National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Adverse Events (1)
- Antibiotics (1)
- Arthritis (1)
- Asthma (2)
- Behavioral Health (1)
- Blood Pressure (2)
- Cancer (1)
- Cancer: Prostate Cancer (1)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (24)
- Care Coordination (1)
- Care Management (4)
- Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI) (2)
- Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) (1)
- Children/Adolescents (7)
- Chronic Conditions (3)
- Clinician-Patient Communication (1)
- Communication (4)
- Comparative Effectiveness (4)
- Critical Care (1)
- Depression (1)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (2)
- Disparities (1)
- Education: Continuing Medical Education (1)
- Elderly (2)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (6)
- Emergency Department (5)
- (-) Evidence-Based Practice (88)
- Guidelines (13)
- Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) (5)
- Healthcare Delivery (11)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (8)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (3)
- Health Systems (2)
- Heart Disease and Health (12)
- Hospital Discharge (1)
- Hospitalization (1)
- Hospitals (6)
- Implementation (16)
- Inpatient Care (3)
- Intensive Care Unit (ICU) (3)
- Labor and Delivery (1)
- Learning Health Systems (2)
- Long-Term Care (1)
- Medical Errors (2)
- Medication (5)
- Medication: Safety (2)
- Newborns/Infants (1)
- Nursing (1)
- Nursing Homes (1)
- Organizational Change (2)
- Orthopedics (4)
- Outcomes (14)
- Palliative Care (1)
- Patient-Centered Healthcare (12)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (39)
- Patient and Family Engagement (2)
- Patient Safety (21)
- Practice Improvement (5)
- Pregnancy (1)
- Prevention (12)
- Primary Care (30)
- Primary Care: Models of Care (4)
- Provider (1)
- Provider: Clinician (1)
- Provider: Physician (1)
- Provider Performance (5)
- Quality Improvement (65)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (6)
- Quality Measures (12)
- (-) Quality of Care (88)
- Quality of Life (1)
- Research Methodologies (2)
- Respiratory Conditions (2)
- Risk (2)
- Sepsis (1)
- Shared Decision Making (1)
- Stroke (1)
- Surgery (14)
- Teams (2)
- Tobacco Use (1)
- Tools & Toolkits (2)
- Training (1)
- Transitions of Care (1)
- Women (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
51 to 75 of 88 Research Studies DisplayedCalderwood MS, Yokoe DS, Murphy MV
Effectiveness of a multistate quality improvement campaign in reducing risk of surgical site infections following hip and knee arthroplasty.
The authors assessed the effect of a multistate quality improvement campaign to promote the adoption of evidence-based surgical site infection (SSI) prevention practices. Rates of SSI among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty during pre-intervention and post-intervention in five states included in a multistate trial of the Project JOINTS campaign and five matched comparison states were analyzed. The authors found a larger reduction of SSI rates following hip and knee arthroplasty in intervention states than in the matched control states.
AHRQ-funded; HS021424.
Citation: Calderwood MS, Yokoe DS, Murphy MV .
Effectiveness of a multistate quality improvement campaign in reducing risk of surgical site infections following hip and knee arthroplasty.
BMJ Qual Saf 2019 May;28(5):374-81. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2018-007982..
Keywords: Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs), Surgery, Orthopedics, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Evidence-Based Practice, Prevention, Patient Safety
Ban KA, Gibbons MM, Ko CY
Evidence review conducted for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Improving
This evidence review was conducted for AHRQ in partnership with the American College of Surgeons and the Johns Hopkins Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality who have developed the Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery (ISCR). This national effort will disseminate best practices in perioperative care to more than 750 hospitals across multiple procedures in the next 5 years. This evidence-based review is focused on improving patient safety of anesthesiology for colorectal (CR) surgery. Components reviewed included carbohydrate loading, reduced fasting, multimodal preanesthesia medicine, antibiotic prophylaxis, normothermia, blood transfusion, intraoperative fluid management/goal-directed fluid therapy, a standardized intraoperative anesthesia pathway, and standard postoperative multimodal analgesic regiments. The results of this review will be used to develop an evidence-based CR protocol for implementation.
AHRQ-funded; 233201500020I.
Citation: Ban KA, Gibbons MM, Ko CY .
Evidence review conducted for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Improving
Anesth Analg 2019 May;128(5):879-89. doi: 10.1213/ane.0000000000003366..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Surgery, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Patient Safety, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Antibiotics, Medication, Medication: Safety
Lindner S, Solberg LI, Miller WL
Does ownership make a difference in primary care practice?
