National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Ambulatory Care and Surgery (3)
- Care Coordination (1)
- Chronic Conditions (1)
- Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) (1)
- COVID-19 (1)
- Data (1)
- Diabetes (1)
- Disparities (4)
- Elderly (1)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (2)
- Evidence-Based Practice (4)
- Healthcare Costs (1)
- Healthcare Delivery (20)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (2)
- Health Insurance (1)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (2)
- (-) Health Systems (36)
- Hospitals (8)
- Implementation (3)
- Learning Health Systems (8)
- Medicare (6)
- Organizational Change (1)
- Orthopedics (1)
- Outcomes (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (2)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (1)
- Patient and Family Engagement (1)
- Patient Experience (1)
- Payment (2)
- Policy (1)
- Primary Care (4)
- Primary Care: Models of Care (1)
- Provider (1)
- Provider Performance (3)
- Public Health (2)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (1)
- Quality Measures (2)
- Quality of Care (8)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (2)
- Research Methodologies (2)
- Rural Health (1)
- Shared Decision Making (2)
- Social Determinants of Health (1)
- Surgery (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 25 of 36 Research Studies DisplayedChisolm DJ, Dugan JA, Figueroa JF
Improving health equity through health care systems research.
This study’s objective was to describe health equity research priorities for health care delivery systems and delineate a research and action agenda that generates evidence-based solutions to persistent racial and ethnic inequities in health outcomes. This project was conducted as a component of the AHRQ stakeholder engaged process to develop an Equity Agenda and Action Plan to guide priority setting to advance health equity. The stakeholders included experts from academia, health care organizations, industry, and government. Five priority themes were derived iteratively through experts from academia, health care organizations, industry, and government. They identified six priority themes for research; (1) institutional leadership, culture, and workforce; (2) data-driven, culturally tailored care; (3) health equity targeted performance incentives; (4) health equity-informed approaches to health system consolidation and access; (5) whole person care; (6) and whole community investment. They also suggested cross-cutting themes regarding research workforce and research timelines.
AHRQ-funded.
Citation: Chisolm DJ, Dugan JA, Figueroa JF .
Improving health equity through health care systems research.
Health Serv Res 2023 Dec; 58(suppl 3):289-99. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14192..
Keywords: Health Systems, Disparities, Social Determinants of Health, Healthcare Delivery
Bierman AS, Mistry KB
AHRQ Author: Bierman AS, Mistry KB
Commentary: Achieving health equity - the role of learning health systems.
The article discussed learning health systems and their role in achieving health equity. Issues considered were prioritization of health equity, development and implementation of models of care, partnerships with patients and communities, research on the effectiveness of interventions across diverse populations, integration strategies, and multisector collaborations to address social needs. The authors concluded that by considering these issues, learning health systems can play a pivotal role in eliminating health inequities.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Bierman AS, Mistry KB .
Commentary: Achieving health equity - the role of learning health systems.
Healthc Policy 2023 Nov; 19(2):21-27. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2023.27236..
Keywords: Learning Health Systems, Health Systems, Disparities
Ganguli I, Mackwood MB, Yang CW
Racial differences in low value care among older adult Medicare patients in US health systems: retrospective cohort study.
The objective of this retrospective cohort study was to characterize racial differences in receipt of low-value care among older Medicare beneficiaries overall and within U.S. health systems. Medicare fee-for-service administrative data was used for Black and White Medicare patients who were at least 65 as of 2016. Findings showed that, of the 40 low value services examined, Black patients had a higher adjusted receipt of 9 services and lower receipt of 20 services than White patients. Differences were generally small and largely due to differential care within health systems, but the authors concluded that their findings suggested potential factors that researchers, policymakers, and health system leaders might investigate to improve health care quality and equity.
AHRQ-funded; HS024930.
Citation: Ganguli I, Mackwood MB, Yang CW .
Racial differences in low value care among older adult Medicare patients in US health systems: retrospective cohort study.
BMJ 2023 Oct 25; 383:e074908. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2023-074908..
Keywords: Elderly, Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Medicare, Health Systems
Kim B, Cruden G, Crable EL
A structured approach to applying systems analysis methods for examining implementation mechanisms.
This article delineated a structured approach to applying systems analysis methods to examining implementation mechanisms. This approach included steps for selecting, tailoring, and evaluating an implementation strategy. The authors illustrated the approach by using an example case, then discussed the strengths and limitations of this approach, when each step might be appropriate. They suggested work that might extend systems analysis methods to the implementation mechanisms research.
