National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 3 of 3 Research Studies DisplayedChou R, Deyo R, Friedly J
Systemic pharmacologic therapies for low back pain: a systematic review for an American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline.
The authors reviewed the current evidence on systemic pharmacologic therapies for acute or chronic nonradicular or radicular low back pain. They found that several systemic medications for low back pain are associated with small to moderate, primarily short-term effects on pain. New evidence suggests that acetaminophen is ineffective for acute low back pain, and duloxetine is associated with modest effects for chronic low back pain.
AHRQ-funded; 290201200014I.
Citation: Chou R, Deyo R, Friedly J .
Systemic pharmacologic therapies for low back pain: a systematic review for an American College of Physicians clinical practice guideline.
Ann Intern Med 2017 Apr 4;166(7):480-92. doi: 10.7326/m16-2458.
.
.
Keywords: Back Health and Pain, Medication, Comparative Effectiveness, Outcomes, Evidence-Based Practice
Makris UE, Edwards TC, Lavallee DC
Patient priority weighting of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire does not change results of the lumbar epidural steroid injections for spinal stenosis trial.
The researchers reevaluated whether outcomes for older adults receiving epidural steroid injections with or without corticosteroid improve after using patient-prioritized Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ) items. Their findings provide additional evidence that epidural injection of corticosteroid + lidocaine offered minimal or no short-term benefit as compared with epidural injection of lidocaine alone for older adults with lumbar spinal stenosis.
AHRQ-funded; HS019222; HS022418.
Citation: Makris UE, Edwards TC, Lavallee DC .
Patient priority weighting of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire does not change results of the lumbar epidural steroid injections for spinal stenosis trial.
Spine 2017 Jan;42(1):42-48. doi: 10.1097/brs.0000000000001647.
.
.
Keywords: Comparative Effectiveness, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Elderly, Back Health and Pain, Medication
Chou R, Hashimoto R, Friedly J
Epidural corticosteroid injections for radiculopathy and spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
The researchers reviewed evidence on the benefits and harms of epidural corticosteroid injections in adults with radicular low back pain or spinal stenosis of any duration. They concluded that epidural corticosteroid injections for radiculopathy were associated with immediate reductions in pain and function. However, benefits were small and not sustained, and there was no effect on long-term surgery risk.
AHRQ-funded; 290201200014I.
Citation: Chou R, Hashimoto R, Friedly J .
Epidural corticosteroid injections for radiculopathy and spinal stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ann Intern Med 2015 Sep 1;163(5):373-81. doi: 10.7326/m15-0934.
.
.
Keywords: Medication, Back Health and Pain, Chronic Conditions, Comparative Effectiveness, Evidence-Based Practice