National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 4 of 4 Research Studies DisplayedFichtenberg CM, Alley DE, Mistry KB
AHRQ Author: Mistry KB
Improving social needs intervention research: key questions for advancing the field.
This paper summarizes emerging evidence and identifies key areas where more research is needed to advance implementation and policy development. Gaps exist in terms of comparative effectiveness and cost effectiveness of social needs intervention approaches. Increased understanding of mechanisms of action to maximize practitioners' ability to tailor interventions would be a benefit. More research is recommended to guard against unintended consequences and ensure these interventions reduce health inequities. Implementation science research should identify supports and incentives for adoption of effective interventions. Focusing both public and private research efforts on these evidence gaps can help advance identification of interventions that maximize both health equity and healthcare value.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; HS026664.
Citation: Fichtenberg CM, Alley DE, Mistry KB .
Improving social needs intervention research: key questions for advancing the field.
Am J Prev Med 2019 Dec;57(6s1):S47-s54. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.07.018..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Social Determinants of Health
Krist AH, Davidson KW, Ngo-Metzger Q
AHRQ Author: Ngo-Metzger Q, Mills J
Social determinants as a preventive service: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force methods considerations for research.
The authors offer a brief review of the social determinants of health that may be germane to the USPSTF, the methods the USPSTF uses to evaluate relevant evidence, and current evidence gaps for social risks. Their road map for research is intended to spark ingenuity and purpose in the next generation of research studies, thereby ensuring that future recommendations to address and prevent social risks in primary care are informed by high-quality evidence.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; HS026664.
Citation: Krist AH, Davidson KW, Ngo-Metzger Q .
Social determinants as a preventive service: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force methods considerations for research.
Am J Prev Med 2019 Dec;57(6s1):S6-s12. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.07.013..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Social Determinants of Health, Research Methodologies, Evidence-Based Practice, Prevention
Smith NA, Voisin DR, Yang JP
Keeping your guard up: hypervigilance among urban residents affected by community and police violence.
This study’s aim was to quantify the effects of hypervigilance among urban residents affected by community and police violence. A survey of 504 adults in Chicago in 2018 was done in a neighborhood affected by high levels of violence. It was found that exposure to police violence was associated with a 9.8% increase in hypervigilance while exposure to community violence caused a 5.5% increase. Among participants who had a police stop, it was associated with 20% increase in hypervigilance. Overall, the highest quartile of hypervigilance was associated with higher systolic blood pressure.
AHRQ-funded; HS023007.
Citation: Smith NA, Voisin DR, Yang JP .
Keeping your guard up: hypervigilance among urban residents affected by community and police violence.
Health Aff 2019 Oct;38(10):1662-69. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2019.00560..
Keywords: Urban Health, Social Determinants of Health, Behavioral Health, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice
Krist AH, Davidson KW, Ngo-Metzger Q
AHRQ Author: Ngo-Metzger Q
What evidence do we need before recommending routine screening for social determinants of health?
This editorial, co-written by two members of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), and a member of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) discusses the need to determine if social determinants of health (SDOH) should be discussed during a primary care visit. At the present time only 2 USPSTF recommendations are social determinants (intimate partner violence, elder abuse, and abuse of vulnerable adults; and child maltreatment). However, there are recommendations for nine health behaviors and three mental health behaviors that are included in SDOH. There is an absence of evidence of benefit for routine screening for many of the social determinants, and the USPSTF is currently conducting an evaluation to understand the state of screening for SDOH.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Krist AH, Davidson KW, Ngo-Metzger Q .
What evidence do we need before recommending routine screening for social determinants of health?
Am Fam Physician 2019 May 15;99(10):602-05..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Primary Care, Screening, Social Determinants of Health, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)