AHRQ-funded; HS025632.
Citation: Kim B, Cruden G, Crable EL .
A structured approach to applying systems analysis methods for examining implementation mechanisms.
Implement Sci Commun 2023 Oct 19; 4(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00504-5..
Keywords: Implementation, Evidence-Based Practice, Health Systems
Simpson SA, Loh R, Elliott L
A mortality surveillance collaboration between a health system and public health department.
The authors described a collaboration between a health system and public health department to create a mortality surveillance system that enabled the health system to identify more than six times the number of deaths identified through local system medical records. They concluded that this epidemiological process that combined nuanced data captured through clinical care in health systems with subsequent data on mortality can be of particular benefit to underserved communities.
AHRQ-funded; HS027389.
Citation: Simpson SA, Loh R, Elliott L .
A mortality surveillance collaboration between a health system and public health department.
Am J Public Health 2023 Sep; 113(9):943-46. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2023.307335..
Keywords: Public Health, Health Systems
Johnson PT, Conway SJ, Berkowitz SA
Transforming health care from volume to value: a health system implementation road map.
The mission of the High Value Practice Academic Alliance is to 1) rapidly disseminate effective value-based performance improvement processes to safely decrease the cost of care for patients, and 2) train the next generation of physicians in principles of high value practice. The organization convened 100 academic medical center partners, and after 5 years of practice, opened membership to any medical center and became the High Value Practice Alliance. In 2021 and 2022, directors of the alliance devoted educational programs of the annual conference to developing a care delivery roadmap identifying the strategies and programs required to maximize resource use, clinical effectiveness, and care coordination. The group is now publishing the “playbook” as a series of focused articles, a comprehensive framework to improve the health care value in a delivery system. This playbook includes 3 performance improvement approaches: 1) resource focused, 2) infrastructure focused, and 3) condition focused. The Transforming Healthcare from Volume to Value: a Health System Implementation RoadMap manuscript series will address each of the strategies and relevant programs.
AHRQ-funded; HS029151; HS026350.
Citation: Johnson PT, Conway SJ, Berkowitz SA .
Transforming health care from volume to value: a health system implementation road map.
Am J Med 2023 Aug; 136(8):763-67. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2023.04.030..
Keywords: Health Systems, Implementation, Healthcare Delivery
Ong T, Albon D, Amin RS
Establishing a Cystic Fibrosis Learning Network: interventions to promote collaboration and data-driven improvement at scale.
This paper describes the Cystic Fibrosis Learning Network (CFLN), which was designed to improve medical outcomes and quality of life through an intentional focus on achieving reliable evidence-based chronic care delivery and creating a system for data-driven collaborative learning. The authors described the development and growth of the CFLN considering six domains of a Network Maturity Grid: system leadership; governance and policy management; quality improvement (QI); engagement and community building; data and analytics; and research. The CFLN represents 36 accredited care centers in the CF Foundation Care Center Network caring for over 6300 patients, with 77% of 6779 patient clinical care visits/quarter entering into the Registry within 30 days. Almost all CFLN teams (94%) have a patient/family partner (PFP), and 74% of PFPs indicate they are actively participating, taking ownership of, or leading QI initiatives with the interdisciplinary care team. In 2022, most (97%) centers reported completing 1-13 improvement cycles per month, and 82% contributed to monthly QI progress reports to share learning.
AHRQ-funded; HS02639.
Citation: Ong T, Albon D, Amin RS .
Establishing a Cystic Fibrosis Learning Network: interventions to promote collaboration and data-driven improvement at scale.
Learn Health Syst 2023 Jul; 7(3):e10354. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10354..
Keywords: Learning Health Systems, Health Systems
Harrison MI, Borsky AE
AHRQ Author: Harrison MI
How alignment between health systems and their embedded research units contributes to system learning.
This AHRQ-authored paper examined the organization of learning health system (LHS) research units and conditions affecting their contributions to system improvement and learning. The authors conducted 12 key-informant and 44 semi-structured interviews in six delivery systems engaged in LHS research. Using rapid qualitative analysis, they identified themes and compared successful versus challenging projects; LHS units and other research units in the same system; and LHS units in different systems. They found that LHS units operate both independently and as subunits within larger research centers. Key alignment factors identified were availability of internal (system) funding directing researchers' work toward system priorities; researchers' skills and experiences that fit a system's operational needs; LHS unit subculture supporting system improvement and collaboration with clinicians and other internal stakeholders; applications of external funding to system priorities; and executive leadership for system-wide learning. Direct consultation between LHS unit leaders and system executives and engagement of researchers in clinical and operational activities fostered mutual understanding and collaboration between researchers, clinicians, and leaders.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Harrison MI, Borsky AE .
