National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Adverse Drug Events (ADE) (22)
- Adverse Events (40)
- Ambulatory Care and Surgery (2)
- Back Health and Pain (1)
- Blood Pressure (1)
- Care Coordination (1)
- Children/Adolescents (1)
- Chronic Conditions (1)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (8)
- Communication (3)
- Critical Care (1)
- Data (2)
- Dental and Oral Health (1)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (12)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (22)
- Electronic Prescribing (E-Prescribing) (5)
- Emergency Department (1)
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) (1)
- Healthcare Costs (2)
- Healthcare Delivery (3)
- (-) Health Information Technology (HIT) (55)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (1)
- Hospital Discharge (2)
- Inpatient Care (1)
- Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (1)
- Medical Devices (1)
- (-) Medical Errors (55)
- Medicare (1)
- Medication (26)
- Medication: Safety (13)
- Newborns/Infants (1)
- Opioids (1)
- Patient Safety (49)
- Prevention (3)
- Primary Care (1)
- Primary Care: Models of Care (1)
- Provider (2)
- Provider: Pharmacist (2)
- Public Reporting (1)
- Quality Improvement (2)
- Quality Measures (2)
- Quality of Care (3)
- Risk (1)
- Shared Decision Making (1)
- System Design (1)
- Telehealth (2)
- Transitions of Care (1)
- Transplantation (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 25 of 55 Research Studies DisplayedKalenderian E, Bangar S, Yansane A
Identifying contributing factors associated with dental adverse events through a pragmatic electronic health record-based root cause analysis.
This study’s objective was to analyze harmful dental adverse events (AEs) to assess potential contributing factors. Harmful AEs were defined as those that resulted in temporary moderate to severe harm, required hospitalization, or resulted in permanent moderate to severe harm. The authors classified potential contributing factors according to (1) who was involved (person), (2) what were they doing (tasks), (3) what tools/technologies were they using (tools/technologies), (4) where did the event take place (environment), (5) what organizational conditions contributed to the event? (organization), (6) patient (including parents), and (7) professional-professional collaboration. A second review was conducted by a blinded panel of dental experts to confirm the presence of an AE. A total of 59 cases at 2 dental institutions had 1 or more harmful AEs. The most common harmful AE was pain (27.1%) followed by nerve injury (16.9%), hard tissue injury (15.2%), and soft tissue injury (15.2%). The most common contribution factor was the care provider (training, supervision, and fatigue at 31.5%) followed by patient ((noncompliance, unsafe practices at home, low health literacy, 17.1%), and professional-professional collaboration (15.3%).
AHRQ-funded; HS027268.
Citation: Kalenderian E, Bangar S, Yansane A .
Identifying contributing factors associated with dental adverse events through a pragmatic electronic health record-based root cause analysis.
J Patient Saf 2023 Aug 1; 19(5):305-12. doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000001122..
Keywords: Dental and Oral Health, Adverse Events, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Medical Errors, Patient Safety
Liberman AL, Wang Z, Zhu Y
Optimizing measurement of misdiagnosis-related harms using Symptom-Disease Pair Analysis of Diagnostic Error (SPADE): comparison groups to maximize SPADE validity.
The purpose of this paper was to clarify features of the Symptom-Disease Pair Analysis of Diagnostic Error (SPADE) approach to accurately measure diagnostic errors to assure that researchers utilize this method to yield valid results, as well as improve the validity of SPADE and related approaches to quantify diagnostic error in medicine. The researchers describe four types of comparators (intra-group and inter-group), detailing the reason for selecting one over the other and conclusions that can be drawn from these comparative analyses.
AHRQ-funded; HS027614.
Citation: Liberman AL, Wang Z, Zhu Y .
Optimizing measurement of misdiagnosis-related harms using Symptom-Disease Pair Analysis of Diagnostic Error (SPADE): comparison groups to maximize SPADE validity.
