National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Children/Adolescents (1)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (3)
- Communication (2)
- (-) Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) (14)
- Cultural Competence (1)
- Home Healthcare (1)
- Inpatient Care (1)
- Long-Term Care (1)
- Nursing Homes (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (1)
- Patient Experience (9)
- Patient Safety (1)
- Practice Improvement (2)
- Primary Care (4)
- Provider: Health Personnel (1)
- Provider: Nurse (1)
- Provider Performance (3)
- Quality Improvement (4)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (2)
- Quality Measures (2)
- Quality of Care (5)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (1)
- Workforce (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 14 of 14 Research Studies DisplayedBhaumik D, Schlesinger MJ
How exposure to patient narratives affects stereotyped choices of primary care clinicians.
Researchers examined whether patient narratives alter the impact of stereotyping on choice of primary care clinicians, specifically the assumption that female doctors will be more attentive to empathic relationships with patients. Individuals selected from a nationally representative Internet panel participated in a survey that provided performance data about 12 fictitious primary care physicians and included a randomized set of narrative feedback from patients. The results showed that exposure to patient narratives that do not disrupt gendered stereotypes increased the likelihood of choosing a female clinician; however, when a sufficient proportion of patient comments run counter to stereotypes, even a minority of narratives is sufficient to disrupt gendered-expectations and alter choices.
AHRQ-funded; HS016978.
Citation: Bhaumik D, Schlesinger MJ .
How exposure to patient narratives affects stereotyped choices of primary care clinicians.
PLoS One 2023 Dec 7; 18(12):e0295243. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0295243..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Primary Care
Hays RD, Walling AM, Sudore RL
Support for use of Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems communication items among seriously ill patients.
High-quality doctor-patient communication is essential for patients with serious illnesses. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS(®)) communication items among patients with serious illnesses. The study found that Eigenvalues and internal consistency reliability supported a 5-item communication scale. Item characteristic curves revealed a monotonic relationship of response options with the communication score. Item thresholds indicated that most patients reported positive patient experiences, and item slopes confirmed that all items were strongly related to the communication score. Reliability of the communication scale was higher for assessing patients with negative experiences of care than for the positive end of the spectrum. Communication was positively correlated with confidence in other's knowledge of ACP medical wishes, ACP engagement, and confidence in filling out ACP-related medical forms.
AHRQ-funded; HS029321.
Citation: Hays RD, Walling AM, Sudore RL .
Support for use of Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems communication items among seriously ill patients.
J Palliat Med 2023 Sep; 26(9):1234-39. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0572..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Provider: Health Personnel
Martino SC, Reynolds KA, Grob R
Evaluation of a protocol for eliciting narrative accounts of pediatric inpatient experiences of care.
This study’s objective was to evaluate the measurement properties of a set of six items designed to elicit narrative accounts of pediatric inpatient experience. This cross-sectional survey with follow-up phone interviews used data from 163 participants recruited from a probability-based online panel of US adults. Eligible participants were family members of a child who had an overnight hospital stay in the past 12 months. Participants completed an online (n = 129) or phone (n = 34) survey about their child's hospitalization experience that contained closed-ended items from the Child HCAHPS Survey followed by the six narrative items. About two weeks after completing the survey, 47 participants additionally completed a one-hour, semi-structured phone interview, the results of which served as a "gold standard" for evaluating the fidelity of narrative responses. The average narrative was 248 words, with 79% of narratives mentioning a topic included on the Child HCAHPS survey; 89% mentioning a topic not covered by that survey; 75% including at least one detailed description of an actionable event. Overall, there was a 66% correspondence between narrative and interview responses, with higher correspondence in the phone than in the online condition (75% vs. 59%).
AHRQ-funded; HS025920; HS016978.
Citation: Martino SC, Reynolds KA, Grob R .
Evaluation of a protocol for eliciting narrative accounts of pediatric inpatient experiences of care.
Health Serv Res 2023 Apr;58(2):271-81. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14134.
