National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report
Latest available findings on quality of and access to health care
Data
- Data Infographics
- Data Visualizations
- Data Tools
- Data Innovations
- All-Payer Claims Database
- Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP)
- Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS)
- AHRQ Quality Indicator Tools for Data Analytics
- State Snapshots
- United States Health Information Knowledgebase (USHIK)
- Data Sources Available from AHRQ
Search All Research Studies
AHRQ Research Studies Date
Topics
- Cancer (1)
- Cancer: Breast Cancer (1)
- Clinical Decision Support (CDS) (3)
- Data (1)
- Diagnostic Safety and Quality (2)
- Emergency Department (1)
- (-) Evidence-Based Practice (10)
- Guidelines (3)
- Healthcare Delivery (1)
- Health Information Technology (HIT) (1)
- Health Systems (2)
- Imaging (2)
- Implementation (1)
- Influenza (1)
- Injuries and Wounds (1)
- Learning Health Systems (2)
- Outcomes (1)
- Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (2)
- Practice Patterns (1)
- Provider (2)
- Provider: Clinician (1)
- Provider: Physician (2)
- Registries (1)
- Respiratory Conditions (2)
- (-) Shared Decision Making (10)
- Surgery (2)
- Transplantation (1)
- Women (1)
AHRQ Research Studies
Sign up: AHRQ Research Studies Email updates
Research Studies is a compilation of published research articles funded by AHRQ or authored by AHRQ researchers.
Results
1 to 10 of 10 Research Studies DisplayedEhlers AP, Vitous CA, Sales A
Exploration of factors associated with surgeon deviation from practice guidelines for management of inguinal hernias.
Investigators explored factors associated with surgeon choice of approach (minimally invasive vs open) in inguinal hernia repair as a tool to gain an understanding of guideline-discordant care. They found that decision-making for the approach to inguinal hernia repair was largely influenced by surgeon preference and access to resources rather than patient factors. Although a one-size-fits-all approach is not recommended, the operative approach should ideally be informed by patient factors, including hernia characteristics. They recommended addressing surgeon preference and available resources with a clinician-facing decision aid to provide an opportunity to optimize care for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.
AHRQ-funded; HS025778.
Citation: Ehlers AP, Vitous CA, Sales A .
Exploration of factors associated with surgeon deviation from practice guidelines for management of inguinal hernias.
JAMA Netw Open 2020 Nov 2;3(11):e2023684. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.23684..
Keywords: Surgery, Guidelines, Provider: Physician, Provider, Shared Decision Making, Evidence-Based Practice
Chen DW, Reyes-Gastelum D, Radhakrishnan A
Physician-reported misuse of thyroid ultrasonography.
The authors explored physician-reported use of thyroid ultrasonography. They found that a substantial number of physicians endorsed the use of ultrasonography for reasons not supported by clinical guidelines and in conflict with the Choosing Wisely recommendations. They concluded that their study highlights the need for focused physician education on clinically supported and unsupported indications for use of thyroid ultrasonography, with potential roles for future clinical practice guidelines, patient decision-making aids, and clinical decision-making support tools.
AHRQ-funded; HS024512.
Citation: Chen DW, Reyes-Gastelum D, Radhakrishnan A .
Physician-reported misuse of thyroid ultrasonography.
JAMA Surg 2020 Oct;155(10):984-86. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.2507..
Keywords: Imaging, Shared Decision Making, Guidelines, Evidence-Based Practice
Macheel C, Reicks P, Sybrant C
Clinical decision support intervention for rib fracture treatment.
The authors developed an evidence-based rib fracture protocol and clinical decision support intervention (CDSI) at their institution. The purpose of their study was to evaluate implementation and clinical outcomes using this CDSI. They found that the development and use of a CDSI resulted in improved provider delivery of evidence-based practice and was associated with reduced hospital length of stay.
AHRQ-funded; HS026379.
Citation: Macheel C, Reicks P, Sybrant C .
Clinical decision support intervention for rib fracture treatment.
J Am Coll Surg 2020 Aug;231(2):249-56.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.04.023..
Keywords: Shared Decision Making, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Injuries and Wounds, Evidence-Based Practice
Wang T, Baskin AS, Dossett LA
Deimplementation of the choosing wisely recommendations for low-value breast cancer surgery: a systematic review.
Overtreatment of early-stage breast cancer results in increased morbidity and cost without improving survival. Major surgical organizations participating in the Choosing Wisely campaign identified 4 breast cancer operations as low value. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the extent to which these procedures have been deimplemented, determine the implications of decreased use, and recognize possible barriers and facilitators to deimplementation.
AHRQ-funded; HS026030.
Citation: Wang T, Baskin AS, Dossett LA .
Deimplementation of the choosing wisely recommendations for low-value breast cancer surgery: a systematic review.
JAMA Surg 2020 Aug;155(8):759-70. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0322..
Keywords: Cancer: Breast Cancer, Cancer, Surgery, Shared Decision Making, Women, Evidence-Based Practice
Lin JS, Murad MH, Leas B
A narrative review and proposed framework for using health system data with systematic reviews to support decision-making.
This paper addresses when and how the use of health system data might make systematic reviews more useful to decisionmakers. The authors have developed a framework to guide the use of health system data alongside systematic reviews based on a narrative review of the literature and empirical experience. They recommend future methodological work on how best to handle internal and external validity concerns of health system data in the context of systematically reviewed data and work on developing infrastructure to do this type of work.
