National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 4 of 4 Research Studies DisplayedKwon Y, Perraillon MC, Drake C
Comparison of primary payer in cancer registry and discharge data.
The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to ascertain agreement between variables capturing the primary payer at cancer diagnosis across the Pennsylvania Cancer Registry (PCR) and statewide facility discharge records (Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council [PHC4]) for adults under 65 years, and to examine variables related with misclassification of Medicaid status in the registry given the role of managed care. The researchers evaluated agreement of payer at diagnosis across data sources. The study found that agreement of payers was high for private insurance, but there was misclassification and/or underreporting of Medicaid in the registry. Among cases with "other" and "unknown" insurance, 73.8% and 62.1%, respectively, had private insurance. Medicaid managed care was related with a statistically significant increase of 12.6 percentage points in the probability of misclassifying Medicaid enrollment as private insurance in the registry.
AHRQ-funded; HS027396.
Citation: Kwon Y, Perraillon MC, Drake C .
Comparison of primary payer in cancer registry and discharge data.
Am J Manag Care 2023 Sep; 29(9):455-62. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2023.89425..
Keywords: Cancer, Payment
Landon BE, Lam MB, Landrum MB
Opportunities for savings in risk arrangements for oncologic care.
High spending for cancer care is a target for savings as the United States hastens adoption of alternative payment through global payment models such as Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) or Medicare Advantage (MA). The purpose of this study was to quantify the level at which Accountable Care Organizations ACOs and other risk-bearing organizations operating in a specific geographic area could realize savings by directing patients to efficient medical oncology practices. The incident cohort included 1,309,825 patients Options for directing differed across markets; the top quartile market had 10 or more oncology practices, but the bottom quartile had 3 or fewer oncology practices. Total spending (including Medicare Part D) in the incident cohort increased from a mean of $57,314 in 2009 to 2010 to $66,028 in 2016 to 2017. Within markets, total spending for practices in the highest spending quartile was 19% greater than in the lowest quartile. Hospital spending was the single largest component of spending in both time periods followed by Part B (infused) chemotherapy. Correlations in practice-level spending between the first-year (2009) and second-year (2010) spending were high.
Citation: Landon BE, Lam MB, Landrum MB .
Opportunities for savings in risk arrangements for oncologic care.
JAMA Health Forum 2023 Sep; 4(9):e233124. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.3124..
Keywords: Cancer, Medicare, Healthcare Costs, Payment
Modi PK, Kaufman SR, Qi J
National trends in active surveillance for prostate cancer: validation of medicare claims-based algorithms.
This study analyzed the use of active surveillance of low-risk prostate cancer among a wide variety of health care practices. Researchers identified men with prostate cancer from 2012-2014 using a 100% sample of Michigan Medicare data and linked them with the Michigan Urologic Surgery Improvement Collaborative (MUSIC) registry. They analyzed the performance of 8 claims-based algorithms that were used and selected 3 of them to apply to a 20% national Medicare sample. The 3 algorithms were determined to be either the most sensitive, the most specific, and a balanced algorithm incorporating age and comorbidity. They found that use of surveillance for men increased from 2007 to 2014 but there was a large decrease in the rate of prostate cancer diagnosis. The rate of active surveillance either increased or remained stable depending on the algorithm used.
AHRQ-funded; HS025707.
Citation: Modi PK, Kaufman SR, Qi J .
National trends in active surveillance for prostate cancer: validation of medicare claims-based algorithms.
Urology 2018 Oct;120:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2018.06.037..
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Prostate Cancer, Medicare, Men's Health, Payment
Abdelsattar ZM, Birkmeyer JD, Wong SL
Variation in Medicare payments for colorectal cancer surgery.
The researchers assessed the contributions of index hospitalization, physician services, readmissions, and postacute care to the overall variation in payment for colorectal cancer surgery (CRC). They concluded that Medicare spending in the first year after CRC surgery varies across hospitals even after case-mix adjustment and price standardization. Variation is largely driven by postacute care and not the index surgical hospitalization.
AHRQ-funded; HS020937; HS000053.
Citation: Abdelsattar ZM, Birkmeyer JD, Wong SL .
Variation in Medicare payments for colorectal cancer surgery.
J Oncol Pract 2015 Sep;11(5):391-5. doi: 10.1200/jop.2015.004036.
.
.
Keywords: Cancer, Cancer: Colorectal Cancer, Payment, Medicare, Surgery