National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Access to Care (1)
- Antibiotics (1)
- Back Health and Pain (1)
- Behavioral Health (2)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (1)
- Care Coordination (1)
- Care Management (1)
- Children/Adolescents (4)
- Chronic Conditions (2)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (1)
- Communication (1)
- Comparative Effectiveness (1)
- Data (1)
- Emergency Department (2)
- Emergency Medical Services (EMS) (1)
- (-) Evidence-Based Practice (39)
- Guidelines (3)
- Healthcare Delivery (6)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- (-) Health Services Research (HSR) (39)
- Home Healthcare (1)
- Hospital Readmissions (1)
- Hospitals (2)
- Imaging (1)
- Implementation (6)
- Outcomes (3)
- Pain (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (8)
- Patient Safety (1)
- Policy (1)
- Prevention (1)
- Primary Care (3)
- Provider (1)
- Provider: Pharmacist (1)
- Public Health (1)
- Quality Improvement (3)
- Quality of Care (3)
- Research Methodologies (20)
- Skin Conditions (1)
- TeamSTEPPS (1)
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) (2)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 25 of 39 Research Studies DisplayedTyler A, Jolles M
Methodological progress note: implementation science contributions to healthcare research and practice.
Existing research reflects that specific populations such as senior citizens, minorities, and rural Americans have proportionally less access to telehealth when compared to the average American. The purpose of this study was to explore specific strategies for overcoming barriers to telehealth access through an evaluation of data collected by a medical student-run telehealth education program. During the study period the researchers contacted 47 patients by telephone through the GET (Geriatric Education On Telehealth) Access Program. The study found 4 main themes during the discussions with patients, including: completion of registration steps, familiarity with accessing and using video conferencing software, attainment of proxy access for parents of a pediatric patient, and resolution of miscellaneous technical queries.
AHRQ-funded; HS026512.
Citation: Tyler A, Jolles M .
Methodological progress note: implementation science contributions to healthcare research and practice.
J Hosp Med 2023 Oct; 18(10):920-25. doi: 10.1002/jhm.13147..
Keywords: Implementation, Health Services Research (HSR), Evidence-Based Practice
Tugwell P, Welch V, Magwood O
AHRQ Author: Chang C
Protocol for the development of guidance for collaborator and partner engagement in health care evidence syntheses.
The objectives of this protocol were to: Identify, map, and synthesize findings related to engagement in evidence syntheses; Explore how engagement in evidence synthesis promotes health equity; Develop equity-oriented guidance on methods for conducting, evaluating, and reporting engagement. The authors intended to use their findings to develop draft guidance checklists and assess agreement with each item through an international survey. The guidance checklists will be co-produced and after being finalized at a consensus meeting, an international team will develop guidance for collaborators and partner engagement. The authors concluded that incorporating partnership values and expectations may result in better uptake, potentially reducing health inequities.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Tugwell P, Welch V, Magwood O .
Protocol for the development of guidance for collaborator and partner engagement in health care evidence syntheses.
Syst Rev 2023 Aug 2; 12(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02279-1..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR), Healthcare Delivery
Jaramillo ET, Willging CE, Saldana L
Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based interventions in the context of a randomized clinical trial in the United States: a qualitative study.
This study examined factors that facilitate or impede success in the implementation of evidence-based interventions in a clinical trial. This study utilized the clinical trial SafeCare®, a child maltreatment intervention. Qualitative data were obtained between May and October 2017 as part of a larger mixed-methods study involving a cluster randomized trial comparing SafeCare to usual services for caregivers within nine child welfare agencies across four states. Individual interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of 21 child welfare administrators and 24 supervisors, and 19 focus groups were conducted with 84 providers. Facilitators and barriers were determined with facilitators including: 1) Benefits afforded through RCT participation; (2) Shared vision and sustained buy-in across system and organizational levels; and (3) Ongoing leadership support for SafeCare and the RCT. The three barriers identified that hindered SafeCare were: (1) Insufficient preparation to incorporate SafeCare into services; (2) Perceived lack of fit, leading to mixed support for SafeCare and the RCT; and (3) Requirements of RCT participation at the provider level.