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Patient Experience, Inpatient Care
Schuttner L, Guo R, Wong E
High-risk patient experiences associated with an intensive primary care management program in the Veterans Health Administration.
This study assessed high-risk patient experiences associated with an intensive primary care management program conducted at the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). The authors assessed patient experience using a patient survey based on the CAHPS Survey in 2019. Patient experience was assessed among 1) prior enrollees (n = 59) of an intensive management program (2014-2018); (2) nonenrollees (n = 356) at program sites; and (3) nonprogram site patients (n = 728). The VHA Office of Primary Care used a patient-centered medical home model (PACT) to deliver coordinated, continuous primary care through multidisciplinary teams. The PACT-Intensive Management (PIM) program was piloted at 5 sites from 2014 to 2018. Outcomes examined included patient ratings of patient-centered care; overall health care experience; and satisfaction with their usual outpatient care provider. Enrollees were more satisfied with their current provider versus nonenrollees within program sites. However, the authors weren’t sure if the benefits persisted after program conclusion.
AHRQ-funded; HS026369.
Citation: Schuttner L, Guo R, Wong E .
High-risk patient experiences associated with an intensive primary care management program in the Veterans Health Administration.
J Ambul Care Manage 2023 Jan-Mar;46(1):45-53. doi: 10.1097/jac.0000000000000428..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Patient Experience, Primary Care
Quigley DD, Elliott MN, Slaughter ME
Follow-up shadow coaching improves primary care provider-patient interactions and maintains improvements when conducted regularly: a spline model analysis.
The purpose of this study was to explore whether a second shadow coaching session (re-coaching) improves the patient experience and maintains it over time. The researchers observed a statistically significant increase of 3.7 points among re-coached providers after re-coaching on overall provider rating (OPR) and 3.5 points on provider communication (PC) (differences of 1, 3, and 5 points or more are considered small, medium, and large, respectively). Improvements from the re-coaching endured for 12 months for OPR and 8 months for PC.
AHRQ-funded; HS025920.
Citation: Quigley DD, Elliott MN, Slaughter ME .
Follow-up shadow coaching improves primary care provider-patient interactions and maintains improvements when conducted regularly: a spline model analysis.
J Gen Intern Med 2023 Jan; 38(1):221-27. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07881-y..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Primary Care, Clinician-Patient Communication, Patient Experience, Provider Performance
Nembhard IM, Matta S, Shaller D
Learning from patients: the impact of using patients' narratives on patient experience scores.
The purpose of this study was to assess whether primary care clinics that often share patients' narratives with their staff have higher patient experience survey scores. The researchers conducted a 1-year study of 5,545 adult patients and 276 staff affiliated with nine clinics in one health system. The study found the frequency of sharing useful narratives with staff was related with patient experience scores for all measures, a result which was conditional upon staff confidence in their own knowledge. For operational measures such as care coordination, higher levels of sharing was associated with subsequently higher performance for more confident staff and lower performance or no difference for less confident staff, depending on the measure. For relational measures such as patient-provider communication, increased sharing was associated with higher scores for less confident staff and lower scores for more confident staff.
AHRQ-funded; HS016978.
Citation: Nembhard IM, Matta S, Shaller D .
Learning from patients: the impact of using patients' narratives on patient experience scores.
Health Care Manage Rev 2023 Jan-Mar; 49(1):2-13. doi: 10.1097/hmr.0000000000000386..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Patient Experience, Provider Performance
Quigley DD, Quereshi N, Hays RD
Reasons primary care practices chose patient experience surveys during patient-centered medical home transformation.
This study’s objective was to identify reasons primary care practices chose to implement a patient experience survey during their patient-centered medical home transformation. The authors conducted interviews with a stratified-random sample of 105 of these practices. Fifty-one practices used a Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) survey and 53 administered another patient survey. The three most common reasons to use a survey were given as: (1) to compare performance against other practices, which requires systematically collected data across large numbers of practices (ie, the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems survey), (2) participation in an external patient-centered medical home program, and (3) survey administration cost. A second patient survey was used to identify quality improvement needs.
AHRQ-funded; HS016980; HS025920.
