Implementation Guide No. 2
1 U.S. Public Health Service. Report of the Surgeon General’s Conference on Youth’s Mental Health: a national action agenda. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; 2000.http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK44233/. Accessed July 28, 2014.
2 Currie J, Stabile M. Mental health in childhood and human capital. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research; 2007.
3 Perou R, Bitsko RH, Blumberg, SJ, et al. Mental health surveillance among children—United States, 2005-2011. MMWR Surveill Summ 2013 May; 62 Suppl 2: 1-35.
4 National Alliance on Mental Health. Facts on children’s mental health in America.http://www.nami.org/Template.cfm?Section=federal_and_state_policy_legislation&template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=43804. Accessed December 16, 2013.
5 Sheldon GH, Berwki D, Hyde PS. State director letter.http://www.medicaid.gov/Federal-Policy-Guidance/downloads/SMD-11-23-11.pdf. Accessed December 16, 2013.
6 Stambaugh LF, Leslie LK, Ringeisen H, et al. Psychotropic medication use by children in child welfare. OPRE Report #2012-33, Washington, DC: Office of Planning Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families; 2012. http://www.acf.hhs.gov/programs/opre/resource/nscaw-no-17-psychotropic-medication-use-by-children-in-child-welfare. Accessed July 28. 2014.
7 Maryland Child and Adolescent Innovations Institute and Mental Health Institute. The Maryland care management model: care coordination using high-fidelity wraparound to support the strengths and needs of youth with complex needs and their families. Baltimore, MD: University of Maryland; 2008.
8 Hair HJ. Outcomes for children and adolescents after residential treatment: a review of research from 1993 to 2003. J Child Fam Stud 2005;14(4):551-75.
9 Pires SA. Care management entities: a primer. Hamilton, NJ: Center for Health Care Strategies, 2011. http://www.chcs.org/usr_doc/CHIPRACMEPrimer.pdf. Accessed August 15, 2013.
10 Bruns EJ, Walker JS, Zabel M, et al. Intervening in the lives of youth with complex behavioral health challenges and their families: the role of the wraparound process. Am J Community Physiol 2010;46:314-31.
11 Bruns EJ, Walker JS, Adams J, et al. Ten principals of the wraparound process. Portland, OR: National Wraparound Initiative, Research and Training Center on Family Support and Children’s Mental Health, Portland State University; 2004.
12 Mann C, Hyde PS. Joint CMCS and SAMHSA informational bulletin: coverage of behavioral health services for children, youth, and young adults with significant mental health conditions. May 7, 2013. http://medicaid.gov/Federal-Policy-Guidance/Downloads/CIB-05-07-2013.pdf. Accessed June 30, 2014.
13 Stroul BA, Pires SA, Boyce S, et al. Return on investment in systems of care for children with behavioral health challenges. Washington, DC: National Technical Assistance Center for Children’s Mental Health, Georgetown University Center for Child and Human Development; April 2004.
14 Clark HB, Lee B, Prange ME, et al. Children lost within the foster care system: can wraparound service strategies improve placement outcomes? J Child Fam Stud 1996;5(1):39-54.
15 Carney MM, Buttell F. Reducing juvenile recidivism: evaluating the wraparound services model. Res Soc Work Pract 2004;13(5):551-68.
16 Wraparound Milwaukee. 2011 Year End Report. http://county.milwaukee.gov/ImageLibrary/Groups/cntyHHS/Wraparound/WCCFWraparoundReport2011.pdf. Accessed October 2, 2013.
17 Grimes KE, Mullin B. MHSPY: A children’s health initiative for maintaining at-risk youth in the community. J Behav Health Serv Res 2006;33(2):196-212.
18 Cuyahoga Tapestry System of Care. 2009 annual report. http://cuyahogatapestry.org/pdf_tapestry/en-US/Tapestry-AnnualRprt-2009.PDF. Accessed October 2, 2013.
19 Urdapilleta O, Kim G, Wang Y, et al. National evaluation of the Medicaid demonstration waiver home-and community-based alternatives to psychiatric residential treatment facilitates: final evaluation report. Prepared by IMPAQ International under Contract No. HHSM-500-2006-00007I. Baltimore, MD: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; April 2013. http://www.medicaid.gov/Medicaid-CHIP-Program-Information/By-Topics/Delivery-Systems/Downloads/CBA-Evaluation-Final.pdf. Accessed July 31, 2014.