AHRQ-funded; HS023370.
Citation: Jaramillo ET, Willging CE, Saldana L .
Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based interventions in the context of a randomized clinical trial in the United States: a qualitative study.
BMC Health Serv Res 2023 Jan 26; 23(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09079-2..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR)
Saldanha IJ, Adam GP, Bañez LL
AHRQ Author: Bañez LL
Inclusion of nonrandomized studies of interventions in systematic reviews of interventions: updated guidance from the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality Effective Health Care program.
A guidance workgroup comprised systematic review experts utilized an informal consensus generation method to develop guidelines to inform decisions regarding the inclusion of nonrandomized studies of interventions (NRSIs) in systematic reviews (SRs) of the effects of interventions. The study found that varying topics may require varying decisions regarding NRSI inclusion. The researchers identified key considerations to inform the decisions; from refinement of topics through to development of protocols. During the scoping and refinement of topics, considerations were associated with the clinical decisional dilemma, adequacy of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to address the crucial questions, risk of bias in NRSIs, and the degree to which NRSIs are likely to complement RCTs. When NRSIs are included, during SR team formation, familiarity with topic-specific data sources and advanced analytic methods for NRSIs should be considered. During protocol development, the decision regarding NRSI inclusion or exclusion should be justified, and potential implications explained. When NRSIs are included, the protocol should describe the processes for synthesizing evidence from RCTs and NRSIs and determining the overall strength of evidence. CONCLUSION: We identified specific considerations for decisions regarding NRSI inclusion in SRs and highlight the importance of flexibility and transparency.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290-2017-00003 -C; 75Q80120D00001- 75Q8120D00003; 75Q80120D00005 - 75Q8120D00009.
Citation: Saldanha IJ, Adam GP, Bañez LL .
Inclusion of nonrandomized studies of interventions in systematic reviews of interventions: updated guidance from the Agency for Health Care Research and Quality Effective Health Care program.
J Clin Epidemiol 2022 Dec; 152:300-06. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.08.015..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Research Methodologies, Health Services Research (HSR)
Lewis CC, Powell BJ, Brewer SK
Advancing mechanisms of implementation to accelerate sustainable evidence-based practice integration: protocol for generating a research agenda.
This article outlines the protocol for an AHRQ-funded initiative to: 1) establish priorities for an agenda to guide research on implementation mechanisms in health and public health, and 2) disseminate the agenda to research, policy, and practice audiences. The goal is to advance mechanisms of implementation to accelerate sustainable evidence-based practice integration. A network of scientific experts will be created to convene in “Deep Dive” meetings for 3 years. The research agenda will be generated through analysis and synthesis of information from 6 sources: (1) systematic reviews, (2) network members' approaches to studying mechanisms, (3) new proposals presented in implementation proposal feedback sessions, (4) working group sessions conducted in a leading implementation research training institute, (5) breakout sessions at the Society for Implementation Research Collaboration's (SIRC) 2019 conference and (6) SIRC conference abstracts. Mechanism-relevant text segments will be extracted by two members and a third member will generate statements as an input for concept mapping.
AHRQ-funded; HS025632.
Citation: Lewis CC, Powell BJ, Brewer SK .
Advancing mechanisms of implementation to accelerate sustainable evidence-based practice integration: protocol for generating a research agenda.
BMJ Open 2021 Oct 18;11(10):e053474. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-053474..
Keywords: Implementation, Evidence-Based Practice, Research Methodologies, Health Services Research (HSR)
Bierman AS, Wang J, O'Malley PG
AHRQ Author: Bierman AS, Wang J, O'Malley PG, Moss DK
Transforming care for people with multiple chronic conditions: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's research agenda.
This article describes issues addressing the needs of those with multiple chronic conditions and discusses the AHRQ research agenda.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Bierman AS, Wang J, O'Malley PG .
Transforming care for people with multiple chronic conditions: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's research agenda.
Health Serv Res 2021 Oct;56(Suppl 1):973-79. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13863..
Keywords: Chronic Conditions, Health Services Research (HSR), Healthcare Delivery, Quality of Care, Primary Care, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice
Callejo-Black A, Wagner DV, Ramanujam K
A systematic review of external validity in pediatric integrated primary care trials.
