National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- (-) Cancer (54)
- Cancer: Breast Cancer (20)
- Cancer: Colorectal Cancer (4)
- Cancer: Lung Cancer (4)
- Cancer: Prostate Cancer (3)
- Caregiving (2)
- Case Study (1)
- Children/Adolescents (3)
- Chronic Conditions (1)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (8)
- Communication (5)
- Comparative Effectiveness (1)
- COVID-19 (1)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (4)
- Disparities (1)
- Education: Continuing Medical Education (1)
- Education: Patient and Caregiver (2)
- Elderly (11)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (2)
- Genetics (7)
- Guidelines (1)
- Healthcare Costs (3)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (2)
- Imaging (2)
- Implementation (1)
- Medication (2)
- Men's Health (2)
- Mortality (1)
- Outcomes (3)
- Pain (1)
- Palliative Care (3)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (8)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (7)
- Patient Adherence/Compliance (1)
- Patient and Family Engagement (5)
- Patient Experience (2)
- Practice Patterns (2)
- Pregnancy (1)
- Prevention (6)
- Primary Care (2)
- Provider: Physician (1)
- Quality of Life (2)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (3)
- Research Methodologies (1)
- Risk (4)
- Screening (14)
- (-) Shared Decision Making (54)
- Surgery (11)
- Training (1)
- Treatments (2)
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) (1)
- Vulnerable Populations (1)
- Women (17)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 25 of 54 Research Studies DisplayedSalwei ME, Ancker JS, Weinger MB
The decision aid is the easy part: workflow challenges of shared decision making in cancer care.
The authors indicate that widespread use of shared decision making (SDM) in clinical care has been limited even though both the National Academy of Medicine and the American Society of Clinical Oncology recommend SDM methods to improve patient-centered care. The purpose of this commentary is to explore 3 workflow-related barriers to SDM, and to discuss human factors engineering and demonstrate its potential value to decision aid design through a decision-making case study.
AHRQ-funded; HS026395.
Citation: Salwei ME, Ancker JS, Weinger MB .
The decision aid is the easy part: workflow challenges of shared decision making in cancer care.
J Natl Cancer Inst 2023 Nov 8; 115(11):1271-77. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djad133..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Cancer, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Kukhareva PV, Li H, Caverly TJ
Implementation of lung cancer screening in primary care and pulmonary clinics: pragmatic clinical trial of electronic health record-integrated everyday shared decision-making tool and clinician-facing prompts.
The authors conducted pre- and post-intervention analysis in primary care and pulmonary clinics to explore whether clinician-facing electronic health record (EHR) prompts and an EHR-integrated shared decision-making (SDM) tool designed to support incorporation of SDM into primary care could improve low-dose computer tomography scan imaging ordering and completion. Subjects were patients who met US Preventive Services Task Force criteria for lung cancer screening (LCS). The results indicated that EHR prompts and the EHR-integrated SDM tool were promising approaches to improving LCS in the primary care setting. The authors noted that further research is warranted.
AHRQ-funded; HS026198; HS028791.
Citation: Kukhareva PV, Li H, Caverly TJ .
Implementation of lung cancer screening in primary care and pulmonary clinics: pragmatic clinical trial of electronic health record-integrated everyday shared decision-making tool and clinician-facing prompts.
Chest 2023 Nov; 164(5):1325-38. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.04.040..
Keywords: Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Screening, Primary Care, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Shared Decision Making
Gore Moses R, Nieters A, Valentine rKD
Performance of the shared decision-making process scale for use in evaluation of hereditary cancer genetic testing decisions.
This study’s objective was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, reliability, and validity of the four-item Shared Decision Making (SDM) Process Scale for use in for hereditary cancer genetic testing decision-making. Participants were patients from a large hereditary cancer genetics practice who responded to an online survey following pre-test genetic counseling; the survey included the SDM Process Scale and the SURE scale. The SDM Process Scale showed feasibility, acceptability, and retest reliability, but not convergent validity with decisional conflict. The authors concluded that their findings provided evidence for use of this scale to measure patient perceptions of SDM in pre-test counseling.