This study looked into whether ownership of a primary care practice makes a difference in structural characteristics, quality improvement practices, and cardiovascular preventive care. This analysis was done was part of an evaluation of the EvidenceNOW: Advancing Heart Health in Primary Care Initiative by AHRQ. Physician-owned practices, health system or medical group practices, and Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) were compared using 15 survey-based measures, and 4 electronic health record-based cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention quality measures known as ABCS (aspirin prevention, blood pressure control, cholesterol management, and smoking cessation support). Physician-owned practices were solo 45% of the time as opposed to 8.1% for health system practices and 12.8% for FQHCs. FQHCs were more likely to use quality improvement practices followed by health system practices. ABCS use was similar across ownership types with the exception of smoking cessation support.
AHRQ-funded; HS023940.
Citation: Lindner S, Solberg LI, Miller WL .
Does ownership make a difference in primary care practice?
J Am Board Fam Med 2019 May-Jun;32(3):398-407. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2019.03.180271..
Keywords: Heart Disease and Health, Cardiovascular Conditions, Primary Care, Evidence-Based Practice, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Healthcare Delivery
Machta RM, Maurer KA, Jones DJ
AHRQ Author: Furukawa MF
A systematic review of vertical integration and quality of care, efficiency, and patient-centered outcomes.
This systematic review examined the effects of small independent practices becoming part of larger provider organizations and hospital systems. A literature review was done for studies from 1996 to 2016. Out of 7,559 articles generated, 29 articles were included in this review. Vertical integration was associated with better quality but there were no differences or even lower efficiency than prior to the integration measured by utilization, spending and prices. Patient-centered outcome was measured by only a few studies so was not included.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290201600001C.
Citation: Machta RM, Maurer KA, Jones DJ .
A systematic review of vertical integration and quality of care, efficiency, and patient-centered outcomes.
Health Care Manage Rev 2019 Apr/Jun;44(2):159-73. doi: 10.1097/hmr.0000000000000197..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Quality of Care
Soffin EM, Gibbons MM, Ko CY
Evidence review conducted for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety program for improving surgical care and recovery: focus on anesthesiology for total hip arthroplasty.
Successes using enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for total hip arthroplasty (THA) are increasingly being reported. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, in partnership with the American College of Surgeons and the Johns Hopkins Medicine Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, has developed the Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery. In this study, the investigators conducted an evidence review to select anesthetic interventions that positively influence outcomes and facilitate recovery after total hip arthroplasty (THA).
AHRQ-funded; 233201500020I.
Citation: Soffin EM, Gibbons MM, Ko CY .
Evidence review conducted for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety program for improving surgical care and recovery: focus on anesthesiology for total hip arthroplasty.
Anesth Analg 2019 Mar;128(3):454-65. doi: 10.1213/ane.0000000000003663..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Surgery, Patient Safety, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care
Hanlon JT, Perera S, Drinka PJ
The IOU consensus recommendations for empirical therapy of cystitis in nursing home residents.
A 19-member panel of clinical pharmacists was convened for the Improving Outcomes of UTI Management in Long-Term Care Project (IOU) funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The objective is to reach consensus on a set of recommendations for the empirical treatment of cystitis in older nursing home residents with oral anti-infective medications. A comprehensive literature search was conducted and out of that 31 recommendations were created. There were two Delphi Survey rounds conducted and those recommendations were rated on a 5-point Likert scale. In the first round three recommendations reached consensus and in the second round an additional eight recommendations were agreed on.
AHRQ-funded; HS023779.
Citation: Hanlon JT, Perera S, Drinka PJ .
The IOU consensus recommendations for empirical therapy of cystitis in nursing home residents.
J Am Geriatr Soc 2019 Mar;67(3):539-45. doi: 10.1111/jgs.15726..
Keywords: Elderly, Nursing Homes, Long-Term Care, Medication, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Evidence-Based Practice
Montori VM, Hargraves I, McNellis RJ
AHRQ Author: Montori VM, McNellis RJ, Ganiats TG, Genevro J, Miller T, Ricciardi R
The Care and Learn Model: a practice and research model for improving healthcare quality and outcomes.
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality conducted internal work to formulate a model that could be used to analyze the Agency's research portfolio, identify gaps, develop and prioritize its research agenda, and evaluate its performance. In this study, the researchers produced a model caring and learning. The Agency and the health services research and improvement communities can use this Care and Learn Model to frame an evidence-based understanding of vexing clinical, healthcare delivery, and population health problems and to identify targets for investment, innovation, and investigation.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Montori VM, Hargraves I, McNellis RJ .