Diagnosis 2023 Aug 1; 10(3):225-34. doi: 10.1515/dx-2022-0130..
Keywords: Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient Safety
Taft T, Rudd EA, Thraen I
"Are we there yet?" Ten persistent hazards and inefficiencies with the use of medication administration technology from the perspective of practicing nurses.
The objectives of this study were to characterize persistent hazards and inefficiencies in inpatient medication administration, to explore cognitive attributes of medication administration tasks, and to discuss strategies to reduce technology-related hazards. Researchers interviewed nurses at two urban US health systems. Persistent safety hazards and inefficiencies related to medication administration technology were organized around the perception-action cycle (PAC) cycle. The researchers concluded that errors may persist in medication administration despite successful deployment of Bar Code Medication Administration and Electronic Medication Administration Record. Opportunities to improve would require a deeper understanding of high-level reasoning in medication administration.
AHRQ-funded; HS025136.
Citation: Taft T, Rudd EA, Thraen I .
"Are we there yet?" Ten persistent hazards and inefficiencies with the use of medication administration technology from the perspective of practicing nurses.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2023 Apr 19; 30(5):809-18. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad031..
Keywords: Medication, Electronic Prescribing (E-Prescribing), Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient Safety, Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Medical Errors, Medication: Safety
Grauer A, Rosen A, Applebaum JR
Examining medication ordering errors using AHRQ network of patient safety databases.
Research on the impact of Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) systems on drug order inaccuracies has shown inconsistent results, with CPOE not reliably preventing such mistakes. The study utilized the Network of Patient Safety Databases (NPSD) from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) to explore the frequency and degree of harm associated with reported events during the ordering stage, and to classify them by error type.
The researchers conducted a retrospective analysis of reported safety incidents provided by healthcare systems associated with patient safety organizations from June 2010 to December 2020. All errors related to medication and other substance orders reported to the NPSD using the common format v1.2 during this period were assessed. The researchers grouped and categorized the prevalence of reported medication order errors by error type, harm levels, and demographic data. The study found that during the study period, 12,830 mistakes were reported. Incorrect dosage accounted for 3,812 errors (29.7%), followed by incorrect medicine 2,086 (16.3%), and incorrect duration 765 (6.0%). Out of 5,282 incidents that affected the patient and had a known severity level, 12 resulted in fatalities, 4 led to severe harm, 45 caused moderate harm, 341 led to minor harm, and 4,880 resulted in no harm. The study concluded that the most frequently reported and damaging types of medication order errors were incorrect dose and incorrect medication orders.
The researchers conducted a retrospective analysis of reported safety incidents provided by healthcare systems associated with patient safety organizations from June 2010 to December 2020. All errors related to medication and other substance orders reported to the NPSD using the common format v1.2 during this period were assessed. The researchers grouped and categorized the prevalence of reported medication order errors by error type, harm levels, and demographic data. The study found that during the study period, 12,830 mistakes were reported. Incorrect dosage accounted for 3,812 errors (29.7%), followed by incorrect medicine 2,086 (16.3%), and incorrect duration 765 (6.0%). Out of 5,282 incidents that affected the patient and had a known severity level, 12 resulted in fatalities, 4 led to severe harm, 45 caused moderate harm, 341 led to minor harm, and 4,880 resulted in no harm. The study concluded that the most frequently reported and damaging types of medication order errors were incorrect dose and incorrect medication orders.
AHRQ-funded; HS026121.
Citation: Grauer A, Rosen A, Applebaum JR .
Examining medication ordering errors using AHRQ network of patient safety databases.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2023 Apr 19; 30(5):838-45. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad007..
Keywords: Medication, Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Adverse Events, Medical Errors, Patient Safety, Electronic Prescribing (E-Prescribing), Health Information Technology (HIT), Medication: Safety
Malik MA, Motta-Calderon D, Piniella N
A structured approach to EHR surveillance of diagnostic error in acute care: an exploratory analysis of two institutionally-defined case cohorts.