20 Bickman L. A continuum of care: more is not always better. Am Psychol 1996;51(7):689-701.
21 Zipper IN, Broughton A, Behar L. Changing practices with children and families in North Carolina: using technology to facilitate collaboration and training. J Technol Hum Serv 2000;17(1):49-67.
22 Office of Continuous Quality Improvement Services. Wraparound Maine: a mental health service use and cost study. QI Data Snapshot 2011 July;3(3). http://www.maine.gov/dhhs/QI/snaphots/Volume-3-Issue-3.pdf. Accessed October 2, 2013.
23 Grimes KE, Kapunan PE, Mullin B. Children’s health services in a ‘system of care’: patterns of mental health, primary and specialty use. Public Health Rep 2006;121:311-23.
24 Miles P, Brown N, The National Wraparound Initiative Implementation Workgroup. The wraparound implementation guide: a handbook for administrators and mangers. Portland, OR: National Wraparound Initiative; 2011.
25 Pires SA. Building Systems of Care: A Primer, 2nd edition. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Center for Child and Human Development; 2010.
26 Simons D, Hendricks T, Lipper J, et al. Intensive care coordination using high-quality wraparound for children with serious behavioral health needs: state and community profiles. Prepared by the Center for Health Care Strategies under grant CFDA 93.767. Baltimore, MD: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services; 2014. http://www.chcs.org/resource/intensive-care-coordination-using-high-quality-wraparound-children-serious-behavioral-health-needs-state-community-profiles/. Accessed July 23, 2014.
27 Albritton E, Edmunds M, Thomas V, et al. Implementation guide number 1: engaging stakeholders to improve the quality of children’s health care. Prepared by Mathematica Policy Research and AcademyHealth under Contract No. HHSA29020090002191. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014. http://www.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/implementation-guides/implementation-guide1/index.html. Accessed July 23, 2014.
28 Peterson D, Ireys H, Ferry G. How are CHIPRA quality demonstration States working together to improve the quality of health care for children? Prepared by Mathematica Policy Research under Contract No. HHSA29020090002191. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2014. http://www.ahrq.gov/policymakers/chipra/demoeval/what-we-learned/highlight06.pdf. Accessed July 23, 2014.
29 Miles P, National Wraparound Initiative Advisory Team. Choosing a consultant to support your wraparound project. Portland, OR: National Wraparound Initiative; 2010. http://www.nwi.pdx.edu/NWI-book/Chapters/Miles-5a.3-(consultant-tips).pdf. Accessed July 23, 2014.
30 Reveal E, Helfgott K. Putting the pieces together: guidebook for fact-based decision making to improve outcomes for children and families. Washington, DC: Technical Assistance Partnership for Child and Family Mental Health; 2012.
31 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Technical assistance tool: “at-a-glance” guide to federal Medicaid authorities useful in restructuring Medicaid health care delivery or payment.” Baltimore, MD: Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services; April 2012. http://www.medicaid.gov/State-Resource-Center/Medicaid-State-Technical-Assistance/Health-Homes-Technical-Assistance/Downloads/At-a-glance-medicaid-Authorities.pdf. Accessed June 30, 2014.
32 Center for Health Care Strategies. Using care management entities for behavioral health home providers: sample language for state plan amendment development. Hamilton, NJ: Center for Health Care Strategies; 2012. http://www.chcs.org/media/CMEs_as_Behavioral_Health_Homes_-_SPA_Development.pdf. Accessed July 23, 2014.
33 National Wraparound Initiative Workforce Workgroup. Training, coaching, and supervision for wraparound facilitators: guidelines from the National Wraparound Initiative. Portland, OR: National Wraparound Initiative; 2013.
34Center for Health Care Strategies. Case rate scan for care management entities. Prepared under CMS grant CFDA 93.767. Hamilton, NJ: Center for Health Care Strategies; October 2012.
35 National Conference of State Legislatures. Medicaid payment reform. http://www.ncsl.org/research/health/medicaid-payment-reform.aspx. Accessed December 17, 2013.
36 Administration for Children and Families. Continuous quality improvement toolkit. https://www.childwelfare.gov/management/reform/soc/communicate/initiative/soctoolkits/cqi.cfm#phase=pre-planning. Accessed December 16. 2013.
37 Walker JS, Matarese M. Using a theory of change to drive human resource development for wraparound. J Child Fam Stud 2011;20:791-803.
38 Kersbergen AL. Case management: a rich history of coordinating care to control costs. Nurs Outlook 1996;44(4):169-72.
39 Hurley RE, Draper DA. Medicaid managed care for special need populations: behavioral health as a “tracer condition.” New Dir Ment Health Serv 1998;78:51-65.
