Medication, Prevention, Primary Care, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
Villani J, Ngo-Metzger Q, Vincent IS
AHRQ Author: Ngo-Metzger Q
Sources of funding for research in evidence reviews that inform recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force.
This study characterizes the sources of funding for the scientific evidence base used by the USPSTF. One or more funding sources were identified for 79 percent of the 1,650 research articles. Government agencies provided support for 931 articles (56 percent). The remaining support came from nonprofits or universities (530 articles, 32 percent) and industry (282 articles, 17 percent).The sources of funding varied by recommendation topic.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Villani J, Ngo-Metzger Q, Vincent IS .
Sources of funding for research in evidence reviews that inform recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2018 May 22;319(20):2132-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.5404.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Prevention, Research Methodologies, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
Velopulos CG, Shihab HM, Lottenberg L
Prehospital spine immobilization/spinal motion restriction in penetrating trauma: a practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST).
This study reviewed the published evidence on prehospital spine immobilization or spinal motion restriction in adult patients with penetrating trauma in order to structure a practice management guideline. Using a Cochrane-style systematic review, 24 studies met inclusion criteria; five studies were used for the quantitative review. No study showed benefit to spine immobilization with regard to mortality and neurologic injury, even for patients with direct neck injuries. Increased mortality was associated with spine immobilization. The authors recommend that spine immobilization not be routinely used for adult patients with penetrating trauma.
AHRQ-funded; HS024547.
Citation: Velopulos CG, Shihab HM, Lottenberg L .
Prehospital spine immobilization/spinal motion restriction in penetrating trauma: a practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST).
J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2018 May;84(5):736-44. doi: 10.1097/ta.0000000000001764..
Keywords: Care Management, Emergency Medical Services (EMS), Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Trauma
Sepucha KR, Abhyankar P, Hoffman AS
Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluation studies: the development of SUNDAE Checklist.
This study sought to develop and reach consensus on reporting guidelines to improve the quality of publications evaluating patient decision aids (PDAs). The study concluded that the SUNDAE (Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluations) Checklist will help ensure that reports of PDA evaluation studies are understandable, transparent and of high quality.
AHRQ-funded; HS024250.
Citation: Sepucha KR, Abhyankar P, Hoffman AS .
Standards for UNiversal reporting of patient Decision Aid Evaluation studies: the development of SUNDAE Checklist.
BMJ Qual Saf 2018 May;27(5):380-88. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-006986..
Keywords: Communication, Shared Decision Making, Education: Patient and Caregiver, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Health Literacy, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Armstrong MJ, Mullins CD, Gronseth GS
Impact of patient involvement on clinical practice guideline development: a parallel group study.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of patient and public involvement (PPI) on guideline question formation and validate a conceptual model of patient and public contributions to guidelines. The qualitative analysis of the discussions occurring during guideline question development demonstrated key differences in group conduct and validated the proposed conceptual model of patient and public contributions to guidelines.
AHRQ-funded; HS024159; HS022135.
Citation: Armstrong MJ, Mullins CD, Gronseth GS .
Impact of patient involvement on clinical practice guideline development: a parallel group study.
Implement Sci 2018 Apr 16;13(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0745-6.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Research Methodologies
Jump RLP, Crnich CJ, Mody L
Infectious diseases in older adults of long-term care facilities: update on approach to diagnosis and management.
The diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of infectious diseases in older adults in long-term care facilities (LTCFs), particularly nursing facilities, remains a challenge for all health providers who care for this population. This review provides updated information on the currently most important challenges of infectious diseases in LTCFs. With the increasing prescribing of antibiotics in older adults, particularly in LTCFs, the topic of antibiotic stewardship is presented in this review.
AHRQ-funded; HS022465.
Citation: Jump RLP, Crnich CJ, Mody L .
Infectious diseases in older adults of long-term care facilities: update on approach to diagnosis and management.
J Am Geriatr Soc 2018 Apr;66(4):789-803. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15248.
.
.
Keywords: Elderly, Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs), Infectious Diseases, Nursing Homes, Long-Term Care, Antimicrobial Stewardship, Antibiotics, Medication, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines
Henrikson NB, Morrison CC, Blasi PR
Behavioral counseling for skin cancer prevention: evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
The authors systematically reviewed the evidence on the benefits and harms of behavioral counseling for skin cancer prevention to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). They concluded that behavioral interventions can increase sun protection behavior, but there is no consistent evidence that interventions are associated with a reduction in the frequency of sunburn in children or adults and minimal evidence on skin cancer outcomes.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500007I.
