National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Access to Care (3)
- Adverse Drug Events (ADE) (1)
- Adverse Events (2)
- Ambulatory Care and Surgery (1)
- Cancer (57)
- Cancer: Breast Cancer (3)
- Cancer: Colorectal Cancer (4)
- (-) Cancer: Lung Cancer (83)
- Cancer: Prostate Cancer (1)
- Care Management (1)
- Case Study (4)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (1)
- Comparative Effectiveness (5)
- COVID-19 (1)
- Data (1)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (10)
- Disabilities (1)
- Disparities (6)
- Elderly (15)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (4)
- Emergency Department (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (8)
- Guidelines (5)
- Healthcare Costs (5)
- Healthcare Delivery (1)
- Healthcare Utilization (4)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (6)
- Health Insurance (1)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (1)
- Health Status (3)
- Hospital Discharge (1)
- Hospital Readmissions (1)
- Imaging (10)
- Implementation (2)
- Learning Health Systems (1)
- Lifestyle Changes (1)
- Medicaid (1)
- Medicare (4)
- Medication (5)
- Mortality (8)
- Nursing Homes (2)
- Opioids (2)
- Organizational Change (1)
- Outcomes (13)
- Pain (2)
- Palliative Care (4)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (11)
- Patient Experience (1)
- Patient Safety (4)
- Policy (2)
- Practice Patterns (2)
- Prevention (7)
- Primary Care (2)
- Provider (1)
- Provider: Physician (1)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Quality Measures (1)
- Quality of Care (3)
- Quality of Life (5)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (8)
- Registries (1)
- Research Methodologies (1)
- Respiratory Conditions (3)
- Risk (4)
- Rural/Inner-City Residents (1)
- Rural Health (2)
- Screening (19)
- Shared Decision Making (6)
- Social Determinants of Health (1)
- Substance Abuse (1)
- Surgery (18)
- Teams (1)
- Tobacco Use (2)
- Tobacco Use: Smoking Cessation (1)
- Transitions of Care (1)
- Treatments (6)
- U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) (5)
- Urban Health (1)
- Vaccination (1)
- Vulnerable Populations (1)
- Women (1)
- Workflow (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 25 of 83 Research Studies DisplayedBalbin CA, Kawamoto K
The SIMPLE architectural pattern for integrating patient-facing apps into clinical workflows: desiderata and application for lung cancer screening.
To address the need for electronic health record (EHR) systems to accept the connection of any patient-facing digital health app using the SMART on FHIR standard, the authors proposed the Standards-based Implementation Maximizing Portability Leveraging the EHR (SIMPLE). SIMPLE’s architectural pattern was designed to meet several key requirements, such as not requiring patients to install new software; not retaining patient data outside of the EHR; leveraging existing personal health record (PHR) capabilities to optimize user experience; and maximizing portability.
AHRQ-funded; HS028791.
Citation: Balbin CA, Kawamoto K .
The SIMPLE architectural pattern for integrating patient-facing apps into clinical workflows: desiderata and application for lung cancer screening.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2024 Jan 11; 2023:844-53..
Keywords: Workflow, Health Information Technology (HIT), Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Screening
Stevens ER, Caverly T, Butler JM
Considerations for using predictive models that include race as an input variable: the case study of lung cancer screening.
Indiscriminate use of predictive models incorporating race can reinforce biases present in source data and lead to an exacerbation of health disparities. In some countries, such as the United States, there is therefore a push to remove race from prediction models; however, there are still many prediction models that use race as an input. Biomedical informaticists who are given the responsibility of using these predictive models in healthcare environments are likely to be faced with questions like how to deal with race covariates in these models. The authors report that there is a need for a practical framework to facilitate model user thinking on how to incorporate race in their chosen model to avoid inadvertently amplifying disparities. The purpose of this paper is to utilize a case study of lung cancer screening to propose a simple framework to guide model users in approaching race inputs in the predictive models they are attempting to leverage in electronic health records and clinical workflows.
AHRQ-funded; HS028791.
Citation: Stevens ER, Caverly T, Butler JM .
Considerations for using predictive models that include race as an input variable: the case study of lung cancer screening.
J Biomed Inform 2023 Nov; 147:104525. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2023.104525..
