National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- (-) Cancer (6)
- Cancer: Breast Cancer (4)
- Cancer: Prostate Cancer (1)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (1)
- Communication (1)
- Disparities (1)
- Genetics (2)
- Men's Health (1)
- Mortality (1)
- Outcomes (2)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (2)
- Patient and Family Engagement (1)
- Provider: Physician (1)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (1)
- Research Methodologies (1)
- (-) Shared Decision Making (6)
- Surgery (2)
- Women (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 6 of 6 Research Studies DisplayedKunst NR, Alarid-Escudero F, Paltiel AD
A value of information analysis of research on the 21-gene assay for breast cancer management.
The authors aimed to quantify the value of conducting further research to reduce decision uncertainty in the use of the 21-gene assay Oncotype DX (21-GA). They found that current evidence strongly supports the use of the 21-GA in intermediate- and high-risk women and recommended that further research focus on low-risk women.
AHRQ-funded; HS023900.
Citation: Kunst NR, Alarid-Escudero F, Paltiel AD .
A value of information analysis of research on the 21-gene assay for breast cancer management.
Value Health 2019 Oct;22(10):1102-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.05.004..
Keywords: Genetics, Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Shared Decision Making, Research Methodologies
Sepucha KR, Langford AT, Belkora JK
Impact of timing on measurement of decision quality and shared decision making: longitudinal cohort study of breast cancer patients.
Med Decis Making 2019 Aug;39(6):642-50. doi: 10.1177/0272989x19862545.
AHRQ-funded; HS025718.
Citation: Sepucha KR, Langford AT, Belkora JK .
Impact of timing on measurement of decision quality and shared decision making: longitudinal cohort study of breast cancer patients.
Med Decis Making 2019 Aug;39(6):642-50. doi: 10.1177/0272989x19862545..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Surgery
Bateni SB, Davidson AJ, Arora M
Is breast-conserving therapy appropriate for male breast cancer patients? A national cancer database analysis.
The purpose of this study was to compare overall survival rates among male breast cancer patients who underwent breast-conserving therapy (BCT) versus mastectomy. A retrospective analysis identified 8445 stage I-II male breast cancer patients from the National Cancer Database and grouped them according to surgical and radiation therapy (RT). Most of the patients underwent total mastectomy, while 18.2% underwent BCT, 12.4% underwent total mastectomy with RT, and 8.2% underwent partial mastectomy alone. Partial mastectomy alone, total mastectomy alone, and total mastectomy with RT were associated with worse overall survival rates compared with BCT. The authors conclude that BCT is associated with greater survival, but the underlying mechanisms of this association warrant further study.
AHRQ-funded; HS022236.
Citation: Bateni SB, Davidson AJ, Arora M .
Is breast-conserving therapy appropriate for male breast cancer patients? A national cancer database analysis.
Ann Surg Oncol 2019 Jul;26(7):2144-53. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07159-4..
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Breast Cancer, Shared Decision Making, Mortality, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Johnston FM, Beckman M
Navigating difficult conversations.
In this paper, the authors discussed breaking bad news and navigating difficult conversations in surgical oncology practice. They note that mounting evidence supports a patient-centered communication approach and models of shared decisionmaking. Physician training in patient-centered cancer communication also continues to evolve.
AHRQ-funded; HS024736.
Citation: Johnston FM, Beckman M .
Navigating difficult conversations.
J Surg Oncol 2019 Jul;120(1):23-29. doi: 10.1002/jso.25472..
Keywords: Cancer, Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Shared Decision Making, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient and Family Engagement, Provider: Physician, Surgery
Gordon BE, Basak R, Carpenter WR
Factors influencing prostate cancer treatment decisions for African American and white men.
This prospective, population-based cohort study examined some possible reasons for mortality outcome differences for prostate cancer between African American (AA) and white patients. A cohort of 1170 men with nonmetastatic prostate cancer were enrolled from 2011 to 2013 before treatment in North Carolina. Participants were asked to rate their aggressiveness of their cancer, and also the importance of 10 factors their treatment decision-making process. Among low-risk patients, there was no difference in perception of their cancer as “not very aggressive”. Among high-risk patients, 54% of AA patients considered their cancer to be “not very aggressive” while only 24% of white patients did. For AA patients, cost, treatment time, and recovery time were considered very important more than white patients.
AHRQ-funded.
Citation: Gordon BE, Basak R, Carpenter WR .
Factors influencing prostate cancer treatment decisions for African American and white men.
Cancer 2019 May 15;125(10):1693-700. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31932..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Cancer, Cancer: Prostate Cancer, Disparities, Men's Health, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Racial and Ethnic Minorities
Matsen CB, Lyons S, Goodman MS
Decision role preferences for return of results from genome sequencing amongst young breast cancer patients.
The purpose of this study was to better understand decision role preferences in women diagnosed with breast cancer at a young age for return of results of genome sequencing in research and clinical settings. The investigators found that most women in their study preferred to share in decision making and that participants had somewhat different role preferences for clinical and research contexts, with greater preference for active roles in the research context.
AHRQ-funded; HS024784.
Citation: Matsen CB, Lyons S, Goodman MS .
Decision role preferences for return of results from genome sequencing amongst young breast cancer patients.
Patient Educ Couns 2019 Jan;102(1):155-61. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.08.004..
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Breast Cancer, Shared Decision Making, Genetics, Women