Citation: Quigley DD, Quereshi N, Hays RD .
Reasons primary care practices chose patient experience surveys during patient-centered medical home transformation.
J Ambul Care Manage 2023 Jan-Mar;46(1):34-44. doi: 10.1097/jac.0000000000000442.
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Patient-Centered Healthcare, Primary Care, Quality Improvement, Practice Improvement
Quigley DD, Qureshi N, Palimaru A
Content and actionability of recommendations to providers after shadow coaching.
This paper examined the content of the recommendations given to shadow-coached providers aimed at improving provider-patient interactions, to characterize these recommendations, and to examine their actionability. Using CAHPS data, the study’s findings showed that patient experience surveys were effective at identifying where improvement is needed but are not always informative enough to instruct providers on how to modify and improve their interactions with patients. Analyzing the feedback given to coached providers as part of an effective shadow-coaching program provides details about implementation on shadow-coaching feedback.
AHRQ-funded; HS025920.
Citation: Quigley DD, Qureshi N, Palimaru A .
Content and actionability of recommendations to providers after shadow coaching.
Qual Manag Health Care 2022 Oct-Dec;31(4):199-209. doi: 10.1097/qmh.0000000000000354..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Patient Experience, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Practice Improvement, Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication
Quigley D, Qureshi N, Rybowski L
AHRQ Author: Ginsberg C
Summary of the 2020 AHRQ research meeting on 'Advancing Methods of Implementing and Evaluating Patient experience improvement using consumer assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Surveys'.
The purpose of this AHRQ authored paper was to discuss the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality research meeting on using Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) data for quality improvement (QI). The author reports on 3 topics addressed, including: lessons learned about organizational factors/environment for improving patient experience; 2) organizational use of data to improve patient experience; and 3) information provided by evaluations utilizing CAHPS data and their use in implementing successful programs to improve patient experience. The author further identified key themes, including: Early and frequent engagement of providers and stakeholders, QI process standardization, complementing CAHPS data with other data, and compiling dashboards of CAHPS scores to identify and track improvement. The author concluded that much can be learned and achieved from organization-level studies.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; HS025920; HS016978.
Citation: Quigley D, Qureshi N, Rybowski L .
Summary of the 2020 AHRQ research meeting on 'Advancing Methods of Implementing and Evaluating Patient experience improvement using consumer assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS®) Surveys'.
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2022 Sep;22(6):883-90. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2022.2064848..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Patient Experience
Fowler FJ, Brenner PS, Cosenza C
How responding in Spanish affects CAHPS results.
The purpose of this study was to examine the associations of language and ethnicity with responses to CAHPS surveys and assess the effect of responding to CAHPS surveys in Spanish. The researchers surveyed patients who had received care at a Connecticut community health center within 6 or 12 months of being sent a CAHPS survey that asks about care experiences. Three hypotheses were tested: 1. Spanish speakers are more likely to choose extreme response options. 2. The meaning of the Spanish translation is different than the English version of the questions, with Spanish speakers providing different answers because of meaning differences. 3. Spanish speakers have different expectations regarding their health care than those who answer in English. Researchers evaluated any differences by ethnicity and language. The study found that those answering in Spanish gave significantly more positive reports than the other two groups on three of the five measures, and higher than the non-Hispanic respondents on a fourth. The study concluded that subjects answering in Spanish gave more positive reports of their medical experiences than Hispanics and non-Hispanics answering in English.
AHRQ-funded; HS016978.
Citation: Fowler FJ, Brenner PS, Cosenza C .
How responding in Spanish affects CAHPS results.
BMC Health Serv Res 2022 Jul 8;22(1):884. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08262-1..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Cultural Competence, Patient Experience, Quality of Care, Racial and Ethnic Minorities
Merkow RP, Chung JW, Slota JM
Correlation of the US News and World Report-calculated nurse staffing index with actual hospital-reported nurse staffing.
