National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Brain Injury (1)
- Cancer (1)
- Cancer: Prostate Cancer (1)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (2)
- Data (1)
- Emergency Department (1)
- Guidelines (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (2)
- (-) Patient-Centered Healthcare (5)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (1)
- Patient and Family Engagement (1)
- Patient Experience (1)
- (-) Shared Decision Making (5)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 5 of 5 Research Studies DisplayedTamirisa NP, Goodwin JS, Kandalam A
Patient and physician views of shared decision making in cancer.
The aim of the study was to explore patient and physician perceptions of shared decision making in clinical encounters for cancer care. Among the study’s multiple conclusions was that most physicians reported providing patients with written information, however, most patients reported that written information was too detailed and felt that the physicians did not assess the level of information they wished to receive.
AHRQ-funded; HS022134.
Citation: Tamirisa NP, Goodwin JS, Kandalam A .
Patient and physician views of shared decision making in cancer.
Health Expect 2017 Dec;20(6):1248-53. doi: 10.1111/hex.12564..
Keywords: Cancer, Shared Decision Making, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient Experience, Clinician-Patient Communication
Melnick ER, Hess EP, Guo G
Patient-centered decision support: formative usability evaluation of integrated clinical decision support with a patient decision aid for minor head injury in the emergency department.
The study’s objective was to formatively evaluate an electronic tool that not only helps clinicians at the bedside to determine the need for CT use based on the Canadian CT Head Rule but also promotes evidence-based conversations between patients and clinicians regarding patient-specific risk and patients' specific concerns. It concluded that the Concussion or Brain Bleed app is a useful and usable final product integrating clinical decision support with a patient decision aid.
AHRQ-funded; HS021271.
Citation: Melnick ER, Hess EP, Guo G .
Patient-centered decision support: formative usability evaluation of integrated clinical decision support with a patient decision aid for minor head injury in the emergency department.
J Med Internet Res 2017 May 19;19(5):e174. doi: 10.2196/jmir.7846.
.
.
Keywords: Brain Injury, Shared Decision Making, Emergency Department, Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient-Centered Healthcare
LeRouge C, Hasselquist MB, Kellogg L
Using heuristic evaluation to enhance the visual display of a provider dashboard for patient-reported outcomes.
A human-centered design (HCD) approach to understanding the data visualization needs for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in clinical practice can optimize the visual design of an interactive PRO system. Beyond iterative methods, the authors explored the additive value of other HCD methods such as heuristic evaluation. Their evaluation led to several recommendations to improve the display, accessibility, and interpretability of the dashboard’s data.
AHRQ-funded; HS023785.
Citation: LeRouge C, Hasselquist MB, Kellogg L .
Using heuristic evaluation to enhance the visual display of a provider dashboard for patient-reported outcomes.
eGEMS 2017 Apr 20;5(2):Article 6. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1283.
.
.
Keywords: Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Health Information Technology (HIT), Data, Shared Decision Making
Hamilton JG, Lillie SE, Alden DL
What is a good medical decision? A research agenda guided by perspectives from multiple stakeholders.
This position paper, informed by conference sessions featuring diverse stakeholders held at the 2015 Society of Behavioral Medicine and Society for Medical Decision Making annual meetings, describes key concepts that influence the decision making process itself and that may change what it means to make a good decision: interpersonal factors, structural constraints, affective influences, and values clarification methods.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Hamilton JG, Lillie SE, Alden DL .
What is a good medical decision? A research agenda guided by perspectives from multiple stakeholders.
J Behav Med 2017 Feb;40(1):52-68. doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9785-z.
.
.
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Guidelines, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Scherr KA, Fagerlin A, Hofer T
Physician recommendations trump patient preferences in prostate cancer treatment decisions.
This study assessed the influence of patient preferences and urologist recommendations in treatment decisions for clinically localized prostate cancer. It found that patients' initial treatment preferences did not predict receipt of active treatment versus surveillance. Instead, receipt of active treatment was predicted primarily by urologists' recommendations.
AHRQ-funded; HS021764.
Citation: Scherr KA, Fagerlin A, Hofer T .
Physician recommendations trump patient preferences in prostate cancer treatment decisions.
Med Decis Making 2017 Jan;37(1):56-69. doi: 10.1177/0272989x16662841.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer: Prostate Cancer, Shared Decision Making, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Clinician-Patient Communication