National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Anxiety (1)
- Asthma (1)
- Behavioral Health (1)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (9)
- Care Coordination (1)
- Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) (3)
- Children/Adolescents (6)
- Chronic Conditions (2)
- Communication (3)
- Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS) (1)
- Critical Care (1)
- Depression (1)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (1)
- Education: Continuing Medical Education (1)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (16)
- Guidelines (2)
- Healthcare Delivery (8)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (3)
- Health Systems (3)
- Heart Disease and Health (4)
- Hospitals (5)
- (-) Implementation (42)
- Inpatient Care (1)
- Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (2)
- Learning Health Systems (3)
- Medicaid (3)
- Medication (1)
- Medication: Safety (1)
- Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) (1)
- Newborns/Infants (1)
- Nursing (1)
- Organizational Change (6)
- Orthopedics (1)
- Outcomes (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (6)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (5)
- Patient and Family Engagement (1)
- Patient Experience (1)
- Patient Safety (4)
- Patient Self-Management (1)
- Practice Improvement (5)
- Prevention (3)
- Primary Care (17)
- Primary Care: Models of Care (6)
- Provider (1)
- Provider Performance (1)
- Quality Improvement (41)
- Quality Measures (6)
- (-) Quality of Care (42)
- Respiratory Conditions (2)
- Rural Health (1)
- Screening (1)
- Teams (4)
- TeamSTEPPS (1)
- Telehealth (1)
- Tools & Toolkits (1)
- Training (1)
- Urban Health (1)
- Vulnerable Populations (1)
- Workflow (1)
- Workforce (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 25 of 42 Research Studies DisplayedGoldberg DG, Owens-Jasey C, Haghighat S
Implementation strategies for large scale quality improvement initiatives in primary care settings: a qualitative assessment.
This study focused on gaining a comprehensive understanding of perspectives from research participants and research team members on the value of implementation strategies and factors that influenced the AHRQ-funded EvidenceNOW initiative in Virginia. The goal of EvidenceNOW’s Advancing Heart Health in Primary Care initiative is to assist primary care practices in the US in implementing evidence-based practices in cardiovascular care and building capacity for quality improvement. In 2018, the authors conducted 25 focus groups with clinicians and staff at participating practices, including 80 physicians, advanced practice clinicians, practice managers, and other practice staff. They also conducted face-to-face and telephone interviews with 22 research team members, including lead investigators, practice facilitators, physician expert consultants, and evaluators. They used the integrated-Promoting Action on Research Implementation in the Health Services (i-PARIHS) framework in their qualitative data analysis and organization of themes. Implementation strategies that were valued by both practice representatives and research team members included the kick-off event, on-site practice facilitation, and interaction with physician expert consults. Day-to-day activities often overwhelmed clinicians and staff, which hindered their ability to fully participate in the EvidenceNOW initiative.
AHRQ-funded; HS023913.
Citation: Goldberg DG, Owens-Jasey C, Haghighat S .
Implementation strategies for large scale quality improvement initiatives in primary care settings: a qualitative assessment.
BMC Prim Care 2023 Nov 17; 24(1):242. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02200-8..
Keywords: Quality Improvement, Primary Care, Quality of Care, Implementation
Rome D, Sales A, Cornelius T
Impact of telemedicine modality on quality metrics in diverse settings: implementation science-informed retrospective cohort study.
The objective of this study was to assess telemedicine uptake during the COVID-19 pandemic and impact of visit modality on primary care quality metrics in diverse, low socioeconomic status settings. Research was informed by the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework. Researchers found that there were marginally better quality metrics for in-person care versus video and phone visits, and that de-adoption of telemedicine was marked within 2 years in the study population. They concluded that the impact of visit modality on quality outcomes, provider and patient preferences, and technological barriers in historically marginalized settings should be considered.
AHRQ-funded; HS025198.
Citation: Rome D, Sales A, Cornelius T .
Impact of telemedicine modality on quality metrics in diverse settings: implementation science-informed retrospective cohort study.
J Med Internet Res 2023 Jul 26; 25:e47670. doi: 10.2196/47670..
Keywords: Telehealth, Health Information Technology (HIT), Implementation, Quality Measures, Quality of Care
Cope EL, Johnson M, Khan M
AHRQ Author: Mistry KB
Contextual factors affecting implementation of pediatric quality improvement programs.
