National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Adverse Drug Events (ADE) (1)
- Adverse Events (1)
- Alcohol Use (2)
- Anxiety (1)
- Asthma (1)
- Behavioral Health (7)
- Cancer (10)
- Cancer: Breast Cancer (4)
- Cancer: Colorectal Cancer (1)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (9)
- Care Coordination (1)
- Caregiving (2)
- Care Management (2)
- Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) (1)
- Children/Adolescents (6)
- Chronic Conditions (8)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (4)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (6)
- Communication (9)
- Comparative Effectiveness (6)
- Critical Care (1)
- Data (3)
- Depression (2)
- Diabetes (3)
- Education: Patient and Caregiver (2)
- Elderly (3)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (5)
- Emergency Department (5)
- Evidence-Based Practice (29)
- Falls (1)
- Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) (1)
- Healthcare Costs (2)
- Healthcare Delivery (10)
- Health Information Exchange (HIE) (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (12)
- Health Literacy (2)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (4)
- Health Systems (1)
- Heart Disease and Health (5)
- Hospital Discharge (2)
- Hospitalization (3)
- Hospitals (1)
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) (1)
- Imaging (2)
- Implementation (4)
- Injuries and Wounds (3)
- Inpatient Care (1)
- Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (1)
- Learning Health Systems (2)
- Medicare (1)
- Medication (5)
- Neurological Disorders (1)
- Nursing (1)
- Nutrition (1)
- Obesity (1)
- Obesity: Weight Management (1)
- Opioids (1)
- Organizational Change (2)
- Orthopedics (2)
- Outcomes (13)
- Pain (3)
- Palliative Care (3)
- (-) Patient-Centered Healthcare (86)
- (-) Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (86)
- Patient Adherence/Compliance (1)
- Patient and Family Engagement (11)
- Patient Experience (4)
- Patient Safety (1)
- Patient Self-Management (2)
- Practice Improvement (2)
- Prevention (7)
- Primary Care (20)
- Primary Care: Models of Care (3)
- Provider (3)
- Provider: Clinician (1)
- Provider: Health Personnel (1)
- Provider: Pharmacist (1)
- Provider: Physician (1)
- Quality Improvement (11)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (1)
- Quality Measures (2)
- Quality of Care (12)
- Quality of Life (3)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (1)
- Registries (2)
- Rehabilitation (3)
- Research Methodologies (7)
- Risk (2)
- Rural Health (1)
- Screening (1)
- Shared Decision Making (9)
- Sickle Cell Disease (2)
- Social Determinants of Health (1)
- Surgery (4)
- Teams (2)
- Telehealth (2)
- Transitions of Care (2)
- Vulnerable Populations (1)
- Women (3)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 25 of 86 Research Studies DisplayedTimbie JW, Reynolds KA, Evans EL
AHRQ Author: Cohen JW
Advancing data capacity for economic outcomes in patient-centered outcomes research: challenges and opportunities.
The HHS Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation convened a symposium that brought together patients, researchers, federal agency representatives, and other stakeholders to discuss research on the collection, linkage, and analysis of economic outcomes data for patient-centered outcomes research (PCOR) studies. The purpose of this paper was to synthesize the information gathered in the symposium to guide efforts to build data capacity. The authors then emphasize preliminary opportunities to expand the availability and use of relevant, high-quality economic outcomes data as part of evidence generation in patient-centered outcomes research. Across panel discussions, 4 overarching themes arose to guide efforts to build data capacity for PCOR studies with economic outcomes: 1) Measurement and data collection for economic outcomes should enable a comprehensive, person-centered, and longitudinal understanding of health and other impacts; 2) Research data on economic outcomes should be high quality, accessible, timely, interoperable, and linkable. 3) Collaborative partnerships across stakeholder groups are essential for aligning, advancing, and sustaining efforts to improve the measurement and use of economic outcomes in PCOR; and 5) Economic outcomes in PCOR studies should be defined, collected, and analyzed in ways that advance health equity. With those factors in mind, the researchers explored opportunities to build data capacity for economic outcomes in patient-centered outcomes research in 4 domains: measurement, data collection, data linkage, and data access and use. Within each domain the researchers emphasize opportunities for meaningful, impactful improvements.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Timbie JW, Reynolds KA, Evans EL .
Advancing data capacity for economic outcomes in patient-centered outcomes research: challenges and opportunities.