The Care and Learn Model: a practice and research model for improving healthcare quality and outcomes.
J Gen Intern Med 2019 Jan;34(1):154-58. doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4737-7..
Keywords: Quality of Care, Healthcare Delivery, Evidence-Based Practice, Organizational Change
I Auerbach, M Badaki-Makun, O
AHRQ Author: Barata
A research agenda to advance pediatric emergency care through enhanced collaboration across emergency departments.
In 2018, the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine and the journal Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) convened a consensus conference entitled, "Academic Emergency Medicine Consensus Conference: Aligning the Pediatric Emergency Medicine Research Agenda to Reduce Health Outcome Gaps." This article is the product of the breakout session, "Emergency Department Collaboration-Pediatric Emergency Medicine in Non-Children's Hospital."
AHRQ-funded; HS026101.
Citation: I Auerbach, M Badaki-Makun, O .
A research agenda to advance pediatric emergency care through enhanced collaboration across emergency departments.
Acad Emerg Med 2018 Dec;25(12):1415-26. doi: 10.1111/acem.13642..
Keywords: Care Coordination, Children/Adolescents, Emergency Department, Evidence-Based Practice, Health Services Research (HSR), Outcomes, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement
Hornor MA, Liu JY, Hu QL
Surgical technical evidence review for acute appendectomy conducted for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery.
This evidence review uses enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) protocols developed for the AHRQ-funded Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery (ISCR Program) to develop ERPs for acute appendectomy surgery. The authors classified appendicitis into uncomplicated (nonperforated) and complicated (perforated or gangrenous) to help with risk stratification. They identified 13 components for appendectomy for review. The processes are organized by perioperative phase, and each phase includes the rationale, evidence review, summary of guidelines, and a recommendation summary of the evidence for or against inclusion in the ERP. Preoperative management components included: education and counseling; preoperative antibiotics; initial nonsurgical management for perforated appendicitis with abscess or phlegmon, venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, delay for operation for 12-24 hours for uncomplicated appendicitis. Intraoperative management components include: laparoscopic surgical technique, peritoneal drain placement, urinary catheter placement, and prophylactic nasogastric tube insertion. Postoperative management components include same-day surgery discharge for uncomplicated appendicitis, antibiotics, early oral alimentation, and early mobilization. Of the ERPs reviewed: there was no evidence to support the routine use of abdominal drainage in patients undergoing appendectomies, urinary catheter insertion for laparoscopic surgery, use of prophylactic nasogastric tube placement, postoperative antibiotic use for uncomplicated appendicitis, and early oral alimentation for uncomplicated appendicitis.
AHRQ-funded.
Citation: Hornor MA, Liu JY, Hu QL .
Surgical technical evidence review for acute appendectomy conducted for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery.
J Am Coll Surg 2018 Dec;227(6):605-17.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.09.024..
Keywords: Surgery, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Patient Safety, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Outcomes
Kalogera E, Nelson G
Surgical technical evidence review for gynecologic surgery conducted for the AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery.
The objective of this study was to review the enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) literature in gynecologic surgery (GS) and provide the framework for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery (ISCR) pathway for GS. The investigators concluded that evidence and existing guidelines supported 29 protocol elements for the AHRQ Safety Program for ISCR in GS.
AHRQ-funded; 23337004T.
Citation: Kalogera E, Nelson G .
Surgical technical evidence review for gynecologic surgery conducted for the AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018 Dec;219(6):563.e1-63.e19. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2018.07.014..
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Quality of Care, Patient Safety, Quality Improvement
Desai AD, Simon TD, Leyenaar JK
Utilizing family-centered process and outcome measures to assess hospital-to-home transition quality.
This commentary describes the success of using 8 new caregiver-reported measures to assess the quality of hospital- and emergency department (ED)-to-home transitions in pediatric patients. This measures were originally created by the national Pediatric Quality Measures Program mandated by the Children’s Health Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2009 (CHIPRA). An original article describing these measures was published 2016 and there have been several follow-up studies. These measures are undergoing further testing.
AHRQ-funded; HS024133; HS024299; HS020506.
Citation: Desai AD, Simon TD, Leyenaar JK .
Utilizing family-centered process and outcome measures to assess hospital-to-home transition quality.
Acad Pediatr 2018 Nov - Dec;18(8):843-46. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2018.07.013..