Keywords: Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Racial and Ethnic Minorities
Kukhareva PV, Li H, Caverly TJ
Implementation of lung cancer screening in primary care and pulmonary clinics: pragmatic clinical trial of electronic health record-integrated everyday shared decision-making tool and clinician-facing prompts.
The authors conducted pre- and post-intervention analysis in primary care and pulmonary clinics to explore whether clinician-facing electronic health record (EHR) prompts and an EHR-integrated shared decision-making (SDM) tool designed to support incorporation of SDM into primary care could improve low-dose computer tomography scan imaging ordering and completion. Subjects were patients who met US Preventive Services Task Force criteria for lung cancer screening (LCS). The results indicated that EHR prompts and the EHR-integrated SDM tool were promising approaches to improving LCS in the primary care setting. The authors noted that further research is warranted.
AHRQ-funded; HS026198; HS028791.
Citation: Kukhareva PV, Li H, Caverly TJ .
Implementation of lung cancer screening in primary care and pulmonary clinics: pragmatic clinical trial of electronic health record-integrated everyday shared decision-making tool and clinician-facing prompts.
Chest 2023 Nov; 164(5):1325-38. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.04.040..
Keywords: Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Screening, Primary Care, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Shared Decision Making
Godfrey CM, Shipe ME, Welty VF
The thoracic research evaluation and treatment 2.0 model: a lung cancer prediction model for indeterminate nodules referred for specialist evaluation.
In this research study the authors updated and expanded the Thoracic Research Evaluation and Treatment (TREAT) model into a more generalized, robust approach for lung cancer prediction in patients referred for specialty evaluation to improve lung cancer prediction accuracy. Clinical and radiographic data on 1401 patients with indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs) from six sites were collected retrospectively and divided into groups by clinical setting: pulmonary nodule clinic (n = 374; cancer prevalence, 42%), outpatient thoracic surgery clinic (n = 553; cancer prevalence, 73%), or inpatient surgical resection (n = 474; cancer prevalence, 90%). The new prediction model was developed using a missing data-driven pattern submodel approach and compared with the original TREAT, Mayo Clinic, Herder, and Brock models. Two-thirds of patients were found to have missing data; nodule growth and fluorodeoxyglucose-PET scan avidity were missing most frequently. The TREAT version 2.0 mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve across missingness patterns was 0.85 compared with the original TREAT (0.80), Herder (0.73), Mayo Clinic (0.72), and Brock (0.68) models with improved calibration.
AHRQ-funded; HS026122.
Citation: Godfrey CM, Shipe ME, Welty VF .
The thoracic research evaluation and treatment 2.0 model: a lung cancer prediction model for indeterminate nodules referred for specialist evaluation.
Chest 2023 Nov; 164(5):1305-14. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.06.009..
Keywords: Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer
Bonner SN, Lagisetty K, Reddy RM
Clinical implications of removing race-corrected pulmonary function tests for African American patients requiring surgery for lung cancer.
This study’s objective was to identify how many hospitals providing lung cancer surgery use race correction in pulmonary function tests (PFTs), examine the association of race correction with predicted lung function, and test the effect of decorrection on surgeons' treatment recommendations. Percent predicted preoperative and postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) was calculated for African American patients who underwent lung cancer resection between January 1, 2015, and September 31, 2022, using race-corrected and race-neutral equations for hospitals performing race correction. Randomization of US cardiothoracic surgeons was conducted to receive 1 clinical vignette that differed by the use of Global Lung Function Initiative equations for (1) African American patients (percent predicted postoperative FEV1, 49%), (2) other race or multiracial patients (percent predicted postoperative FEV1, 45%), and (3) race-neutral patients (percent predicted postoperative FEV1, 42%). A total of 515 African American patients (308 [59.8%] female; mean age, 66.2 years) were included in the study. Among these patients, the percent predicted preoperative FEV1 and postoperative FEV1 would have decreased by 9.2% and 7.6%, respectively, if race-neutral equations had been used. A total of 225 surgeons (194 male [87.8%]; mean time in practice, 19.4 years) were successfully randomized and completed the vignette items regarding risk perception and treatment outcomes (76% completion rate). Surgeons randomized to the vignette with African American race-corrected PFTs were more likely to recommend lobectomy (79.2%) compared with surgeons randomized to the other race or multiracial-corrected (61.7%) or race-neutral PFTs (52.8%).
AHRQ-funded; HS028038.