Med Care 2023 Dec; 61(12 Suppl 2):s161-s65. doi: 10.1097/mlr.0000000000001901..
Keywords: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Bierman AS, Burke BT, Comfort LN
AHRQ Author: Bierman AS, Burke BT, Comfort LN, Gerstein M, Mueller NM, Umscheid CA
From precision medicine to precision care: choosing and using precision medicine in the context of multimorbidity.
Swift progress in personalized medicine offers significant potential to decrease disease and death rates for numerous health issues. To maximize the advantages of personalized medicine and minimize negative outcomes, addressing real-world obstacles in applying this research to clinical practice is crucial. A primary challenge involves selecting and employing personalized medicine approaches in everyday practice, considering the care of a substantial portion of individuals with multiple coexisting conditions. Personalized medicine should be incorporated into a broader framework of individualized care, which takes into account factors that impact the efficacy of specific treatments. Individualized care combines a patient-focused approach with personalized medicine to guide decision-making and care plans, considering multiple health conditions, functional ability, personal values, goals, preferences, and social and societal contexts. Creating dissemination and implementation strategies for personalized medicine centered around individualized care can enhance patient-centric quality and health outcomes, direct interventions toward those who will benefit most, improve access to novel treatments, reduce the likelihood of treatment withdrawal due to unforeseen side effects, and promote health equity by customizing interventions and care for diverse individuals and communities. Delivering personalized medicine within the scope of individualized care supports respectful treatment that aligns with patient preferences, values, and objectives, fostering trust and offering necessary information for informed decision-making. Accelerating its adoption demands focus on the entire translational research continuum: devising innovative methods, proving their value, disseminating and implementing findings, and involving patients throughout the process. This includes basic science, preclinical and clinical research, and integration into practice, all aimed at enhancing health. This paper scrutinizes the challenges in adopting personalized medicine in the presence of multiple health conditions. The authors conclude that while the promise of personalized medicine is immense, proactive measures are essential to prevent unintended repercussions and ensure its equitable and efficient implementation.
AHRQ-authored: All.
Citation: Bierman AS, Burke BT, Comfort LN .
From precision medicine to precision care: choosing and using precision medicine in the context of multimorbidity.
Cambridge Prisms: Precision Medicine 2023 Feb 21;1:e19. doi:10.1017/pcm.2023.8.
Keywords: Learning Health Systems, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Moise N, Paniagua-Avila A, Barbecho JM
A theory-informed, rapid cycle approach to identifying and adapting strategies to promote sustainability: optimizing depression treatment in primary care clinics seeking to sustain collaborative care (the transform depcare study).
This study used a collaborative care (CC) use case to describe a novel, theory-informed, stakeholder engaged process for operationalizing strategies for sustainability using a behavioral lens. The goal is to optimize depression treatment in primary care clinics using the Transform DepCare shared decision-making and psychoeducation patient tool. The authors applied the Behaviour Change Wheel to their prior mixed methods to identify key sustainability behaviors and determinants of sustainability. The authors enlisted 22 national and local stakeholders to operationalize and adapt a multi-level, multi-component implementation strategy to maximally target behavioral and contextual determinants of sustainability. They identified ongoing care manager CC delivery, provider treatment optimization, and patient enrollment as key sustainability behaviors. They determined that a waiting room that delivered DepCare, the results of which are delivered to providers, as well as ongoing problem-solving meetings/local technical assistance with care managers would be the most acceptable and equitable multi-level strategy in diverse settings seeking to sustain CC programs. Key improvements would include expanding the DepCare tool to incorporate anxiety/suicide screening, triage support, multi-modal delivery, and patient activation (vs. shared decision making) (patient); pairing summary reports with decisional support and yearly onboarding/motivational educational videos (provider); incorporating behavioral health providers into problem-solving meetings and shifting from billing support to quality improvement and triage (system).
AHRQ-funded; HS025198.
Citation: Moise N, Paniagua-Avila A, Barbecho JM .
A theory-informed, rapid cycle approach to identifying and adapting strategies to promote sustainability: optimizing depression treatment in primary care clinics seeking to sustain collaborative care (the transform depcare study).
Implement Sci Commun 2023 Jan 25; 4(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00383-2..
