National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Adverse Events (7)
- Ambulatory Care and Surgery (1)
- Anxiety (1)
- Behavioral Health (1)
- Cancer (3)
- Cancer: Breast Cancer (1)
- Children/Adolescents (6)
- Chronic Conditions (1)
- Critical Care (1)
- Depression (1)
- (-) Diagnostic Safety and Quality (29)
- Disparities (1)
- Electronic Health Records (EHRs) (4)
- Emergency Department (2)
- Evidence-Based Practice (1)
- Genetics (1)
- Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) (1)
- Healthcare Delivery (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (6)
- Health Systems (1)
- Hospitals (3)
- Imaging (5)
- Implementation (1)
- Inpatient Care (1)
- Learning Health Systems (1)
- Medical Errors (9)
- Medication (1)
- Organizational Change (1)
- Outcomes (2)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (2)
- Patient Experience (1)
- Patient Safety (12)
- Practice Patterns (1)
- Prevention (2)
- Primary Care (4)
- Provider Performance (1)
- (-) Quality Improvement (29)
- Quality Indicators (QIs) (2)
- Quality Measures (2)
- Quality of Care (23)
- Respiratory Conditions (1)
- Screening (2)
- Shared Decision Making (1)
- Stroke (1)
- Surgery (2)
- Tools & Toolkits (1)
- Women (1)
- Workflow (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
26 to 29 of 29 Research Studies DisplayedAl-Mutairi A, Meyer AN, Thomas EJ
Accuracy of the safer Dx instrument to identify diagnostic errors in primary care.
The researchers aimed to test the accuracy of an instrument to help detect presence or absence of diagnostic error through record reviews. They found that their Safer Dx Instrument helped quantify the likelihood of diagnostic error in primary care visits, achieving a high degree of accuracy for measuring their presence or absence.
AHRQ-funded; HS022087.
Citation: Al-Mutairi A, Meyer AN, Thomas EJ .
Accuracy of the safer Dx instrument to identify diagnostic errors in primary care.
J Gen Intern Med 2016 Jun;31(6):602-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-016-3601-x.
.
.
Keywords: Primary Care, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medical Errors, Patient Safety, Quality Improvement
Cutting EM, Overby CL, Banchero M
Using workflow modeling to identify areas to improve genetic test processes in the University of Maryland Translational Pharmacogenomics Project.
The researchers used information gained from focus groups in order to illustrate the current process of delivering genetic test results to clinicians. They proposed a business process model and notation (BPMN) representation of this process for a Translational Pharmacogenomics Project being implemented at the University of Maryland Medical Center. They found that the current process could be improved to reduce input errors, better inform and notify clinicians about the implications of certain genetic tests, and make results more easily understood. They demonstrated theiruse of BPMN to improve this important clinical process for CYP2C19 genetic testing.
AHRQ-funded; HS023390.
Citation: Cutting EM, Overby CL, Banchero M .
Using workflow modeling to identify areas to improve genetic test processes in the University of Maryland Translational Pharmacogenomics Project.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2015 Nov 5;2015:466-74.
.
.
Keywords: Genetics, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Medication, Workflow, Quality Improvement, Quality of Care, Organizational Change
Young RS, Gobel BH, Schumacher M
Use of the modified early warning score and serum lactate to prevent cardiopulmonary arrest in hematology-oncology patients: a quality improvement study.
The authors aimed to improve the early identification of clinically deteriorating hematology-oncology patients in order to prevent the development of critical illness and to facilitate timely intensive care unit (ICU) transfers. They used a protocol employing the Modified Early Warning Score and found that implementation of this protocol reduced codes and preventable codes without an associated increase in ICU transfers.
AHRQ-funded; HS000078.
Citation: Young RS, Gobel BH, Schumacher M .
Use of the modified early warning score and serum lactate to prevent cardiopulmonary arrest in hematology-oncology patients: a quality improvement study.
Am J Med Qual 2014 Nov-Dec;29(6):530-7. doi: 10.1177/1062860613508305.
.
.
Keywords: Adverse Events, Cancer, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Prevention, Quality Improvement
Henriksen K, Brady J
AHRQ Author: Henriksen K, Brady J
The pursuit of better diagnostic performance: a human factors perspective.
Improving diagnostic performance is increasingly recognised as a multifaceted challenge. This paper addresses a few of these challenges, including questions that focus on who owns the problem, treating cognitive and system shortcomings as separate issues, why knowledge in the head is not enough, and what we are learning from health information technology and the use of checklists. The authors propose a systems engineering approach making use of rapid-cycle prototyping and simulation, and they call for the formation of substantive partnerships with those in disciplines beyond the clinical domain.
AHRQ-authored.
Citation: Henriksen K, Brady J .
The pursuit of better diagnostic performance: a human factors perspective.
BMJ Qual Saf 2013 Oct;22 Suppl 2:ii1-ii5. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2013-001827.
.
.
Keywords: Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Health Information Technology (HIT), Medical Errors, Health Information Technology (HIT), Quality Improvement