Researchers assessed the role of contextual factors in influencing the efforts of 5 diverse quality improvement projects as part of the Pediatric Quality Measure Program (PQMP) directed by AHRQ. In a mixed methods study, they conducted semistructured interviews, followed by structured worksheets, of 5 PQMP grantees. They found that using a determinant framework, such as the Tailored Implementation for Chronic Diseases, is valuable in facilitating comparisons across heterogeneous projects, allowing identification of key contextual factors influencing the implementation of pediatric quality measures across a diverse range of clinical topics and settings.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Cope EL, Johnson M, Khan M .
Contextual factors affecting implementation of pediatric quality improvement programs.
Acad Pediatr 2022 Apr;22(3S):S81-S91. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.08.016..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Quality Measures, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Implementation
Mistry KB, Sagatov RDF, Schur C
AHRQ Author: Mistry KB, Sagatov RDF
Design and implementation of the Pediatric Quality Measures Program 2.0.
This AHRQ-authored research discusses the design and implementation of the Pediatric Quality Measures Program (PQMP) 2.0. The PQMP was established in response to the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009. AHRQ and CMS awarded 6 grants to Centers of Excellence (COEs) and a contract to facilitate collaboration and learning across the COEs. The COEs partnered with stakeholders from multiple levels to field test real-world implementation and refinement of pediatric quality measures and quality improvement initiatives. A PQMP Learning Collaborative (PQMP-LC) consisting of AHRQ, CMS, the 6 COEs, and L&M Policy Research, LLC was created to complete literature reviews, conduct key informant interviews, and collect data to develop reports to address the Research Foci. It also aided with development of measure implementation and quality improvement toolkits; conceptualized an implementation science framework, analysis, and roadmap; and facilitated dissemination of learnings and products. The various products created are intended to support the uptake of PQMP measures and inform future pediatric measurement and improvement work.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Mistry KB, Sagatov RDF, Schur C .
Design and implementation of the Pediatric Quality Measures Program 2.0.
Acad Pediatr 2022 Apr;22(3s):S59-S64. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.12.021..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Medicaid, Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), Quality Measures, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Implementation
Schnipper JL, Reyes Nieva H, Mallouk M
Effects of a refined evidence-based toolkit and mentored implementation on medication reconciliation at 18 hospitals: results of the MARQUIS2 study.
This study was a follow-up of the first Multicenter Medication Reconciliation Quality Improvement Study (MARQUIS1) that demonstrated mentored implementation of a medication reconciliation best practices toolkit. The toolkit decreased total unintentional medication discrepancies in five hospitals, but results varied by site. The toolkit has been refined with lessons learned and retooled as MARQUIS2. The tool was implemented at 18 North American hospitals or hospital systems from 2016 to 2018, offering 17 system-level and 6-patient-level interventions. One of eight physicians coached each site remotely via monthly calls and one or two site visits. A total of 4947 patients were sampled, with 1229 preimplementation and 3718 postimplementation. A steady decline in medication discrepancy rates were experienced from 2.85 discrepancies per patient down to 0.98 discrepancies. An interrupted time series analysis of the 17 sites showed the intervention was associated with a 5% relative decrease in discrepancies per month.
AHRQ-funded; HS025486; HS023757.
Citation: Schnipper JL, Reyes Nieva H, Mallouk M .
Effects of a refined evidence-based toolkit and mentored implementation on medication reconciliation at 18 hospitals: results of the MARQUIS2 study.
BMJ Qual Saf 2022 Apr;31(4):278-86. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2020-012709..
Keywords: Medication, Evidence-Based Practice, Tools & Toolkits, Implementation, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Medication: Safety, Patient Safety
Forrest CB, Simpson L, Mistry KB
AHRQ Author: Mistry KB
PQMP Phase 2: implementation and dissemination.
The authors provide an overview of the articles in this supplement concerning the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act Pediatric Quality Measures Program (PQMP). The articles examine the opportunities and challenges associated with the PQMP 2.0 work of the Centers for Excellence and how findings may advance the science for pediatric quality measurement and improvement, and, ultimately, child health outcomes.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Forrest CB, Simpson L, Mistry KB .
PQMP Phase 2: implementation and dissemination.
Acad Pediatr 2022 Apr;22(3s):S55-S58. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2022.01.012..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Medicaid, Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), Quality Measures, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Implementation
Schur C, Johnson M, Doherty J
AHRQ Author: Mistry KB
Real-world considerations for implementing pediatric quality measures: insights from key stakeholders.