Keywords: Depression, Primary Care, Behavioral Health, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Ortiz D, Perkins AJ, Fuchita M
Pre-existing anxiety and depression in injured older adults: an under-recognized comorbidity with major health implications.
The purpose of this retrospective post-hoc analysis study was to evaluate variations in baseline depression and anxiety screenings between older injured patients with pre-existing diagnoses and those without. Data from the Trauma Medical Home, a multicenter randomized controlled trial was used for analysis. The study found that almost 50% of the patients screened positive for at least mild depressive symptoms as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and 41% of the patients screened positive for at least mild anxiety symptoms as measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale. Female patients with a history of concurrent anxiety and depression, greater injury severity scores, and higher Charlson scores were more likely to have mild anxiety at the baseline assessment. Patients with a history of depression only, a prior history of depression and concurrent anxiety, and higher Charlson scores (greater medical comorbidity) were more likely to have experienced at least mild depression at the time of hospital discharge after traumatic injury.
AHRQ-funded; HS026390.
Citation: Ortiz D, Perkins AJ, Fuchita M .
Pre-existing anxiety and depression in injured older adults: an under-recognized comorbidity with major health implications.
Ann Surg Open 2022 Dec; 3(4):e217. doi: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000217..
Keywords: Elderly, Anxiety, Depression, Behavioral Health, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Injuries and Wounds
Graber J, Kittelson A, Juarez-Colunga E
Comparing "people-like-me" and linear mixed model predictions of functional recovery following knee arthroplasty.
This study compared the relative strengths and weaknesses of 2 prediction model approaches for predicting functional recovery after knee arthroplasty: a neighbors-based "people-like-me" (PLM) approach and a linear mixed model (LMM) approach. The authors used 2 distinct datasets to train and then test PLM and LMM prediction approaches. They used the Timed Up and Go (TUG)-a common test of mobility-to operationalize physical function. Both approaches use patient characteristics and baseline postoperative TUG values to predict TUG recovery from days 1-425 following surgery. They then compared the accuracy and precision of the two approaches. A total of 317 patient records with 1379 TUG observations were used to train approaches, and 456 patient records with 1244 TUG observations were used to test the predictions. Both approaches performed similarly in terms of mean squared error and bias, but the PLM approach provided more accurate and precise estimates of prediction uncertainty.
AHRQ-funded; HS025692.
Citation: Graber J, Kittelson A, Juarez-Colunga E .
Comparing "people-like-me" and linear mixed model predictions of functional recovery following knee arthroplasty.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022 Oct 7;29(11):1899-907. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac123..
Keywords: Orthopedics, Surgery, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Outcomes
Salloum RG, Bilello L, Bian J
Study protocol for a type III hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial to evaluate scaling interoperable clinical decision support for patient-centered chronic pain management in primary care.
The objective of this 3-year project is to study the adaptation and implementation of an existing interoperable clinical decision support (CDS) tool for pain treatment shared decision making, with tailored implementation support, in new clinical settings in the OneFlorida Clinical Research Consortium. The evaluation will be organized by the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework, with an adaptation and tailoring of PainManager, an open source interoperable CDS tool. It is anticipated that this evaluation will establish the feasibility and obtain preliminary data in preparation for a multi-site pragmatic trial targeting the effectiveness of PainManager and tailored implementation support on shared decision making and patient-reported pain and physical function.
AHRQ-funded; R18 HS028584.
Citation: Salloum RG, Bilello L, Bian J .
Study protocol for a type III hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial to evaluate scaling interoperable clinical decision support for patient-centered chronic pain management in primary care.
Implement Sci 2022 Jul 15;17(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01217-4..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Pain, Chronic Conditions, Primary Care, Health Information Technology (HIT), Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Dullabh P, Sandberg SF, Heaney-Huls K
AHRQ Author: Berliner E, Dymek C, Harrison MI, Swiger J
Challenges and opportunities for advancing patient-centered clinical decision support: findings from a horizon scan.
This AHRQ-authored horizon scan identified challenges and opportunities for advancing patient-centered clinical decision support (PC CDS) and future directions for PC CDS. The authors engaged a technical expert panel, conducted a scoping literature review, and interviewed key informants. They quantitatively analyzed literature and interview transcripts and mapped the findings to the 4 phases translating evidence into PC CDS interventions (Prioritizing, Authoring, Implementing, and Measuring) and to external factors. Twelve challenges were identified for PC CDS development with lack of patient input identified as a critical challenge. Lack of patient-centered terminology standards was viewed as a challenge in authoring PC CDS. They also found a dearth of CDS studies that measured clinical outcomes, creating significant gaps in the understanding of PC CDS’ impact.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 233201500023I.