AHRQ-funded; 290201500007I; 29032001T05; 290201500005I; 290201500009I.
Citation: Lin JS, Murad MH, Leas B .
A narrative review and proposed framework for using health system data with systematic reviews to support decision-making.
J Gen Intern Med 2020 Jun;35(6):1830-35. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-05783-5..
Keywords: Learning Health Systems, Health Systems, Evidence-Based Practice, Data, Shared Decision Making
Westafer LM, Kunz A, Bugajska P
Provider perspectives on the use of evidence-based risk stratification tools in the evaluation of pulmonary embolism: a qualitative study.
Providers often pursue imaging in patients at low risk of pulmonary embolism (PE), resulting in imaging yields <10% and false-positive imaging rates of 10% to 25%. Attempts to curb overtesting have had only modest success and no interventions have used implementation science frameworks. The objective of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators to the adoption of evidence-based diagnostic testing for PE.
AHRQ-funded; HS025701.
Citation: Westafer LM, Kunz A, Bugajska P .
Provider perspectives on the use of evidence-based risk stratification tools in the evaluation of pulmonary embolism: a qualitative study.
Acad Emerg Med 2020 Jun;27(6):447-56. doi: 10.1111/acem.13908..
Keywords: Respiratory Conditions, Evidence-Based Practice, Diagnostic Safety and Quality, Imaging, Shared Decision Making, Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Practice Patterns, Provider: Physician, Provider: Clinician, Provider
Guise JM, Reid E, Fiordalisi CV
AHRQ Author: Borsky A, Chang S
AHRQ series on improving translation of evidence: progress and promise in supporting learning health systems.
The authors discuss the articles in the AHRQ EPC series published in this journal over the past six months. They state that satisfaction, care, and costs would all improve if health care delivery were as efficient and effective as possible given current knowledge. They conclude that millions of health decisions must be made by clinicians, patients, and health care systems, and they believe better decisions will be made with evidence.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290201700003C.
Citation: Guise JM, Reid E, Fiordalisi CV .
AHRQ series on improving translation of evidence: progress and promise in supporting learning health systems.
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 2020 Jan;46(1):51-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.10.008..
Keywords: Implementation, Evidence-Based Practice, Learning Health Systems, Health Systems, Healthcare Delivery, Shared Decision Making
Schaffhausen CR, Bruin MJ, Chu S
Comparing pretransplant and posttransplant outcomes when choosing a transplant center: focus groups and a randomized survey.
In response to calls for an increased focus on pretransplant outcomes and other patient-centered metrics in public reports of center outcomes, this mixed methods study evaluated how the content and presentation style of new information influenced decision-making. This mixed methods design utilized qualitative and quantitative phases where the strengths of one method helped address limitations of the other, and multiple methods facilitated comparing results. The authors concluded that the presentation of public reports influenced decision-making behavior.
AHRQ-funded; HS026379; HS024527.
Citation: Schaffhausen CR, Bruin MJ, Chu S .
Comparing pretransplant and posttransplant outcomes when choosing a transplant center: focus groups and a randomized survey.
Transplantation 2020 Jan;104(1):201-10. doi: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002809..
Keywords: Transplantation, Shared Decision Making, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Outcomes
Dugas AF, Hsieh YH, LoVecchio F
Derivation and validation of a clinical decision guideline for influenza testing in 4 US emergency departments.
This study looked at which patients should be tested for influenza among adult emergency department (ED) patients with fever or respiratory symptoms who met criteria for antiviral treatment per 2013 CDC guidelines. A prospective cohort study was conducted at 4 US EDs from November 2013 to April 2014. All 1941 enrolled participants were tested for influenza using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and 183 patients (9.4%) had influenza. The CDC clinical decision guidelines (CDGs) for influenza testing includes new or increased cough (2 points), headache (1 point), subjective fever (1 point), and triage temperature >100.4F degrees. The CDG had a sensitivity and specificity of 94.1% and 36.6% respectively in the derivation set and the validation set.
AHRQ-funded; HS009699.
Citation: Dugas AF, Hsieh YH, LoVecchio F .
Derivation and validation of a clinical decision guideline for influenza testing in 4 US emergency departments.
Clin Infect Dis 2020 Jan;70(1):49-58. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz171..
Keywords: Guidelines, Shared Decision Making, Influenza, Respiratory Conditions, Emergency Department, Evidence-Based Practice, Diagnostic Safety and Quality
Lomotan EA, Meadows G, Michaels M
AHRQ Author: Lomotan EA
To share is human! Advancing evidence into practice through a national repository of interoperable clinical decision support.
The purpose of this study was to describe how a national repository of clinical decision support (CDS) can serve as a public resource for healthcare systems, academic researchers, and informaticists seeking to share and reuse CDS knowledge resources. AHRQ’s CDS Connect has provided a functional platform where CDS developers are actively sharing their work. CDS sharing may lead to improved implementation efficiency through numerous pathways, and further research is ongoing to quantify efficiencies gained.
AHRQ-authored; AHRQ-funded; 290201600001U; 233201500022I.
Citation: Lomotan EA, Meadows G, Michaels M .
To share is human! Advancing evidence into practice through a national repository of interoperable clinical decision support.
Appl Clin Inform 2020 Jan;11(1):112-21. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1701253..
Keywords: Clinical Decision Support (CDS), Shared Decision Making, Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Evidence-Based Practice, Registries, Health Information Technology (HIT)