AHRQ-funded; HS025718.
Citation: Gore Moses R, Nieters A, Valentine rKD .
Performance of the shared decision-making process scale for use in evaluation of hereditary cancer genetic testing decisions.
J Genet Couns 2023 Oct; 32(5):957-64. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1704..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Cancer, Genetics
Foraker R, Phommasathit C, Clevenger K
Using the sociotechnical model to conduct a focused usability assessment of a breast reconstruction decision tool.
The purpose of this study was to collect patients' and clinicians' perspectives on barriers and facilitators for implementing BREASTChoice, a web-based breast reconstruction decision aid, into the clinical workflow. From August 2020 to April 2021, the researchers conducted 12 qualitative interviews with patients and clinicians from two Midwestern medical specialty centers. The study found patients and clinicians agreed that BREASTChoice could provide benefits in a number of areas including: 1) BREASTChoice could assist patients make more informed decisions about their reconstruction and improve preparation for their first plastic surgery appointment; 2) BREASTChoice could improve communication and processes if the patient could view the tool at home and/or in the waiting room; 3) Clinicians recommended the information from BREASTChoice about patients' risks and preferences could be included in the patient's chart or the clinician electronic health record (EHR) inbox for access during the consultation; 5) Patients and clinicians indicated that the BREASTChoice tool does not require much time for the patient to use, efficiently fills gaps in knowledge, includes helpful information. Patients did report requiring time to properly read and digest the information.
AHRQ-funded; HS026699.
Citation: Foraker R, Phommasathit C, Clevenger K .
Using the sociotechnical model to conduct a focused usability assessment of a breast reconstruction decision tool.
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2023 Jul 28; 23(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02236-x..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Women, Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer
Vo H, Valentine KD, Barry MJ
Evaluation of the shared decision-making process scale in cancer screening and medication decisions.
The objectives of this study were to examine the reliability and validity of the Shared Decision-Making (SDM) Process scale for cancer screening and medication decisions. Researchers conducted a secondary data analysis of more than 6,000 participants who made decisions about breast, colon, or prostate cancer screening or taking medication for menopause, depression, hypertension or high cholesterol. They concluded that the SDM Process scale demonstrated construct validity and retest reliability.
AHRQ-funded; HS025718.
Citation: Vo H, Valentine KD, Barry MJ .
Evaluation of the shared decision-making process scale in cancer screening and medication decisions.
Patient Educ Couns 2023 Mar;108:107617. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.107617.
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Cancer, Medication, Screening
Rosenberg SM, Zheng Y, Gelber S
Adjuvant endocrine therapy non-initiation and non-persistence in young women with early-stage breast cancer.
The purpose of this study was to describe oral adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET) non-initiation and non-persistence in young women with breast cancer to inform strategies to improve adherence. The researchers identified 693 women with hormone receptor-positive, stage I to III breast cancer enrolled in a cohort of women diagnosed with breast cancer at 40 years or less, assessed ET decision-making and identified variables related with non-initiation/non-persistence and to assess the relationship between non-persistence and recurrence. The study found that by 18 months, 9% had not initiated ET. Black women had a greater chances and women with a college degree had lower chances of non-initiation. Of the 607 women who initiated, 20% were non-persistent. The researchers specified that younger age, being married or partnered, and indicating greater weight issues were related with higher chances of non-persistence. Having received chemotherapy and higher burdens of hot flashes and vaginal symptoms were related with lower odds of non-persistence. Women who initiated therapy had an increased likelihood of reporting shared decision-making than non-initiators (57% vs. 38%), and women who were non-persistent were less likely to report high confidence with the decision than women who were persistent (40% vs. 63%).
AHRQ-funded; HS023680.
Citation: Rosenberg SM, Zheng Y, Gelber S .