Citation: Bonner SN, Lagisetty K, Reddy RM .
Clinical implications of removing race-corrected pulmonary function tests for African American patients requiring surgery for lung cancer.
JAMA Surg 2023 Oct; 158(10):1061-68. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.3239..
Keywords: Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Surgery, Diagnostic Safety and Quality
Marcotte LM, Khor S, Flum DR
Factors associated with lung cancer risk factor documentation.
This cross-observational study’s objective was to identify factors associated with the minimum necessary information to determine an individual’s eligibility for lung cancer screening (ie, sufficient risk factor documentation) and to characterize clinic-level variability in documentation. The authors calculated the relative risk of sufficient lung cancer risk factor documentation by patient-, provider-, and system-level variables using Poisson regression models, clustering by clinic. They compared unadjusted, risk-adjusted, and reliability-adjusted proportions of patients with sufficient smoking documentation across 31 clinics using logistic regression models and 2-level hierarchical logit models to estimate reliability-adjusted proportions across clinics. A majority (60%) of 20,632 individuals were found to have sufficient risk factor documentation to determine screening eligibility. Patient-level factors were inversely associated with risk factor documentation including Black race, non-English preferred language, Medicaid insurance, and nonactivated patient portal, with documentation varying across clinics.
AHRQ-funded; HS026369.
Citation: Marcotte LM, Khor S, Flum DR .
Factors associated with lung cancer risk factor documentation.
Am J Manag Care 2023 Sep; 29(9):89354..
Keywords: Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Risk
Landy R, Gomez I, Caverly TJ
Methods for using race and ethnicity in prediction models for lung cancer screening eligibility.
The purpose of this study was to compare eligibility for lung cancer screening in a representative United States population by refitting the life-years gained from screening-computed tomography (LYFS-CT) model to exclude race and ethnicity versus a counterfactual eligibility method that recalculates life expectancy for racial and ethnic minority individuals utilizing the same covariates but substitutes White race and utilizes the higher predicted life expectancy, preventing historically underserved groups from being penalized. The National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) 2015-2018 included 25,601 individuals aged 50 to 80 years who ever smoked. The study found that removing race and ethnicity from the submodels underestimated lung cancer death risk and all-cause mortality in African American individuals. It also overestimated mortality in Hispanic American and Asian American individuals. As a result, the LYFS-CT NoRace model increased Hispanic American and Asian American eligibility by 108% and 73%, respectively, while decreasing African American eligibility by 39%. Utilizing LYFS-CT with the counterfactual all-cause mortality model better maintained calibration across groups and increased African American eligibility by 13% without decreasing eligibility for Hispanic American and Asian American individuals.
AHRQ-funded; HS026198.
Citation: Landy R, Gomez I, Caverly TJ .
Methods for using race and ethnicity in prediction models for lung cancer screening eligibility.
JAMA Netw Open 2023 Sep; 6(9):e2331155. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.31155..
Keywords: Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Screening, Prevention
Murphy DR, Zimolzak AJ, Upadhyay DK
Developing electronic clinical quality measures to assess the cancer diagnostic process.
Electronic clinical quality measures (eCQMs) to evaluate quality of cancer diagnosis could facilitate quantification and improvement of diagnostic performance. The purpose of this study was to developed 2 eCQMs to evaluate diagnostic assessment of red-flag clinical findings for colorectal cancer (CRC) and lung cancer. At each site the researchers assessed 100 positive and 20 negative randomly chosen records for each eCQM at each site to validate accuracy and categorized missed opportunities associated with system, provider, or patient factors. The researchers applied the CRC eCQM at both sites, while the lung cancer eCQM was only applied at the VA due to an absence of structured data indicating level of cancer suspicion on most chest imaging results at Geisinger. The study found that for the CRC eCQM, the appropriate follow-up took place in 26, 746 out of 74, 314 patients (36.0%) in the VA after removing clinical exclusions and in 1,009 out of 2,461 patients (41.1%) at Geisinger. The appropriate assessment for lung cancer in the VA took place in 25, 166 out of 40, 924 patients (61.5). Provider factors were cited by reviewers the primary source of missed opportunities at both sites.
AHRQ-funded; HS022087.
Citation: Murphy DR, Zimolzak AJ, Upadhyay DK .
Developing electronic clinical quality measures to assess the cancer diagnostic process.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2023 Aug 18; 30(9):1526-31. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocad089..
