National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Access to Care (1)
- Antibiotics (1)
- Back Health and Pain (1)
- Behavioral Health (2)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (1)
- Care Coordination (1)
- Care Management (1)
- Children/Adolescents (4)
- Chronic Conditions (2)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (1)
- Communication (1)
- Comparative Effectiveness (1)
- Data (1)
- Emergency Department (2)
- Emergency Medical Services (EMS) (1)
- (-) Evidence-Based Practice (39)
- Guidelines (3)
- Healthcare Delivery (6)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- (-) Health Services Research (HSR) (39)
- Home Healthcare (1)
- Hospital Readmissions (1)
- Hospitals (2)
- Imaging (1)
- Implementation (6)
- Outcomes (3)
- Pain (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (8)
- Patient Safety (1)
- Policy (1)
- Prevention (1)
- Primary Care (3)
- Provider (1)
- Provider: Pharmacist (1)
- Public Health (1)
- Quality Improvement (3)
- Quality of Care (3)
- Research Methodologies (20)
- Skin Conditions (1)
- TeamSTEPPS (1)
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) (2)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
26 to 39 of 39 Research Studies DisplayedMabry-Hernandez IR, Curry SJ, Phillips WR
AHRQ Author: Mabry-Hernandez IR, Ngo-Metzger Q, Bierman AS
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force priorities for prevention research.
This article describes the types of evidence gaps that the USPSTF encounters across its various recommendations and how the USPSTF identifies and communicates these gaps to researchers and policymakers, who can help generate the needed evidence. Common types of evidence gaps include limited evidence in primary care settings and populations, a lack of appropriate health outcomes, limited evidence linking behavior change to health outcomes, and a lack of evidence for effective preventive services in diverse populations.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Mabry-Hernandez IR, Curry SJ, Phillips WR .
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force priorities for prevention research.
Am J Prev Med 2018 Jan;54(1s1):S95-s103. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.08.014.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR), Prevention, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
Ji X, Machiraju R, Ritter A
Visualizing article similarities via sparsified article network and map projection for systematic reviews.
In this study, the authors visualized article similarities to extend its utilization in practical settings for SR researchers, aiming to promote human comprehension of article distributions and hidden patterns. To prompt an effective visualization in an interpretable, intuitive, and scalable way, they implemented a graph-based network visualization with three network sparsification approaches and a distance-based map projection via dimensionality reduction.
AHRQ-funded; HS025047.
Citation: Ji X, Machiraju R, Ritter A .
Visualizing article similarities via sparsified article network and map projection for systematic reviews.
Stud Health Technol Inform 2017;245:422-26.
.
.
Keywords: Data, Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR), Research Methodologies
Aarons GA, Sklar M, Mustanski B
"Scaling-out" evidence-based interventions to new populations or new health care delivery systems.
This paper introduces a new concept for implementation called "scaling-out" when evidence-based interventions are adapted either to new populations or new delivery systems, or both. Using existing external validity theories and multilevel mediation modeling, the authors provide a logical framework for determining what new empirical evidence is required for an intervention to retain its evidence-based standard in this new context.
AHRQ-funded; HS024192.
Citation: Aarons GA, Sklar M, Mustanski B .
"Scaling-out" evidence-based interventions to new populations or new health care delivery systems.
Implement Sci 2017 Sep 6;12(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0640-6..
Keywords: Healthcare Delivery, Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR)
Mortensen ML, Adam GP, Trikalinos TA
An exploration of crowdsourcing citation screening for systematic reviews.
This study explored the use of crowdsourcing (distributing tasks to untrained workers via the web) to reduce the cost of screening citations. Crowdworkers completed screening in 4 to 17 days, costing $460 to $2220, a cost reduction of up to 88 percent compared to trained experts. Crowdsourcing may represent a useful approach to reducing the cost of identifying literature for systematic reviews.
AHRQ-funded; HS025024.
Citation: Mortensen ML, Adam GP, Trikalinos TA .
An exploration of crowdsourcing citation screening for systematic reviews.
Res Synth Methods 2017 Sep;8(3):366-86. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1252.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR), Research Methodologies
Bishai D, Xu J, Sherry M
Strengthening the efferent arm in public health.
The purpose of the efferent arm in public health is to convene, coordinate, and shepherd the energy and resources of a community into collectively addressing shared health problems. The authors argue that the secret of an effective efferent arm is to focus on convening and communicating clearly the public health burdens and threats as widely as possible and to speak with authority about the evidence base of proven approaches.
AHRQ-funded; HS000029.
Citation: Bishai D, Xu J, Sherry M .
Strengthening the efferent arm in public health.
Am J Public Health 2016 Jul;106(7):1196-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2016.303216.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR), Public Health
Kronick R
AHRQ Author: Kronick R
AHRQ's role in improving quality, safety, and health system performance.
The author, director of AHRQ, focuses on several topics including investing in research and evidence to understand how to improve the safety and quality of health care, and generating measures and data used to track and improve performance and evaluate progress of the U.S. health-care system. He concludes by discussing AHRQ’s continuing exploration of ways to expand its efforts in patient safety into nonhospital settings.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Kronick R .
AHRQ's role in improving quality, safety, and health system performance.
Public Health Rep 2016 Mar-Apr;131(2):229-32.
.
.
Keywords: Patient Safety, Quality of Care, Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR)
Berliner E
AHRQ Author: Berliner E
Multisociety letter to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: serious methodological flaws plague technology assessment on pain management injection therapies for low back pain.
The recent publication of an AHRQ report on Pain Management Injection Therapies for Low Back Pain has raised significant concerns for physicians who utilize injection procedures to treat patients suffering with pain and functional limitations resulting from spinal pathology. The authors are concerned that the methodology used by the report cannot and does not make such determinations, and that the conclusions may lead to egregious denial of access to these procedures for many patients suffering from low back pain.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Berliner E .
