National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Access to Care (4)
- Ambulatory Care and Surgery (1)
- Behavioral Health (1)
- Cancer (3)
- Cancer: Breast Cancer (2)
- Cancer: Colorectal Cancer (2)
- Cancer: Ovarian Cancer (1)
- Caregiving (1)
- Children/Adolescents (4)
- Chronic Conditions (1)
- Colonoscopy (1)
- Community-Based Practice (3)
- Community Partnerships (1)
- COVID-19 (1)
- Depression (2)
- Diabetes (1)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (2)
- Disparities (7)
- Domestic Violence (1)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (3)
- Emergency Department (4)
- Evidence-Based Practice (2)
- Genetics (3)
- Guidelines (2)
- Healthcare Delivery (1)
- Healthcare Utilization (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (4)
- Health Promotion (1)
- Health Systems (1)
- Imaging (1)
- Implementation (2)
- Low-Income (3)
- Maternal Care (1)
- Medicaid (1)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) (1)
- Nutrition (2)
- Payment (1)
- Policy (1)
- Practice Patterns (2)
- Pregnancy (1)
- Prevention (4)
- Primary Care (7)
- Provider (1)
- Provider: Clinician (1)
- Provider: Health Personnel (1)
- Public Health (1)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (4)
- Risk (2)
- Rural Health (2)
- (-) Screening (33)
- (-) Social Determinants of Health (33)
- Telehealth (1)
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) (2)
- Urban Health (2)
- Vulnerable Populations (4)
- Women (3)
- Workflow (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
26 to 33 of 33 Research Studies DisplayedChilders KK, Maggard-Gibbons M, Macinko J
National distribution of cancer genetic testing in the United States: evidence for a gender disparity in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.
Identifying mutation carriers is critical for treatment decisions, cancer prevention, and early detection. This study analyzed the 2015 US National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), a cross-sectional in-person interview gathering self-reported health data for the US population. The study found that while cancer genetic testing seems to reach a broad geographic and sociodemographic population in the national survey, there remain underrepresented groups, including Hispanics, the uninsured, noncitizens, and those with less education.
AHRQ-funded; HS025079.
Citation: Childers KK, Maggard-Gibbons M, Macinko J .
National distribution of cancer genetic testing in the United States: evidence for a gender disparity in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.
JAMA Oncol 2018 Jun;4(6):876-79. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0340..
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer: Ovarian Cancer, Genetics, Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Screening, Social Determinants of Health, Women
Kato E, Borsky AE, Zuvekas SH
AHRQ Author: Kato E, Borsky AE, Zuvekas SH, Soni A, Ngo-Metzger Q
Missed opportunities for depression screening and treatment in the United States.
This study estimates the prevalence of depression assessment in adults age 35 and older and how prevalence varies by sociodemographic characteristics and depressive symptoms. It found that approximately 50 percent of US adults aged 35+ were being assessed for depression in 2014-2015. Certain populations were more likely to be missed, including men, people over 75 years old, minorities, and the uninsured.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Kato E, Borsky AE, Zuvekas SH .
Missed opportunities for depression screening and treatment in the United States.
J Am Board Fam Med 2018 May-Jun;31(3):389-97. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170406.
.
.
Keywords: Depression, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), Prevention, Screening, Social Determinants of Health
Lobo JM, Anderson R, Stukenborg GJ
Disparities in the use of diabetes screening in Appalachia.
This study examines disparities in the use of diabetes screening in Appalachia. Results showed that at-risk counties had significantly lower screening rates than competitive counties. Recommendations include introducing social policies that improve socioeconomic status and educational attainment, and health policies that reduce barriers to access to care in order to reduce disparities in diabetes screening rates in the less affluent Appalachian counties.
AHRQ-funded; HS018542.
Citation: Lobo JM, Anderson R, Stukenborg GJ .
Disparities in the use of diabetes screening in Appalachia.
J Rural Health 2018 Mar;34(2):173-81. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12247..