Citation: Dullabh P, Sandberg SF, Heaney-Huls K .
Challenges and opportunities for advancing patient-centered clinical decision support: findings from a horizon scan.
J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022 Jun 14;29(7):1233-43. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac059.
.
.
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Patient-Centered Healthcare, Health Information Technology (HIT), Shared Decision Making, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice
Loo S, Mullikin K, Robbins C
Patient navigator team perceptions on the implementation of a citywide breast cancer patient navigation protocol: a qualitative study.
This study’s goal was to assess the implementation of the 2018 Translating Research Into Practice (TRIP), an evidence-based patient navigation intervention aimed at addressing breast cancer care disparities, across six Boston hospitals. Patient navigator team member perspectives regarding implementation barriers and facilitators one-year post-study implementation were assessed. Seventeen interviews were conducted with patient navigators, patient navigator supervisors, and designated clinical champions. The following benefits were identified by participants: 1) increased networking and connections for navigators across clinical sites (Cosmopolitanism), 2) formalization of the patient navigation process (Goals and Purpose, Access to Knowledge and Information, and Relative Advantage), and 3) flexibility within the TRIP intervention that allowed for diversity in implementation and use of TRIP components across sites (Adaptability). Barriers included documentation requirements and the structured patient follow up guidelines that did not always align with the timeline of existing site navigation processes.
AHRQ-funded; HS022242.
Citation: Loo S, Mullikin K, Robbins C .
Patient navigator team perceptions on the implementation of a citywide breast cancer patient navigation protocol: a qualitative study.
BMC Health Serv Res 2022 May 21;22(1):683. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08090-3..
Keywords: Patient-Centered Healthcare, Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice
Keeney T, Kumar A, Erler KS
Making the case for patient-reported outcome measures in big-data rehabilitation research: implications for optimizing patient-centered care.
This article discussed the potential of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to transform clinical practice. It also provided examples of health systems that use PROMs to guide care and identified barriers to aggregating data from PROMs in conducting health services research. The authors proposed two priority areas which could help advance rehabilitation health services research: standardization of collecting PROMs data in electronic health records and increased partnerships between rehabilitation providers, researchers, and payors.
AHRQ-funded; HS000011.
Citation: Keeney T, Kumar A, Erler KS .
Making the case for patient-reported outcome measures in big-data rehabilitation research: implications for optimizing patient-centered care.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2022 May; 103(5s):S140-s45. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2020.12.028..
Keywords: Rehabilitation, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Health Information Technology (HIT), Outcomes
Aiyegbusi OL, Nair D, Peipert JD
A narrative review of current evidence supporting the implementation of electronic patient-reported outcome measures in the management of chronic diseases.
This review discusses and summarizes evidence of the impact of electronic patient-reported outcomes measures (ePROMs) on clinical parameters and outcomes relevant to chronic diseases. Various studies have demonstrated the feasibility of ePROMs in routine clinical practice with patients increasing expressing a preference for an electronic mode of administration. These ePROMs could have significant impacts on outcomes valued by patients, healthcare providers, and researchers. Recently published literature.
AHRQ-funded; HS026395.
Citation: Aiyegbusi OL, Nair D, Peipert JD .
A narrative review of current evidence supporting the implementation of electronic patient-reported outcome measures in the management of chronic diseases.
Ther Adv Chronic Dis 2021 May 24;12:20406223211015958. doi: 10.1177/20406223211015958..
Keywords: Chronic Conditions, Patient Experience, Health Information Technology (HIT), Outcomes, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice
Bell N, Wilkerson R, Mayfield-Smith K
Community social determinants and health outcomes drive availability of patient-centered medical homes.
This study assessed the geographic distribution of patient-centered medical homes and the community social determinants and health outcomes that drive availability. The authors assessed spatial clusters of mental and physical health surveys; health behaviors; as well as premature mortality with clusters of medical home saturation and community socioeconomic characteristics. Counties having lower uninsured rates and lower poverty rates were more likely to have medical homes.
AHRQ-funded; HS026263.