The purpose of this study was to examine a structured electronic health record (EHR) case review process to identify diagnostic errors (DE) and diagnostic process failures (DPFs) in acute care. The researchers created two test cohorts of all preventable cases (n=28) and an equal number of randomly sampled non-preventable cases (n=28) from 365 adult general medicine patients who expired and were part of the mortality case review process at the research institution. Twenty-seven preventable and 24 non-preventable cases were included in the review process. The study found that the frequency of DE contributing to death was significantly higher for the preventable cohort compared to the non-preventable cohort. The researchers concluded that substantial agreement was observed among final consensus and expert panel reviews using their structured EHR case review process, and DEs contributing to death associated with DPFs were identified in institutionally designated preventable and non-preventable cases.
AHRQ-funded; HS026613.
Citation: Malik MA, Motta-Calderon D, Piniella N .
A structured approach to EHR surveillance of diagnostic error in acute care: an exploratory analysis of two institutionally-defined case cohorts.
Diagnosis 2022 Nov;9(4):446-57. doi: 10.1515/dx-2022-0032..
Keywords: Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors
Shafer GJ, Singh H, Thomas EJ
Frequency of diagnostic errors in the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study.
The objective of this study was to determine the frequency and etiology of diagnostic errors during the first 7 days of admission for inborn neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) patients. The "Safer Dx NICU Instrument" was used to review electronic health records. The reviewers discovered that the frequency of diagnostic error in inborn NICU patients during the first 7 days of admission was 6.2%.
AHRQ-funded; HS027363.
Citation: Shafer GJ, Singh H, Thomas EJ .
Frequency of diagnostic errors in the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective cohort study.
J Perinatol 2022 Oct;42(10):1312-18. doi: 10.1038/s41372-022-01359-9..
Keywords: Newborns/Infants, Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Critical Care, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Patient Safety, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT)
Fong A, Behzad S, Pruitt Z
A machine learning approach to reclassifying miscellaneous patient safety event reports.
This research paper describes an effort to develop a machine learning natural language processing model to reclassify medical adverse events that were classified as “miscellaneous” as opposed to a specific event-type category. The authors integrated the model into a clinical workflow dashboard, evaluated user feedback, and compared differences in user thresholds for model performance to reclassify those reports.
AHRQ-funded; HS026481.
Citation: Fong A, Behzad S, Pruitt Z .
A machine learning approach to reclassifying miscellaneous patient safety event reports.
J Patient Saf 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e829-e33. doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000731..
Keywords: Patient Safety, Health Information Technology (HIT), Medical Errors
Iqbal AR, Parau CA, Kazi S
Identifying electronic medication administration record (eMAR) usability issues from patient safety event reports.
This study investigated the contribution of usability challenges associated with the electronic medication administration record (eMAR) to medication errors using patient safety event reports (PSEs). The authors analyzed free-text descriptions of 849 medication-related PSEs selected from 2.3 million reports. Specific health IT components, usability challenge categories, and nuanced usability themes that contributed to each PSE were identified by coders. Usability challenges included workflow support, alerting, and display/visual clutter.
AHRQ-funded; HS025136.
Citation: Iqbal AR, Parau CA, Kazi S .
Identifying electronic medication administration record (eMAR) usability issues from patient safety event reports.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2021 Dec;47(12):793-801. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2021.09.004..
Keywords: Electronic Prescribing (E-Prescribing), Health Information Technology (HIT), Medication, Medical Errors, Patient Safety
Adams KT, Pruitt Z, Kazi S
Identifying health information technology usability issues contributing to medication errors across medication process stages.
Researchers sought to identify the types of medication errors associated with health IT use, whether they reached the patient, where in the medication process those errors occurred, and the specific usability issues contributing to those errors. They found that health IT usability issues were a prevalent contributing factor to medication errors, many of which reach the patient. They recommended that data entry, workflow support, and alerting be prioritized during usability and safety optimization efforts.