Keywords: Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Quality Measures, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Quality of Care
Lee SJC, Lee J, Zhu H
Assessing barriers and facilitators to lung cancer screening: initial findings from a patient navigation intervention.
This study’s objective was to examine the challenges to providing lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography for patients, particularly minority, under-, and uninsured populations. The authors conducted a pragmatic randomized controlled trial of telephone-based navigation for lung cancer screening in an integrated, urban safety-net health care system. They used bilingual navigators (Spanish and English) to make systematic contact with patients, recording standardized call characteristics in a study-specific database. A total of 225 patients (mean age 63 years, 46% female, 70% racial/ethnic minority) were assigned navigators, with a total of 559 barriers to screening identified during 806 telephone calls. The most common barrier types were personal (46%), provider (30%), and practical (17%). System (6%) and psychosocial (1%) barriers were described by English-speaking patients, but not by Spanish-speaking patients. Provider-related barriers decreased by 80% over the course of the lung cancer screening process.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Lee SJC, Lee J, Zhu H .
Assessing barriers and facilitators to lung cancer screening: initial findings from a patient navigation intervention.
Popul Health Manag 2023 Jun; 26(3):177-84. doi: 10.1089/pop.2023.0053..
Keywords: Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Screening, Prevention, Imaging
Richmond J, Murray MH, Milder CM
Racial disparities in lung cancer stage of diagnosis among adults living in the southeastern United States.
The purpose of this study was to identify factors contributing to racial disparities in stage of lung cancer stage diagnosis in low-income adults. The researchers identified cases of incident lung cancer from the prospective observational Southern Community Cohort Study by linking them with state cancer registries in 12 southeastern states. A subset of participants who answered psychosocial questions such as those related to racial discrimination experiences were assessed to determine if model predictive power improved. The study identified 1,572 patients with incident lung cancer with available lung cancer stage. Compared with White participants Black participants with lung cancer reflected higher unadjusted odds of distant stage diagnosis. Higher neighborhood area deprivation was related with distant stage diagnosis. No significant differences were found in distant stage disease for Black vs White participants after controlling for individual- and area-level factors, but participants with COPD showed decreased odds of distant stage diagnosis in the primary model.
AHRQ-funded; HS026122.
Citation: Richmond J, Murray MH, Milder CM .
Racial disparities in lung cancer stage of diagnosis among adults living in the southeastern United States.
Chest 2023 May; 163(5):1314-27. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2022.11.025..
Keywords: Disparities, Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer
Ray EM, Hinton SP, Reeder-Hayes KE
Risk factors for return to the emergency department and readmission in patients with hospital-diagnosed advanced lung cancer.
The objectives of this study were to examine the patterns of care and risk factors for subsequent acute care utilization among patients with hospital-diagnosed advanced lung cancer (ALC). Researchers identified patients with incident ALC from 2007-13 and an index hospitalization within 7 days of diagnosis in Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare. Results showed that more than half of the incident ALC patients were hospitalized around the time of diagnosis; among those who survived to discharge, only 37% received systemic cancer treatment. Many patients experienced an early readmittance and most died within 6 months. The researchers conclude that such patients may benefit from increased access to palliative and other supportive care during hospitalization to prevent subsequent health care utilization.
AHRQ-funded; HS000032.
Citation: Ray EM, Hinton SP, Reeder-Hayes KE .
Risk factors for return to the emergency department and readmission in patients with hospital-diagnosed advanced lung cancer.
Med Care 2023 Apr;61(4):237-46. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001829.
Keywords: Emergency Department, Hospital Readmissions, Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Risk
Logan CD, Feinglass J, Halverson AL
Rural-urban disparities in receipt of surgery for potentially resectable non-small cell lung cancer.
This study examined the reasons there are lower rates of surgical treatment for potentially resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for patients living in rural areas than in urban areas. The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients with clinical stage I-IIIA NSCLC between 2004 and 2018. Reasons for nonreceipt of surgery was evaluated for rural and urban area patients. The study included 328,785 patients with NSCLC with 13% from rural areas. Overall, 62.4% of patients from urban areas and 58.8% of patients from rural areas underwent surgery. Patients from rural areas had increased odds of (1) being recommended primary nonsurgical management, (2) surgery being deemed contraindicated due to risk, (3) surgery being recommended but not performed, and (4) overall failure to receive surgery.