Citation: Bell N, Wilkerson R, Mayfield-Smith K .
Community social determinants and health outcomes drive availability of patient-centered medical homes.
Health Place 2021 Jan;67:102439. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102439..
Keywords: Social Determinants of Health, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Outcomes
Cykert S, Keyserling TC, Pignone M
A controlled trial of dissemination and implementation of a cardiovascular risk reduction strategy in small primary care practices.
Researchers assessed the effect of dissemination and implementation of an intervention consisting of practice facilitation and a risk-stratified, population management dashboard on cardiovascular risk reduction for patients at high risk in small, primary care practices. They found that a risk-stratified, population management dashboard combined with practice facilitation led to substantial reductions of 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk for patients at high risk. They recommended utilizing similar approaches to lead to effective dissemination and implementation of other new evidence, especially in rural and other under-resourced practices.
AHRQ-funded; HS023912.
Citation: Cykert S, Keyserling TC, Pignone M .
A controlled trial of dissemination and implementation of a cardiovascular risk reduction strategy in small primary care practices.
Health Serv Res 2020 Dec;55(6):944-53. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.13571..
Keywords: Cardiovascular Conditions, Risk, Prevention, Primary Care, Implementation, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Nijhawan AE, Bhattatiry M, Chansard M
HIV care cascade before and after hospitalization: impact of a multidisciplinary inpatient team in the US South.
Hospitalization represents an opportunity to re-engage out-of-care individuals, improve HIV outcomes, and reduce health disparities. The authors reviewed electronic health records of HIV-positive individuals hospitalized at an urban, public hospital between September 2013 and December 2015. They found that hospitalized patients with HIV had low rates of engagement in care, retention in care, and virologic suppression, though all three outcomes improved after hospitalization. A multidisciplinary transitions team improved care engagement and virologic suppression in those who received the intervention.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Nijhawan AE, Bhattatiry M, Chansard M .
HIV care cascade before and after hospitalization: impact of a multidisciplinary inpatient team in the US South.
AIDS Care 2020 Nov;32(11):1343-52. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2019.1698704.
.
.
Keywords: Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Transitions of Care, Inpatient Care, Teams, Hospitalization, Patient and Family Engagement, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Outcomes, Evidence-Based Practice
Singh SA, Bakshi N, Mahajan P
What is the future of patient-reported outcomes in sickle-cell disease?
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a complex, chronic disease caused by abnormal polymerization of hemoglobin, which leads to severe pain episodes, fatigue, and end-organ damage. Patient reported outcomes (PROs) have emerged as a critical tool for measuring SCD disease severity and response to treatment. In this study, the authors reviewed the key issues involved when deciding to use a PRO in a clinical trial. They described the most highly recommended generic and disease-specific PRO tools in SCD and discussed the challenges of incorporating them in clinical practice.
AHRQ-funded; HS024953; HS026622.
Citation: Singh SA, Bakshi N, Mahajan P .
What is the future of patient-reported outcomes in sickle-cell disease?
Expert Rev Hematol 2020 Nov;13(11):1165-73. doi: 10.1080/17474086.2020.1830370..
Keywords: Sickle Cell Disease, Pain, Quality of Life, Chronic Conditions, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Richardson JE, Middleton B, Platt JE
Building and maintaining trust in clinical decision support: recommendations from the Patient-Centered CDS Learning Network.
Knowledge artifacts in digital repositories for clinical decision support (CDS) can promote the use of CDS in clinical practice. However, stakeholders will benefit from knowing which they can trust before adopting artifacts from knowledge repositories. In this paper, the investigators discuss their investigation into trust for knowledge artifacts and repositories by the Patient-Centered CDS Learning Network's Trust Framework Working Group (TFWG).
AHRQ-funded; HS024849.
Citation: Richardson JE, Middleton B, Platt JE .
Building and maintaining trust in clinical decision support: recommendations from the Patient-Centered CDS Learning Network.
Learn Health Syst 2020 Apr;4(2):e10208. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10208.
.
.
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Hernandez-Boussard T, Blayney DW, Brooks JD
Leveraging digital data to inform and improve quality cancer care.
Efficient capture of routine clinical care and patient outcomes is needed at a population-level, as is evidence on important treatment-related side effects and their effect on well-being and clinical outcomes. The increasing availability of electronic health records (EHR) offers new opportunities to generate population-level patient-centered evidence on oncologic care that can better guide treatment decisions and patient-valued care. This study discussed how to leverage digital data to inform and improve quality cancer care.