AHRQ-funded; HS025136.
Citation: Adams KT, Pruitt Z, Kazi S .
Identifying health information technology usability issues contributing to medication errors across medication process stages.
J Patient Saf 2021 Dec 1;17(8):e988-e94. doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000868..
Keywords: Medication, Health Information Technology (HIT), Medical Errors, Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Adverse Events, Patient Safety
Watterson TL, Stone JA, Brown R
CancelRx: a health IT tool to reduce medication discrepancies in the outpatient setting.
Medication list discrepancies between outpatient clinics and pharmacies can lead to medication errors. Within the last decade, a new health information technology (IT), CancelRx, emerged to send a medication cancellation message from the clinic's electronic health record (EHR) to the outpatient pharmacy's software. The objective of this study was to measure the impact of CancelRx on reducing medication discrepancies between the EHR and pharmacy dispensing software.
AHRQ-funded; HS025793.
Citation: Watterson TL, Stone JA, Brown R .
CancelRx: a health IT tool to reduce medication discrepancies in the outpatient setting.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021 Jul 14;28(7):1526-33. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocab038..
Keywords: Medication: Safety, Medication, Medical Errors, Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Adverse Events, Patient Safety, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Ambulatory Care and Surgery
King CR, Abraham J, Fritz BA
Predicting self-intercepted medication ordering errors using machine learning.
Current approaches to understanding medication ordering errors rely on relatively small manually captured error samples. These approaches are resource-intensive, do not scale for computerized provider order entry (CPOE) systems, and are likely to miss important risk factors associated with medication ordering errors. Previously, the investigators described a dataset of CPOE-based medication voiding accompanied by univariable and multivariable regression analyses. In this paper, they updated the analysis using machine learning (ML) models to predict erroneous medication orders and identify its contributing factors.
AHRQ-funded; HS025443.
Citation: King CR, Abraham J, Fritz BA .
Predicting self-intercepted medication ordering errors using machine learning.
PLoS One 2021 Jul 14;16(7):e0254358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254358..
Keywords: Medication, Medical Errors, Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Adverse Events, Medication: Safety, Patient Safety, Electronic Prescribing (E-Prescribing), Health Information Technology (HIT)
Gonzales HM, Fleming JN, Gebregziabher M
Pharmacist-led mobile health intervention and transplant medication safety: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
The goal of this study was to examine the efficacy of improving medication safety through a pharmacist-led, mobile health-based intervention. In this single-center study of adult kidney recipients 6-36 months post-transplant, findings showed that participants receiving the intervention experienced a significant reduction in medication errors and a significantly lower incidence risk of Grade 3 or higher adverse events. The intervention arm also demonstrated significantly lower rates of hospitalizations.
AHRQ-funded; HS023754.
Citation: Gonzales HM, Fleming JN, Gebregziabher M .
Pharmacist-led mobile health intervention and transplant medication safety: a randomized controlled clinical trial.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2021 May 8;16(5):776-84. doi: 10.2215/cjn.15911020..
Keywords: Medication: Safety, Medication, Patient Safety, Transplantation, Telehealth, Health Information Technology (HIT), Provider: Pharmacist, Provider, Medical Errors, Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Adverse Events
Classen DC, Munier W, Verzier N
AHRQ Author: Munier W, Eldridge N, Brady PJ, Helwig A, Battles J
Measuring patient safety: the Medicare Patient Safety Monitoring System (past, present, and future).
This review article discusses the development, strengths and limitations, and future of the Medicare Patient Safety Monitoring System (MPSMS), which was created more than 10 years ago. MPSMS is a chart review-based national patient safety surveillance system that provides rates of 21 specific hospital inpatient adverse event measures, which are divided into 4 clinical domains (general, hospital-acquired infections, post-procedure adverse events, and adverse drug events). The 2014 MPSMS national sample was drawn from 1109 hospitals and includes approximately 20,000 medical records of patients admitted to the hospital for at least 1 of 4 conditions: congestive heart failure, acute myocardial infarction, pneumonia, and major surgical procedures as defined by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Surgical Care Improvement Project. The MSPMS is now undergoing a major transformation to capture additional types of adverse events, and is being renamed the Quality and Safety Review System (QSRS). Data will be electronically imported and will be updated and evolved over time to incorporate expanded standardized data available from electronic health records.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Classen DC, Munier W, Verzier N .
