National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Autism (1)
- Behavioral Health (1)
- Cancer (1)
- Cancer: Cervical Cancer (1)
- Cancer: Colorectal Cancer (1)
- Children/Adolescents (2)
- (-) Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (6)
- Colonoscopy (1)
- Depression (1)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (1)
- Domestic Violence (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (3)
- Guidelines (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (3)
- Outcomes (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (2)
- Pregnancy (1)
- Prevention (3)
- Primary Care (2)
- (-) Screening (6)
- Sepsis (1)
- Shared Decision Making (3)
- Women (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 6 of 6 Research Studies DisplayedGale BM, Hall KK
The use of patient monitoring systems to improve sepsis recognition and outcomes: a systematic review.
This systematic review’s aim was to determine the impact of automated patient monitoring systems (PMSs) on sepsis recognition and outcomes. The review was conducted using articles published from 2008 through 2018. Nineteen articles were identified for inclusion with 4 systematic reviews and 15 individual studies. Study results for outcome measures were mixed, with more than half the studies showing a significant improvement in at least one outcome measure (eg mortality, intensive care unit length of stay, ICU transfer). Evidence for process measure improvement was of moderate strength across multiple hospital units.
AHRQ-funded; 233201500013I.
Citation: Gale BM, Hall KK .
The use of patient monitoring systems to improve sepsis recognition and outcomes: a systematic review.
J Patient Saf 2020 Sep;16(3S Suppl 1):S8-s11. doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000750..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Sepsis, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Screening, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice
Downs SM, Bauer NS, Saha C
Effect of a computer-based decision support intervention on autism spectrum disorder screening in pediatric primary care clinics: a cluster randomized clinical trial.
This study examined outcomes for implementation of a decision support system called CHICA (Child Health Improvement Through Computer Automation) to improve screening rates for autism in children aged 18 to 24 months. A random sample of 274 children in four urban clinics was used. Two clinics participated in the intervention, and two served as controls. Because participating clinics requested intervention be discontinued for children aged 18 months, only results for those aged 24 months was analyzed. Of the 263 children with reviewed results, 92% were enrolled in Medicaid, 52.5% were African American, and 36.5% were Hispanic. Screening rates increased from 0% at baseline to 100% in 24 months during the study period of November 2010 to November 2012. Screening results were positive for 265 of 980 children screened by CHICA in the time period, with 2 children from the intervention group positively diagnosed in the time frame of the study.
AHRQ-funded; HS018453.
Citation: Downs SM, Bauer NS, Saha C .
Effect of a computer-based decision support intervention on autism spectrum disorder screening in pediatric primary care clinics: a cluster randomized clinical trial.
JAMA Netw Open 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1917676. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17676..
Keywords: Autism, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Health Information Technology (HIT), Primary Care, Children/Adolescents, Screening
Gance-Cleveland B, Leiferman J, Aldrich H
Using the technology acceptance model to develop startsmart: mHealth for screening, brief intervention, and referral for risk and protective factors in pregnancy.
The purpose of this study was to develop StartSmart, a mobile health (mHealth) intervention to support evidence-based prenatal screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment for risk and protective factors in pregnancy. Expert clinicians provided guidance on the screening instruments, resources, and practice guidelines. Clinicians suggested identifying specific prenatal visits for the screening. Patients reported that the tablet-based screening was useful to promote adherence to guidelines and provided suggestions for improvement.
AHRQ-funded; HS024738.
Citation: Gance-Cleveland B, Leiferman J, Aldrich H .
Using the technology acceptance model to develop startsmart: mHealth for screening, brief intervention, and referral for risk and protective factors in pregnancy.
J Midwifery Womens Health 2019 Sep;64(5):630-40. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.13009..
Keywords: Health Information Technology (HIT), Domestic Violence, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Pregnancy, Women, Evidence-Based Practice, Screening, Prevention
Magrath M, Yang E, Ahn C
Impact of a clinical decision support system on guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations for colonoscopy after polypectomy.
The goal of this study was to characterize guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations after implementation of an electronic medical record (EMR)-based Colonoscopy Pathology Reporting and Clinical Decision Support System (CoRS). Results showed that an EMR-based CoRS was widely used and significantly improved guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Magrath M, Yang E, Ahn C .
Impact of a clinical decision support system on guideline adherence of surveillance recommendations for colonoscopy after polypectomy.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2018 Nov;16(11):1321-28. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2018.7050..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Health Information Technology (HIT), Colonoscopy, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Screening, Cancer, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Prevention
Etter DJ, McCord A, Ouyang F
Suicide screening in primary care: use of an electronic screener to assess suicidality and improve provider follow-up for adolescents.
The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of using an existing computer decision support system to screen adolescent patients for suicidality and provide follow-up guidance to clinicians in a primary care setting. The authors concluded that incorporating adolescent suicide screening and provider follow-up guidance into an existing computer decision support system in primary care was feasible and well utilized by providers.
AHRQ-funded; HS022681.
Citation: Etter DJ, McCord A, Ouyang F .
Suicide screening in primary care: use of an electronic screener to assess suicidality and improve provider follow-up for adolescents.
J Adolesc Health 2018 Feb;62(2):191-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.08.026..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Depression, Behavioral Health, Primary Care, Screening
Ravikumar KE, MacLaughlin KL, Scheitel MR
Improving the accuracy of a clinical decision support system for cervical cancer screening and surveillance.
Researchers sought to enhance a clinical decision support system (CDSS) by improving its accuracy and incorporating changes to reflect the latest revision of the guidelines. The recommendation accuracy of the enhanced CDSS improved to 93 percent, which is a substantial improvement over the 84 percent reported previously. A detailed analysis of errors is presented in this article.
AHRQ-funded; HS022911.
Citation: Ravikumar KE, MacLaughlin KL, Scheitel MR .
Improving the accuracy of a clinical decision support system for cervical cancer screening and surveillance.
Appl Clin Inform 2018 Jan;9(1):62-71. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1617451.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer: Cervical Cancer, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Prevention, Screening