Citation: Henrikson NB, Morrison CC, Blasi PR .
Behavioral counseling for skin cancer prevention: evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2018 Mar 20;319(11):1143-57. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21630.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Skin Cancer, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Prevention, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
McCreedy EM, Kane RL, Gollust SE
Patient-centered guidelines for geriatric diabetes care: potential missed opportunities to avoid harm.
Clinicians strive to deliver individualized, patient-centered care. However, these intentions are understudied. This research explored how patient characteristics associated with a high risk-to-benefit ratio with hypoglycemia medications affected decision making by primary care clinicians. The investigators found that primary care clinicians often chose to intensify glycemic control despite individual patient factors that warranted higher glycemic targets based on existing guidelines.
AHRQ-funded; HS000011.
Citation: McCreedy EM, Kane RL, Gollust SE .
Patient-centered guidelines for geriatric diabetes care: potential missed opportunities to avoid harm.
J Am Board Fam Med 2018 Mar-Apr;31(2):192-200. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.02.170141..
Keywords: Diabetes, Elderly, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Shared Decision Making, Medication, Primary Care, Practice Patterns, Provider: Physician, Provider: Clinician, Provider
Howard R, Waljee J, Brummett C
Reduction in opioid prescribing through evidence-based prescribing guidelines.
The authors evaluated the effect of evidence-based postoperative prescribing guidelines in an effort to reduce overprescribing. The post-intervention group received opioid prescriptions for reduced dosages compared to the pre-intervention group. In the post-intervention group, 2.5% requested refills compared with 4.1% in the pre-intervention group. The authors indicated that this work will be used as a template for statewide practice transformation, which may serve as a platform for other states.
AHRQ-funded; HS023313.
Citation: Howard R, Waljee J, Brummett C .
Reduction in opioid prescribing through evidence-based prescribing guidelines.
JAMA Surg 2018 Mar;153(3):285-87. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.4436.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Opioids, Practice Patterns, Surgery
Henderson JT, Webber EM, Sawaya GF
Screening for ovarian cancer: Updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
The researchers systematically reviewed evidence on benefits and harms of ovarian cancer screening among average-risk women to inform the United States Preventive Services Task Force. They concluded that, in randomized trials conducted among average-risk, asymptomatic women, ovarian cancer mortality did not significantly differ between screened women and those with no screening or in usual care.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500007I.
Citation: Henderson JT, Webber EM, Sawaya GF .
Screening for ovarian cancer: Updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2018 Feb 13;319(6):595-606. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21421.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Cancer: Ovarian Cancer, Screening, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
Armstrong MJ, Gronseth GS
Approach to assessing and using clinical practice guidelines.
Knowing when to use guidelines in clinical practice requires neurologists to assess the rigor of published guidelines. This review briefly describes guideline definitions and the American Academy of Neurology process for guideline development, outlines key elements for assessing guideline quality, and details a practical approach for incorporating guideline recommendations when partnering with patients in shared decision-making.
AHRQ-funded; HS024159.
Citation: Armstrong MJ, Gronseth GS .
Approach to assessing and using clinical practice guidelines.
Neurol Clin Pract 2018 Feb;8(1):58-61. doi: 10.1212/cpj.0000000000000417.
.
.
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Patient and Family Engagement, Implementation
Yepes-Nunez JJ, Morgan RL, Mbuagbaw L
AHRQ Author: Chang S
Two alternatives versus the standard Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) summary of findings (SoF) tables to improve understanding in the presentation of systematic review results: a three-arm, randomised, controlled,
The primary objective of this trial is to investigate whether an alternative Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) SoF table or Evidence-based Practice Center SoF table is non-inferior to the current GRADE SoF table in the understanding of the information presented to systematic review users. Non-inferiority would be declared if the difference in the proportion of participants who understand the information displayed in the alternative SoF table is 10 percent or less.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Yepes-Nunez JJ, Morgan RL, Mbuagbaw L .