Keywords: Hospital Discharge, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Transitions of Care, Quality of Care, Quality Measures, Quality Improvement, Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP), Evidence-Based Practice
Admon AJ, Gupta A, Williams M
Appraising the evidence supporting Choosing Wisely(R) recommendations.
This study’s objective was to appraise the evidence supporting the Choosing Wisely® campaign initiated by the American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) Foundation to advance dialogue on prevention of unnecessary medical tests, treatments, and procedures. The authors extracted all 320 recommendations that were published through August 2014. The recommendations were then categorized by evidence strength and then a sample of referenced clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) using the validated Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument. Overall, 70.3% of recommendations cited CPGs, whereas 22.2% cited primary research as their highest evidence level. Hospital medicine recommendations cited CPGs 90% of the time. However, the median overall score using AGREE II was 54.2% and even for hospital medicine-referenced CPGs was 58.3%.
AHRQ-funded; HS020672.
Citation: Admon AJ, Gupta A, Williams M .
Appraising the evidence supporting Choosing Wisely(R) recommendations.
J Hosp Med 2018 Oct;13(10):688-91. doi: 10.12788/jhm.2964..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Prevention, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement
Baldwin LM, Fischer MA, Powell J
Virtual educational outreach intervention in primary care based on the principles of academic detailing.
This paper describes the efforts of the Healthy Hearts Northwest (H2N) EvidenceNOW cooperative in providing virtual outreach intervention in primary care based on the principles of academic detailing (AD). EvidenceNOW is AHRQ’s initiative to fund seven regional cooperatives to identify and implement effective strategies to improve the quality of cardiovascular care in communities across the United States. The H2N network covers three states: Oregon, Washington, and Idaho. For this initiative they recruited 259 primary care practices that had 10 full-time or fewer providers and met stage 1 electronic health record meaningful use criteria. The aim was to increase adoption of the four ABCS of heart disease prevention: Aspirin use by high-risk individuals, Blood pressure control, Cholesterol management, and Smoking cessation. Due to the long distances and staffing limitations H2N decided to develop an educational outreach program using virtual visits instead of the traditional AD program structure. The findings and outcomes of this program is described in detail in this paper.
AHRQ-funded; HS023236; HS023908.
Citation: Baldwin LM, Fischer MA, Powell J .
Virtual educational outreach intervention in primary care based on the principles of academic detailing.
J Contin Educ Health Prof 2018 Fall;38(4):269-75. doi: 10.1097/ceh.0000000000000224..
Keywords: Cardiovascular Conditions, Heart Disease and Health, Evidence-Based Practice, Primary Care, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Outcomes, Prevention
Ciolino JD, Jackson KL, Liss DT
Design of Healthy Hearts in the Heartland (H3): a practice-randomized, comparative effectiveness study.
The Healthy Hearts in the Heartland (H3) study is part of a nationwide effort, EvidenceNOW, seeking to better understand the ability of small primary care practices to improve "ABCS" clinical quality measures: appropriate Aspirin therapy, Blood pressure control, Cholesterol management, and Smoking cessation. In this paper, the authors describe the design and randomization of the H3 study.
AHRQ-funded; HS023921.
Citation: Ciolino JD, Jackson KL, Liss DT .
Design of Healthy Hearts in the Heartland (H3): a practice-randomized, comparative effectiveness study.
Contemp Clin Trials 2018 Aug;71:47-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.06.004..
Keywords: Cardiovascular Conditions, Comparative Effectiveness, Evidence-Based Practice, Heart Disease and Health, Prevention, Primary Care, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement, Outcomes, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Chou AF, Homco JB, Nagykaldi Z
Disseminating, implementing, and evaluating patient-centered outcomes to improve cardiovascular care using a stepped-wedge design: healthy hearts for Oklahoma.
The Healthy Hearts for Oklahoma (H2O) Study proposes to build a quality improvement (QI) infrastructure by (1) constructing a sustainable Oklahoma Primary Healthcare Improvement Collaborative (OPHIC) to support dissemination and implementation (D&I) of QI methods; and (2) providing QI support in primary care practices to better manage patients at risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) events. H2O has 263 small primary care practices across Oklahoma that receive the bundled QI intervention to improve ABCS (aspirin therapy, blood pressure control, cholesterol management, and smoking cessation) performance. The infrastructure established as a result of this funding will help reach medically underserved Oklahomans, particularly among rural and tribal populations.
AHRQ-funded; HS023919.
Citation: Chou AF, Homco JB, Nagykaldi Z .
Disseminating, implementing, and evaluating patient-centered outcomes to improve cardiovascular care using a stepped-wedge design: healthy hearts for Oklahoma.
