National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
Topics
- Behavioral Health (2)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (4)
- Care Management (2)
- Children/Adolescents (2)
- Chronic Conditions (1)
- Communication (1)
- Comparative Effectiveness (2)
- Evidence-Based Practice (5)
- (-) Healthcare Delivery (8)
- Health Insurance (1)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (1)
- Heart Disease and Health (2)
- Implementation (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (4)
- (-) Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (8)
- Practice Improvement (1)
- Prevention (3)
- (-) Primary Care (8)
- Primary Care: Models of Care (4)
- Quality Improvement (5)
- Quality of Care (4)
- Research Methodologies (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 8 of 8 Research Studies DisplayedKuzel AJ, Cuellar A, Nichols L
The EvidenceNOW practice support initiative: the Heart of Virginia Healthcare.
The purpose of this study was for The Heart of Virginia Health care (HVH) collaborative (one of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's (AHRQ) Evidence Now project’s 7 collaboratives) to test different ways to improve performance and outcomes on ABCS clinical quality measures (appropriate Aspirin use, Blood pressure control, Cholesterol control, and Smoking cessation counseling) within small primary care practices. The researchers recruited 264 eligible practices and randomized them to 3 cohorts in a stepped wedge design, with 173, utilizing 16 different EHRs, participated through the entire initiative. Trained coaches delivered the practice support curriculum to improve performance on the ABCS measures. The program included an initial kickoff meeting, 3 months of focused support, 9 months of continued support, and access to online materials and faculty. The intervention phase was shortened due to difficulty in recruiting a sufficient number of practices. The study found that the short HVH intervention had a small but statistically significant positive average effects on appropriate use of aspirin and other anti-thrombotics, small negative effects on blood pressure control, except for those practices which did not attend the kickoff, and small negative effects on smoking cessation counseling. The researchers concluded that the truncation of the intervention contributed to the lack of substantial improvements in the ABCS.
AHRQ-funded; HS023913.
Citation: Kuzel AJ, Cuellar A, Nichols L .
The EvidenceNOW practice support initiative: the Heart of Virginia Healthcare.
J Am Board Fam Med 2022 Oct 18;35(5):979-89. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.05.210021..
Keywords: Heart Disease and Health, Cardiovascular Conditions, Evidence-Based Practice, Primary Care, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Healthcare Delivery
Persell SD, Liss DT, Walunas TL
Effects of 2 forms of practice facilitation on cardiovascular prevention in primary care: a practice-randomized, comparative effectiveness trial.
Effective quality improvement (QI) strategies are needed for small practices. The objective of this study was to compare practice facilitation implementing point-of-care (POC) QI strategies alone versus facilitation implementing point-of-care plus population management (POC+PM) strategies on preventive cardiovascular care. The investigators concluded that facilitator-led QI promoting population management approaches plus POC improvement strategies was not clearly superior to POC strategies alone.
AHRQ-funded; HS023921.
Citation: Persell SD, Liss DT, Walunas TL .
Effects of 2 forms of practice facilitation on cardiovascular prevention in primary care: a practice-randomized, comparative effectiveness trial.
.
Keywords: Cardiovascular Conditions, Prevention, Primary Care: Models of Care, Primary Care, Comparative Effectiveness, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Care Management, Healthcare Delivery
Riley AR, Paternostro JK, Walker BL
The impact of behavioral health consultations on medical encounter duration in pediatric primary care: a retrospective match-controlled study.
This retrospective match-controlled study examined the impact of behavioral health consultations on medical visit duration in pediatric primary care. Patient encounters involving behavioral health consultants were significantly longer (11 plus minutes) than matched controls, and had less time allowed for medical care. The authors of the study recommend that behavioral health consultants work with the clinician to improve time efficiency.
AHRQ-funded; HS022981.
Citation: Riley AR, Paternostro JK, Walker BL .
The impact of behavioral health consultations on medical encounter duration in pediatric primary care: a retrospective match-controlled study.
Fam Syst Health 2019 Jun;37(2):162-66. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000406..
Keywords: Behavioral Health, Children/Adolescents, Healthcare Delivery, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Primary Care, Primary Care: Models of Care
Riley AR, Freeman KA
Impacting pediatric primary care: opportunities and challenges for behavioral research in a shifting healthcare landscape.
This commentary discusses the role that behavioral analysts can have in partnership with pediatric medicine. There have been advances, but there has been limited impact for the daily practice of pediatrics. The authors discuss why behavioral pediatrics has failed to gain traction in primary care, describe possible opportunities for an expanded portfolio of research, and identify several examplars from the behavior analytic literature that has influenced pediatric primary care, and make further recommendations for producing influential data.