AHRQ-funded; R01 HS024096.
Citation: Hernandez-Boussard T, Blayney DW, Brooks JD .
Leveraging digital data to inform and improve quality cancer care.
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020 Apr;29(4):816-22. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.Epi-19-0873..
Keywords: Cancer, Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Health Information Technology (HIT), Quality Improvement, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice
Marcial LH, Blumenfeld B, Harle C
Barriers, facilitators, and potential solutions to advancing interoperable clinical decision support: multi-stakeholder consensus recommendations for the opioid use case.
These proceedings report on the AHRQ-sponsored Patient-Centered CDS Learning Network (PCCDS LN) Technical Framework Working Group (TechFWG), which was convened to identify barriers, facilitators, and potential solutions for interoperable clinical decision support, with a specific focus on addressing the opioid epidemic. The key insights were extrapolated to CDS-facilitated care improvement outside of the specific opioid use case. If applied broadly, the recommendations should help advance the availability and impact of interoperable CDS delivered at scale.
AHRQ-funded; HS024849.
Citation: Marcial LH, Blumenfeld B, Harle C .
Barriers, facilitators, and potential solutions to advancing interoperable clinical decision support: multi-stakeholder consensus recommendations for the opioid use case.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2020 Mar 4;2019:637-46..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Opioids, Medication, Pain, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Nguyen AM, Cuthel A, Padgett DK
How practice facilitation strategies differ by practice context.
The purpose of this study was to identify contextual factors that drive facilitators' strategies to meet practice improvement goals, and how these strategies are tailored to practice context. This study was conducted as part of a larger study, HealthyHearts New York City, which evaluated the impact of practice facilitation on adoption of cardiovascular disease prevention and treatment guidelines.
AHRQ-funded; HS023922.
Citation: Nguyen AM, Cuthel A, Padgett DK .
How practice facilitation strategies differ by practice context.
J Gen Intern Med 2020 Mar;35(3):824-31. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05350-7..
Keywords: Quality Improvement, Evidence-Based Practice, Heart Disease and Health, Cardiovascular Conditions, Primary Care, Quality of Care, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Primary Care: Models of Care
Byham-Gray LD, Peters EN, Rothpletz-Puglia P
Patient-centered model for protein-energy wasting: stakeholder deliberative panels.
Integrating the patient's voice into research prioritization is essential for solving problems that patients care the most about in terms of health, symptom management, and survival. In this study, the investigators used deliberative processes for adapting the existing model of protein-energy wasting (PEW) to one that included stakeholder priorities, addressing gaps from the initial concept.
AHRQ-funded; HS023434.
Citation: Byham-Gray LD, Peters EN, Rothpletz-Puglia P .
Patient-centered model for protein-energy wasting: stakeholder deliberative panels.
J Ren Nutr 2020 Mar;30(2):137-44. doi: 10.1053/j.jrn.2019.06.001..
Keywords: Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient and Family Engagement, Research Methodologies
Kamal AH, Bausewein C, Casarett DJ
Standards, guidelines, and quality measures for successful specialty palliative care integration into oncology: current approaches and future directions.
This review paper discusses the need to integrate specialty palliative care into oncology and that there is robust evidence that it improves patient and health system outcomes. Three of the most cited standards/guidelines are discussed as well as quality measures related to integrated palliative and oncology care. They also recommend changes to the quality measurement framework for palliative care and a new way to match palliative care services to patients with advanced cancer.
AHRQ-funded; HS023681.
Citation: Kamal AH, Bausewein C, Casarett DJ .
Standards, guidelines, and quality measures for successful specialty palliative care integration into oncology: current approaches and future directions.
J Clin Oncol 2020 Mar 20;38(9):987-94. doi: 10.1200/jco.18.02440..
Keywords: Palliative Care, Cancer, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice
Kelly Costa D, Liu H, Boltey EM
The structure of critical care nursing teams and patient outcomes: a network analysis.