AHRQ-funded; HS026385.
Citation: Logan CD, Feinglass J, Halverson AL .
Rural-urban disparities in receipt of surgery for potentially resectable non-small cell lung cancer.
J Surg Res 2023 Mar;283:1053-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2022.10.097.
Keywords: Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Disparities, Surgery, Rural Health, Access to Care
Strayer TE, Spalluto LB, Burns A
Using the framework for reporting adaptations and modifications-expanded (frame) to study adaptations in lung cancer screening delivery in the Veterans Health Administration: a cohort study.
The purpose of this study was to apply the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Expanded (FRAME) to study adaptations in lung cancer screening delivery processes in a Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Initiative. Between 2019 and 2021 the researchers prospectively administered semi-structured interviews with lung cancer screening program navigators at 10 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers (VAMCs). Baseline process maps were developed for each program, and each program navigator reviewed process maps in subsequent years 1 and 2. Researchers then identified, documented, and mapped adaptations in screening processes to the FRAME categories. 16 interviews were conducted across 10 VHA lung cancer screening programs, with 6 of these being operational, and of those 3 reported adaptations to their screening processes that were planned or in response to COVID-19. In year 2 all 10 programs were operational and eligible. Programs reported 14 adaptations in year 2. The adaptations identified were both planned and unplanned and often prompted by increased workload; 57% of year 2 adaptations were associated with the identification and eligibility of Veterans and 43% were associated with follow-up with Veterans for screening results. During the 2 years, adaptations associated with data management and patient tracking took place in 60% of programs to improve the data collection and tracking of Veterans in the screening process. The study concluded that adaptations took place predominantly in the categories of patient identification and communication of results due to increased workload.
AHRQ-funded; HS026122; HS026395.
Citation: Strayer TE, Spalluto LB, Burns A .
Using the framework for reporting adaptations and modifications-expanded (frame) to study adaptations in lung cancer screening delivery in the Veterans Health Administration: a cohort study.
Implement Sci Commun 2023 Jan 12; 4(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00388-x..
Keywords: Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Screening, Evidence-Based Practice, Learning Health Systems
Herb J, Friedman H, Shrestha S
Prevalence and risk factors associated with readmission with acute kidney injury in patients receiving vancomycin outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.
The purpose of this study was to understand barriers to early-stage lung cancer care at high-volume academic centers in the US. Researchers conducted semi-structured interviews with patients with suspected or diagnosed early-stage non-small cell lung cancer who had presented to a multidisciplinary clinic at academic institutions over a 6-month period; a qualitative content analysis was then performed using the framework method. Six themes relating to barriers and facilitators to lung-cancer care were identified, and the authors concluded that these factors must be addressed to improve quality of care among lung cancer patients.
AHRQ-funded; HS000032.
Citation: Herb J, Friedman H, Shrestha S .
Prevalence and risk factors associated with readmission with acute kidney injury in patients receiving vancomycin outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy.
Support Care Cancer 2022 Dec 14;31(1):21. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07465-w..
Keywords: Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Access to Care
Liu MA, Keeney T, Papaila A
Functional status and survival in older nursing home residents with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a SEER-Medicare analysis.
The purpose of this study was to examine the association between activities of daily living (ADL) impairment and overall survival in patients 65 and older with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving care in nursing homes from 2011 to 2015. The researchers examined the association between ADL scores and overall survival among 3,174 patients who received systemic cancer chemotherapy or immunotherapy within 3 months of NSCLC diagnosis; and among patients who did not receive any treatment. The study found that the ADL score was associated with increased risk of death. One standard deviation increase in the ADL score was associated with lower overall survival rate among treated and untreated patients The median overall survival was 3.1 months for patients with an ADL score of less than 14, 2.8 months for patients with an ADL score between 14 and 17, 2.3 months for patients with ADL score between 18-19, and 1.8 months for patients with ADL score of 20+. The researchers concluded that the ADL assessment may be a useful clinical tool in nursing home adults aged 65 and older with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.
AHRQ-funded; HS000011.
Citation: Liu MA, Keeney T, Papaila A .
Functional status and survival in older nursing home residents with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a SEER-Medicare analysis.
JCO Oncol Pract 2022 Jun;18(6):e886-e95. doi: 10.1200/op.21.00460..