How alignment between health systems and their embedded research units contributes to system learning.
Healthc 2023 Jun; 11(2):100688. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2023.100688..
Keywords: Health Systems, Learning Health Systems
Beaulieu ND, Chernew ME, McWilliams JM
Organization and performance of US health systems.
The objectives of this evidence review were to identify and describe health systems in the US, to assess differences between physicians and hospitals in and outside of health systems, and to compare quality and cost of care delivered by physicians and hospitals in and outside of health systems. A total of 580 health systems in a great variety of sizes were identified; prices for physician, hospital services, and total spending were assessed in 2018 commercial claims data. Health system physicians and hospitals were shown to deliver a large portion of medical services. Clinical quality performance and patient experience measures were slightly better in systems; however, spending and prices were significantly higher, especially in small practices. The authors concluded that slight quality differentials in combination with large price differentials suggested that health systems have not realized their potential for better care at equal or lower cost.
AHRQ-funded; HS024072.
Citation: Beaulieu ND, Chernew ME, McWilliams JM .
Organization and performance of US health systems.
JAMA 2023 Jan 24; 329(4):325-35. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.24032..
Keywords: Health Systems, Healthcare Delivery, Provider Performance, Quality Measures, Quality of Care, Hospitals
Sirkin JT, Flanagan E, Tong ST
AHRQ Author: Tong ST, McNellis RJ, Bierman AS
Primary care's challenges and responses in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from AHRQ's learning community.
The purpose of this paper was to review the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality’s (AHRQ) learning community organized to engage and support primary care in responding to COVID-19 and provide an opportunity for participants to communicate learning and peer support, improve understanding of the stressors and challenges faced by practices, determine needs, and identify possible solutions to challenges of the pandemic. The researchers identified challenges, responses, and innovations that occurred through the engagement and information sharing of the learning community and categorized them across 5 domains, including: patient-centeredness, clinician and practice, systems and infrastructure, community and public health; and health equity which cut across each of the other domains. The authors concluded that the learning community provided valuable insights for future research and policy, primary care delivery improvement, and ensuring greater preparedness for future challenges.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Sirkin JT, Flanagan E, Tong ST .
Primary care's challenges and responses in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic: insights from AHRQ's learning community.
Ann Fam Med 2023 Jan-Feb; 21(1):76-82. doi: 10.1370/afm.2904..
Keywords: COVID-19, Primary Care, Learning Health Systems, Health Systems, Evidence-Based Practice, Public Health
Scanlon DP, Harvey JB, Wolf LJ
Are health systems redesigning how health care is delivered?
The purpose of this study was to explore why and how health systems are engaging in care delivery redesign (CDR)-defined as the variety of tools and organizational change processes health systems use to pursue the Triple Aim. The investigators concluded that the ability to validly and reliably measure CDR activities-particularly across varying organizational contexts and markets-was currently limited but is key to better understanding CDR's impact on intended outcomes, which is important for guiding both health system decision making and policy making.
AHRQ-funded; HS024067.
Citation: Scanlon DP, Harvey JB, Wolf LJ .
Are health systems redesigning how health care is delivered?
Health Serv Res 2020 Dec;55(Suppl 3):1129-43. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13585..
Keywords: Health Systems, Healthcare Delivery
Graves JA, Nshuti L, Everson J
Breadth and exclusivity of hospital and physician networks in US insurance markets.
The goal of this study was to quantify network breadth and overlap among primary care physician (PCP), cardiology, and general acute care hospital networks for employer-based (large group and small group), individually purchased (marketplace), Medicare Advantage (MA), and Medicaid managed care (MMC) plans. The main outcomes measured were percentage of in-network physicians and/or hospitals within a 60-minute drive from a hypothetical patient in a given zip code (breadth), and the number of physicians and/or hospitals within each network that overlapped with other insurers' networks, expressed as a percentage of the total possible number of shared connections (exclusivity). Networks were categorized by network breadth size and analyzed by insurance type, state, and insurance, physician, and/or hospital market concentration level, as measured by the Hirschman-Herfindahl index. Markets with concentrated primary care and insurance markets had the broadest and least exclusive primary care networks among large-group commercial plans. Markets with the least concentration had the narrowest and most exclusive networks. Rising levels of insurer and market concentration were associated with broader and less exclusive healthcare networks. The authors suggest that this means that patients could switch to a lower-cost, narrow network plan without losing-in-network coverage to their PCP.
