National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 3 of 3 Research Studies DisplayedWey A, Salkowski N, Kasiske BL
Comparing Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients posttransplant program-specific outcome ratings at listing with subsequent recipient outcomes after transplant.
To improve accessibility of program-specific reports to patients, the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients released a 5-tier system for categorizing 1-year posttransplant program evaluations. Whether this system predicts subsequent posttransplant outcomes at the time patients are waitlisted has been questioned. IN this study, researchers investigated the association of tier at listing and the corresponding continuous score used for tier assignment, which ranges from 0 (poor outcomes) to 1 (good outcomes), with eventual 1-year posttransplant graft survival.
AHRQ-funded; HS024527.
Citation: Wey A, Salkowski N, Kasiske BL .
Comparing Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients posttransplant program-specific outcome ratings at listing with subsequent recipient outcomes after transplant.
Am J Transplant 2019 Feb;19(2):391-98. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15038..
Keywords: Transplantation, Surgery, Mortality, Registries, Adverse Events, Risk
Qian F, Hannan EL, Pine M
Can adding laboratory values improve risk-adjustment mortality models using clinical percutaneous cardiac intervention registry data?
The authors predicted in-hospital/30-day mortality with and without appended laboratory data using New York's percutaneous coronary intervention registry data from 2008-2010. They found that adding laboratory data did not significantly improve the risk-adjustment mortality models' performance and did not dramatically change the quality assessment of hospitals.
AHRQ-funded; HS019965.
Citation: Qian F, Hannan EL, Pine M .
Can adding laboratory values improve risk-adjustment mortality models using clinical percutaneous cardiac intervention registry data?
J Invasive Cardiol 2015 Jul;27(7):E117-24.
.
.
Keywords: Heart Disease and Health, Mortality, Registries, Risk
Hannan EL, Qian F, Pine M
The value of adding laboratory data to coronary artery bypass grafting registry data to improve models for risk-adjusting provider mortality rates.
The purpose of this study was to determine whether the addition of laboratory data to the clinical database for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) would identify laboratory variables that are significant independent predictors of short-term (in-hospital / 30-day) mortality. The researchers found that there was no significant difference in the discrimination of the registry model or the combined registry/laboratory model.
AHRQ-funded; HS019965.
Citation: Hannan EL, Qian F, Pine M .
The value of adding laboratory data to coronary artery bypass grafting registry data to improve models for risk-adjusting provider mortality rates.
Ann Thorac Surg 2015 Feb;99(2):495-501. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.08.043..
Keywords: Registries, Mortality, Risk, Surgery, Data