BMC Health Serv Res 2018 Jun 4;18(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3189-4.
.
.
Keywords: Cardiovascular Conditions, Communication, Heart Disease and Health, Healthcare Delivery, Evidence-Based Practice, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Primary Care, Prevention, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement
Hemler JR, Hall JD, Cholan RA
Practice facilitator strategies for addressing electronic health record data challenges for quality improvement: EvidenceNOW.
In this paper, the authors describe the strategies facilitators use to help practices perform quality improvement (QI) when complete or accurate performance data are not available. The investigators found facilitators faced practice-level EHR data challenges, such as a lack of clinical performance data, partial or incomplete clinical performance data, and inaccurate clinical performance data.
AHRQ-funded; HS023940.
Citation: Hemler JR, Hall JD, Cholan RA .
Practice facilitator strategies for addressing electronic health record data challenges for quality improvement: EvidenceNOW.
J Am Board Fam Med 2018 May-Jun;31(3):398-409. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170274..
Keywords: Electronic Health Records (EHRs), Quality Improvement, Evidence-Based Practice, Health Information Technology (HIT), Primary Care, Quality of Care
Meyers D, Miller T, Genevro J
AHRQ Author: Meyers D, Miller T, Genevro J, Zhan C, De La Mare J, Fournier A, Bennett H, McNellis RJ
EvidenceNOW: Balancing primary care implementation and implementation research.
In 2015, AHRQ invested in the largest primary care research project in its history. EvidenceNOW is a $112 million effort to disseminate and implement patient-centered outcomes research evidence in more than 1,500 primary care practices and to study how quality-improvement support can build the capacity of primary care practices to understand and apply evidence. EvidenceNOW comprises 7 implementation research grants, each funded to provide external quality-improvement support to primary care practices to implement evidence-based cardiovascular care and to conduct rigorous internal evaluations of their work.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Meyers D, Miller T, Genevro J .
EvidenceNOW: Balancing primary care implementation and implementation research.
Ann Fam Med 2018 Apr;16(Suppl 1):S5-s11. doi: 10.1370/afm.2196.
.
.
Keywords: Cardiovascular Conditions, Communication, Evidence-Based Practice, Heart Disease and Health, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Prevention, Primary Care, Quality of Care, Quality Improvement, Implementation
Childers CP, Siletz AE, Singer ES
Surgical technical evidence review for elective total joint replacement conducted for the AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery.
AHRQ, the American College of Surgeons, and the Johns Hopkins Medicine Armstrong Institute for Patent Safety and Quality have developed the Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery - a national effort to catalyze implementation of practices to improve perioperative care and enhance recovery of surgical patients. This review synthesizes evidence that can be used to develop a protocol for elective total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty.
AHRQ-funded; 233201500020I.
Citation: Childers CP, Siletz AE, Singer ES .
Surgical technical evidence review for elective total joint replacement conducted for the AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery.
Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil 2018 Feb 12;9:2151458518754451. doi: 10.1177/2151458518754451.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Orthopedics, Patient Safety, Surgery, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
Rangachari P
Innovation implementation in the context of hospital QI: lessons learned and strategies for success.
This paper conducts an integrative review of the literature on "innovation implementation" in hospitals and health systems over the last decade, since the spotlight was cast on "innovation implementation failure" in health care organizations (HCOs). It summarizes the lessons learned from the literature, discusses the relevance of management research on innovation implementation in HCOs, and identifies future research avenues.
AHRQ-funded; HS024335.
Citation: Rangachari P .
Innovation implementation in the context of hospital QI: lessons learned and strategies for success.
Innov Entrep Health 2018;5:1-14. doi: 10.2147/ieh.s151040.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Health Systems, Health Information Technology (HIT), Implementation, Quality Improvement, Hospitals, Quality of Care
Ono SS, Crabtree BF, Hemler JR
Taking innovation to scale in primary care practices: the functions of health care extension.
Health care extension is an approach to providing external support to primary care practices with the aim of diffusing innovation. EvidenceNOW was launched to rapidly disseminate and implement evidence-based guidelines for cardiovascular preventive care in the primary care setting. This article describes how cooperatives varied in their approaches to extension and provides early empirical evidence that health care extension is a feasible and potentially useful approach for providing quality improvement.
AHRQ-funded; HS023940.
Citation: Ono SS, Crabtree BF, Hemler JR .
Taking innovation to scale in primary care practices: the functions of health care extension.
Health Aff 2018 Feb;37(2):222-30. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1100.