This study used the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance) framework to conduct a systematic review of external validity reporting in integrated primary care (IPC) interventions for mental health concerns. A literature search was conducted to identify relevant literature from 1998 to 2018 reporting on open, randomized or quasi-randomized trials of IPC interventions that targeted child (ages 0-18 years) psychological symptoms. The authors included 39 publications describing 25 studies in the review. Publications rarely reported indicators of external validity, including the representatives of participants (12%), rate of adoption clinics or providers (16%), cost of implementation (8%), or evidence of maintenance (16%). Few studies also included key pragmatic factors such as cost or organizational change processes related to implementation and maintenance.
AHRQ-funded; HS022981.
Citation: Callejo-Black A, Wagner DV, Ramanujam K .
A systematic review of external validity in pediatric integrated primary care trials.
J Pediatr Psychol 2020 Oct 1;45(9):1039-52. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsaa068..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Primary Care, Behavioral Health, Healthcare Delivery, Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR), Research Methodologies
Landes SJ, Kerns SEU, Pilar MR
Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial Conference of the Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) 2019: where the rubber meets the road: the intersection of research, policy, and practice - part 1.
This paper offers a compilation of the abstracts of the oral and poster presentations from the 2019 Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) Conference entitled “Where the Rubber Meets the Road: The Intersection of Research, Policy, and Practice” held in Seattle from 12-14 September. The society had evolved following a NIMH-funded conference grant and is now an international society. The conference included 432 attendees. Highlights of the conference are described.
AHRQ-funded; HS025632.
Citation: Landes SJ, Kerns SEU, Pilar MR .
Proceedings of the Fifth Biennial Conference of the Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) 2019: where the rubber meets the road: the intersection of research, policy, and practice - part 1.
Implement Sci 2020 Sep 30;15(Suppl 3):76. doi: 10.1186/s13012-020-01034-7..
Keywords: Implementation, Health Services Research (HSR), Evidence-Based Practice, Policy, Research Methodologies
Gernant SA, Adeoye-Olatunde OA, Murawski MM
Experiences applying technology to overcome common challenges in pharmacy practice-based research in the United States.
Despite the importance of pharmacy practice-based research in generating knowledge that results in better outcomes for patients, health systems and society alike, common challenges to PPBR persist. In this paper, the authors described PPBR challenges their research teams have encountered, and their experiences using technology-driven solutions to overcome such challenges. The authors describe the technology driven solutions they have used to address PPBR challenges.
AHRQ-funded; HS025943.
Citation: Gernant SA, Adeoye-Olatunde OA, Murawski MM .
Experiences applying technology to overcome common challenges in pharmacy practice-based research in the United States.
Pharmacy 2020 May 30;8(2):93. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy8020093..
Keywords: Provider: Pharmacist, Provider, Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR)
Tsou AY, Treadwell JR, Erinoff E
Machine learning for screening prioritization in systematic reviews: comparative performance of Abstrackr and EPPI-Reviewer.
Improving the speed of systematic review (SR) development is key to supporting evidence-based medicine. Machine learning tools which semi-automate citation screening might improve efficiency. Few studies have assessed use of screening prioritization functionality or compared two tools head to head. In this project, the investigators compared performance of two machine-learning tools for potential use in citation screening.
AHRQ-funded; HS025859.
Citation: Tsou AY, Treadwell JR, Erinoff E .
Machine learning for screening prioritization in systematic reviews: comparative performance of Abstrackr and EPPI-Reviewer.
Syst Rev 2020 Apr 2;9(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13643-020-01324-7..
Keywords: Health Services Research (HSR), Research Methodologies, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Broder-Fingert S, Kuhn J, Sheldrick RC
Using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) framework to test intervention delivery strategies: a study protocol.
Researchers describe a study protocol for a large randomized controlled trial using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST), a novel framework developed to optimize interventions. They apply this framework to delivery of Family Navigation (FN), an evidence-based care management strategy designed to reduce disparities and improve access to behavioral health services, and test four components related to its implementation. In this paper, they describe how the MOST framework can be used to improve intervention delivery. These methods will be useful for future studies testing intervention delivery strategies and their impact on implementation.