AHRQ-funded; HS022981.
Citation: Riley AR, Freeman KA .
Impacting pediatric primary care: opportunities and challenges for behavioral research in a shifting healthcare landscape.
Behav Anal 2019 Feb;19(1):23-38. doi: 10.1037/bar0000114..
Keywords: Behavioral Health, Children/Adolescents, Health Services Research (HSR), Healthcare Delivery, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Primary Care, Primary Care: Models of Care, Research Methodologies
Chou AF, Homco JB, Nagykaldi Z
Disseminating, implementing, and evaluating patient-centered outcomes to improve cardiovascular care using a stepped-wedge design: healthy hearts for Oklahoma.
The Healthy Hearts for Oklahoma (H2O) Study proposes to build a quality improvement (QI) infrastructure by (1) constructing a sustainable Oklahoma Primary Healthcare Improvement Collaborative (OPHIC) to support dissemination and implementation (D&I) of QI methods; and (2) providing QI support in primary care practices to better manage patients at risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. H2O has 263 small primary care practices across Oklahoma that receive the bundled QI intervention to improve ABCS (aspirin therapy, blood pressure control, cholesterol management, and smoking cessation) performance. The infrastructure established as a result of this funding will help reach medically underserved Oklahomans, particularly among rural and tribal populations.
AHRQ-funded; HS023919.
Citation: Chou AF, Homco JB, Nagykaldi Z .
Disseminating, implementing, and evaluating patient-centered outcomes to improve cardiovascular care using a stepped-wedge design: healthy hearts for Oklahoma.
BMC Health Serv Res 2018 Jun 4;18(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3189-4.
.
.
Keywords: Cardiovascular Conditions, Communication, Heart Disease and Health, Healthcare Delivery, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Primary Care, Prevention, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement
Balasubramanian BA, Marino M, Cohen DJ
Use of quality improvement strategies among small to medium-size us primary care practices.
This study examined variations in use of QI strategies among 1,181 small to medium-size primary care practices engaged in a national initiative spanning 12 US States to improve quality of care for heart health and assessed factors associated with those variations. It concluded that there is substantial variation in the use of QI strategies among small to medium-size primary care practices across 12 US States.
AHRQ-funded; HS023940.
Citation: Balasubramanian BA, Marino M, Cohen DJ .
Use of quality improvement strategies among small to medium-size us primary care practices.
Ann Fam Med 2018 Apr;16(Suppl 1):S35-s43. doi: 10.1370/afm.2172.
.
.
Keywords: Healthcare Delivery, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Primary Care, Quality Improvement
Ono SS, Crabtree BF, Hemler JR
Taking innovation to scale in primary care practices: the functions of health care extension.
Health care extension is an approach to providing external support to primary care practices with the aim of diffusing innovation. EvidenceNOW was launched to rapidly disseminate and implement evidence-based guidelines for cardiovascular preventive care in the primary care setting. This article describes how cooperatives varied in their approaches to extension and provides early empirical evidence that health care extension is a feasible and potentially useful approach for providing quality improvement.
AHRQ-funded; HS023940.
Citation: Ono SS, Crabtree BF, Hemler JR .
Taking innovation to scale in primary care practices: the functions of health care extension.
Health Aff 2018 Feb;37(2):222-30. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1100.
.
.
Keywords: Primary Care, Implementation, Cardiovascular Conditions, Evidence-Based Practice, Healthcare Delivery, Practice Improvement, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Prevention
Luo Z, Chen Q, Annis AM
A comparison of health plan- and provider-delivered chronic care management models on patient clinical outcomes.
Two contrasting strategies of chronic care management include provider-delivered care management (PDCM) and health plan-delivered care management (HPDCM). The researchers aimed to compare the effectiveness of PDCM vs. HPDCM on improving clinical outcomes for patients with chronic diseases. They found that in a commercially insured population, neither PDCM nor HPDCM resulted in substantial improvement in patients' clinical indicators in the first year.
AHRQ-funded; HS020108.
Citation: Luo Z, Chen Q, Annis AM .
A comparison of health plan- and provider-delivered chronic care management models on patient clinical outcomes.
J Gen Intern Med 2016 Jul;31(7):762-70. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3617-2.
.
.
Keywords: Chronic Conditions, Care Management, Primary Care: Models of Care, Primary Care, Healthcare Delivery, Comparative Effectiveness, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Health Insurance