AHRQ-funded; HS025976; HS026395.
Citation: Graves JA, Nshuti L, Everson J .
Breadth and exclusivity of hospital and physician networks in US insurance markets.
JAMA Netw Open 2020 Dec;3(12):e2029419. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.29419..
Keywords: Health Insurance, Learning Health Systems, Health Systems, Primary Care, Hospitals, Healthcare Delivery
Singer SJ, Sinaiko AD, Tietschert MV
Care integration within and outside health system boundaries.
The purpose of this study was to examine care integration-efforts to unify disparate parts of health care organizations to generate synergy across activities occurring within and between them-to understand whether and at which organizational level health systems impact care quality and staff experience. The investigators concluded that measures of clinical process integration related to higher staff ratings of quality and experience.
AHRQ-funded; HS024067.
Citation: Singer SJ, Sinaiko AD, Tietschert MV .
Care integration within and outside health system boundaries.
Health Serv Res 2020 Dec;55(Suppl 3):1033-48. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13578..
Keywords: Health Systems, Healthcare Delivery, Health Services Research (HSR), Research Methodologies
Kranz AM, DeYoreo M, shete-Roesler B
Health system affiliation of physician organizations and quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries who have high needs.
The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that health systems provide better care to patients with high needs compared to nonaffiliated physician organizations (POs). The 2015 Medicare Data on Provider Practice and Specialty linked physicians’ database was linked to POs Medicare Provider Enrollment, Chain, and Ownership System (PECOS) and IRS Form 990 data to identify health system affiliations. Among 2,323,301 beneficiaries with high needs, 52.3% received care from system-affiliated practices. The emergency department (ED) visit rate was statistically significantly different in system-affiliated POs and nonaffiliated POs. There were small differences for the remaining five of six quality measures examined: continuity of care, follow-up visits, all-cause readmissions, and ambulatory care-sensitive hospitalizations. Within systems there was substantial variation for rates of continuity of care and follow-up after ED visits.
AHRQ-funded; HS024067.
Citation: Kranz AM, DeYoreo M, shete-Roesler B .
Health system affiliation of physician organizations and quality of care for Medicare beneficiaries who have high needs.
Health Serv Res 2020 Dec;55(Suppl 3):1118-28. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13570..
Keywords: Health Systems, Medicare, Quality of Care, Healthcare Delivery
Machta RM, Reschovsky JD, Jones DJ
AHRQ Author: Furukawa MF
Health system integration with physician specialties varies across markets and system types.
Data from the AHRQ Compendium of US Health Systems and the IQVIA OneKey database was used to examine the change from 2016 to 2018 in the percentage of physicians in systems, focusing on primary care and the 10 most numerous non-hospital based specialties across 382 metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) in the US. The authors also categorized systems by ownership, mission, and payment program participation and examined how these characteristics were related to their patterns of physician integration in 2018. Findings were that specialists with lucrative hospital services were the most commonly integrated with systems, including hematology-oncology, cardiology, and general surgery. High market concentration by insurers and hospital-systems was associated with lower rates of physician integration. In addition, systems with academic medical centers (AMCs) and publicly owned systems unrelated to the physicians’ potential contribution to hospital revenue, and investor-owned systems demonstrated more limited physician integration.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290201600001C.
Citation: Machta RM, Reschovsky JD, Jones DJ .
Health system integration with physician specialties varies across markets and system types.
Health Serv Res 2020 Dec;55(Suppl 3):1062-72. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13584..
Keywords: Health Systems, Healthcare Delivery, Primary Care
Colla C, Yang W, Mainor AJ
Organizational integration, practice capabilities, and outcomes in clinically complex Medicare beneficiaries.
This study examines the association between clinical integration and financial integration, quality-focused care delivery processes, and beneficiary utilization and outcomes. Data was used from multiphysician practices in the 2017-2018 National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems and 2017 Medicare claims data. Out of 1.6M fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries aged 66 or older attributed to 2113 practices, 414,209 were considered clinically complex (frailty or 2 or more chronic conditions). Financial and clinical integration were weakly correlated. Clinical integration was significantly associated with greater adoption of quality-focused care delivery processes, while financial integration was associated with the opposite. Integration was not associated with reduced utilization or better beneficiary-level health-related outcomes, but both integration types were associated with lower spending.