This study’s objective was to understand how the Nurse Staffing Index (NSI) used in the US News and World Report “Best Hospitals” rankings correlates to actual nurse staffing levels. Nurse staffing data was obtained from publicly available data in the states of Illinois, California, and New Jersey. No other states had publicly accessible data. Hospital characteristics were obtained from the 2016 American Hospital Association (AHA) survey. The NSI was calculated using AHA data and is defined as the number of FTE RNs per adjusted patient day. Hospital characteristics were assessed using Hospital Compare data. Higher actual hospital-reported nurse staffing in Illinois and New Jersey was paradoxically associated with lower nurse staffing when measured by the NSI. California hospital-reported staffing intensity was weakly correctly with the NSI and RN nursing hours per patient day was not correlated with any of the 9 structural measures of hospital quality, while NSI was positively correlated with 3 of the 9 measures, particularly hospital volume status. None of the 11 outcome measures the authors assessed were associated with RN nursing hours per patient day or the NSI in either Illinois or California. All 12 patient experience measures were significantly and positively correlated with RN nursing hours in Illinois. However, none of the patient experience measures were significantly associated with the NSI in Illinois. The authors concluded that the NSI may not measure actual nurse staffing as intended.
AHRQ-funded; HS024516; HS026385.
Citation: Merkow RP, Chung JW, Slota JM .
Correlation of the US News and World Report-calculated nurse staffing index with actual hospital-reported nurse staffing.
J Nurs Care Qual 2022 Jul-Sep;37(3):195-98. doi: 10.1097/ncq.0000000000000619..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Provider: Nurse, Workforce
Schwartz ML, Rahman M, Thomas KS
Consumer selection and home health agency quality and patient experience stars.
The objective of this study was to compare the impact of the introduction of two distinct sets of star ratings, quality of care, and patient experience, on home health agency (HHA) selection. The investigators concluded that the introduction of quality of care and patient experience stars were associated with changes in HHA selection; however, the strength of these relationships was weaker than observed in other health care settings where a single star rating was reported.
AHRQ-funded; HS026440.
Citation: Schwartz ML, Rahman M, Thomas KS .
Consumer selection and home health agency quality and patient experience stars.
Health Serv Res 2022 Feb;57(1):113-24. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13867..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Home Healthcare, Patient Experience, Quality Measures, Quality of Care, Provider Performance, Quality Indicators (QIs)
Quigley DD, Predmore Z
What parents have to say: content and actionability of narrative comments from Child HCAHPS survey.
The purpose of this study was to examine the content and actionability of written comments from parents and guardians on the Child Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (Child HCAHPS) survey. The investigators concluded that Child HCAHPS comments provided rich detail and a large portion were deemed actionable. Comments also provided insights into topics both on the survey itself and on many other inpatient pediatric issues raised by parents and guardians.
AHRQ-funded; HS025920.
Citation: Quigley DD, Predmore Z .
What parents have to say: content and actionability of narrative comments from Child HCAHPS survey.
Hosp Pediatr 2022 Feb;12(2):205-19. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2021-006032..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Patient Experience
Yount N, Zebrak KA, Famolaro T
Linking patient safety culture to quality ratings in the nursing home setting.
This study examined the relationship between scores on the AHRQ Surveys on Patient Safety Culture™ (SOPS®) Nursing Home Survey (NH SOPS) and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Nursing Home Five-Star Quality Ratings. The authors used data on 186 nursing homes to conduct multiple regression analyses predicting the Five-Star Quality Ratings from the NH SOPS survey measures. Five NH SOPS measures were related to the Overall, Health Inspections, and Quality Five-Star Ratings; four NH SOPS measures were related to at least two of the four Five-Star Quality Ratings and three SOPS measures were related to one Five-Star Rating. No NH SOPS measures were significantly associated with the Staffing Five-Star Rating.
AHRQ-funded; 233201500026I.
Citation: Yount N, Zebrak KA, Famolaro T .
Linking patient safety culture to quality ratings in the nursing home setting.
J Appl Gerontol 2022 Jan;41(1):73-81. doi: 10.1177/0733464820969283..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Patient Safety, Nursing Homes, Long-Term Care, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality Measures, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care