National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Cancer (1)
- Cancer: Breast Cancer (1)
- Care Coordination (1)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (7)
- (-) Communication (8)
- Education: Patient and Caregiver (1)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (1)
- Genetics (1)
- Healthcare Delivery (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (2)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (3)
- (-) Patient and Family Engagement (8)
- Primary Care (1)
- Shared Decision Making (4)
- Web-Based (1)
- Women (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 8 of 8 Research Studies DisplayedGordon HS, Street RL
How physicians, patients, and observers compare on the use of qualitative and quantitative measures of physician-patient communication.
The purpose of this study was to compare several different measures of physician-patient communication. Communication was measured with rating scales completed by patients and physicians and by two groups of external observers who used rating scales or coded the frequency of communication behaviors. The findings highlight the potential for using observers' ratings as an alternate measure of communication to more labor intensive frequency measures.
AHRQ-funded; HS010876.
Citation: Gordon HS, Street RL .
How physicians, patients, and observers compare on the use of qualitative and quantitative measures of physician-patient communication.
Eval Health Prof 2016 Dec;39(4):496-511. doi: 10.1177/0163278715625737.
.
.
Keywords: Communication, Shared Decision Making, Patient and Family Engagement, Clinician-Patient Communication
Traino HM, Siminoff LA
Keep it going: maintaining health conversations using relational and instrumental approaches.
The researchers examined how elements of relational and instrumental communication occurring within the first five minutes of the request impacted the length of the discussion. Sixteen U.S. tissue banking organizations and their staff making telephone requests for donation to families of tissue-donation eligible patients agreed to participate in the research. The researchers concluded that aspects of both relational and instrumental communication were associated with discussion length.
AHRQ-funded; HS013152.
Citation: Traino HM, Siminoff LA .
Keep it going: maintaining health conversations using relational and instrumental approaches.
Health Commun 2016;31(3):308-19. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2014.950020.
.
.
Keywords: Communication, Patient and Family Engagement, Clinician-Patient Communication
Gulbrandsen P, Clayman ML, Beach MC
Shared decision-making as an existential journey: aiming for restored autonomous capacity.
The researchers described the different ways in which illness represents an existential problem, and its implications for shared decision-making. They found that the fundamental uncertainty, state of vulnerability, and lack of power of the ill patient, imbue shared decision-making with a deeper existential significance and call for greater attention to the emotional and relational dimensions of care. They propose that the aim of shared decision-making should be restoration of the patient's autonomous capacity.
AHRQ-funded; HS022932.
Citation: Gulbrandsen P, Clayman ML, Beach MC .
Shared decision-making as an existential journey: aiming for restored autonomous capacity.
Patient Educ Couns 2016 Sep;99(9):1505-10. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.014.
.
.
Keywords: Communication, Shared Decision Making, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient and Family Engagement, Clinician-Patient Communication
Khan A, Rogers JE, Forster CS
Communication and shared understanding between parents and resident-physicians at night.
The researchers studied communication breakdowns evidenced by lack of shared understanding between parents and night-team residents about the reason for admission and care plan. After conducting a prospective cohort study of 286 parents and 37 night-team senior residents, they found that parents and residents reported that they shared an understanding with one another about care plans in 86.0percent and 73.1 percent of cases, respectively.
AHRQ-funded; HS022986; HS000063.
Citation: Khan A, Rogers JE, Forster CS .
Communication and shared understanding between parents and resident-physicians at night.
Hosp Pediatr 2016 Jun;6(6):319-29. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2015-0224.
.
.
Keywords: Care Coordination, Healthcare Delivery, Communication, Patient and Family Engagement, Clinician-Patient Communication
Roberts MC, Bryson A, Weinberger M
Patient-centered communication for discussing oncotype DX testing.
The researchers identified patient-centered communication strategies/gaps for discussing Oncotype DX testing (ODX) results. They applied a patient-centered communication framework to analyze qualitative interviews with oncologists about how they communicate about ODX with patients. Overall, providers discussed four patient-centered communication domains: exchanging information, assessing uncertainty, making decisions and cross-cutting themes.
AHRQ-funded; HS019468; HS022189.
Citation: Roberts MC, Bryson A, Weinberger M .
Patient-centered communication for discussing oncotype DX testing.
Cancer Invest 2016 May 27;34(5):205-12. doi: 10.3109/07357907.2016.1172637.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Breast Cancer, Communication, Clinician-Patient Communication, Shared Decision Making, Genetics, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Women
Spatz ES, Krumholz HM, Moulton BW
The new era of informed consent: getting to a reasonable-patient standard through shared decision making.
The authors discuss a range of issues associated with shared decision making. They see it as a collaborative communication process between clinicians and patients that integrates the best evidence available with the patients’ values and preferences, to promote high-quality health care decisions.
AHRQ-funded; HS023000.
Citation: Spatz ES, Krumholz HM, Moulton BW .
The new era of informed consent: getting to a reasonable-patient standard through shared decision making.
JAMA 2016 May 17;315(19):2063-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.3070..
Keywords: Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Shared Decision Making, Education: Patient and Caregiver, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Prey JE, Polubriaginof F, Kuperman GJ
International perspectives on sharing clinical data with patients.
The researchers investigated the current state of approaches for providing patients with access to their own clinical information. Participants span 16 countries across six continents, and the authors found that there is considerable variability in the level of maturity, the degree of government involvement, the technical infrastructure, and the plans for future development across the world. They concluded that we are still in the early stages of deploying patient engagement technologies and have yet to identify optimal strategies in this arena.
AHRQ-funded; HS021393; HS21816.
Citation: Prey JE, Polubriaginof F, Kuperman GJ .
International perspectives on sharing clinical data with patients.
Int J Med Inform 2016 Feb;86:135-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.11.007.
.
.
Keywords: Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient and Family Engagement
Mirsky JB, Tieu L, Lyles C
A mixed-methods study of patient-provider e-mail content in a safety-net setting.
The researchers explored the content of patient-provider e-mails in a safety-net primary care clinic, by conducting a content analysis using inductive and deductive coding of e-mail exchanges. Their results showed that patients in safety-net clinics are capable of safely and effectively using electronic messaging for between-visit communication with providers.
AHRQ-funded; HS022408; HS023558.
Citation: Mirsky JB, Tieu L, Lyles C .
A mixed-methods study of patient-provider e-mail content in a safety-net setting.
J Health Commun 2016;21(1):85-91. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2015.1033118..
Keywords: Communication, Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient and Family Engagement, Primary Care, Web-Based