Measuring patient safety: the Medicare Patient Safety Monitoring System (past, present, and future).
J Patient Saf 2021 Apr 1;17(3):e234-3240. doi: 10.1097/pts.0000000000000322..
Keywords: Patient Safety, Medicare, Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT)
Kane-Gill SL, Wong A, Culley CM
JA, et al. Transforming the medication regimen review process using telemedicine to prevent adverse events.
The objective of this study was to determine the impact of pharmacist-led telemedicine services on reducing high-risk medication adverse drug events (ADEs) for nursing home (NH) residents using medication reconciliation and prospective medication regimen reviews (MRRs) on admission plus ongoing clinical decision support alerts throughout the residents' stay. Studying residents in four NHs in Southwestern Pennsylvania, findings showed that the intervention group had a 92% lower incidence of alert-specific ADEs than usual care, and all-cause hospitalization was similar between groups, as were 30-day readmissions.
AHRQ-funded; HS02420.
Citation: Kane-Gill SL, Wong A, Culley CM .
JA, et al. Transforming the medication regimen review process using telemedicine to prevent adverse events.
J Am Geriatr Soc 2021 Feb;69(2):530-38. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16946..
Keywords: Medication: Safety, Medication, Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Adverse Events, Medical Errors, Patient Safety, Telehealth, Health Information Technology (HIT), Provider: Pharmacist, Provider, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Prevention
Abraham J, Galanter WL, Touchette D
Risk factors associated with medication ordering errors.
This study’s goal was to collect data on “voided” orders in computerized order entry systems for medication to 1) identify the nature and characteristics of medication ordering errors; 2) investigate the risk factors associated with these errors and; 3) explore potential strategies to mitigate these risk factors. Data was collected using clinician interviews and surveys within 24 hours of the voided order and using chart reviews. During the 16-month study period 1074 medication orders were voided, with 842 being true medication errors. A total of 22% reached the patient, with at least a single administration, but without causing patient harm. Interviews were conducted on 355 voided orders (33%). Errors were associated with multiple factors not just a single risk factor. The causal contributors included a combination of technological-, cognitive-, environment-, social-, and organization-level factors.
AHRQ-funded; HS025443.
Citation: Abraham J, Galanter WL, Touchette D .
Risk factors associated with medication ordering errors.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2021 Jan 15;28(1):86-94. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa264..
Keywords: Medication: Safety, Electronic Prescribing (E-Prescribing), Medication: Safety, Medication, Medical Errors, Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Adverse Events, Risk, Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient Safety
Griffey RT, Schneider RM, Todorov AA
The emergency department trigger tool: validation and testing to optimize yield.
Researchers validated the emergency department trigger tool (EDTT) in an independent sample and compared record selection approaches to optimize yield for quality improvement. In this single-site study of the EDTT, they observed high levels of validity in trigger selection, yield, and representativeness of adverse events, with yields that are superior to estimates for traditional approaches to adverse event detection. Record selection using weighted triggers outperformed a trigger count threshold approach and far outperformed random sampling from records with at least one trigger. They concluded that the EDTT is a promising efficient and high-yield approach for detecting all-cause harm to guide quality improvement efforts in the emergency department.
AHRQ-funded; HS025052.
Citation: Griffey RT, Schneider RM, Todorov AA .
The emergency department trigger tool: validation and testing to optimize yield.
Acad Emerg Med 2020 Dec;27(12):1279-90. doi: 10.1111/acem.14101..
