National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Antibiotics (2)
- Antimicrobial Stewardship (2)
- Blood Pressure (1)
- Burnout (1)
- Chronic Conditions (1)
- (-) Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (6)
- Diabetes (1)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (1)
- Electronic Prescribing (E-Prescribing) (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (2)
- Hospitals (1)
- (-) Medication (6)
- Medication: Safety (2)
- Opioids (1)
- Pain (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (1)
- Patient Safety (2)
- Quality of Care (1)
- Risk (1)
- Shared Decision Making (5)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 6 of 6 Research Studies DisplayedPatterson ES, DiLoreto GN, Vanam R
Enhancing usefulness and usability of a clinical decision support prototype for antibiotic stewardship.
This paper describes a multi-method approach to improve clinical decision support (CDS) for antibiotic stewardship. A heuristic review was employed to generate recommendations to improve the usability of a prototype CDS in the hospital setting. The authors then engaged in a design improvement cycle in collaboration with software programmers that enhanced their prototype. The revised prototype was then demonstrated to physician and pharmacist subject matter experts in three walkthrough interviews. These interviews generated recommendations to improve the interface, functionality, and tailoring for groups of users. Common elements for the recommendations are discussed for models for using clinical decision support in general.
AHRQ-funded; HS024379.
Citation: Patterson ES, DiLoreto GN, Vanam R .
Enhancing usefulness and usability of a clinical decision support prototype for antibiotic stewardship.
Proc Int Symp Hum Factors Ergon Healthc 2020 Sep;9(1):61-65. doi: 10.1177/2327857920091034..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Antimicrobial Stewardship, Antibiotics, Medication
Co Z, Holmgren AJ, Classen DC
The tradeoffs between safety and alert fatigue: data from a national evaluation of hospital medication-related clinical decision support.
This study evaluated the overall performance of hospitals that used the Computerized Physician Order Entry Evaluation Tool in 2017 and 2018 and compared performances for fatal orders and nuisance orders each year. The authors evaluated 1599 hospitals that took the test by using their overall percentage scores along with the percentage of fatal orders appropriately alerted on and the percentage of nuisance orders incorrectly alerted on. Overall hospital scores improved from 58.1% in 2017 to 66.2% in 2018. Fatal order performance improved slightly from 78.8% to 83.0%, but there no very little change in nuisance order performance (89.0% to 89.7%). Conclusions were that perhaps hospitals are not targeting the deadliest orders first and some hospitals may be achieving higher scores by over-alerting. This has the potential to cause clinician burnout and even worsen patient safety.
AHRQ-funded; HS023696.
Citation: Co Z, Holmgren AJ, Classen DC .
The tradeoffs between safety and alert fatigue: data from a national evaluation of hospital medication-related clinical decision support.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2020 Aug;27(8):1252-58. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa098..
Keywords: Medication: Safety, Medication, Patient Safety, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Burnout, Hospitals, Health Information Technology (HIT), Quality of Care
Trubiano JA, Vogrin S, Chua KYL
Development and validation of a penicillin allergy clinical decision rule.
Penicillin allergy is a significant public health issue for patients, antimicrobial stewardship programs, and health services. Validated clinical decision rules are urgently needed to identify low-risk penicillin allergies that potentially do not require penicillin skin testing by a specialist. The objective of this study was to develop and validate a penicillin allergy clinical decision rule that enables point-of-care risk assessment of patient-reported penicillin allergies.
AHRQ-funded; HS026395.
Citation: Trubiano JA, Vogrin S, Chua KYL .
Development and validation of a penicillin allergy clinical decision rule.
JAMA Intern Med 2020 May;180(5):745-52. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0403..
Keywords: Antimicrobial Stewardship, Antibiotics, Medication, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Risk
Ramirez M, Chen K, Follett RW
Impact of a "chart closure" hard stop alert on prescribing for elevated blood pressures among patients with diabetes: quasi-experimental study.
The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the implementation of the Best Practice Advisory (BPA) was associated with changes in angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB) prescribing during primary care encounters for patients with diabetes. The investigators concluded that a BPA with a "chart closure" hard stop is a promising tool for the treatment of patients with comorbid diabetes and hypertension with an ACEI or ARB, especially when implemented within the context of team-based care, wherein clinical pharmacists support the work of primary care providers.
AHRQ-funded; HS00046.
Citation: Ramirez M, Chen K, Follett RW .
Impact of a "chart closure" hard stop alert on prescribing for elevated blood pressures among patients with diabetes: quasi-experimental study.
JMIR Med Inform 2020 Apr 17;8(4):e16421. doi: 10.2196/16421..
Keywords: Blood Pressure, Medication, Diabetes, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Chronic Conditions
Marcial LH, Blumenfeld B, Harle C
Barriers, facilitators, and potential solutions to advancing interoperable clinical decision support: multi-stakeholder consensus recommendations for the opioid use case.
These proceedings report on the AHRQ-sponsored Patient-Centered CDS Learning Network (PCCDS LN) Technical Framework Working Group (TechFWG), which was convened to identify barriers, facilitators, and potential solutions for interoperable clinical decision support, with a specific focus on addressing the opioid epidemic. The key insights were extrapolated to CDS-facilitated care improvement outside of the specific opioid use case. If applied broadly, the recommendations should help advance the availability and impact of interoperable CDS delivered at scale.
AHRQ-funded; HS024849.
Citation: Marcial LH, Blumenfeld B, Harle C .
Barriers, facilitators, and potential solutions to advancing interoperable clinical decision support: multi-stakeholder consensus recommendations for the opioid use case.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2020 Mar 4;2019:637-46..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Opioids, Medication, Pain, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Holmgren AJ, Co Z, Newmark L
Assessing the safety of electronic health records: a national longitudinal study of medication-related decision support.
The authors tested how well EHRs prevented medication errors with the potential for patient harm. Data from a national, longitudinal sample of 1527 hospitals in the US from 2009-16 who took a safety performance assessment test using simulated medication orders was used. The authors found that hospital medication order safety performance improved over time. They conclude that intentional quality improvement efforts appear to be a critical part of high safety performance and may indicate the importance of a culture of safety.
AHRQ-funded; HS023696.
Citation: Holmgren AJ, Co Z, Newmark L .
Assessing the safety of electronic health records: a national longitudinal study of medication-related decision support.
BMJ Qual Saf 2020 Jan;29(1):52-59. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009609..
Keywords: Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient Safety, Medication, Electronic Prescribing (E-Prescribing), Medication: Safety, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making