Two alternatives versus the standard Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) summary of findings (SoF) tables to improve understanding in the presentation of systematic review results: a three-arm, randomised, controlled,
BMJ Open 2018 Jan 23;8(1):e015623. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015623.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Research Methodologies
Dunn J, Henrikson NB, Morrison CC
Screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
The authors systematically reviewed evidence on benefits and harms of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) screening for the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). They concluded that screening can detect AIS. Also, bracing and possibly exercise treatment can interrupt or slow progression of curvature in adolescence. However, there is little or no evidence on long-term outcomes for AIS treated in adolescence.
AHRQ-funded; 290201200015I357.
Citation: Dunn J, Henrikson NB, Morrison CC .
Screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.
JAMA 2018 Jan 9;319(2):173-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.11669.
.
.
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Prevention, Screening
Krist AH, Bibbins-Domingo K, Wolff TA
AHRQ Author: Wolff TA, Mabry-Hernandez IR
Advancing the methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
The mission of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) is to provide evidence-based recommendations on preventive services to primary care clinicians who deliver preventive care.This editorial introduces a journal supplement issue the purpose of which is to present and discuss some of the key methodologic concepts and questions that the USPSTF is currently addressing.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Krist AH, Bibbins-Domingo K, Wolff TA .
Advancing the methods of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
Am J Prev Med 2018 Jan;54(1s1):S1-s3. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.10.012.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Prevention, Primary Care, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
Kemper AR, Krist AH, Tseng CW
AHRQ Author: Mabry-Hernandez IR, Wolff TA
Challenges in developing U.S. Preventive Services Task Force child health recommendations.
In March 2016, the USPSTF convened an expert panel to discuss its portfolio of child and adolescent recommendations and identify unique methodologic issues when evaluating evidence regarding children and adolescents. The panel identified key domains of challenges, including measuring patient-centered health outcomes; identifying intermediate outcomes predictive of important health outcomes and evaluating the long time horizon needed to assess the balance of benefits and harms.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Kemper AR, Krist AH, Tseng CW .
Challenges in developing U.S. Preventive Services Task Force child health recommendations.
Am J Prev Med 2018 Jan;54(1s1):S63-s69. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.08.023.
.
.
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
Ngo-Metzger Q, Moyer V, Grossman D
AHRQ Author: Ngo-Metzger Q, Chowdhury J, Kato E
Conflicts of interest in clinical guidelines: update of U.S. Preventive Services Task Force policies and procedures.
The conflicts of interest policy is described, as is the formal process by which best practices were incorporated to update the policy. The USPSTF conflicts of interest policy includes disclosures for immediate family members, a clear non-financial conflicts of interest definition, long look-back period and application of the policy to prospective members. The conflicts of interest policy is publicly available as part of the USPSTF Procedure Manual.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Ngo-Metzger Q, Moyer V, Grossman D .
Conflicts of interest in clinical guidelines: update of U.S. Preventive Services Task Force policies and procedures.
Am J Prev Med 2018 Jan;54(1s1):S70-s80. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.06.034.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Policy, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
Doherty JA, Crelia SJ, Smith MW
AHRQ Author: Mabry-Hernandez IR, Ngo-Metzger Q
Large health systems' prevention guideline implementation: a qualitative study.
In 2015, researchers conducted and analyzed interviews with quality leaders from eight hospital-based systems and one physician organization who explained organizational processes to adapt, adopt, disseminate, and incentivize adherence to preventive services guidelines. Nearly all have a formal process for reviewing and refining guidelines, developing clinician support, and disseminating the approved guidelines.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Doherty JA, Crelia SJ, Smith MW .
Large health systems' prevention guideline implementation: a qualitative study.
Am J Prev Med 2018 Jan;54(1s1):S88-s94. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.07.025.
.
.
Keywords: Primary Care, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Prevention, Implementation, Healthcare Delivery
Kurth AE, Krist AH, Borsky AE
AHRQ Author: Borsky AE, Fan T, Weinstein R
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force methods to communicate and disseminate clinical preventive services recommendations.
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) issues evidence-based screening and prevention recommendations, and key to this task is dissemination and implementation of these recommendations. This paper outlines the approaches used by the USPSTF to both solicit input (e.g., public comment periods), as well as to facilitate dissemination of its recommendations to help improve the health of all Americans (e.g., web-based and mobile application tools, journal publications, and annual reports to Congress).
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Kurth AE, Krist AH, Borsky AE .
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force methods to communicate and disseminate clinical preventive services recommendations.
Am J Prev Med 2018 Jan;54(1s1):S81-s87. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.07.004.
.
.
Keywords: Communication, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Prevention, Primary Care, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)