This AHRQ-authored paper describes key stakeholder insights focused on measure implementation and increasing the uptake of Pediatric Quality Measures (PQM). The PQMP Learning Collaborative conducted semistructured interviews with 9 key informants (KIs) presenting states, health plans, and other potential end users. The interviews focused on obtaining KIs’ perspectives on 6 research questions focused on assessing the feasibility and usability of PQM and strengthening the connection between measurement and improvement. The KIs uniformly acknowledged the complexity of the issues raised and pinpointed multiple unresolved issues.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290201400003I.
Citation: Schur C, Johnson M, Doherty J .
Real-world considerations for implementing pediatric quality measures: insights from key stakeholders.
Acad Pediatr 2022 Apr;22(3S):S76-S80. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2021.04.007..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Medicaid, Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), Quality Measures, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Implementation
Franklin PD, Bond CP, Rothrock NE
Strategies for effective implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty practice.
This study’s goal was to synthesize patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) implementation strategies that are successfully used by hundreds of arthroplasty surgeons and early PROM-adopter clinical systems. The authors developed guidelines to inform clinical care, drive quality-improvement activities, and support reporting for payer-sponsored incentives. They also outlined future research that is needed to define methods for optimal patient engagement, technology infrastructure, and operational systems to seamlessly integrate PROM collection in clinical care.
AHRQ-funded; HS018910.
Citation: Franklin PD, Bond CP, Rothrock NE .
Strategies for effective implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in arthroplasty practice.
J Bone Joint Surg Am 2021 Dec 15;103(24):e97. doi: 10.2106/jbjs.20.02072..
Keywords: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Orthopedics, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Evidence-Based Practice, Implementation, Outcomes
Gephart SM, Newnam K, Weiss A
Feasibility and acceptability of a Neonatal Project ECHO (NeoECHO) as a dissemination and implementation strategy to prevent necrotizing enterocolitis.
Investigators examined the feasibility and acceptability of the care tools bundle NeoECHO to disseminate NEC-Zero education and describe the intentions of internal facilitators and clinicians to initiate quality improvement changes. They found that NeoECHO was an acceptable and feasible way to engage under-resourced NICUs and share NEC-Zero evidence and tools. They recommended more research to examine the impact of NeoECHO on care processes and patient outcomes.
AHRQ-funded; HS022908.
Citation: Gephart SM, Newnam K, Weiss A .
Feasibility and acceptability of a Neonatal Project ECHO (NeoECHO) as a dissemination and implementation strategy to prevent necrotizing enterocolitis.
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2021 Dec;18(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12529..
Keywords: Newborns/Infants, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Implementation
Bender M, Williams M, Cruz MF
A study protocol to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the Clinical Nurse Leader care model in improving quality and safety outcomes.
The authors discuss the Clinical Nurse Leader care model, a Hybrid Type II Implementation-Effectiveness study to evaluate the effect of the care model on standardized quality and safety outcomes and to identify implementation characteristics that are sufficient and necessary to achieve outcomes. Findings are expected to elucidate Registered Nurse's mechanisms of action as organized into frontline models of care and link actions to improved care quality and safety.
AHRQ-funded; HS027181.
Citation: Bender M, Williams M, Cruz MF .
A study protocol to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the Clinical Nurse Leader care model in improving quality and safety outcomes.
Nurs Open 2021 Nov;8(6):3688-96. doi: 10.1002/nop2.910..
Keywords: Implementation, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Patient Safety, Nursing, Evidence-Based Practice
Berry CA, Nguyen AM, Cuthel AM
Measuring implementation strategy fidelity in HealthyHearts NYC: a complex intervention using practice facilitation in primary care.
This study measured implementation strategy fidelity for the HealthyHearts NYC intervention program, an AHRQ-funded program that uses practice facilitation (PF) to improve adoption of cardiovascular disease evidence-based guidelines in primary care practices. Data from 257 practices measured fidelity using 4 categories: frequency, duration, content, and coverage. Almost all (94.2%) of practices received at least the 13 PF visits with an average 26.3 hours spent at each site by facilitators. Most practices (95.7%) completed all Task List items, and 71.2% were educated on all Chronic Care Models, with the majority (65.8%) receiving full coverage.
AHRQ-funded; HS023922.
Citation: Berry CA, Nguyen AM, Cuthel AM .
Measuring implementation strategy fidelity in HealthyHearts NYC: a complex intervention using practice facilitation in primary care.
Am J Med Qual 2021 Jul-Aug;36(4):270-76. doi: 10.1177/1062860620959450..
Keywords: Implementation, Heart Disease and Health, Cardiovascular Conditions, Primary Care, Practice Improvement, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Primary Care: Models of Care
Pham-Singer H, Onakomaiya M, Cuthel A
Using a customer relationship management system to manage a quality improvement intervention.