Adjuvant endocrine therapy non-initiation and non-persistence in young women with early-stage breast cancer.
Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023 Feb; 197(3):547-58. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06810-1..
Keywords: Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Women, Shared Decision Making, Patient Adherence/Compliance
Dalton AF, Golin CE, Morris C
Effect of a patient decision aid on preferences for colorectal cancer screening among older adults: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.
This research studied the effects of a patient decision aid on preferences for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among adults aged 76 to 84 years. Participants were recruited from 14 community-based primary care practices who were not up to date with screening and had an appointment within 6 weeks. They were randomized to receive the intervention or control. Among the 424 participants, mean age was 76.8, 248 were women, and 333 were White. There were no statistically significant differences found in patient preferences between the health groups. Additional studies that are appropriately powered were recommended.
AHRQ-funded; HS021133.
Citation: Dalton AF, Golin CE, Morris C .
Effect of a patient decision aid on preferences for colorectal cancer screening among older adults: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial.
JAMA Netw Open 2022 Dec;5(12):e2244982. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.44982..
Keywords: Elderly, Shared Decision Making, Screening, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Cancer
Schumacher JR, Zahrieh D, Chow S
Increasing socioeconomically disadvantaged patients' engagement in breast cancer surgery decision-making through a shared decision-making intervention (A231701CD): protocol for a cluster randomised clinical trial.
This paper describes the protocol for a multisite randomized trial to test the impact of a newly developed decision aid to increase socioeconomically disadvantaged patients' engagement in breast cancer surgery decision-making. The study will be conducted through 10 surgical clinics within the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP). A stepped-wedge design with clinics will be randomized to the time of transition from usual care to the decision aid arm. Study participants will be female, aged ≥18 years, with newly diagnosed stage 0-III breast cancer who are planning breast surgery. Data collection will include a baseline surgeon survey, baseline patient survey, audio-recording of the surgeon-patient consultation, a follow-up patient survey and medical record data review. A subset of patients, surgeons, and clinic stakeholders will participate in interviews and focus groups.
AHRQ-funded; HS025194.
Citation: Schumacher JR, Zahrieh D, Chow S .
Increasing socioeconomically disadvantaged patients' engagement in breast cancer surgery decision-making through a shared decision-making intervention (A231701CD): protocol for a cluster randomised clinical trial.
BMJ Open 2022 Nov 17;12(11):e063895. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063895..
Keywords: Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Patient and Family Engagement, Shared Decision Making, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Surgery, Women
Ross RL, Rubio K, Rodriguez HP
Mammography and decision aid use for breast cancer screening in older women.
This study examines the association between practice-level decision-aid use and mammography use among older women. Physician practice responses to the 2017/2018 National Survey of Healthcare Organizations and Systems were linked to 2016-17 Medicare fee-for-service beneficiary data from eligible beneficiaries aged 65-74 years. Findings showed that health information technology-enabled automation of mammography reminders and other advanced health information technology functions may support mammography, whereas breast cancer decision aids may reduce patients' propensities to be screened through the alignment of their preferences and screening decision.
AHRQ-funded; HS022241; HS024075.
Citation: Ross RL, Rubio K, Rodriguez HP .
Mammography and decision aid use for breast cancer screening in older women.
Am J Prev Med 2022 Oct;63(4):630-35. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.04.014..
Keywords: Imaging, Screening, Shared Decision Making, Cancer: Breast Cancer, Women, Prevention, Cancer, Elderly
Wernli KJ, Smith RE, Henderson LM
Decision quality and regret with treatment decisions in women with breast cancer: pre-operative breast MRI and breast density.
The authors evaluated self-report of decision quality and regret with breast cancer surgical treatment by pre-operative breast MRI use in women recently diagnosed with breast cancer. They found that breast MRI use in the diagnostic work-up of breast cancer does not negatively alter women's perceptions of surgical treatment decisions in early survivorship.
AHRQ-funded; HS018366.
Citation: Wernli KJ, Smith RE, Henderson LM .