AHRQ-funded; HS024075.
Citation: Colla C, Yang W, Mainor AJ .
Organizational integration, practice capabilities, and outcomes in clinically complex Medicare beneficiaries.
Health Serv Res 2020 Dec;55(Suppl 3):1085-97. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13580..
Keywords: Medicare, Health Systems, Healthcare Delivery
Timbie JW, Kranz AM, DeYoreo M
Racial and ethnic disparities in care for health system-affiliated physician organizations and non-affiliated physician organizations.
The purpose of this study was to assess racial and ethnic disparities in care for Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) beneficiaries and whether disparities differ between health system-affiliated physician organizations (POs) and nonaffiliated POs. The investigators found no evidence that system-affiliated POs had smaller racial and ethnic disparities than nonaffiliated POs. Where differences existed, disparities were slightly larger in affiliated POs.
AHRQ-funded; HS024067.
Citation: Timbie JW, Kranz AM, DeYoreo M .
Racial and ethnic disparities in care for health system-affiliated physician organizations and non-affiliated physician organizations.
Health Serv Res 2020 Dec;55(Suppl 3):1107-17. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13581..
Keywords: Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Disparities, Medicare, Health Systems
Ridgely MS, Buttorff C, Wolf L
The importance of understanding and measuring health system structural, functional, and clinical integration.
In this study, the authors explored if there were ways to characterize health systems-not already revealed by secondary data-that could provide new insights into differences in health system performance. The investigators sought to collect rich qualitative data to reveal whether and to what extent health systems varied in important ways across dimensions of structural, functional, and clinical integration.
AHRQ-funded; HS024067.
Citation: Ridgely MS, Buttorff C, Wolf L .
The importance of understanding and measuring health system structural, functional, and clinical integration.
Health Serv Res 2020 Dec;55(Suppl 3):1049-61. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13582..
Keywords: Health Systems, Healthcare Delivery
Harvey JB, Vanderbrink J, Mahmud Y
Understanding how health systems facilitate primary care redesign.
The objectives of this study were to understand how health systems are facilitating primary care redesign (PCR), examine the PCR initiatives taking place within systems, and identify barriers to this work. A sample of 24 health systems in 4 states was used to identify how system leaders define and implement initiatives to redesign primary care delivery and identify challenges. Codes based on the theoretical PCR literature was used and researchers also created new codes. Semi-structured telephone interviews with 162 system executives and physician organization leaders from 24 systems were conducted. Initiatives to redesign the delivery of primary care were described by leaders, but many were still in the early stages. Motivating factors for team-based care included improvement efficiency and enhancing clinician job satisfaction. Changes in payment and risk assumption as well as community needs were commonly cited as motivators for population health management and care coordination. Challenges health systems face in redesigning primary included return on investment and slower than anticipated rate in moving from fee-for-service to value-based payment.
AHRQ-funded; HS024067.
Citation: Harvey JB, Vanderbrink J, Mahmud Y .
Understanding how health systems facilitate primary care redesign.
Health Serv Res 2020 Dec;55(Suppl 3):1144-54. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13576..
Keywords: Health Systems, Primary Care: Models of Care, Primary Care, Healthcare Delivery
Short MN, Ho V
Weighing the effects of vertical integration versus market concentration on hospital quality.
Provider organizations are increasing in complexity, as hospitals acquire physician practices and physician organizations grow in size. At the same time, hospitals are merging with each other to improve bargaining power with insurers. In this study, the investigators analyzed 29 quality measures reported to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services' Hospital Compare database for 2008 to 2015 to test whether vertical integration between hospitals and physicians or increases in hospital market concentration influenced patient outcomes.
AHRQ-funded; HS024727.
Citation: Short MN, Ho V .
Weighing the effects of vertical integration versus market concentration on hospital quality.
Med Care Res Rev 2020 Dec;77(6):538-48. doi: 10.1177/1077558719828938.
.
.
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Quality of Care, Patient Experience, Hospitals, Medicare, Provider Performance, Health Systems
Agniel D, Haviland A, Shekelle P
Distinguishing high-performing health systems using a composite of publicly reported measures of ambulatory care.