.
.
Keywords: Primary Care, Implementation, Cardiovascular Conditions, Evidence-Based Practice, Healthcare Delivery, Practice Improvement, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Patient-Centered Healthcare, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Prevention
Ban KA, Gibbons MM, Ko CY
Surgical technical evidence review for colorectal surgery conducted for the AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery.
The objective of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the evidence supporting the surgical components of the Improving Surgical Care and Recovery (ISCR) colorectal (CR) pathway. This review will evaluate the evidence supporting CR pathways and develop an evidence-based CR protocol to help hospitals participating in the ISCR program implement evidence-based practices.
AHRQ-funded; 233201500020I.
Citation: Ban KA, Gibbons MM, Ko CY .
Surgical technical evidence review for colorectal surgery conducted for the AHRQ Safety Program for Improving Surgical Care and Recovery.
J Am Coll Surg 2017 Oct;225(4):548-57.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.06.017.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Hospitals, Patient Safety, Quality Improvement, Surgery, Quality of Care, Guidelines
Shaughnessy AF, Vaswani A, Andrews BK
Developing a clinician friendly tool to identify useful clinical practice guidelines: G-TRUST.
The goal of this project was to develop a simple, easy-to-use checklist for clinicians to use to identify trustworthy, relevant, and useful practice guidelines, the Guideline Trustworthiness, Relevance, and Utility Scoring Tool (G-TRUST). They concluded that the 8-item G-TRUST developed by the project is potentially helpful as a tool for clinicians to identify useful guidelines.
AHRQ-funded; HS022940.
Citation: Shaughnessy AF, Vaswani A, Andrews BK .
Developing a clinician friendly tool to identify useful clinical practice guidelines: G-TRUST.
Ann Fam Med 2017 Sep;15(5):413-18. doi: 10.1370/afm.2119.
.
.
Keywords: Evidence-Based Practice, Guidelines, Quality of Care, Patient-Centered Healthcare
Henriksen K, Dymek C, Harrison MI
AHRQ Author: Henriksen K, Dymek C, Harrison MI, Brady PJ, Arnold SB
Challenges and opportunities from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) research summit on improving diagnosis: a proceedings review.
AHRQ held a research summit in the fall of 2016, inviting members from a diverse collection of organizations, both inside and outside of government, to share their suggestions regarding what is known about diagnosis and the challenges that need to be addressed. Among the goals of the summit were to learn from the insights of participants and examine issues associated with definitions of diagnostic error and gaps in the evidence base.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Henriksen K, Dymek C, Harrison MI .
Challenges and opportunities from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) research summit on improving diagnosis: a proceedings review.
Diagnosis 2017 Jun;4(2):57-66.
.
.
Keywords: Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Evidence-Based Practice, Quality of Care
Burstein PD, Zalenski DM, Edwards JL
Changing labor and delivery practice: focus on achieving practice and documentation standardization with the goal of improving neonatal outcomes.
The researchers established a multifactorial shoulder dystocia response and management protocol to promote sustainable practice change. In the first year, there was a threefold increase in shoulder dystocia reporting, which continued in years 2 and 3. In the first year, 96 percent of clinicians completed all training elements. Overall teams reached a 99 percent adoption rate of the shoulder dystocia protocol.
AHRQ-funded; HS019608.
Citation: Burstein PD, Zalenski DM, Edwards JL .
Changing labor and delivery practice: focus on achieving practice and documentation standardization with the goal of improving neonatal outcomes.
Health Serv Res 2016 Dec;51 Suppl 3:2472-86. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12589.
.
.
Keywords: Labor and Delivery, Newborns/Infants, Adverse Events, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Patient Safety, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Outcomes, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice, Pregnancy, Teams
Pronovost PJ, Cleeman JI, Wright D
AHRQ Author: Cleeman JI
Fifteen years after to Err is Human: a success story to learn from.
This paper provides a historical profile of the central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) success story, comparing infection rates before and 15 years after the IOM report. It discusses the five elements essential to the national success in reducing CLABSI rates: a reliable and valid measurement system, evidence-based care practices, investment in implementation sciences, local ownership and peer learning communities, and coordination and alignment of CLABSI reduction efforts.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Pronovost PJ, Cleeman JI, Wright D .
Fifteen years after to Err is Human: a success story to learn from.
BMJ Qual Saf 2016 Jun;25(6):396-9. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004720.
.
.
Keywords: Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infections (CLABSI), Patient Safety, Medical Errors, Evidence-Based Practice, Quality of Care