HealthyHearts New York City (HHNYC), one of 7 cooperatives funded through the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's EvidenceNOW initiative, evaluated the impact of practice facilitation on implementation of the Million Hearts guidelines for cardiovascular disease prevention and treatment. Tracking the intervention required a system to facilitate process data collection that was also user-friendly and flexible. Coupled with protocols and training, a strategically planned and customizable customer relationship management system (CRMS) was implemented to support the quality improvement intervention with 257 small independent practices.
AHRQ-funded; HS023922.
Citation: Pham-Singer H, Onakomaiya M, Cuthel A .
Using a customer relationship management system to manage a quality improvement intervention.
Am J Med Qual 2021 Jul-Aug;36(4):247-54. doi: 10.1177/1062860620953214..
Keywords: Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Implementation, Evidence-Based Practice, Cardiovascular Conditions, Heart Disease and Health, Primary Care
Walunas TL, Ye J, Bannon J
Does coaching matter? Examining the impact of specific practice facilitation strategies on implementation of quality improvement interventions in the Healthy Hearts in the Heartland study.
Practice facilitation is a multicomponent implementation strategy used to improve the capacity for practices to address care quality and implementation gaps. In this study, the investigators sought to assess whether practice facilitators use of coaching strategies aimed at improving self-sufficiency were associated with improved implementation of quality improvement (QI) interventions in the Healthy Hearts in the Heartland Study.
AHRQ-funded; HS023921.
Citation: Walunas TL, Ye J, Bannon J .
Does coaching matter? Examining the impact of specific practice facilitation strategies on implementation of quality improvement interventions in the Healthy Hearts in the Heartland study.
Implement Sci 2021 Mar 31;16(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01100-8..
Keywords: Practice Improvement, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Implementation, Heart Disease and Health, Cardiovascular Conditions
Lee YSH, Cleary PD, Nembhard IM
Effects of leader tactics on the creativity, implementation, and evolution of ideas to improve healthcare delivery.
Researchers examined the association between leader tactics and the creativity, implementation outcome, and evolution of quality improvement ideas from clinicians and staff. They found that two identified tactics, brainstorming and reflection, were helpful depending on goals. They suggested that brainstorming may aide leaders seeking disruptive change via more creative, rapidly implemented ideas, while reflection on team process may aide leaders seeking high-engagement ideas that may be implemented slowly. They concluded that both tactics may help leaders cultivate dynamics that increase implementation of ideas that improve healthcare.
AHRQ-funded; HS016978.
Citation: Lee YSH, Cleary PD, Nembhard IM .
Effects of leader tactics on the creativity, implementation, and evolution of ideas to improve healthcare delivery.
J Gen Intern Med 2021 Feb;36(2):341-48. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06139-9..
Keywords: Organizational Change, Healthcare Delivery, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Implementation
Hung DY, Truong QA, Liang SY
Implementing lean quality improvement in primary care: impact on efficiency in performing common clinical tasks.
Investigators examined 3-year impacts of Lean implementation on the amount of time taken for physicians to complete common clinical tasks. They found that Lean redesigns led to improvements in timely completion of 3 out of 4 common clinical tasks, thus supporting the use of Lean techniques to engage teams in routine aspects of patient care. They recommended more research to understand the mechanisms by which Lean promotes quality improvement and effectiveness of care team workflows.
AHRQ-funded; HS024529.
Citation: Hung DY, Truong QA, Liang SY .
Implementing lean quality improvement in primary care: impact on efficiency in performing common clinical tasks.
J Gen Intern Med 2021 Feb;36(2):274-79. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06317-9..
Keywords: Primary Care, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Primary Care: Models of Care, Primary Care, Implementation, Workflow, Teams, Healthcare Delivery
Groetzinger LM, Rivosecchi RM, McVerry BJ
A quality improvement evaluation of a primary as-needed light sedation protocol in mechanically ventilated adults.
This study assessed outcomes of using a light-sedation protocol as needed compared to the more usual continuous infusion sedation in mechanically ventilated adults in medical intensive care units (ICUs). This retrospective review compared patients who received the as needed sedation protocol to similar patients treated initially with continuous infusion sedation at a 32-bed medical ICU in a large academic center. Over a 2-year period, 254 total mechanically ventilated patients were evaluated. Of the evaluable patients, 114 received the prioritizing as-needed sedation protocol, and 140 received the continuous infusion approach. In the as-needed group, 42% of patients never received continuous infusion sedation. The group also received significantly less opioid, propofol, and benzodiazepine; and experienced less delirium, shorter duration of mechanical ventilation, and shorter ICU length of stay compared to the continuous infusion sedation group.