Decision quality and regret with treatment decisions in women with breast cancer: pre-operative breast MRI and breast density.
Breast Cancer Res Treat 2022 Aug;194(3):607-16. doi: 10.1007/s10549-022-06648-7..
Keywords: Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Shared Decision Making, Women, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Wasp GT, Knutzen KE, Murray GF
Systemic therapy decision making in advanced cancer: a qualitative analysis of patient-oncologist encounters.
This study sought to characterize patient-oncologist communication and decision making about continuing or limiting systemic therapy in encounters after an initial consultation, with a particular focus on whether and how oncologists foster shared decision making (SDM). The authors performed content analysis of outpatient oncology encounters at two US National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers audio recorded between November 2010 and September 2014. A multidisciplinary team used a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development with a combination of random and purposive sampling. Among 31 randomly sampled dyads with 3 encounters each (93 total), systematic therapy decision making was discussed in 90% encounters. Only 34 oncologists broached limiting therapy, which 27 framed as temporary; nine as completion of a standard regime; and five as permanent discontinuation. Thematic analysis found that that (1) patients and oncologists framed continuing therapy as the default, (2) deficiencies in the SDM process (facilitating choice awareness, discussing options, and incorporating patient preferences) contributed to this default, and (3) oncologists use persuasion rather than deliberation when broaching discontinuation.
AHRQ-funded; HS022242.
Citation: Wasp GT, Knutzen KE, Murray GF .
Systemic therapy decision making in advanced cancer: a qualitative analysis of patient-oncologist encounters.
JCO Oncol Pract 2022 Aug;18(8):e1357-e66. doi: 10.1200/op.21.00377..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Cancer, Clinician-Patient Communication
Tsang M, DeBoer RJ, Garrett SB
Decision-making about clinical trial options among older patients with metastatic cancer who have exhausted standard therapies.
The purpose of this study was to examine the potential reasons for and responses to older adults’ under enrollment in phase 1 cancer clinical trials. The researchers conducted 101 in-depth qualitative interviews with 39 adults aged 65 and older with advanced cancer and asked about their experiences with the trials. The data was analyzed to identify the participants’ understanding of clinical research, their perceptions of early phase trials, and their experiences with enrollment in the trials. The study found that participants over the age of 70 were less enthusiastic about participation in clinical trials, although they did not mention age as a limitation to participation. Findings indicated that participation in clinical trials was an interactive, ongoing process, in which older adults relied on their oncologist for guidance and discussion. The researchers concluded that older adults rely on their oncologist to navigate the perceived complexities of phase 1 trial enrollment, and that acknowledgement of those complexities via shared decision-making can help prevent under-enrollment.
AHRQ-funded; HS022241.
Citation: Tsang M, DeBoer RJ, Garrett SB .
Decision-making about clinical trial options among older patients with metastatic cancer who have exhausted standard therapies.
J Geriatr Oncol 2022 Jun;13(5):594-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.01.012..
Keywords: Elderly, Cancer, Shared Decision Making, Quality of Life
Rosenberg SM, Gierisch JM, Revette AC
"Is it cancer or not?" A qualitative exploration of survivor concerns surrounding the diagnosis and treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ.
This study investigated the impact of a ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosis by engaging self-identified patients regarding their experience. Findings showed that, in a large, national sample, participants with a history of DCIS reported confusion and concern about the diagnosis and treatment, which caused worry and significant uncertainty.
AHRQ-funded; HS023680.
Citation: Rosenberg SM, Gierisch JM, Revette AC .
"Is it cancer or not?" A qualitative exploration of survivor concerns surrounding the diagnosis and treatment of ductal carcinoma in situ.
Cancer 2022 Apr 15;128(8):1676-83. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34126..
Keywords: Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Shared Decision Making, Women, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Clinician-Patient Communication, Patient and Family Engagement, Communication
Reese TJ, Schlechter CR, Kramer H
Implementing lung cancer screening in primary care: needs assessment and implementation strategy design.