Keywords: Emergency Department, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Patient Safety, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Salmasian H, Blanchfield BB, Joyce K
Association of display of patient photographs in the electronic health record with wrong-patient order entry errors.
Wrong-patient order entry (WPOE) errors have a high potential for harm; these errors are particularly frequent wherever workflows are complex and multitasking and interruptions are common, such as in the emergency department (ED). The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the use of noninterruptive display of patient photographs in the banner of the electronic health record (EHR) is associated with a decreased rate of WPOE errors.
AHRQ-funded; HS024713.
Citation: Salmasian H, Blanchfield BB, Joyce K .
Association of display of patient photographs in the electronic health record with wrong-patient order entry errors.
AMA Netw Open 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2019652. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.19652..
Keywords: Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Medical Errors, Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Adverse Events, Medication, Medication: Safety, Patient Safety, Diagnostic Safety and Quality
Kang H, Gong Y
Creating a database for health IT events via a hybrid deep learning model.
The authors of this study propose a hybrid learning model to identify health information technology (HIT) events to prevent risks from poorly designed and improperly implemented HIT. Events from the FDA MAUDE database was employed from 6994 samples (3521 HIT and 3473 non-HIT events). Nine individual and 120 hybrid models were employed. Error causes included lack of root cause (72.3%), short descriptions (19.7%) and model undertrained (8.0%). The optimal model was applied to the entire MAUDE database (1991-2018) and generated a HIT event database with 48,997 reports with an annual growth rate of 10%.
AHRQ-funded; HS022895.
Citation: Kang H, Gong Y .
Creating a database for health IT events via a hybrid deep learning model.
J Biomed Inform 2020 Oct;110:103556. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2020.103556..
Keywords: Health Information Technology (HIT), Medical Errors, Adverse Events
Soleimani J, Pinevich Y, Barwise AK
Feasibility and reliability testing of manual electronic health record reviews as a tool for timely identification of diagnostic error in patients at risk.
Although diagnostic error (DE) is a significant problem, it remains challenging for clinicians to identify it reliably and to recognize its contribution to the clinical trajectory of their patients. The purpose of this work was to evaluate the reliability of real-time electronic health record (EHR) reviews using a search strategy for the identification of DE as a contributor to the rapid response team (RRT) activation. Early and accurate recognition of critical illness is of paramount importance.
AHRQ-funded; HS026609.
Citation: Soleimani J, Pinevich Y, Barwise AK .
Feasibility and reliability testing of manual electronic health record reviews as a tool for timely identification of diagnostic error in patients at risk.
Appl Clin Inform 2020 May;11(3):474-82. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713750..
Keywords: Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Patient Safety
Lambert BL, Galanter W, Liu KL
Automated detection of wrong-drug prescribing errors.
Investigators assessed the specificity of an algorithm designed to detect look-alike/sound-alike (LASA) medication prescribing errors in electronic health record (EHR) data. They found that automated detection of LASA medication errors is feasible and can reveal errors not currently detected by other means. Additionally, real-time error detection is not possible with the current system. They suggested that further development should replicate their analysis in other health systems and on a larger set of medications and should decrease clinician time spent reviewing false-positive triggers by increasing specificity.
AHRQ-funded; HS021093.
Citation: Lambert BL, Galanter W, Liu KL .
Automated detection of wrong-drug prescribing errors.
BMJ Qual Saf 2019 Nov;28(11):908-15. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009420..
Keywords: Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Adverse Events, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Medical Errors, Medication, Patient Safety
Wang E, Kang H, Gong Y
Generating a health information technology event database from FDA MAUDE reports.
This study examined using a health information technology (HIT) event database to identify patient safety events (PSEs) or medical errors. The study used the FDA Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database to extract HIT events. Classic and CNN models were utilized on a test set. The model was capable of identifying HIT event with about a 90% accuracy.
AHRQ-funded; HS022895.
Citation: Wang E, Kang H, Gong Y .