Keywords: Elderly, Nursing Homes, Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer
Kukhareva PV, Caverly TJ, Li H
Inaccuracies in electronic health records smoking data and a potential approach to address resulting underestimation in determining lung cancer screening eligibility.
The authors sought to characterize EHR smoking data issues and to propose an approach to addressing these issues using longitudinal smoking data. They found that over 80% of evaluated records had inaccuracies, including missing packs-per-day or years-smoked, outdated data, missing years-quit, and a recent change in packs-per-day resulting in inaccurate lifetime pack-years estimation. Further, addressing these issues by using longitudinal data enabled the identification of 49.4% more patients potentially eligible for lung cancer screening.
AHRQ-funded; HS026198.
Citation: Kukhareva PV, Caverly TJ, Li H .
Inaccuracies in electronic health records smoking data and a potential approach to address resulting underestimation in determining lung cancer screening eligibility.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022 Apr 13;29(5):779-88. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac020..
Keywords: Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Screening, Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer
Reese TJ, Schlechter CR, Kramer H
Implementing lung cancer screening in primary care: needs assessment and implementation strategy design.
This study explored the implementation of lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography (CT) in primary care. The study’s two goals included exploring the implementation of lung cancer screening primary care in the context of integrating a decision aid into the electronic health record and a designing of implementation strategies that target hypothesized mechanics of change and context-specific barriers. The two phases included a Qualitative Analysis phase including semi-structured interviews with primary care physicians to elicit key task behaviors, and an Implementation Strategy Design phase consisting of defining implementation strategies and hypothesizing causal pathways to improve screening with a decision aid. Fourteen interviews were conducted and out of that 3 key task behaviors and four behavioral determinants emerged. Strategies included increasing provider self-efficacy toward performing shared decision making and using the decision aid, improving provider performance expectancy, increasing social influence, and addressing key facilitators to using the decision aid.
AHRQ-funded; HS026198.
Citation: Reese TJ, Schlechter CR, Kramer H .
Implementing lung cancer screening in primary care: needs assessment and implementation strategy design.
Transl Behav Med 2022 Feb 16;12(2):187-97. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibab115..
Keywords: Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Primary Care, Screening, Implementation, Shared Decision Making
Gerber DE, Hamann HA, Dorsey O
Clinician variation in ordering and completion of low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in a safety-net medical system.
Less than 5% of eligible individuals in the United States undergo lung cancer screening. Variation in clinicians' participation in lung cancer screening has not been determined. In this study the investigators examined medical providers who ordered ≥ 1 low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) for lung cancer screening from February 2017 through February 2019 in an integrated safety-net healthcare system. The investigators concluded that in an integrated safety-net healthcare system, most adult primary care providers ordered LDCT.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Gerber DE, Hamann HA, Dorsey O .
Clinician variation in ordering and completion of low-dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening in a safety-net medical system.
Clin Lung Cancer 2021 Jul;22(4):e612-e20. doi: 10.1016/j.cllc.2020.12.001..
Keywords: Imaging, Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer
Shipe ME, Haddad DN, Deppen SA
Modeling the impact of delaying the diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer during COVID-19
The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has led surgical societies to recommend delaying diagnosis and treatment of suspected lung cancer for lesions less than 2 cm. The COVID-19 infection rate at which immediate operative risk exceeds benefit is unknown. Delaying diagnosis can lead to disease progression, but the impact of this delay on mortality is unknown. In this study, the investigators sought to model immediate versus delayed surgical resection in a suspicious lung nodule less than 2 cm.
AHRQ-funded; HS026122.
Citation: Shipe ME, Haddad DN, Deppen SA .
Modeling the impact of delaying the diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer during COVID-19
Ann Thorac Surg 2021 Jul;112(1):248-54. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.08.025..
Keywords: COVID-19, Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Case Study, Risk
Tracer H, Pierre J
AHRQ Author: Tracer H
Screening for lung cancer.
This paper is part of the “Putting Prevention into Practice” series. It provides an evidence-based case study related to lung cancer screening. Questions and answers related to the case are included.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Tracer H, Pierre J .
Screening for lung cancer.
Am Fam Physician 2021 Jul 1;104(1):79-80..
Keywords: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Screening, Prevention, Case Study, Evidence-Based Practice
Medbery RL, Fernandez FG, Kosinski AS
Costs associated with lobectomy for lung cancer: an analysis merging STS and Medicare data.