AHRQ-funded; HS022242.
Citation: Broder-Fingert S, Kuhn J, Sheldrick RC .
Using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) framework to test intervention delivery strategies: a study protocol.
Trials 2019 Dec 16;20(1):728. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3853-y..
Keywords: Research Methodologies, Health Services Research (HSR), Healthcare Delivery, Behavioral Health, Evidence-Based Practice, Access to Care
Gates A, Guitard S, Pillay J
Performance and usability of machine learning for screening in systematic reviews: a comparative evaluation of three tools.
Researchers explored the performance of three machine learning tools designed to facilitate title and abstract screening in systematic reviews (SRs) when used to eliminate irrelevant records and complement the work of a single reviewer. Using Abstrackr, DistillerSR, and RobotAnalyst, they found that the workload savings afforded in the automated simulation came with increased risk of missing relevant records. Supplementing a single reviewer's decisions with relevance predictions sometimes reduced the proportion missed, but performance varied by tool and SR. They recommend designing tools based on reviewers' self-identified preferences to improve compatibility with present workflows.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500001I.
Citation: Gates A, Guitard S, Pillay J .
Performance and usability of machine learning for screening in systematic reviews: a comparative evaluation of three tools.
Syst Rev 2019 Nov 15;8(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1222-2..
Keywords: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Health Services Research (HSR), Research Methodologies, Evidence-Based Practice, Comparative Effectiveness
Gartlehner G, Wagner G, Lux L
Assessing the accuracy of machine-assisted abstract screening with DistillerAI: a user study.
The goal of this project was to conduct a case study to explore a screening approach that temporarily replaces a human screener with a semi-automated screening tool. The authors used DistillerAI as a semi-automated screening tool, and a published comparative effectiveness review served as their reference standard. They found that the accuracy of DistillerAI was not yet adequate to replace a human screener temporarily during abstract screening for systematic reviews.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500011I.
Citation: Gartlehner G, Wagner G, Lux L .
Assessing the accuracy of machine-assisted abstract screening with DistillerAI: a user study.
Syst Rev 2019 Nov 15;8(1):277. doi: 10.1186/s13643-019-1221-3..
Keywords: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Health Services Research (HSR), Research Methodologies, Evidence-Based Practice
Marshall IJ, Marshall R, Wallace BC
Rapid reviews may produce different results to systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study.
Researchers analyzed the difference in results between systematic reviews and rapid reviews. They stimulated searching only PubMed, excluding older articles, smaller trials, and using the largest trial only. They examined percentage changes in pooled odds ratios (ORs), statistical significance, and biases between systematic reviews and rapid reviews. A total of 2,512 systematic reviews were included. Using only PubMed had the smallest risk of changed ORs. There were also changes in statistical significance but no evidence of bias. They concluded that rapid reviews can be considered where approximately 10% risk of the primary outcome or by changing greater than 20% could be tolerated.
AHRQ-funded; HS025024.
Citation: Marshall IJ, Marshall R, Wallace BC .
Rapid reviews may produce different results to systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study.
J Clin Epidemiol 2019 May;109:30-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.12.015..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR), Research Methodologies
Gartlehner G, Nussbaumer-Streit B, Wagner G
Increased risks for random errors are common in outcomes graded as high certainty of evidence.
The goal of this article was to assess the risk for random errors in outcomes graded as high certainty of evidence (CoE). Results showed that, overall, 38% of high CoE outcomes had increased risks for random errors. Outcomes assessing harms were more frequently affected than outcomes assessing benefits. Regrading of outcomes with increased random errors showed that 74% should have been downgraded based on current guidance. Recommendations included being aware that outcomes rated as high CoE often have increased risks for false-positive or false-negative findings.
AHRQ-funded; HS024749.
Citation: Gartlehner G, Nussbaumer-Streit B, Wagner G .
Increased risks for random errors are common in outcomes graded as high certainty of evidence.
J Clin Epidemiol 2019 Feb;106:50-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.10.009..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR), Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Research Methodologies
Lin L, Xing A, Kofler MJ
Borrowing of strength from indirect evidence in 40 network meta-analyses.