This examined the connectiveness of critical nursing teams and patient outcomes. The study measured “coreness” (the degree to which a network is represented by a densely integrated core) and “betweenness” (whether a nurse lies on the path of others not directly connected). The researchers used ICU data from a medical center during 2011 and looked at nurses who worked in surgical ICU (SICU) or neurosurgical ICU (NICU) during that same time period. The sample included 598 adult patients and 281 nurses. The researchers found that the greater the coreness of the team, and the more betweenness there was with ICU nurses the less likely patients were to die.
AHRQ-funded; HS024552.
Citation: Kelly Costa D, Liu H, Boltey EM .
The structure of critical care nursing teams and patient outcomes: a network analysis.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020 Feb 15;201(4):483-85. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201903-0543LE..
Keywords: Intensive Care Unit (ICU), Critical Care, Nursing, Teams, Outcomes, Healthcare Delivery, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Patient-Centered Healthcare
McCoy RG, Lipska KJ, Van Houten HK
Paradox of glycemic management: multimorbidity, glycemic control, and high-risk medication use among adults with diabetes.
Researchers examined contemporary patterns of glycemic control and use of medications known to cause hypoglycemia among adults with diabetes across age and multimorbidity. They found that the proportion of patients achieving low HbA1c levels was highest among older and multimorbid patients. Older patients and patients with higher comorbidity burden were more likely to be treated with insulin to achieve these HbA1c levels despite the potential for hypoglycemia and uncertain long-term benefit.
AHRQ-funded; HS024075.
Citation: McCoy RG, Lipska KJ, Van Houten HK .
Paradox of glycemic management: multimorbidity, glycemic control, and high-risk medication use among adults with diabetes.
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2020 Feb;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001007..
Keywords: Diabetes, Medication, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Evidence-Based Practice, Risk, Chronic Conditions
Dukhanin V, Feeser S, Berkowitz SA
Who represents me? A patient-derived model of patient engagement via patient and family advisory councils (PFACs).
This study examined what expectations would be from patients who are not patient and family advisory council (PFAC) members of PFACs. Patients and caregivers from the Johns Hopkins Medical Alliance for Patients, LLC were recruited in 2014. This Medicare accountable care organization has an established PFAC, the Beneficiary Advisory Council. Five focus groups with 42 patients and caregivers participated. Most participants were not aware of PFACs and wanted to know more about representation, what they could do and expected that patients could communicate with PFACs if desired.
AHRQ-funded; HS023684.
Citation: Dukhanin V, Feeser S, Berkowitz SA .
Who represents me? A patient-derived model of patient engagement via patient and family advisory councils (PFACs).
Health Expect 2020 Feb;23(1):148-58. doi: 10.1111/hex.12983..
Keywords: Patient and Family Engagement, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Healthcare Delivery, Health Systems
Barry-Menkhaus SA, Wagner DV, Riley AR
Small interventions for big change: brief strategies for distress and self-management amongst youth with type 1 diabetes.
In this article, the authors review existing evidence for brief interventions, describe several untested clinical strategies, and make recommendations for accelerating the translational study of brief interventions among youth with type 1 diabetes.
AHRQ-funded; HS022981.
Citation: Barry-Menkhaus SA, Wagner DV, Riley AR .
Small interventions for big change: brief strategies for distress and self-management amongst youth with type 1 diabetes.
Curr Diab Rep 2020 Jan 30;20(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s11892-020-1290-7..
Keywords: Diabetes, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient Self-Management, Patient Adherence/Compliance, Care Management, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Healthcare Delivery, Children/Adolescents
Kukulka K, Washington KT, Govindarajan R
Stakeholder perspectives on the biopsychosocial and spiritual realities of living with ALS: implications for palliative care teams.
The purpose of this study was to generate a rich description of the realities of living with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), equipping palliative care teams with an in-depth understanding of the experiences and needs of patients with ALS and their family caregivers. Study findings illustrated the intricacies of living with ALS and the importance of eliciting individualized values when caring for patients with ALS and their families. The investigators concluded that the complex biopsychosocial needs experienced by patients and family caregivers suggested numerous opportunities for meaningful palliative care involvement.
AHRQ-funded; HS022140.
Citation: Kukulka K, Washington KT, Govindarajan R .
Stakeholder perspectives on the biopsychosocial and spiritual realities of living with ALS: implications for palliative care teams.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2019 Oct;36(10):851-57. doi: 10.1177/1049909119834493..
Keywords: Palliative Care, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Neurological Disorders, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient and Family Engagement, Caregiving