Researchers sought to identify underlying case mix factors that contribute to variability of 90-day costs of lobectomy for early-stage lung cancer. Using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database, they found that lobectomy is associated with substantial variability of episode-of-care costs. Variability is driven by patient demographic and clinical factors, hospital characteristics, and the occurrence and severity of complications.
AHRQ-funded; R01 HS022279.
Citation: Medbery RL, Fernandez FG, Kosinski AS .
Costs associated with lobectomy for lung cancer: an analysis merging STS and Medicare data.
Ann Thorac Surg 2021 Jun;111(6):1781-90. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.08.073..
Keywords: Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Healthcare Costs, Surgery, Elderly, Medicare
Cowper PA, Feng L, Kosinski AS
Initial and longitudinal cost of surgical resection for lung cancer.
This study looked at the 4-year longitudinal cost of surgical resection of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study describes initial and 4-year resource use and cost for NSCLC patients aged 65 years of age or older who were treated surgically from 2008 to 2013. Clinical data for NSCLC resections from The Society of Thoracic Surgery Database linked to Medicare claims, resource use and cost of preoperative staging, surgery, and subsequent care through 4 years were examined. Outcomes were stratified by pathologic stage and surgical approach for stage I lobectomy patients. In the first 90 days costs ranged from $12,430 for stage I to $26,350 for stage IV. Cumulative costs ranged from $131,032 for stage I to $205,368 for stage IV. For the stage I lobectomy cohort, patients who had minimally invasive procedures had lower 4-year costs than thoracotomy patients ($120,346 versus $136,250).
AHRQ-funded; R01 HS022279.
Citation: Cowper PA, Feng L, Kosinski AS .
Initial and longitudinal cost of surgical resection for lung cancer.
Ann Thorac Surg 2021 Jun;111(6):1827-33. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.07.048..
Keywords: Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Surgery, Healthcare Costs
Spalluto LB, Lewis JA, Stolldorf D
Organizational readiness for lung cancer screening: a cross-sectional evaluation at a Veterans Affairs medical center.
Lung cancer has the highest cancer-related mortality in the United States and among Veterans. Screening of high-risk individuals with low-dose CT (LDCT) can improve survival through detection of early-stage lung cancer. Organizational factors that aid or impede implementation of this evidence-based practice in diverse populations are not well described. In this study, the investigators evaluated organizational readiness for change and change valence (belief that change is beneficial and valuable) for implementation of LDCT screening.
AHRQ-funded; HS026395.
Citation: Spalluto LB, Lewis JA, Stolldorf D .
Organizational readiness for lung cancer screening: a cross-sectional evaluation at a Veterans Affairs medical center.
J Am Coll Radiol 2021 Jun;18(6):809-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.12.010..
Keywords: Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Screening, Implementation, Organizational Change
Hochheimer CJ, Sabo RT, Tong ST
Practice, clinician, and patient factors associated with the adoption of lung cancer screening.
This study sought to assess lung cancer screening uptake in three health systems. Findings showed that certain patients appeared more likely to be screened. Of the three systems studied, the only one with increased lung cancer screening explicitly promoted screening rather than relying on clinicians to implement the new 2013 USPSTF guideline.
AHRQ-funded; HS025032.
Citation: Hochheimer CJ, Sabo RT, Tong ST .
Practice, clinician, and patient factors associated with the adoption of lung cancer screening.
J Med Screen 2021 Jun;28(2):158-62. doi: 10.1177/0969141320937326..
Keywords: Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Screening, Guidelines
Panagiotou OA, Keeney T, Ogarek JA
Prevalence of functional limitations and their associations with systemic cancer therapy among older adults in nursing homes with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship of self-care task disabilities with the use of systemic cancer therapies for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in nursing home patients. The investigators concluded that systemic cancer therapy was not commonly used in this population and was strongly predicted by disability in self-care tasks.
AHRQ-funded; HS000011.
Citation: Panagiotou OA, Keeney T, Ogarek JA .
Prevalence of functional limitations and their associations with systemic cancer therapy among older adults in nursing homes with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
J Geriatr Oncol 2021 Jun;12(5):765-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.02.007..
Keywords: Elderly, Cancer: Lung Cancer, Cancer, Nursing Homes