This study explored the implementation of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (CT) in primary care. The study’s two goals included exploring the implementation of lung cancer screening primary care in the context of integrating a decision aid into the electronic health record and a designing of implementation strategies that target hypothesized mechanics of change and context-specific barriers. The two phases included a Qualitative Analysis phase including semi-structured interviews with primary care physicians to elicit key task behaviors, and an Implementation Strategy Design phase consisting of defining implementation strategies and hypothesizing causal pathways to improve screening with a decision aid. Fourteen interviews were conducted and out of that 3 key task behaviors and four behavioral determinants emerged. Strategies included increasing provider self-efficacy toward performing shared decision making and using the decision aid, improving provider performance expectancy, increasing social influence, and addressing key facilitators to using the decision aid.
AHRQ-funded; HS026198.
Citation: Reese TJ, Schlechter CR, Kramer H .
Implementing lung cancer screening in primary care: needs assessment and implementation strategy design.
Transl Behav Med 2022 Feb 16;12(2):187-97. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab115..
Keywords: Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Primary Care, Screening, Implementation, Shared Decision Making
Chen MM, Hughes TM, Dossett LA
Peace of mind: a role in unnecessary care?
This article discusses the role peace of mind plays in unnecessary cancer preventative care, including unnecessary screenings and surgeries. For example, shared-decision making is recommended by the USPSTF for PSA-based screening but if the decision to screen is emotion-based, then shared decision-making guidelines may not be effective. A number of studies have shown that peace of mind has been implicated as a key patient-centered outcome driving the increased utilization of contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM). Overdiagnosis and overtreating of thyroid cancer have resulted in an accelerating rate of total thyroidectomies relative to lobectomies for small papillary cancers in the past decade even though there is no evidence showing better survival rates. Quality-of-life studies have not shown better outcomes to patients who do chose the more radical treatment. The authors recommend that clinicians undergo training in cognitive debiasing strategies and more training in empathic communication and risk communication techniques to decrease the potential negative influence of peace of mind.
AHRQ-funded; HS026030.
Citation: Chen MM, Hughes TM, Dossett LA .
Peace of mind: a role in unnecessary care?
J Clin Oncol 2022 Feb 10;40(5):433-37. doi: 10.1200/jco.21.01895..
Keywords: Patient-Centered Healthcare, Shared Decision Making, Cancer
Dossett LA, Mott NM, Bredbeck BC
Using tailored messages to target overuse of Low-Value breast cancer care in older women.
The purpose of this study was to examine the role that an individual’s maximizing-minimizing trait, an inherent preference for more or less medical care, may influence the preference for low-value care in the omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and post-lumpectomy radiotherapy in women 70 years of age or higher with early-stage, hormone-receptor positive invasive breast cancer. The researchers recruited women 70 years of age or higher (n=1600) who were maximizers (515), minimizers (550), or neutral (535), and presented them with a hypothetical breast cancer diagnosis and then randomized exposure to one of three follow-up messages. Messages included: 1) maximizer-tailored, 2) minimizer-tailored, or 3) neutral. The study reported that higher maximizing tendency correlated positively with electing both SLNB and radiotherapy on logistic regression. Any maximizer- or minimizer-tailoring decreased preference for SLNB in maximizing and neutral women but had no effect in minimizing women. Tailoring had no impact on radiotherapy decision, except for an increased probability of minimizers electing radiotherapy when presented with maximizer-tailored messaging. The study concluded that among women facing a hypothetical breast cancer diagnosis, tendencies for maximizing-minimizing are correlated with preferences for treatment.
AHRQ-funded; HS026030.
Citation: Dossett LA, Mott NM, Bredbeck BC .
Using tailored messages to target overuse of Low-Value breast cancer care in older women.
J Surg Res 2022 Feb;270:503-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.10.005..
Keywords: Elderly, Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Women, Shared Decision Making, Clinician-Patient Communication, Communication
Shipe ME, Baechle JJ, Deppen SA
Modeling the impact of delaying surgery for early esophageal cancer in the era of COVID-19.
Surgical society guidelines have recommended changing the treatment strategy for early esophageal cancer during the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Delaying resection can allow for interim disease progression, but the impact of this delay on mortality is unknown. The COVID-19 infection rate at which immediate operative risk exceeds benefit is unknown. In this study, the investigators sought to model immediate versus delayed surgical resection in a T1b esophageal adenocarcinoma.
AHRQ-funded; HS026122.
Citation: Shipe ME, Baechle JJ, Deppen SA .
Modeling the impact of delaying surgery for early esophageal cancer in the era of COVID-19.
Surg Endosc 2021 Nov;35(11):6081-88. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08101-6..
Keywords: COVID-19, Cancer, Surgery, Shared Decision Making, Risk
Sella T, Poorvu PD, Ruddy KJ
Impact of fertility concerns on endocrine therapy decisions in young breast cancer survivors.
The diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer can have profound effects on a young woman's family planning and fertility, particularly among women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. In this paper the authors discuss the Young Women's Breast Cancer Study, a multicenter cohort of women aged 40 years or younger and newly diagnosed with breast cancer from 2006 to 2016. The investigators concluded that concern about fertility was a contributor to adjuvant ET decisions among a substantial proportion of young breast cancer survivors.
AHRQ-funded; HS023680.
Citation: Sella T, Poorvu PD, Ruddy KJ .
Impact of fertility concerns on endocrine therapy decisions in young breast cancer survivors.
Cancer 2021 Aug 15;127(16):2888-94. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33596..
Keywords: Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Women, Pregnancy, Shared Decision Making
Wallner LP, Banerjee M, Reyes-Gastelum D
Multilevel factors associated with more intensive use of radioactive iodine for low-risk thyroid cancer.
The use of radioactive iodine (RAI) for low-risk thyroid cancer is common, and variation in its use exists, despite the lack of benefit for low-risk disease and potential harms and costs. The objective of this study was to simultaneously assess patient- and physician-level factors associated with patient-reported receipt of RAI for low-risk thyroid cancer. The investigators concluded that physician perspectives and attitudes about using RAI, as well as patient volume, influenced RAI use for low-risk thyroid cancer.
AHRQ-funded; HS024512.
Citation: Wallner LP, Banerjee M, Reyes-Gastelum D .
Multilevel factors associated with more intensive use of radioactive iodine for low-risk thyroid cancer.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2021 May 13;106(6):e2402-e12. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab139..
Keywords: Cancer, Practice Patterns, Shared Decision Making, Risk
Rhoten BA, Sellers JI, Baraff B
A qualitative examination of patient priorities and preferences during treatment decision-making for recurrent head and neck cancer.
Patients with recurrent head and neck cancer (HNC) may feel overwhelmed at the prospect of having to consider treatment options particularly if they recently completed treatment for their primary disease or when they have no options that may lead to long-term survival. The purpose of this study was to examine patient priorities and preferences during treatment decision-making for recurrent HNC.
AHRQ-funded; HS022990.
Citation: Rhoten BA, Sellers JI, Baraff B .
A qualitative examination of patient priorities and preferences during treatment decision-making for recurrent head and neck cancer.
Support Care Cancer 2021 Jan;29(1):377-85. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05488-9..
Keywords: Cancer, Shared Decision Making, Quality of Life
Gutnik L, Allen CM, Presson AP
Breast cancer surgery decision role perceptions and choice of surgery.
This study examined the finding that breast cancer patients who reported more personal responsibility for the surgery decision were more likely to undergo aggressive surgery. Retrospective cohort data was used from 100 newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. Surgery types compared were mastectomy, lumpectomy, and unilateral versus bilateral mastectomy. Patients’ decision-making role was identified using the Patient Preference Scale. Type of surgery and patient role concordance was compared as well as patient decision role performance, role perception, and provider role perception. Patient decision role and perceptions were not associated with type of surgery. Patient role preference depended on the stage of disease. Stage III patients preferred the most active roles with stage I and stage II patients preferring a more collaborative role. Providers perceived more passive patient roles in the mastectomy group.