Multisociety letter to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality: serious methodological flaws plague technology assessment on pain management injection therapies for low back pain.
Pain Med 2016 Jan;17(1):10-15. doi: 10.1111/pme.12934..
Keywords: Back Health and Pain, Care Management, Chronic Conditions, Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR), Pain, Research Methodologies
Hempel S, Shekelle PG, Liu JL
Development of the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS): a tool for critical appraisal of quality improvement intervention publications.
This study developed and psychometrically tested a critical appraisal instrument, the QI Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS) for assessing QI-specific features of quality improvement (QI) publications. The critical appraisal instrument is accompanied by a user manual detailing What to consider, Where to look, and How to rate.
AHRQ-funded; HS018139.
Citation: Hempel S, Shekelle PG, Liu JL .
Development of the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS): a tool for critical appraisal of quality improvement intervention publications.
BMJ Qual Saf 2015 Dec;24(12):796-804. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003151.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR), Quality Improvement
Probst MA, Dayan PS, Raja AS
Knowledge translation and barriers to imaging optimization in the emergency department: a research agenda.
This article outlines a research agenda to promote the dissemination and implementation (also known as knowledge translation) of evidence-based interventions for emergency department (ED) imaging, i.e., clinical pathways, clinical decision instruments, and clinical practice guidelines. A multidisciplinary group of stakeholders held online and telephone discussions over a 6-month period culminating at the 2015 Academic Emergency Medicine consensus conference. They were able to identify four overarching research questions.
AHRQ-funded; HS023498.
Citation: Probst MA, Dayan PS, Raja AS .
Knowledge translation and barriers to imaging optimization in the emergency department: a research agenda.
Acad Emerg Med 2015 Dec;22(12):1455-64. doi: 10.1111/acem.12830.
.
.
Keywords: Emergency Department, Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR), Guidelines, Imaging, Implementation
Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.
The PRISMA-P checklist contains 17 items considered to be essential and minimum components of a systematic review or meta-analysis protocol. This PRISMA-P 2015 Explanation and Elaboration paper provides readers with a full understanding of and evidence about the necessity of each item as well as a model example from an existing published protocol. This paper should be read together with the PRISMA-P 2015 statement.
AHRQ-funded; 290200710059I.
Citation: Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M .
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.
BMJ 2015 Jan 2;349:g7647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647..
Keywords: Research Methodologies, Health Services Research (HSR), Evidence-Based Practice
Guise JM, Chang C, Viswanathan M
AHRQ Author: Chang C, Berliner E
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Evidence-based Practice Center methods for systematically reviewing complex multicomponent health care interventions.
The purpose of this AHRQ EPC methods white paper was to outline approaches to conducting systematic reviews of complex multicomponent health care interventions. It provided a framework for synthesizing studies of multicomponent interventions and also provided an initial list of critical reporting elements for such studies in order to help systematic reviewers understand the options and tradeoffs available for such reviews.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290201200010I; 290201200012I; 290201200011I; 290201200015I; 290201200008I; 290201200004C.
Citation: Guise JM, Chang C, Viswanathan M .
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Evidence-based Practice Center methods for systematically reviewing complex multicomponent health care interventions.
J Clin Epidemiol 2014 Nov;67(11):1181-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.010.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Healthcare Delivery, Health Services Research (HSR), Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Research Methodologies
Jaana M, Vartak S, Ward MM
Evidence-based health care management: what is the research evidence available for health care managers?
The authors conducted a scoping review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses to determine the availability and accessibility of evidence for health care managers. They found that 96.5% of their search results were not on target, and they suggested a better classification within PubMed to increase the accessibility of meaningful resources and to facilitate evidence retrieval. They recommended that health care journals take initiatives encouraging the publication of reviews in relevant management areas.
AHRQ-funded; HS018396.
Citation: Jaana M, Vartak S, Ward MM .
Evidence-based health care management: what is the research evidence available for health care managers?
Eval Health Prof 2014 Sep;37(3):314-34. doi: 10.1177/0163278713511325.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR), Research Methodologies
Jensen JD, Krakow M, John KK
Against conventional wisdom: when the public, the media, and medical practice collide.
In 2009, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force released new mammography screening guidelines that sparked a torrent of criticism. The goal of this article is to articulate how conflicts of this type arise and to review possible means of redress. The authors concluded that science is routinely simplified as it is prepared for public consumption. In line with the model of information overload, this practice may increase short-term adherence to recommendations at the expense of long-term message consistency and trust in science.
AHRQ-funded; 290200810015C
Citation: Jensen JD, Krakow M, John KK .
Against conventional wisdom: when the public, the media, and medical practice collide.
BMC Med Inform Decis Making 2013;13 Suppl 3:S4. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-13-s3-s4..
Keywords: Communication, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Health Services Research (HSR), U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF)
Clancy CM, Margolis PA, Miller M
AHRQ Author: Clancy CM
Collaborative networks for both improvement and research.
The authors discuss collaborative improvement networks, which can serve as large-scale, health system laboratories to engage clinicians, researchers, patients, and parents in testing approaches to translate research into practice. Creation of total population registries in collaborative network sites provides large, representative study samples with high-quality data which can be used to generate evidence and to inform clinical decision-making. Collaborative networks for improvement and research offer the opportunity not only to make improvements but also to study improvements to determine which interventions and combination of strategies work best in which settings.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; HS021114.
Citation: Clancy CM, Margolis PA, Miller M .
Collaborative networks for both improvement and research.
Pediatrics 2013 Jun;131 Suppl 4:S210-4. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-3786H.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR), Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Children/Adolescents, Implementation