National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- (-) Behavioral Health (10)
- Caregiving (1)
- Care Management (1)
- Children/Adolescents (4)
- Chronic Conditions (3)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (2)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (2)
- Communication (2)
- Community-Based Practice (1)
- Cultural Competence (1)
- Depression (3)
- Elderly (1)
- Healthcare Delivery (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (2)
- Medication (2)
- Opioids (2)
- Pain (2)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (3)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (1)
- Patient and Family Engagement (2)
- Primary Care (3)
- Primary Care: Models of Care (1)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (2)
- Screening (2)
- (-) Shared Decision Making (10)
- Social Stigma (1)
- Substance Abuse (2)
- Vulnerable Populations (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 10 of 10 Research Studies DisplayedSomohano VC, Smith CL, Saha S
Patient-provider shared decision-making, trust, and opioid misuse among US veterans prescribed long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain.
This article examined the role that trust in a prescribing provider has on shared decision-making and opioid misuse in opioid-specific pain management. A secondary analysis of data from a prospective cohort study was conducted of US Veterans (N = 1273) prescribed long-term opioid therapy (LTOT) for chronic non-cancer pain. Patient-provider shared decision-making had a total significant effect on opioid misuse, in the absence of the mediator, such that higher levels of shared decision-making were associated with lower levels of reported opioid misuse. When trust in provider was added to the mediation model, the indirect effect of shared decision-making on opioid misuse through trust in provider remained significant.
AHRQ-funded; HS026370.
Citation: Somohano VC, Smith CL, Saha S .
Patient-provider shared decision-making, trust, and opioid misuse among US veterans prescribed long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain.
J Gen Intern Med 2023 Sep; 38(12):2755-60. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08212-5..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Opioids, Medication, Substance Abuse, Behavioral Health, Pain, Chronic Conditions
Valentine KD, Lipstein EA, Vo H
Pediatric caregiver version of the Shared Decision Making Process Scale: validity and reliability for ADHD treatment decisions.
This study’s goal was to examine the validity and reliability of a scale for a shared decision making (SDM) Process scale in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) treatment decisions. This cross-sectional survey included 498 caregivers of children aged 5-13 diagnosed with ADHD who had made a decision about ADHD medication in the last 2 years. Surveys included the adapted SDM Process scale, decisional conflict, decision regret, and decision involvement. The scale was found to be acceptable and reliable. Scores demonstrated convergent validity, as they were higher for those without decisional conflict than those with decisional conflict and higher for caregivers who stated they made the decision with the provider than those who made the decision themselves. Higher scores were related to less regret, though the magnitude of the relationship was small.
AHRQ-funded; HS025718.
Citation: Valentine KD, Lipstein EA, Vo H .
Pediatric caregiver version of the Shared Decision Making Process Scale: validity and reliability for ADHD treatment decisions.
Acad Pediatr 2022 Nov-Dec;22(8):1503-09. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2022.07.014..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Behavioral Health, Shared Decision Making, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Brodney S, Valentine KD, Vo HA
Measuring shared decision making in younger and older adults with depression.
This study compared shared decision making (SDM) of younger (18-39 years) and older (40-75 years) patients for starting or stopping depression treatment. A panel of 494 respondents completed one of two versions of the SDM Process scale that differed in wording of pros and cons items, and completed measures of decisional conflict, decision regret and who made the decision (mainly the respondent, mainly the provider, or together). SDM Process scores were higher for younger respondents than older respondents. Higher scores were also associated with no decisional conflict and less decision regret.
AHRQ-funded; HS025718.
Citation: Brodney S, Valentine KD, Vo HA .
Measuring shared decision making in younger and older adults with depression.
Int J Qual Health Care 2022 Oct 12;34(4):mzac076. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzac076..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Depression, Behavioral Health
Kagarmanova A, Sparkman H, Laiteerapong N
Improving the management of chronic pain, opioid use, and opioid use disorder in older adults: study protocol for i-cope study.
This article describes a protocol for an upcoming study on the planned implementation and evaluation of I-COPE (Improving Chicago Older Adult Opioid and Pain Management through Patient-centered Clinical Decision Support and Project ECHO®) to improve care for older adults with chronic pain, opioid use, and opioid use disorder (OUD). The study will be implemented in 35 clinical sites across the metropolitan Chicago area for patients aged ≥ 65 with chronic pain, opioid use, or OUD who receive primary care at one of the clinics. I-COPE includes the integration of patient-reported data on symptoms and preferences, clinical decision support tools and shared decision making into routine primary care. Primary care providers will be trained on the tools through web-based videos and an optional Project ECHO® course, entitled "Pain Management and OUD in Older Adults." A framework called RE-AIM will be used to assess the I-COPE implementation. Outcomes considered effective include an increased variety of recommended pain treatments, decreased prescriptions of higher-risk pain treatments, and decreased patient pain scores. Outcomes will be evaluated at 6 and 12 months after implementation, and PCPs participating in Project ECHO® will be evaluated on changes in knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy using pre- and post-course surveys.
AHRQ-funded; HS027910.
Citation: Kagarmanova A, Sparkman H, Laiteerapong N .
Improving the management of chronic pain, opioid use, and opioid use disorder in older adults: study protocol for i-cope study.