AHRQ-funded; HS025455.
Citation: Groetzinger LM, Rivosecchi RM, McVerry BJ .
A quality improvement evaluation of a primary as-needed light sedation protocol in mechanically ventilated adults.
Crit Care Explor 2020 Dec;2(12):e0264. doi: 10.1097/cce.0000000000000264..
Keywords: Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Critical Care, Implementation
Liu FF, Lew A, Andes E
Implementation strategies for depression and anxiety screening in a pediatric cystic fibrosis center: a quality improvement project.
The objective of this study was to share key strategies that led to successful mental health screening (MHS) implementation in one pediatric cystic fibrosis center and to report implementation and screening outcomes. Results showed that leveraging coproduction to address stakeholder needs led to successful implementation of a sustainable MHS process.
AHRQ-funded; HS026393.
Citation: Liu FF, Lew A, Andes E .
Implementation strategies for depression and anxiety screening in a pediatric cystic fibrosis center: a quality improvement project.
Pediatr Pulmonol 2020 Dec;55(12):3328-36. doi: 10.1002/ppul.24951..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Respiratory Conditions, Chronic Conditions, Depression, Anxiety, Behavioral Health, Screening, Implementation, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Diagnostic Safety and Quality
Quigley DD, Qureshi N, Masarweh LA
Practice leaders report targeting several types of changes in care experienced by patients during patient-centered medical home transformation.
This study looked at how primary care practices implemented changes during the transition to becoming a patient-centered medical home (PCMH). The authors examined 105 primary care practice leader experiences during PCMH transformation using semi-structured interviews. Practices most commonly targeted changes in care coordination (30%), access to care (25%), and provider communication (24%). Reported areas for PCMH transformation were measured by Clinician & Group CAHPS, PCMH CAHPS, or supplemental CAHPS survey items, including team-based care (35%), providing more on-site services (28%), care management (22%), patient-centered culture (18%), and chronic condition health education (13%). Many PCMH changes are captured by CAHPS survey items, but some are not.
AHRQ-funded; HS025920.
Citation: Quigley DD, Qureshi N, Masarweh LA .
Practice leaders report targeting several types of changes in care experienced by patients during patient-centered medical home transformation.
J Patient Exp 2020 Dec;7(6):1509-18. doi: 10.1177/2374373520934231..
Keywords: Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS), Primary Care: Models of Care, Primary Care, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient Experience, Care Coordination, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Implementation
Abramsohn E, DePumpo M, Boyd K
Implementation of community-based resource referrals for cardiovascular disease self-management.
Investigators described primary care practices' implementation of CommunityRx-H3. They found that practice facilitators were increasingly being utilized by primary care practices to support quality improvement interventions and could also play an important role in implementation science. Their study yielded insights to improve implementation of community resource referral solutions to support primary care cardiovascular disease prevention efforts.
AHRQ-funded; HS023921.
Citation: Abramsohn E, DePumpo M, Boyd K .
Implementation of community-based resource referrals for cardiovascular disease self-management.
Ann Fam Med 2020 Nov;18(6):486-95. doi: 10.1370/afm.2583..
Keywords: Cardiovascular Conditions, Patient Self-Management, Primary Care, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Implementation
Yuce TK, Yang AD, Johnson JK
Association between implementing comprehensive learning collaborative strategies in a statewide collaborative and changes in hospital safety culture.
Hospital safety culture remains a critical consideration when seeking to reduce medical errors and improve quality of care. Little is known regarding whether participation in a comprehensive, multicomponent, statewide quality collaborative is associated with changes in hospital safety culture. The purpose of this study was to examine whether implementation of a comprehensive, multicomponent, statewide surgical quality improvement collaborative was associated with changes in hospital safety culture.
AHRQ-funded; HS024516.
Citation: Yuce TK, Yang AD, Johnson JK .
Association between implementing comprehensive learning collaborative strategies in a statewide collaborative and changes in hospital safety culture.
JAMA Surg 2020 Oct;155(10):934-40. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.2842..
Keywords: Hospitals, Patient Safety, Organizational Change, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Implementation
Soylu TG, Cuellar AE, Goldberg DG
Readiness and implementation of quality improvement strategies among small- and medium-sized primary care practices: an observational study.
