National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 4 of 4 Research Studies DisplayedFerguson MC, O'Shea KJ, Hammer LD
Can following formula-feeding recommendations still result in infants who are overweight or have obesity?
This study compares guidelines for formula feeding and whether current recommendations still result in infants who are overweight or have obesity. The researchers used their “Virtual Infant” agent-based model representing infant-caregiver pairs that allowed caregivers to feed infants each day according to guidelines from Johns Hopkins Medicine (JHM), Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), Children’s Hospital of the King’s Daughters (CHKD), and Women, Infants, and Children (WIC). The WIC guidelines were found to be the best as opposed to JHM/CHOP/CHKD where infants still became overweight/obese by 6 months. The study recommended the minimum recommended amount of daily formula feeding should be made lower for JHM/CHOP/CHKD guidelines and that WIC guidelines may be a good starting point for caregivers.
AHRQ-funded; HS023317.
Citation: Ferguson MC, O'Shea KJ, Hammer LD .
Can following formula-feeding recommendations still result in infants who are overweight or have obesity?
Pediatr Res 2020 Oct;88(4):661-67. doi: 10.1038/s41390-020-0844-3..
Keywords: Newborns/Infants, Obesity: Weight Management, Obesity, Guidelines, Caregiving, Evidence-Based Practice
Gephart SM, Underwood MA, Rosito S
Grading the evidence to identify strategies to modify risk for necrotizing enterocolitis.
This paper presents recommendations to manage modifiable risks to premature infants’ vulnerability for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC). It uses the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria to present recommendations in the context of the supporting evidence. Strategies to limit NEC risk are presented across the prenatal, intrapartum, and early and clinical course. It also offers quality improvement (QI) targets for healthcare teams and offers a patient-family advocate’s perspective on how to engage parents to recognize and reduce NEC risk.
AHRQ-funded; HS022908.
Citation: Gephart SM, Underwood MA, Rosito S .
Grading the evidence to identify strategies to modify risk for necrotizing enterocolitis.
Pediatr Res 2020 Aug;88(Suppl 1):41-47. doi: 10.1038/s41390-020-1079-z..
Keywords: Newborns/Infants, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines
Schafer R, Phillippi JC
Group B streptococcal bacteriuria in pregnancy: an evidence-based, patient-centered approach to care.
Screening and management of group B streptococcus (GBS) bacteriuria in pregnancy aims to reduce the incidence of pyelonephritis and GBS-related neonatal morbidity and mortality. This article used a case study approach to discuss evidence-based, patient-centered care for group B streptococcal bacteriuria in pregnancy as well as ethical incorporation of individual patient preferences and values.
AHRQ-funded; HS024733.
Citation: Schafer R, Phillippi JC .
Group B streptococcal bacteriuria in pregnancy: an evidence-based, patient-centered approach to care.
J Midwifery Womens Health 2020 May;65(3):376-81. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13085..
Keywords: Infectious Diseases, Pregnancy, Women, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Evidence-Based Practice, Newborns/Infants, Sepsis, Case Study
Abrams EM, Brough HA, Keet C
Pros and cons of pre-emptive screening programmes before peanut introduction in infancy.
In this review, researchers evaluated the advantages and disadvantages of a pre-emptive screening approach before the early introduction of peanuts in infants at high risk of peanut allergy. The Learning Early About Peanut study and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) expert panel recommendations are compared.
AHRQ-funded; HS024599.
Citation: Abrams EM, Brough HA, Keet C .
Pros and cons of pre-emptive screening programmes before peanut introduction in infancy.
Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2020 Jul;4(7):526-35. doi: 10.1016/s2352-4642(20)30029-8..
Keywords: Newborns/Infants, Screening, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice