National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 5 of 5 Research Studies DisplayedHoonakker PLT, Carayon P, Brown RL
Satisfaction of older patients with emergency department care: psychometric properties and construct validity of the Consumer Emergency Care Satisfaction Scale.
This study’s purpose to was examine the construct validity of the Consumer Emergency Care Satisfaction Scale (CECSS), designed to measure patient satisfaction in the emergency department (ED). The authors administered 2 surveys to older adults who presented with a fall to the ED and used electronic health record data to examine construct validity of the CECSS and ceiling effects. Using several criteria, they improved construct validity of the CECSS, reduced ceiling effects, and standardized scoring.
AHRQ-funded; HS026624.
Citation: Hoonakker PLT, Carayon P, Brown RL .
Satisfaction of older patients with emergency department care: psychometric properties and construct validity of the Consumer Emergency Care Satisfaction Scale.
J Nurs Care Qual 2023 Jul-Sep; 38(3):256-63. doi: 10.1097/ncq.0000000000000694..
Keywords: Elderly, Emergency Department, Patient Experience
Hoonakker PLT, Carayon P, Brown RL
A systematic review of the Consumer Emergency Care Satisfaction Scale (CECSS).
In this study, researchers systematically reviewed the literature on the Consumer Emergency Care Satisfaction Scale (CECSS) and examined its psychometric properties. Their systematic literature search resulted in 28 articles in which the CECSS was used, demonstrating that, from a psychometric perspective, the CECSS is a valid and reliable instrument. However, their study also showed that the CECSS has several weaknesses, and they made recommendations for its improvement.
AHRQ-funded; HS026624.
Citation: Hoonakker PLT, Carayon P, Brown RL .
A systematic review of the Consumer Emergency Care Satisfaction Scale (CECSS).
J Nurs Care Qual 2022 Oct-Dec;37(4):349-55. doi: 10.1097/ncq.0000000000000636..
Keywords: Emergency Department, Patient Experience
Sharp B, Johnson J, Hamedani AG
What are we measuring? Evaluating physician-specific satisfaction scores between emergency departments.
The goals of this study were to determine whether Press Ganey ED satisfaction scores for emergency physicians working at two different sites were consistent between sites, and to identify factors contributing to any variation. The investigators found that Press Ganey satisfaction scores for the same group of emergency physicians varied significantly between sites. They indicated that this suggests these scores are more dependent on site-specific factors, such as wait times, than a true representation of the quality of care provided by the physician.
AHRQ-funded; HS024558.
Citation: Sharp B, Johnson J, Hamedani AG .
What are we measuring? Evaluating physician-specific satisfaction scores between emergency departments.
West J Emerg Med 2019 May;20(3):454-59. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2019.4.41040..
Keywords: Emergency Department, Patient Experience, Provider: Physician, Provider
Schoenfeld EM, Kanzaria HK, Quigley DD
Patient preferences regarding shared decision making in the emergency department: findings from a multisite survey.
In this study, the investigators sought to determine patients' desired level of involvement in medical decisions and their perceptions of potential barriers and facilitators to shared decision making in the emergency department (ED). They found that the majority of ED patients wanted to be involved in medical decisions, especially in the case of a "serious" medical problem, and felt that they had the ability to do so. Nevertheless, many patients were unlikely to actively seek involvement and defaulted to allowing the physician to make decisions during the ED visit.
AHRQ-funded; HS025701.
Citation: Schoenfeld EM, Kanzaria HK, Quigley DD .
Patient preferences regarding shared decision making in the emergency department: findings from a multisite survey.
Acad Emerg Med 2018 Oct;25(10):1118-28. doi: 10.1111/acem.13499..
Keywords: Clinician-Patient Communication, Shared Decision Making, Emergency Department, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient Experience
Schoenfeld EM, Goff SL, Downs G
A qualitative analysis of patients' perceptions of shared decision making in the emergency department: "let me know i have a choice.".
In this study, the investigators sought to explore the use of shared decision making (SDM) from the perspectives of emergency department (ED) patients, focusing on what affects patients' desired level of involvement and what barriers and facilitators patients found most relevant to their experience. The investigators concluded that this exploration suggested that most patients wanted some degree of involvement in medical decision making but more proactive engagement of patients by clinicians was often needed.
AHRQ-funded; HS024311.
Citation: Schoenfeld EM, Goff SL, Downs G .
A qualitative analysis of patients' perceptions of shared decision making in the emergency department: "let me know i have a choice.".
Acad Emerg Med 2018 Jul;25(7):716-27. doi: 10.1111/acem.13416.
.
.
Keywords: Clinician-Patient Communication, Shared Decision Making, Emergency Department, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient Experience