National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Burnout (1)
- (-) Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (4)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (1)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (2)
- Electronic Prescribing (E-Prescribing) (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (4)
- Hospitals (2)
- Medication (2)
- Medication: Safety (2)
- (-) Patient Safety (4)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (1)
- Quality Measures (1)
- Quality of Care (1)
- Shared Decision Making (2)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 4 of 4 Research Studies DisplayedCo Z, Holmgren AJ, Classen DC
The tradeoffs between safety and alert fatigue: data from a national evaluation of hospital medication-related clinical decision support.
This study evaluated the overall performance of hospitals that used the Computerized Physician Order Entry Evaluation Tool in 2017 and 2018 and compared performances for fatal orders and nuisance orders each year. The authors evaluated 1599 hospitals that took the test by using their overall percentage scores along with the percentage of fatal orders appropriately alerted on and the percentage of nuisance orders incorrectly alerted on. Overall hospital scores improved from 58.1% in 2017 to 66.2% in 2018. Fatal order performance improved slightly from 78.8% to 83.0%, but there no very little change in nuisance order performance (89.0% to 89.7%). Conclusions were that perhaps hospitals are not targeting the deadliest orders first and some hospitals may be achieving higher scores by over-alerting. This has the potential to cause clinician burnout and even worsen patient safety.
AHRQ-funded; HS023696.
Citation: Co Z, Holmgren AJ, Classen DC .
The tradeoffs between safety and alert fatigue: data from a national evaluation of hospital medication-related clinical decision support.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020 Aug;27(8):1252-58. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa098..
Keywords: Medication: Safety, Medication, Patient Safety, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Burnout, Hospitals, Health Information Technology (HIT), Quality of Care
Classen DC, Holmgren AJ, Co Z
National trends in the safety performance of electronic health record systems from 2009 to 2018.
This study examined trends in the safety performance of electronic health records (EHRs) in hospitals from 2009 to 2018. The Leapfrog Health IT Safety Measure test was administered by the Leapfrog Group from July 2018 to December 1, 2019. Overall mean performance scores increased from 53.9% in 2009 to 65.6% in 2018. Mean hospital scores for categories representing basic clinical decision support increased from 69.8% in 2009 to 85.6% in 2018. Advanced decision clinical support also increased from 29.5% in 2009 to 46.1%. These results showed great improvement, but there is still substantial safety risk in current hospital EHR systems.
AHRQ-funded; HS023696.
Citation: Classen DC, Holmgren AJ, Co Z .
National trends in the safety performance of electronic health record systems from 2009 to 2018.
JAMA Netw Open 2020 May;3(5):e205547. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.5547..
Keywords: Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Hospitals, Patient Safety, Quality Measures, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Quality Indicators (QIs)
Meyer AND, Giardina TD, Spitzmueller C
Patient perspectives on the usefulness of an artificial intelligence-assisted symptom checker: cross-sectional survey study.
This study examined patients’ experiences using an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted online symptom checker and their doctors’ reactions to that use. From March 2 through March 15, 2018 an online survey was conducted of US users of the Isabel Symptom Checker within 6 months of their use. The majority of users were women, white, and had a mean age of 48. Overall, patients had a positive experience with the symptom checker and felt they would use it again (91.4%). About 48% discussed the findings with their physician and felt about 40% of their physicians were interested. Patients who had previously experienced diagnostic errors were more likely to use the symptom checker to determine if they should seek care.
AHRQ-funded; HS025474; HS027363.
Citation: Meyer AND, Giardina TD, Spitzmueller C .
Patient perspectives on the usefulness of an artificial intelligence-assisted symptom checker: cross-sectional survey study.
J Med Internet Res 2020 Jan 30;22(1):e14679. doi: 10.2196/14679..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Health Information Technology (HIT), Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Patient Safety
Holmgren AJ, Co Z, Newmark L
Assessing the safety of electronic health records: a national longitudinal study of medication-related decision support.
The authors tested how well EHRs prevented medication errors with the potential for patient harm. Data from a national, longitudinal sample of 1527 hospitals in the US from 2009-16 who took a safety performance assessment test using simulated medication orders was used. The authors found that hospital medication order safety performance improved over time. They conclude that intentional quality improvement efforts appear to be a critical part of high safety performance and may indicate the importance of a culture of safety.
AHRQ-funded; HS023696.
Citation: Holmgren AJ, Co Z, Newmark L .
Assessing the safety of electronic health records: a national longitudinal study of medication-related decision support.
BMJ Qual Saf 2020 Jan;29(1):52-59. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009609..
Keywords: Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient Safety, Medication, Electronic Prescribing (E-Prescribing), Medication: Safety, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making