National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Cancer (4)
- (-) Cancer: Colorectal Cancer (4)
- Case Study (1)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (1)
- Colonoscopy (1)
- Comparative Effectiveness (1)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (1)
- Digestive Disease and Health (1)
- (-) Evidence-Based Practice (4)
- Guidelines (2)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- Imaging (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (3)
- Patient Adherence/Compliance (1)
- Prevention (3)
- (-) Screening (4)
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 4 of 4 Research Studies DisplayedKim HS, Hernaez R, Sansgiry S
Comparative effectiveness of surveillance colonoscopy intervals on colorectal cancer outcomes in a national cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
The purpose of this study was to determine the comparative effectiveness of varying colonoscopy intervals on colorectal cancer (CRC) outcomes among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Data was from the National Veterans Health Administration. Findings showed that, in a national cohort of patients with CRC-IBD, colonoscopy within 3 years prior to CRC diagnosis was associated with early tumor stage at diagnosis, and colonoscopy within 1 year was associated with a reduced all-cause mortality compared with no colonoscopy, supporting colonoscopy intervals of 1 to 3 years in patients with IBD in order to reduce late-stage CRC and all-cause mortality.
AHRQ-funded; HS024122.
Citation: Kim HS, Hernaez R, Sansgiry S .
Comparative effectiveness of surveillance colonoscopy intervals on colorectal cancer outcomes in a national cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022 Dec;20(12):2848-57.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.02.048..
Keywords: Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Cancer, Digestive Disease and Health, Imaging, Screening, Comparative Effectiveness, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Fan T, Stefanos R
AHRQ Author: Fan T
Screening for colorectal cancer.
This AHRQ-authored Putting Preventions in Practice quiz has three questions and answers on the US Preventive Services Task Force final recommendation on screening for colorectal cancer. A case study is presented with questions on the best behavioral interventions, the effect of a patient’s age on the counseling approach, and what is an appropriate test and interval for colorectal screening. References are also provided at the end of the answers.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Fan T, Stefanos R .
Screening for colorectal cancer.
Am Fam Physician 2021 Sep 1;104(3):295-96..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Cancer, Screening, Prevention, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Case Study
Murphy CC, Sen A, Watson B
A systematic review of repeat fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer screening.
This systematic review examined the prevalence of repeat fecal occult blood tests (FOBT) for colorectal cancer screening. MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies published from 1997 to 2017 and reported repeat FOBT over 2 and more screening rounds. Thirty-five articles (n=27) were identified which measured repeat FOBT as 1) proportion of Round 1 participants completing repeat FOBT in Round 2; 2) proportion completing two, consecutive FOBTs; or 3) proportion completing 3 or more rounds. The number of participants completing Round 1 ranged from 24.6% to 89.6%. Those who completed Round 2 ranged from 16.4% to 80%; and completion of 3 or more rounds ranged from 0.8% to 64.1%. Repeat FOBT was higher in mailed outreach than opportunistic screening.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Murphy CC, Sen A, Watson B .
A systematic review of repeat fecal occult blood tests for colorectal cancer screening.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020 Feb;29(2):278-87. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.Epi-19-0775..
Keywords: Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Cancer, Screening, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Prevention, Patient Adherence/Compliance, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice
Magrath M, Yang E, Ahn C
Impact of a clinical decision support system on guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations for colonoscopy after polypectomy.
The goal of this study was to characterize guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations after implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR)-based Colonoscopy Pathology Reporting and Clinical Decision Support System (CoRS). Results showed that an EMR-based CoRS was widely used and significantly improved guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Magrath M, Yang E, Ahn C .
Impact of a clinical decision support system on guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations for colonoscopy after polypectomy.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2018 Nov;16(11):1321-28. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7050..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Health Information Technology (HIT), Colonoscopy, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Screening, Cancer, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Prevention