Generating a health information technology event database from FDA MAUDE reports.
Stud Health Technol Inform 2019 Aug 21;264:883-87. doi: 10.3233/shti190350..
Keywords: Health Information Technology (HIT), Medical Devices, Adverse Events, Data, Medical Errors, Patient Safety
Liang C, Miao Q, Kang H
Leveraging patient safety research: efforts made fifteen years since To Err Is Human.
The present study sought to explore the associations between federal incentives of patient safety research and the outcomes from 1995 to 2014, in which two historical events - the release of To Err Is Human and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act - were considered in the analysis. They concluded that their findings suggested a positive outcome in patient safety research.
AHRQ-funded; HS022895.
Citation: Liang C, Miao Q, Kang H .
Leveraging patient safety research: efforts made fifteen years since To Err Is Human.
Stud Health Technol Inform 2019 Aug 21;264:983-87. doi: 10.3233/shti190371..
Keywords: Patient Safety, Medical Errors, Adverse Events, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Health Information Technology (HIT)
Wyatt DL
AHRQ Author: Wyatt DL
Employing technology to make care transitions safer.
This commentary discusses the potential for errors in patient handoffs; important information about medications and instructions regarding patient care may be overlooked when the patient is referred to special care, moved to a new hospital setting, or discharged. The problem is especially acute for patients with multiple chronic conditions who often undergo frequent transitions to new care settings and healthcare providers. The author describes AHRQ’s funding opportunities for health information technology interventions that aim to improve communication and coordination during care transitions, such as location-based smartphone alerts, a patient-centered discharge toolkit, and a ‘smart pillbox’ electronic medication adherence reporting project.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Wyatt DL .
Employing technology to make care transitions safer.
J Nurs Care Qual 2019 Jul/Sep;34(3):185-88. doi: 10.1097/ncq.0000000000000417..
Keywords: Adverse Events, Care Coordination, Chronic Conditions, Communication, Health Information Technology (HIT), Healthcare Delivery, Hospital Discharge, Medical Errors, Medication, Patient Safety, Transitions of Care
Adelman JS, Applebaum JR, Schechter CB
Effect of restriction of the number of concurrently open records in an electronic health record on wrong-patient order errors: a randomized clinical trial.
This study assessed whether the belief that having only 1 electronic health record (EHR) open at a time as opposed to 4 will reduce the number of wrong-patient orders by clinicians. A randomized clinical trial was conducted with 3356 clinicians in a large New York Health system from October 2015 to April 2017. Outcomes from emergency department, inpatient, and outpatient settings showed that there seemed to be no difference in the number of wrong-patient order errors. However, most clinicians in the unrestricted group placed orders with a single-record open anyway which limited the power of the study.
AHRQ-funded; HS023704.
Citation: Adelman JS, Applebaum JR, Schechter CB .
Effect of restriction of the number of concurrently open records in an electronic health record on wrong-patient order errors: a randomized clinical trial.
JAMA 2019 May 14;321(18):1780-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.3698..
Keywords: Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Healthcare Delivery, Medical Errors, Patient Safety
Wang J, Liang H, Kang H
Understanding health information technology induced medication safety events by two conceptual frameworks.
While health information technology (health IT) is able to prevent medication errors in many ways, it may also potentially introduce new paths to errors. To understand the impact of health IT induced medication errors, this study aimed to conduct a retrospective analysis of medication safety reports. The investigators concluded that the two frameworks provided an opportunity to understand a comprehensive context of safety event and the impact of health IT induced errors on medication safety.
AHRQ-funded; HS022895.
Citation: Wang J, Liang H, Kang H .
Understanding health information technology induced medication safety events by two conceptual frameworks.
Appl Clin Inform 2019 Jan;10(1):158-67. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1678693..
Keywords: Health Information Technology (HIT), Medication: Safety, Medication, Patient Safety, Adverse Drug Events (ADE), Adverse Events, Medical Errors