Grounded in organizational readiness theory, the authors examined how readiness and practice characteristics affect QI strategy implementation. The study was a component of a larger practice-level intervention, Heart of Virginia Healthcare, which sought to transform primary care while improving cardiovascular care. The investigators concluded that QI strategy implementation varied by practice ownership. Independent practices focused on patient care-related activities.
AHRQ-funded; HS023913.
Citation: Soylu TG, Cuellar AE, Goldberg DG .
Readiness and implementation of quality improvement strategies among small- and medium-sized primary care practices: an observational study.
J Gen Intern Med 2020 Oct;35(10):2882-88. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05978-w..
Keywords: Primary Care, Primary Care: Models of Care, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Implementation
Dickinson WP, Nease DE, Rhyne RL
Practice transformation support and patient engagement to improve cardiovascular care: from EvidenceNOW Southwest (ENSW).
The purpose of this study was to improve cardiovascular care through supporting primary care practices' adoption of evidence-based guidelines; a cluster randomized trial compared standard practice support--practice facilitation, practice assessment with feedback, health information technology assistance, and collaborative learning sessions--and standard support plus patient engagement support. Findings showed that practice transformation support can assist practices with improving quality of care. Patient engagement in practice transformation can further enhance practices' implementation of aspects of new models of care.
AHRQ-funded; HS023904.
Citation: Dickinson WP, Nease DE, Rhyne RL .
Practice transformation support and patient engagement to improve cardiovascular care: from EvidenceNOW Southwest (ENSW).
J Am Board Fam Med 2020 Sep-Oct;33(5):675-86. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.05.190395..
Keywords: Cardiovascular Conditions, Primary Care: Models of Care, Primary Care, Patient and Family Engagement, Evidence-Based Practice, Implementation, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Kaiser SV, Lam Cabana, MD
Best practices in implementing inpatient pediatric asthma pathways: a qualitative study.
The objective of this study was to identify potential best practices in pathway implementation. Building upon a previous observational study in which the researchers identified higher and lower performing children's hospitals based on hospital-level changes in asthma patient length of stay after implementation of a pathway, they conducted semi-structured interviews with a sample of healthcare providers involved in pathway implementation at these hospitals. They identified several potential best practices to support pathway implementation. They recommended that hospitals implementing pathways consider applying these strategies to ensure success in improving quality of asthma care for children.
AHRQ-funded; HS024592.
Citation: Kaiser SV, Lam Cabana, MD .
Best practices in implementing inpatient pediatric asthma pathways: a qualitative study.
J Asthma 2020 Jul;57(7):744-54. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2019.1606237..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Asthma, Respiratory Conditions, Hospitals, Inpatient Care, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Implementation, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
McHugh M, Brown T, Walunas TL
Contrasting perspectives of practice leaders and practice facilitators may be common in quality improvement initiatives.
The authors sought to identify patterns of contrasting perspectives on implementation issues between practice leaders and their practice facilitators as well as factors that may contribute to them. Through individual interviews, they found that turnover of staff was frequently reported in dyads with contrasting perspectives. They recommended that planners of quality improvement initiatives using practice facilitation consider taking steps to minimize contrasting perspectives by addressing turnover challenges and encouraging opportunities to share perspectives.
AHRQ-funded; HS023921.
Citation: McHugh M, Brown T, Walunas TL .
Contrasting perspectives of practice leaders and practice facilitators may be common in quality improvement initiatives.
J Healthc Qual 2020 May/Jun;42(3):e32-e38. doi: 10.1097/jhq.0000000000000223..
Keywords: Primary Care, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Implementation, Communication, Provider
Sweeney SM, Hemler JR, Baron AN
Dedicated workforce required to support large-scale practice improvement.
Facilitation is an effective approach for helping practices implement sustainable evidence-based practice improvements. Few studies examine the facilitation infrastructure and support needed for large-scale dissemination and implementation initiatives. In this paper, the authors discuss a project by the Agency for Health care Research and Quality in which it funded 7 Cooperatives, each of which worked with over 200 primary care practices to rapidly disseminate and implement improvements in cardiovascular preventive care.
AHRQ-funded; HS023940.
Citation: Sweeney SM, Hemler JR, Baron AN .
Dedicated workforce required to support large-scale practice improvement.
J Am Board Fam Med 2020 Mar-Apr;33(2):230-39. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2020.02.190261..
Keywords: Practice Improvement, Primary Care, Cardiovascular Conditions, Healthcare Delivery, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Prevention, Implementation, Evidence-Based Practice