The purpose of this study was to develop and evaluate a measure that ranks health care systems by ambulatory care quality. The authors concluded that their measure, using publicly reported data to produce valid, reliable, and stable ranks of ambulatory care quality for health care systems in Minnesota and California, could also be used in other applications.
AHRQ-funded; HS024067.
Citation: Agniel D, Haviland A, Shekelle P .
Distinguishing high-performing health systems using a composite of publicly reported measures of ambulatory care.
Ann Intern Med 2020 Nov 17;173(10):791-98. doi: 10.7326/m20-0718..
Keywords: Health Systems, Ambulatory Care and Surgery, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality Measures, Quality of Care, Provider Performance, Healthcare Delivery
Hernandez AV, Roman YM, White CM
Developing criteria and associated instructions for consistent and useful quality improvement study data extraction for health systems.
This paper describes AHRQ’s efforts to collate and assess quality improvement studies to support learning health systems (LHS). The authors identified quality improvement studies and evaluated the consistency of data extraction from two experienced independent reviewers at three time points: baseline, first revision, and final revision. Six investigators looked at the data extracted by the independent reviewers and determined the extent of similarity on a scale of 0 to 10. Two LHS participants were then asked to assess the relative value of their criteria. The consistency of extraction improved from a mean 1.17 score at baseline to 6.07 at first revision, and 6.81 at the final revision. There was not a significant improvement from the first to final revision. However, the LHS participants rated the value of these ratings a 9 and a 6, demonstrating that there is value in developing criteria.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500012I.
Citation: Hernandez AV, Roman YM, White CM .
Developing criteria and associated instructions for consistent and useful quality improvement study data extraction for health systems.
J Gen Intern Med 2020 Nov;35(Suppl 2):802-07. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06098-1..
Keywords: Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Learning Health Systems, Health Systems, Health Services Research (HSR), Research Methodologies
Fischer SH, Rudin RS, Shi Y
Trends in the use of computerized physician order entry by health-system affiliated ambulatory clinics in the United States, 2014-2016.
This study examined trends in the use of computerized physical order entry (CPOE) by health-system affiliated ambulatory clinics from 2014-2016 in the United States. A total of 19,109 ambulatory clinics that participated in all 3 years of the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society Analytics survey was analyzed. They calculated descriptive statistics to examine overall trends in use, location of order entry, and system-level use of CPOE. The use of CPOE increased from than 9 percentage points from 2015 to 2016, from 58% to 67%. Larger clinics and those affiliated with multi-health hospital systems were more likely to use CPOE.
AHRQ-funded; HS024067.
Citation: Fischer SH, Rudin RS, Shi Y .
Trends in the use of computerized physician order entry by health-system affiliated ambulatory clinics in the United States, 2014-2016.
BMC Health Serv Res 2020 Sep 7;20(1):836. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05679-4..
Keywords: Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Ambulatory Care and Surgery, Health Systems
Machta RM, Reschovsky J, Jones DJ
AHRQ Author: Furukawa MF
Can vertically integrated health systems provide greater value: the case of hospitals under the comprehensive care for joint replacement model?
The authors sought to assess whether system providers perform better than non-system providers under an alternative payment model that incentivizes high-quality, cost-efficient care. Using CMS data linked to AHRQ’s Compendium of US Health Systems, along with secondary sources, they found that when operating under alternative payment model incentives, vertical integration may enable hospitals to lower costs with similar quality scores.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290201600001C.
Citation: Machta RM, Reschovsky J, Jones DJ .
Can vertically integrated health systems provide greater value: the case of hospitals under the comprehensive care for joint replacement model?
Health Serv Res 2020 Aug;55(4):541-47. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13313..
Keywords: Health Systems, Hospitals, Orthopedics, Healthcare Costs, Payment, Quality of Care
Furukawa MF, Kimmey L, Jones DJ
AHRQ Author: Furukawa MF, Guo J
Consolidation of providers into health systems increased substantially, 2016-18.
This article reports that provider consolidation into vertically-integrated health systems increased from 2016 to 2018. More than half of US physicians and 72 percent of hospitals were affiliated with one of 637 health systems in 2018. For-profit and church-operated systems had the largest increases in system size, driven in part by a large number of system mergers and acquisitions.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290201600001C.
Citation: Furukawa MF, Kimmey L, Jones DJ .
Consolidation of providers into health systems increased substantially, 2016-18.
Health Aff 2020 Aug;39(8):1321-25. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00017..
Keywords: Health Systems, Provider