This study investigated the use of network meta-analysis (NMA) in providing clinicians with direct and indirect evidence when comparing multiple treatment options. Researchers analyzed 915 possible treatment combinations although 53% had no direct evidence. They concluded that the potential to provide more precise results only reliably occurs when at least two head-to-head studies are available and the treatments are well connected.
AHRQ-funded; HS024743.
Citation: Lin L, Xing A, Kofler MJ .
Borrowing of strength from indirect evidence in 40 network meta-analyses.
J Clin Epidemiol 2019 Feb;106:41-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.10.007..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR), Research Methodologies
I Auerbach, M Badaki-Makun, O
AHRQ Author: Barata
A research agenda to advance pediatric emergency care through enhanced collaboration across emergency departments.
In 2018, the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine and the journal Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) convened a consensus conference entitled, "Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference: Aligning the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Research Agenda to Reduce Health Outcome Gaps." This article is the product of the breakout session, "Emergency Department Collaboration-Pediatric Emergency Medicine in Non-Children's Hospital."
AHRQ-funded; HS026101.
Citation: I Auerbach, M Badaki-Makun, O .
A research agenda to advance pediatric emergency care through enhanced collaboration across emergency departments.
Acad Emerg Med 2018 Dec;25(12):1415-26. doi: 10.1111/acem.13642..
Keywords: Care Coordination, Children/Adolescents, Emergency Department, Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR), Outcomes, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement
Adelgais KM, Hansen M, Lerner EB
Establishing the key outcomes for pediatric emergency medical services research.
The evidence supporting best practices when treating children in the prehospital setting or even the effect emergency medical services (EMS) has on patient outcomes is limited. This article describes a consensus process among stakeholders in the pediatric emergency medicine and EMS community that identified the critical outcomes for EMS care in five clinical areas (traumatic brain injury, general injury, respiratory disease/failure, sepsis, and seizures).
AHRQ-funded; HS026101.
Citation: Adelgais KM, Hansen M, Lerner EB .
Establishing the key outcomes for pediatric emergency medical services research.
Acad Emerg Med 2018 Dec;25(12):1345-54. doi: 10.1111/acem.13637..
Keywords: Children/Adolescents, Emergency Medical Services (EMS), Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR), Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Marshall IJ, Noel-Storr A, Kuiper J
Machine learning for identifying randomized controlled trials: an evaluation and practitioner's guide.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate machine learning models for RCT classification. Models were evaluated on an external dataset. The authors demonstrate that machine learning approaches are better able to discriminate between RCTs and non-RCTs than traditional database search filters, and also provide practical guidance on the role of machine learning in systematic reviews, and rapid reviews and clinical question answering as well as an open-source software.
AHRQ-funded; HS025024.
Citation: Marshall IJ, Noel-Storr A, Kuiper J .
Machine learning for identifying randomized controlled trials: an evaluation and practitioner's guide.
Res Synth Methods 2018 Dec;9(4):602-14. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1287..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR), Research Methodologies
Baloh J, Zhu X, Ward MM
Types of internal facilitation activities in hospitals implementing evidence-based interventions.
The aim of the study was to examine internal facilitation activities at 10 critical access hospitals in rural Iowa during their implementation of TeamSTEPPS, a patient safety intervention, and to identify characteristics that distinguish different types of facilitation activities. The investigators concluded that there are four types of facilitation activities that hospitals engage in while implementing evidence-based practices, offering a parsimonious way to characterize facilitation activities.
AHRQ-funded; HS024112; HS018396.
Citation: Baloh J, Zhu X, Ward MM .
Types of internal facilitation activities in hospitals implementing evidence-based interventions.
Health Care Manage Rev 2018 Jul/Sep;43(3):229-37. doi: 10.1097/hmr.0000000000000145..
Keywords: TeamSTEPPS, Implementation, Hospitals, Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR)
Patterson ES, Dewart CM, Stevenson K
A mixed methods approach to tailoring evidence-based guidance for antibiotic stewardship to one medical system.