Trials 2022 Jul 27;23(1):602. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06537-w..
Keywords: Elderly, Pain, Chronic Conditions, Opioids, Medication, Substance Abuse, Behavioral Health, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Health Information Technology (HIT)
Hale KL, Wallace DD, Blanco-Duran D
Conversations between Latina mothers and their child's mental health provider: An observational study of shared decision-making regarding pediatric patient mental health needs.
The authors evaluated shared decision-making (SDM) and delineated SDM processes in audio-recorded conversations between language-congruent Spanish-/English-speaking clinicians and parents of pediatric mental health patients. They found that their present sample performed on par with other populations studied to date, and that it expanded the evaluation of observed SDM to include Latino patients and new clinician populations. The practical implications of their findings is that use of the Observer OPTION(5) instrument highlights that eliciting and integrating parent/patient preferences is a skill that requires attention when delivering culturally competent interventions.
AHRQ-funded; HS000032.
Citation: Hale KL, Wallace DD, Blanco-Duran D .
Conversations between Latina mothers and their child's mental health provider: An observational study of shared decision-making regarding pediatric patient mental health needs.
Patient Educ Couns 2020 Jan;103(1):96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.08.013..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Shared Decision Making, Cultural Competence, Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Caregiving, Behavioral Health
Bi S, Gunter KE, Lopez FY
Improving shared decision making for Asian American Pacific Islander sexual and gender minorities.
This study examined the challenges Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) sexual and gender minorities (SGM) encounter with shared decision making (SDM) with their providers, especially concerning mental health. Focus groups were conducted in San Francisco and interviews were conducted in Chicago and San Francisco. The participants were surveyed about attitudes towards SGM disclosure and preferences about providers. Many participants felt that providers either ignored or overemphasized their identities. Some shared the stigma of SGM identities and effects on mental health in their own families.
AHRQ-funded; HS023050.
Citation: Bi S, Gunter KE, Lopez FY .
Improving shared decision making for Asian American Pacific Islander sexual and gender minorities.
Med Care 2019 Dec;57(12):937-44. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001212..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Vulnerable Populations, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Behavioral Health, Social Stigma
Pavlo AJ, O'Connell M, Olsen S
Missing ingredients in shared decision-making?
This article discusses the practice of shared decision making (SDM) for clinicians when making decisions in health care. This widespread practice is considered the best approach for person-centered care, but for individuals diagnosed with serious mental illness there are still many barriers to effective collaboration. The authors suggest that more emphasis needs to be placed on the doctor-patient relationship itself conducting SDM.
AHRQ-funded; HS023000.
Citation: Pavlo AJ, O'Connell M, Olsen S .
Missing ingredients in shared decision-making?
Psychiatr Q 2019 Jun;90(2):333-38. doi: 10.1007/s11126-019-9624-9..
Keywords: Chronic Conditions, Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication, Shared Decision Making, Behavioral Health, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Patient and Family Engagement
Aalsma MC, Zerr AM, Etter DJ
Physician intervention to positive depression screens among adolescents in primary care.
The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of computer-based screening and physician feedback to guide adolescent depression management within primary care. The investigators found that when a computer-based decision support system algorithm focused on adolescent depression and was implemented in two primary care clinics, a majority of physicians utilized screening results to guide clinical care.
AHRQ-funded; HS022681.
Citation: Aalsma MC, Zerr AM, Etter DJ .
Physician intervention to positive depression screens among adolescents in primary care.
J Adolesc Health 2018 Feb;62(2):212-18. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.08.023..
Keywords: Care Management, Children/Adolescents, Shared Decision Making, Depression, Health Information Technology (HIT), Behavioral Health, Primary Care, Primary Care: Models of Care, Screening
Etter DJ, McCord A, Ouyang F
Suicide screening in primary care: use of an electronic screener to assess suicidality and improve provider follow-up for adolescents.
The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of using an existing computer decision support system to screen adolescent patients for suicidality and provide follow-up guidance to clinicians in a primary care setting. The authors concluded that incorporating adolescent suicide screening and provider follow-up guidance into an existing computer decision support system in primary care was feasible and well utilized by providers.
AHRQ-funded; HS022681.
Citation: Etter DJ, McCord A, Ouyang F .
Suicide screening in primary care: use of an electronic screener to assess suicidality and improve provider follow-up for adolescents.
J Adolesc Health 2018 Feb;62(2):191-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.08.026..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Depression, Behavioral Health, Primary Care, Screening
Cohen DJ, Davis M, Balasubramanian BA
Integrating behavioral health and primary care: consulting, coordinating and collaborating among professionals.
This paper sought to describe how clinicians from different backgrounds interact to deliver integrated behavioral and primary health care, and the contextual factors that shape such interactions. It concluded that primary care and behavioral health clinicians, through their interactions, consult, coordinate, and collaborate with each other to solve patients' problems.
AHRQ-funded; HS022981.
Citation: Cohen DJ, Davis M, Balasubramanian BA .
Integrating behavioral health and primary care: consulting, coordinating and collaborating among professionals.
J Am Board Fam Med 2015 Sep-Oct;28 Suppl 1:S21-31. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2015.S1.150042.
.
.
Keywords: Healthcare Delivery, Community-Based Practice, Shared Decision Making, Behavioral Health, Primary Care