National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Adverse Events (1)
- Antibiotics (1)
- Anxiety (1)
- Asthma (1)
- Behavioral Health (7)
- Cancer (5)
- Cancer: Colorectal Cancer (1)
- Cancer: Prostate Cancer (2)
- Cardiovascular Conditions (2)
- Care Management (1)
- Children/Adolescents (1)
- Community-Acquired Infections (1)
- (-) Comparative Effectiveness (28)
- Data (1)
- Depression (3)
- Diabetes (1)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (1)
- Dialysis (1)
- Evidence-Based Practice (18)
- Family Health and History (1)
- Healthcare Costs (1)
- Health Services Research (HSR) (1)
- Hospitalization (3)
- Hospital Readmissions (1)
- Hospitals (1)
- Imaging (1)
- Infectious Diseases (1)
- Inpatient Care (3)
- Kidney Disease and Health (2)
- Low-Income (1)
- Medication (10)
- Mortality (1)
- Neurological Disorders (2)
- Newborns/Infants (1)
- Orthopedics (1)
- Outcomes (14)
- Palliative Care (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (23)
- Patient Safety (1)
- Practice Patterns (1)
- Prevention (3)
- Quality Improvement (1)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (1)
- Quality of Care (1)
- Quality of Life (2)
- Racial and Ethnic Minorities (2)
- Research Methodologies (4)
- Respiratory Conditions (1)
- Risk (2)
- Screening (1)
- Sexual Health (1)
- Shared Decision Making (1)
- Substance Abuse (2)
- Surgery (7)
- Training (1)
- Treatments (3)
- Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) (1)
- Vulnerable Populations (1)
- Women (3)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
26 to 28 of 28 Research Studies DisplayedDeutsch GB, Deneve JL, Al-Kasspooles MF
Intellectual equipoise and challenges: accruing patients with advanced cancer to a trial randomizing to surgical or nonsurgical management (SWOG S1316).
Prospective, randomized trials are needed to determine optimal treatment approaches for palliative care problems such as malignant bowel obstruction (MBO). In this paper, the authors report their experience accruing randomized patients to the Prospective Comparative Effectiveness Trial for Malignant Bowel Obstruction (SWOG S1316) study, comparing surgical and nonsurgical management of MBO. Accrual is ongoing. Experience gained from the S1316 study can aid future palliative care trials. They note that it is possible to randomize patients to palliative studies by giving clinicians clear recommendations utilizing an algorithm of conversation, allotment of necessary time to discuss the trial, and encouragement to overcome internal bias.
AHRQ-funded; HS021491.
Citation: Deutsch GB, Deneve JL, Al-Kasspooles MF .
Intellectual equipoise and challenges: accruing patients with advanced cancer to a trial randomizing to surgical or nonsurgical management (SWOG S1316).
Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2020 Jan;37(1):12-18. doi: 10.1177/1049909119851471..
Keywords: Cancer, Surgery, Comparative Effectiveness, Palliative Care
Singal AG, Tiro JA, Murphy CC
Mailed outreach invitations significantly improve HCC surveillance rates in patients with cirrhosis: a randomized clinical trial.
Mailed outreach invitations significantly improve HCC surveillance rates in patients with cirrhosis: a randomized clinical trial.
Hepatology 2019 Jan;69(1):121-30. doi: 10.1002/hep.30129.
In this study, the investigators compared the effectiveness of mailed outreach and patient navigation strategies to increase hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance in a racially diverse cohort of patients with cirrhosis. They conducted a pragmatic randomized clinical trial comparing mailed outreach for screening ultrasound, mailed outreach plus patient navigation, or usual care with visit-based screening. The investigators concluded that mailed outreach invitations and navigation significantly increased HCC surveillance versus usual care in patients with cirrhosis.
Hepatology 2019 Jan;69(1):121-30. doi: 10.1002/hep.30129.
In this study, the investigators compared the effectiveness of mailed outreach and patient navigation strategies to increase hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance in a racially diverse cohort of patients with cirrhosis. They conducted a pragmatic randomized clinical trial comparing mailed outreach for screening ultrasound, mailed outreach plus patient navigation, or usual care with visit-based screening. The investigators concluded that mailed outreach invitations and navigation significantly increased HCC surveillance versus usual care in patients with cirrhosis.
AHRQ-funded; HS022418.
Citation: Singal AG, Tiro JA, Murphy CC .
Mailed outreach invitations significantly improve HCC surveillance rates in patients with cirrhosis: a randomized clinical trial.
Hepatology 2019 Jan;69(1):121-30. doi: 10.1002/hep.30129..
Keywords: Cancer, Racial and Ethnic Minorities, Prevention, Comparative Effectiveness, Screening
Hsu YJ, Kosinski AS, Wallace AS
Using a society database to evaluate a patient safety collaborative: the Cardiovascular Surgical Translational Study.
The authors assessed the utility of using external databases for quality improvement (QI) evaluations in the context of an innovative QI collaborative aimed to reduce three infections and improve patient safety across the cardiac surgery service line. They compared changes in each outcome between 15 intervention hospitals and 52 propensity score-matched hospitals, and found that improvement trends in several outcomes among the studied intervention hospitals were not statistically different from those in comparison hospitals. They conclude that using external databases may permit comparative effectiveness assessment by providing concurrent comparison groups, additional outcome measures, and longer follow-up.
AHRQ-funded; HS019934.
Citation: Hsu YJ, Kosinski AS, Wallace AS .
Using a society database to evaluate a patient safety collaborative: the Cardiovascular Surgical Translational Study.
J Comp Eff Res 2019 Jan;8(1):21-32. doi: 10.2217/cer-2018-0051..
Keywords: Patient Safety, Quality Improvement, Quality Indicators (QIs), Quality of Care, Surgery, Cardiovascular Conditions, Comparative Effectiveness, Data, Hospitals, Research Methodologies, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research