The purpose of the study is to operationalize a novel antibiotic advisor, called the personalized weighted incidence syndromic combination antibiogram (pWISCA), intended to help physicians with initial antibiotic choice in hospitals. This paper presents findings from applying a mixed methods approach to identifying and prioritizing antibiotic medications and associated contextual data to display in a clinical decision support tailored to the local hospital.
AHRQ-funded; HS024379.
Citation: Patterson ES, Dewart CM, Stevenson K .
A mixed methods approach to tailoring evidence-based guidance for antibiotic stewardship to one medical system.
Proc Int Symp Hum Factors Ergon Healthc 2018 Jun;7(1):224-31. doi: 10.1177/2327857918071053..
Keywords: Antibiotics, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR), Hospitals
Sweeney SM, Hall JD, Ono SS
Recruiting practices for change initiatives is hard: findings from EvidenceNOW.
In this study, the authors describe recruiting primary care recruiting practices. Using grant proposals, online diaries, observational site visits, and interviews with key stakeholders, the authors identified successful practice recruitment strategies in the EvidenceNOW initiative, which aimed to recruit approximately 1500 small- to medium-sized primary care practices.
AHRQ-funded; HS023940.
Citation: Sweeney SM, Hall JD, Ono SS .
Recruiting practices for change initiatives is hard: findings from EvidenceNOW.
Am J Med Qual 2018 May/Jun;33(3):246-52. doi: 10.1177/1062860617728791..
Keywords: Cardiovascular Conditions, Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR), Primary Care, Quality Improvement
Ma C, Shang J, Miner S
The prevalence, reasons, and risk factors for hospital readmissions among home health care patients: a systematic review.
This systematic review examined the current evidence about hospital readmissions from home health care (HHC). Among 18 reviewed articles, they found that reported readmission rates and risk factors varied dramatically between studies; reasons for readmissions were understudied; and findings were limited by small sample sizes, single data source, and methodological flaws. They recommended that future studies use multiple national data sources across patients’ care spectrum and advanced statistical models to identify who among HHC patients are most likely to be readmitted to hospital and for what reason.
AHRQ-funded; HS023593.
Citation: Ma C, Shang J, Miner S .
The prevalence, reasons, and risk factors for hospital readmissions among home health care patients: a systematic review.
Home Health Care Manag Pract 2018 May;30(2):83-92.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR), Home Healthcare, Hospital Readmissions
Surian D, Dunn AG, Orenstein L
A shared latent space matrix factorisation method for recommending new trial evidence for systematic review updates.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate a new method to partially automate the identification of trial registrations that may be relevant for systematic review updates. After identifying 179 systematic reviews of drug interventions for type 2 diabetes, researchers tested a matrix factorization approach that ranks relevant trial registrations for each review. Text from the trial registrations were also used as features. These two approaches were tested on a holdout set of the newest trials. The authors conclude that this matrix was useful in ranking trial registrations and could be used as part of a semi-automated pipeline.
AHRQ-funded; HS024798.
Citation: Surian D, Dunn AG, Orenstein L .
A shared latent space matrix factorisation method for recommending new trial evidence for systematic review updates.
J Biomed Inform 2018 Mar;79:32-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.01.008..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR), Research Methodologies
Thorlacius L, Garg A, Ingram JR
Towards global consensus on core outcomes for hidradenitis suppurativa research: an update from the HISTORIC consensus meetings I and II.
This article describes the outcome of two in-person consensus meetings to create a core outcomes set (COS) for hidradenitis suppurative (HS) research. Forty-one individuals from 13 countries and 4 continents were included. The list of items discussed had been developed from patient interviews, a systematic literature review and a healthcare professional survey. Nine items were excluded and seven domains were approved which included: disease course, physical signs, HS-specific quality of life, satisfaction, symptoms, pain and global assessments.
AHRQ-funded; HS024585.
Citation: Thorlacius L, Garg A, Ingram JR .
Towards global consensus on core outcomes for hidradenitis suppurativa research: an update from the HISTORIC consensus meetings I and II.
Br J Dermatol 2018 Mar;178(3):715-21. doi: 10.1111/bjd.16093..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR), Outcomes, Research Methodologies, Skin Conditions