Keywords: Diabetes, Rural Health, Disparities, Social Determinants of Health, Screening, Prevention
LaForge K, Gold R, Cottrell E
How 6 organizations developed tools and processes for social determinants of health screening in primary care: an overview.
Little is known about how health care organizations are developing tools for identifying/addressing patients' social determinants of health (SDH). The authors of this paper describe the processes recently used by 6 organizations to develop SDH screening tools for ambulatory care and the barriers they faced during those efforts.
AHRQ-funded; HS023324.
Citation: LaForge K, Gold R, Cottrell E .
How 6 organizations developed tools and processes for social determinants of health screening in primary care: an overview.
J Ambul Care Manage 2018 Jan/Mar;41(1):2-14. doi: 10.1097/jac.0000000000000221..
Keywords: Ambulatory Care and Surgery, Prevention, Primary Care, Screening, Social Determinants of Health
Berkowitz SA, Percac-Lima S, Ashburner JM
Building equity improvement into quality improvement: reducing socioeconomic disparities in colorectal cancer screening as part of population health management.
The aim of this study was to determine if implementation of a system-wide screening intervention could reduce disparities in the setting of improved overall screening rates. It found that a multifaceted population management intervention sensitive to the needs of vulnerable patients modestly narrowed disparities in colorectal cancer screening, while also increasing overall screening rates.
AHRQ-funded; HS018161.
Citation: Berkowitz SA, Percac-Lima S, Ashburner JM .
Building equity improvement into quality improvement: reducing socioeconomic disparities in colorectal cancer screening as part of population health management.
J Gen Intern Med 2015 Jul;30(7):942-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3227-4..
Keywords: Disparities, Screening, Social Determinants of Health, Colonoscopy
Pignone MP, Crutchfield TM, Brown PM
Using a discrete choice experiment to inform the design of programs to promote colon cancer screening for vulnerable populations in North Carolina.
This study used a discrete choice experiment (DCE) to learn about how vulnerable individuals in North Carolina value different aspects of CRC screening programs. It found that follow-up cost coverage was most frequently found to be the most important attribute from the DCE (47 percent); followed by test reward/copayment (33 percent).
AHRQ-funded; HS019468.
Citation: Pignone MP, Crutchfield TM, Brown PM .
Using a discrete choice experiment to inform the design of programs to promote colon cancer screening for vulnerable populations in North Carolina.
BMC Health Serv Res 2014 Nov 30;14:611. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0611-4..
Keywords: Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Health Promotion, Rural Health, Screening, Social Determinants of Health
Wheeler SB, Kuo TM, Goyal RK
Regional variation in colorectal cancer testing and geographic availability of care in a publicly insured population.
The researchers examined colorectal cancer (CRC) testing across regions of North Carolina by using population-based Medicare and Medicaid claims data from disabled individuals who turned 50 years of age during 2003-2008. They found that fewer than 50% of eligible individuals had evidence of CRC testing; men, African-Americans, Medicaid beneficiaries, and those living furthest away from endoscopy facilities had significantly lower odds of CRC testing, with significant regional variation.
AHRQ-funded; HS019468.
Citation: Wheeler SB, Kuo TM, Goyal RK .
Regional variation in colorectal cancer testing and geographic availability of care in a publicly insured population.
Health Place 2014 Sep;29:114-23. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.07.001.
.
.
Keywords: Access to Care, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Disparities, Screening, Social Determinants of Health
Kenik J, Jean-Jacques M, Feinglass J
Explaining racial and ethnic disparities in cholesterol screening.
This study examining the impact of low socioeconomic status, access to care, and language on racial and ethnic disparities in cholesterol screening found that these factors explained most of those disparities. After adjusting for these factors, disparities between whites and Blacks and Hispanics but not Asians and Pacific Islanders were eliminated.
AHRQ-funded; HS021141
Citation: Kenik J, Jean-Jacques M, Feinglass J .
Explaining racial and ethnic disparities in cholesterol screening.
Prev Med. 2014 Aug;65:65-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.04.026..
Keywords: Social Determinants of Health, Disparities, Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Screening, Access to Care