AHRQ-funded; HS024784.
Citation: Gutnik L, Allen CM, Presson AP .
Breast cancer surgery decision role perceptions and choice of surgery.
Ann Surg Oncol 2020 Oct;27(10):3623-32. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08485-8.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Shared Decision Making, Surgery, Women
Smith ME, Vitous CA, Hughes TM
Barriers and facilitators to de-implementation of the Choosing Wisely((R)) guidelines for low-value breast cancer surgery.
The objective of this study was to understand why surgeons stop performing certain unnecessary cancer operations but not others and how best to de-implement entrenched and emerging unnecessary procedures. The investigators concluded that with a growing focus on the elimination of ineffective, unproven or low value practices, it is imperative that the behavioral determinants are understood and targeted with specific interventions to decrease utilization rapidly.
AHRQ-funded; HS026030.
Citation: Smith ME, Vitous CA, Hughes TM .
Barriers and facilitators to de-implementation of the Choosing Wisely((R)) guidelines for low-value breast cancer surgery.
Ann Surg Oncol 2020 Aug;27(8):2653-63. doi: 10.1245/s10434-020-08285-0..
Keywords: Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Surgery, Shared Decision Making, Guidelines, Women
Wang T, Baskin AS, Dossett LA
Deimplementation of the choosing wisely recommendations for low-value breast cancer surgery: a systematic review.
Overtreatment of early-stage breast cancer results in increased morbidity and cost without improving survival. Major surgical organizations participating in the Choosing Wisely campaign identified 4 breast cancer operations as low value. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the extent to which these procedures have been deimplemented, determine the implications of decreased use, and recognize possible barriers and facilitators to deimplementation.
AHRQ-funded; HS026030.
Citation: Wang T, Baskin AS, Dossett LA .
Deimplementation of the choosing wisely recommendations for low-value breast cancer surgery: a systematic review.
JAMA Surg 2020 Aug;155(8):759-70. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0322..
Keywords: Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Surgery, Shared Decision Making, Women, Evidence-Based Practice
Eden KB, Ivlev I, Bensching KL
Use of an online breast cancer risk assessment and patient decision aid in primary care practices.
A cross-sectional study evaluating a web-based breast cancer risk assessment and decision aid (MammoScreen) was conducted in an academic general internal medicine clinic. Breast cancer risk assessment and mammography screening decision support were efficiently implemented through a web-based tool for patients sent through an electronic patient portal. Findings indicated that integration of patient decision aids with risk algorithms in clinical practice may help support the implementation of USPSTF recommendations that include risk assessment and shared decision-making.
AHRQ-funded; HS026370.
Citation: Eden KB, Ivlev I, Bensching KL .
Use of an online breast cancer risk assessment and patient decision aid in primary care practices.
J Womens Health 2020 Jun;29(6):763-69. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8143..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Screening, Shared Decision Making, Risk, Health Information Technology (HIT), Prevention, Women
Richardson DR, Crossnohere NL, Seo J
Age at diagnosis and patient preferences for treatment outcomes in AML: a discrete choice experiment to explore meaningful benefits.
The recent expansion of treatment options in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has necessitated a greater understanding of patient preferences for treatment benefits, about which little is known. In this study, the investigators sought to quantify and assess heterogeneity of the preferences of AML patients for treatment outcomes. An AML-specific discrete choice experiment (DCE) was developed involving multiple stakeholders.
AHRQ-funded; HS000032.
Citation: Richardson DR, Crossnohere NL, Seo J .
Age at diagnosis and patient preferences for treatment outcomes in AML: a discrete choice experiment to explore meaningful benefits.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020 May;29(5):942-48. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.Epi-19-1277..
Keywords: Cancer, Shared Decision Making